Recommended Posts

I remember in a documentary years ago about how the words "breast" and "thigh" would never be used when talking about cuts of meat. "Dark" and "white" or "light" were used instead because you would never describe anatomy, especially sexual parts in polite company.

 

I know of no butcher today who doesn't sell "breasts" of chicken or "Chicken thighs".

 

 

 

 

Because you insulted his intelligence. Your feeling; in this case intellectually superiority, was made clear. That was condescending.

 

I think you're confusing being abused with certain language which can emphasis feelings and swearing in general. Swearing in general among adults rarely raises and eyebrow except among those who think they are socially superior because they don't swear. An entirely odd thing to feel superior about.

 

As far as the filter question goes: isn't Neowin owned by another company? It might be their policy to censor it because they believe it is better to err on the side of caution and try to offend no one than to allow it. That is probably the reasoning for a lot of companies who discourage swearing around clients.

 

Okay, that's a good point.  I guess I got a little carried away.  I just have always felt (because of the way I was raised) that swearing to sound cool or grown up, and especially cussing in every sentence that comes out of your mouth is just not polite and is somewhat disrespectful of those around you. But to use an argument that language is just sounds and so no sound should be offensive is really not good logic to me.

^ you're obviously as oblivious as he is, even with a step-by-step explanation.

 

You folded on your original argument regardless of how you tried to word your step-by-step explanation.

 

Hell you folded in the same post by saying language is just sounds but then saying it has intention and meaning behind it.

Swear words also have intention and meaning behind them and some aren't offensive but they are vulgar ways to say something which can be said in regular English.

 

 

I grew up with a lot of people who swore to sound "hard" (tough, macho, etc.) - I agree it sounds stupid.

 

Yes, this is the point I was trying to get across. People mostly use swear words to try act tough or cool, it is why I consider people who swear constantly ignorant. They are just trying too hard to act tough/cool.

I wouldn't mind a little less public swearing.

People get out of hand sometimes.

With a bunch of salty Marines, Navy and USAF types in the family swearing certainly happened, but we rarely used more than "damn" in front of our kids and discouraged it.

  • Like 2

You folded on your original argument regardless of how you tried to word your step-by-step explanation.

 

Hell you folded in the same post by saying language is just sounds but then saying it has intention and meaning behind it.

Swear words also have intention and meaning behind them and some aren't offensive but they are vulgar ways to say something which can be said in regular English.

 

 

 

I really didn't. Words and their meanings have changed over time and context is far more important than the words themselves. Oddly enough, children swearing seems much less offensive than adults because children don't have the intellect to use language abusively or violently like an adult does. Children seeing adults using language aggressively or abusively seems like a more important thing to discourage than which words adults might pick when being aggressive or abusive.

 

Consider this in another way: someone is insulting you and abusing you in a language you don't understand. Ultimately, they are just sounds. To you they have zero meaning. If you have no idea what they mean, you can't be offended by them. You might find their aggressive nature towards you (yelling, waving their hands around, etc.) an indication of what they mean, but though their body language you are determining their meaning. The words are still just sounds.

 

 

I agree with bigkaye: worrying about the words more than the meaning or emotion someone is attaching to them seems silly.

Yes, this is the point I was trying to get across. People mostly use swear words to try act tough or cool, it is why I consider people who swear constantly ignorant. They are just trying too hard to act tough/cool.

 

Generally, I classify that sort of person as a mindless cretin and ignore them from that point on.

 

If you can't express yourself without constant profanity, don't bother talking at all.

With a bunch of salty Marines, Navy and USAF types in the family swearing certainly happened, but we rarely used more than "damn" in front of our kids and discouraged it.

Perfectly fine in your car, or private home, with friends and family.

 

It gets disturbing in a restaurant, or a convenience store, listening to disrespectful teens, yelling at the top of the voice -- trying to be 'cool' -- but looking like idiots.

Perfectly fine in your car, or private home, with friends and family.

 

It gets disturbing in a restaurant, or a convenience store, listening to disrespectful teens, yelling at the top of the voice -- trying to be 'cool' -- but looking like idiots.

 Ignore them, it isn't hard.

I really didn't. Words and their meanings have changed over time and context is far more important than the words themselves. Oddly enough, children swearing seems much less offensive than adults because children don't have the intellect to use language abusively or violently like an adult does. Children seeing adults using language aggressively or abusively seems like a more important thing to discourage than which words adults might pick when being aggressive or abusive.

 

Consider this in another way: someone is insulting you and abusing you in a language you don't understand. Ultimately, they are just sounds. To you they have zero meaning. If you have no idea what they mean, you can't be offended by them. You might find their aggressive nature towards you (yelling, waving their hands around, etc.) an indication of what they mean, but though their body language you are determining their meaning. The words are still just sounds.

 

 

I agree with bigkaye: worrying about the words more than the meaning or emotion someone is attaching to them seems silly.

 

Not many words have changed, new words have come into play and other words have become more socially acceptable though.

Children do have the intellect to use language in an aggressive manner.

 

Meaning to words can be seen via body language, volume and pitch also even if I don't speak the same language. It doesn't change the meaning behind the words if I don't speak the same language or if I can decipher what they are saying via other means.

 

Words have a static meaning, you can use sarcasm and body language to twist the meaning of them or joke around but that really has nothing to do with this because you can do that without using swear words.

absolutely. I've played a FPS on xbox live before

 

Which probably has more to do with anonymity than anything else.

 

Regardless of what anyone thinks about swearing, telling a police officer you just heard someone swear and expect them to warn them is ######ing stupid. She merely overheard someone else's conversation, which I think is called eavesdropping, something also considered equally rude.

Which probably has more to do with anonymity than anything else.

 

Regardless of what anyone thinks about swearing, telling a police officer you just heard someone swear and expect them to warn them is ######ing stupid. She merely overheard someone else's conversation, which I think is called eavesdropping, something also considered equally rude.

 

While true and I agree 100%, under the law of ordinance in that part of SC the woman who was annoyed by what she heard had the full right to lodge a complaint for disorderly conduct. 

 

"Disorderly conduct within the city is hereby prohibited. It shall constitute disorderly conduct for any person to engage in riotous conduct of any kind or to declaim or cry out in a noisy, scandalous or abusive manner in any taxicab, bus or other public conveyance, or in any place of public worship or amusement, or on any street, sidewalk or other public place, or sufficiently near to any such place, or to any residence or place of business as to disturb or annoy any other person."

 

They go on to further say, "Utter, while in a state of anger, in the presence of another, any bawdy, lewd or obscene words or epithets." but I'm unable to find a clear definition of what bawdly, lewd or obscene consists of.. so I guess its treated like harassment and how it was intended don't matter, but how it was received. Meaning anyone can find anything offensive and officers would have to act on it.

This just goes to show that people are getting arrested today for the stupidest of crimes, hell, swearing shouldn't even be considered a crime. 

I thought we were living in 2014, not 1614.

If this was 1614, swearing could be grounds for treason and execution. Hence, this woman would have gotten off easy.

Truth. When my kids were little bitty I'd filter my language but I drop F bombs all the time now particularly when they're being punks! ;)

I went golfing with a guy from Scotland once. He was visiting stateside for some reason. Anyway, his language was epic. He'd be doing 8 life sentences after that one round. The funniest thing he'd say when he hit a ball was "DROP YA SLUT!" LOL

 

People need to lighten up. The lady who heard the foul language needs to reexamine her priorities. The police need to also. Hopefully the judge will agree that it's a colossal waste of time and throw it out of court.

 

Scottish you say? Perchance he is related to the great Malcolm Tucker?

Present.  I don't cuss around anyone.  If you have to use vulgar language all the time, like this woman does (she admitted she has a filthy mouth, even when not angry), you've got some social skills that need work.

It's a form of expression :)

While true and I agree 100%, under the law of ordinance in that part of SC the woman who was annoyed by what she heard had the full right to lodge a complaint for disorderly conduct. 

 

"Disorderly conduct within the city is hereby prohibited. It shall constitute disorderly conduct for any person to engage in riotous conduct of any kind or to declaim or cry out in a noisy, scandalous or abusive manner in any taxicab, bus or other public conveyance, or in any place of public worship or amusement, or on any street, sidewalk or other public place, or sufficiently near to any such place, or to any residence or place of business as to disturb or annoy any other person."

 

They go on to further say, "Utter, while in a state of anger, in the presence of another, any bawdy, lewd or obscene words or epithets." but I'm unable to find a clear definition of what bawdly, lewd or obscene consists of.. so I guess its treated like harassment and how it was intended don't matter, but how it was received. Meaning anyone can find anything offensive and officers would have to act on it.

 

 

IDK how that would stand up against the first amendment "free speech" right. You might not be able to abuse people, but not permitted to utter something obscene or lewd in another's presence? 

 

Oh well. I think my city has a law forbidding any swearing in public, so I can't get too uppity about what's going on in South Carolina.  :laugh:

What parent doesn't cuss to and around their kids?  The things I said around my kids ... if arrested for it, I'd be serving a life sentence

This parent, I can honestly say I never swore around my kids, they're both grown ups now and I STILL don't. Infact I don't swear ever :D

If she does it in her own home, that's her choice.

 

But when you swear in public around children, yours or someone elses, then depending on where you live it can be a legal issue. Lots of places have bylaws about obscene language in public & around minors.

 

Not saying I agree, just it's the real world. There's a time and a place for everything, swearing over pizza in a grocery store, probably not one of them.

yesterday i was in wal-mart & some lady kept looking at me & i said you got a f'ing problem. she said no, i said move the f along then. still waiting for the police 

 

Sure, because that couldn't have been handled in a more polite and classy way. I feel bad for the lady.

 

I understand that when people stare at you it triggers something that makes you want to snap, but the key is to simply not give in to that sort of behavior. It's almost always what they want and you come off as the bad guy. Guess who wins in that situation?

  • Like 2

I don't think the person reporting the problem was necessarily the problem here... more so, the officer that was involved did not use common sense and was most likely undertrained/overarmed like most of the police force here in the US.

 

For all we know, it may have sounded like legitimate verbal abuse. There is a difference between uttering a cuss word and verbal abuse, but we don't really know how this mother sounded and it may have raised a red flag with a lot of you who are otherwise defending her.

 

Anyway, this shouldn't have gone further than a warning especially if this was the first complaint about this particular person.

Does anyone honestly believe not swearing around their kids made them better people? Our species is pretty hopeless if profanity heard as a child can turn you into a no-hoper.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!