Recommended Posts

I've decided to install Windows 10 on the laptop my kids use, partly to check out its performance on older hardware, along with the idea that if anyone can break it, tweens and teens can.

 

First I'll start with that it runs great on the laptop which is an older Dell d520

Core Duo T2400 1.8GHz

3GB RAM

250 GB HDD

Intel 965G integrated graphics

intel 3945 ABG wireless chipset.

 

Now all that being said, because its the kids, I prefer to have an AV app installed. I've been using Norton Internet Security (lets not get into a Norton flame war please), but Window 10 does not appear to like that, not a surprise, it is a new and preview OS.

 

Does the preview come with the same integrated a/v like 8.x does, a version of Windows Defender? Not a great choice, i realize.

 

Has anyone else found a basic AV suite/app that works with the preview?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1231783-antivirus-for-windows-10/
Share on other sites

I'm using 360 Total Security, seems to be working fine with the preview.

 

Correct That's what i'm using too. Only thing that doesn't work or won't turn on is the sandbox.

 

I wouldn't touch Defender with a 20 foot pole.

 

I also like Avast, but haven't used it on 10 yet, While Avast is good, even with pups turned on it's not very good from the test i've done from detecting poo packs. 360 total security on the other hand is fantastic.

Windows Defender is a great antimalware for Windows, works pretty good in my laptop. I don't need anything else.

I use a tag-team of Defender and Malwarebytes Premium - what gets by one won't get by the other.  Malwarebytes works fine on all versions of the Technical Preview.

Defender and your brain is the only thing you need and you will never have a virus :)

 

For myself, i'd agree with you, this particular PC however is used by a 7, 12 and 15 year old. :/

  • Like 1

Correct That's what i'm using too. Only thing that doesn't work or won't turn on is the sandbox.

 

I wouldn't touch Defender with a 20 foot pole.

 

I also like Avast, but haven't used it on 10 yet, While Avast is good, even with pups turned on it's not very good from the test i've done from detecting poo packs. 360 total security on the other hand is fantastic.

What are your thoughts on Kaspersky from the prespective of your business?

Antiviruses don't detect a big part of drive-by malware. Install firefox, block any addon but flash (and set flash to autoupdate in control panel), install adblock+ghostery, set clicktoplay to true (it should be already enabled by default), install publicfox and set it to lock EXE/ZIP downloads with password and bam - problem solved.

What are your thoughts on Kaspersky from the prespective of your business?

 

Haven't used it much but I always think it feels heavy.

 

 

Antiviruses don't detect a big part of drive-by malware. Install firefox, block any addon but flash (and set flash to autoupdate in control panel), install adblock+ghostery, set clicktoplay to true (it should be already enabled by default), install publicfox and set it to lock EXE/ZIP downloads with password and bam - problem solved.

 

I use flashblock to block all flash from automatically loading.

Correct That's what i'm using too. Only thing that doesn't work or won't turn on is the sandbox.

 

I wouldn't touch Defender with a 20 foot pole.

 

I also like Avast, but haven't used it on 10 yet, While Avast is good, even with pups turned on it's not very good from the test i've done from detecting poo packs. 360 total security on the other hand is fantastic.

Avast won't install on Windows 10 TP

I don't wear tin foil hats. Windows Defender (AKA Microsoft Security Essentials) works well enough for me, working alongside Malwarebytes.

 

Defender has always performed quite well int eh AV Comparatives from memory. It's always found nasty stuff on my computer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!