Disallow animated avatars and signatures


Recommended Posts

 

I believe most browsers also allow users to apply custom stylesheets to all pages, so extensions are not necessary. The following snippet works in IE11 on Windows 8, where ##### is the number of the member's avatar image. Mine would be 17075, I think. I suppose it would not be impossible to tweak it so that you block all avatars that are GIFs, but it can't, I think, discriminate between animated or not.

img[src*="av-#####"] {
 visibility: hidden !important;
}

 

The stylesheets is what causes massive memory usage

ad blockers, how to make your browser used 4+ times as much memory in the effort in the belief you're trying to save resources. 

actually no, using a simple regex text replacement, you can remove user signature easily.

 

example using proxomitron:

 

URL = "www.neowin.net/forum/topic/*"
Match = "<div class="signature"*</div>"
Replace = ""

I don't want to remove signatures or avatars, I want annoying animated ones gone. 

 

I use ad-block for avatars that are annoying. I've had Hum's avatar blocked since before I registered an account. I don't activate the general adblock for Neowin but I do specify the avatars that become an annoyance. We can't disallow something for thousands of users just because we aren't happy with the quality.

 

We are in an age of technology where we can customize and modify anything to our personal standards. This is a prime example of where such technological capabilities could be utilized. We just need to be thaumaturgic with our resources sometimes.

Sorry but if you don't like my blinking budman logo you can just FO!! ;)

Why is this topic of discussion? Here is what I do, I dislike signatures - they are turned off, simple as that. Did I go crying that should be banned for everyone? If I didn't like avatars - turn them off.. Block the ones you don't like with a proxy or software - if your worried about the resources adblocker or style sheets are using. Buy a faster freaking machine or more ram ;)

  • Like 3

Didn't even notice NW allowed them till this topic - Shows how much they must have been annoying me lol.

 

As others have said I would be surprised if 99% of Neowin didn't have adblock installed, just block images you don't like. 

and again, ad blocks cause browsers to have ridiculous memory usage because of their stylesheets. 

 

If you use Chrome - https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/%C2%B5block/cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm?hl=en

 

I refuse to believe with whatever browser you are using you aren't using some sort of blocking :/ Even software wise (Admuncher?)

"and again, ad blocks cause browsers to have ridiculous memory usage because of their stylesheets. "

What are you on some box with 640K of ram or something?? What does it matter if my browser uses 500MB or 1GB when there is 12GB in the system?

So what do you think is a ridiculous amount of memory?

edit:

So I did a little test - simple enough I restarted FF with adblocker running, went to few of my fav sites

post-14624-0-14748800-1412685268.png

I then disabled adblock, and restarted FF and went to those same sites

post-14624-0-24971900-1412685452.png

Maybe 30MB difference -- clearly I need to turn that off, I mean 30 whole MB.. WTF???? ;)

"and again, ad blocks cause browsers to have ridiculous memory usage because of their stylesheets. "

What are you on some box with 640K of ram or something?? What does it matter if my browser uses 500MB or 1GB when there is 12GB in the system?

So what do you think is a ridiculous amount of memory?

edit:

So I did a little test - simple enough I restarted FF with adblocker running, went to few of my fav sites

attachicon.gifwithadblock.png

I then disabled adblock, and restarted FF and went to those same sites

attachicon.gifyeahsomuchhigher.png

Maybe 30MB difference -- clearly I need to turn that off, I mean 30 whole MB.. WTF???? ;)

 

Ad blocks cause browsers to chomp up 6+ gigs of memory, in any browser due to the way their stylesheets work.

 

I would have used a software solution, but the one I tried had a thirty day trial and caused issues with some pages where it delayed loading of pictures long enough for the site scripts to not show the pictures at all unless you repeatedly refreshed a few times.  and Im not really going to pay for an ad blocker. 

I have had adblock for ages now and have never seen it eat even over 1gig

 

if your browser is using 6gig RAM maybe something else needs looked at

"Ad blocks cause browsers to chomp up 6+ gigs of memory, in any browser due to the way their stylesheets work. "

Yeah clearly that is everyone use case :rolleyes: -- see my example.. That 30MB it used vs the 6GB your talking about - close enough ;)

I agree if your seeing 6 GB in browser usage you have something WRONG!!! I have left my browser running for days on end and never got anywhere close to 2GB, with lots and lots of tabs open..

If you are opening so many sites in tabs that it uses up 6GB, I wouldn't be blaming it on the style sheets that is for damn sure.. Why don't you just show us this usage via adblocker and your tabs and no adblocker and your tabs

Here I opened up ever single tab I could think of - 60 plus tabs!!

post-14624-0-41581700-1412689403.png

Adblocker enabled!! Got right around 1GB.. How much do you think it would be with ad blocker off??

Now I turned OFF adblocker and restarted firefox - it reopens all 60 some tabs..

post-14624-0-17271000-1412689885.png

OMG --- look at that I right around 1 GB - what maybe 30MB difference?? Yeah clearly your nuts to run an adblocker if your worried about saving resources ;) How many possible tabs could you be having open that your using 6GB?? Clearly that has to be productive.. If you have more open than what shows up on the top of your screen you should prob rethink what your doing.

And look at that cpu usage with all those freaking ads reloading all the time ;) Clearly the machine is more responsive with adblock on vs off

edit: What the hell is network doing there with adblockers OFF.. Great now prob got some driveby!! ;)

Topic seems to be going a bit oftopic, anyway: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gif-jam-animation-stopper/bclnijbemellankmoaafepibbboobalb?hl=en

This is one of the hundreds of gif blockers available for chrome firefox etc. If you really can't stand gif's consider using this :p

I have no problem with adblock .... my browser does not slow me down with adblock on. I also have very long list of the hosts file. My computer runs fast enough. Not a problem.

 

If you have that slowdown problem... like Budman said, get more ram or new computer. Remember, not all of the computers are same...  Some runs smoothly and fast, while others run slow.. Which some features do not work on some of the computers...  such as errors, BSOD, etc.

 

 

Stop complaining or whining...  if you don't like any of the animated gifs, block them with adblock image block feature, stylish, or ignore user. 

 

That simple.

 

Runs barely same RAM amount, no matter if the adblock is on or not.

 

You have been whining over the little stupid thing.

"Ad blocks cause browsers to chomp up 6+ gigs of memory, in any browser due to the way their stylesheets work. "

Yeah clearly that is everyone use case :rolleyes: -- see my example.. That 30MB it used vs the 6GB your talking about - close enough ;)

I agree if your seeing 6 GB in browser usage you have something WRONG!!! I have left my browser running for days on end and never got anywhere close to 2GB, with lots and lots of tabs open..

If you are opening so many sites in tabs that it uses up 6GB, I wouldn't be blaming it on the style sheets that is for damn sure.. Why don't you just show us this usage via adblocker and your tabs and no adblocker and your tabs

Here I opened up ever single tab I could think of - 60 plus tabs!!

attachicon.gif60plustabs.png

Adblocker enabled!! Got right around 1GB.. How much do you think it would be with ad blocker off??

Now I turned OFF adblocker and restarted firefox - it reopens all 60 some tabs..

attachicon.gif60plustabsadblockOFF1.png

OMG --- look at that I right around 1 GB - what maybe 30MB difference?? Yeah clearly your nuts to run an adblocker if your worried about saving resources ;) How many possible tabs could you be having open that your using 6GB?? Clearly that has to be productive.. If you have more open than what shows up on the top of your screen you should prob rethink what your doing.

And look at that cpu usage with all those freaking ads reloading all the time ;) Clearly the machine is more responsive with adblock on vs off

edit: What the hell is network doing there with adblockers OFF.. Great now prob got some driveby!! ;)

 

 

Maybe if you didn't act like you're so much better in your replied all the time.

 

 

Fact is ad blockers work by applying a giant stylesheet to every page you load, this causes webpages to use a lot more memory than they normally would, usually several times as much as just the webpage alone unless it's a very heavy webpage. 

 

But seeing as you're unable to accept any fault in your own hypothesises. 

 

post-69433-0-02353300-1412693637.jpg

This is a fairly recent opening of chrome with a recently restarted machine no other addons running constantly. 

 

This is how ad block works, unless you use ad muncher or similar.

I come to this site for its content, not to look at avatars. I personally have no problem with them, it sets people apart and helps put names to faces (avatars).

 

If Neowin wants to implement a feature to turn off avatars or animations, I have no problem. The more options the better I guess.

As far as I can tell, it's an odd limitation of IPB.

 

I believe there are ways to add this feature through an addon (forum backend side), but I don't know if it'd be worth the effort, given the problems it might create with the customization of the website. (e.g. how it looks on the news comments and other areas)

 

Wish I had more I could tell ya. I like blocking avatars too when I'm at work. Browser scripts/extensions seem to be about it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!