Woman Orders Pizza From 911 To Save Her From Domestic Abuse


Recommended Posts

A woman who is a victim of domestic violence called 911 for help but was unable to directly discuss of what was happening to her so she used a code-like conversation by starting to order a pizza.

Fortunately, the dispatcher did not take her call lightly, instead he became intuitive and analyzed her situation very carefully.

Read the transcript of the conversation between the victim and the dispatcher and noticed how well their thoughts were connected to each other.

?911, where is your emergency??

?123 Main St.?

?Ok, what?s going on there??

?I?d like to order a pizza for delivery.? (oh great, another prank call).

?Ma?am, you?ve reached 911?

?Yeah, I know. Can I have a large with half pepperoni, half mushroom and peppers??

?Ummm?. I?m sorry, you know you?ve called 911 right??

?Yeah, do you know how long it will be??

?Ok, Ma?am, is everything ok over there? do you have an emergency??

?Yes, I do.?

?..And you can?t talk about it because there?s someone in the room with you?? (moment of realization)

?Yes, that?s correct. Do you know how long it will be??

?I have an officer about a mile from your location. Are there any weapons in your house??

?Nope.?

?Can you stay on the phone with me??

?Nope. See you soon, thanks?

According to the dispatcher, he checked the history of the address given by the lady and found out that there were records of multiple domestic violence from the previous calls.

Finally, the officer arrived at the house and immediately saw the lady in bad shape with her drunk boyfriend. Her partner was arrested for beating her.

The dispatcher said that she was intelligent to pull that kind of trick and that emergency call is the most memorable one for him.

Source

Good on her to use her wits to get out of this mess. :hug_girl:   It must of taken her last bit of energy and sanity to do this.

 

Most times a woman doesn't make it out of this situation...

 

Hopefully the gentleman learns a lesson (maybe gets a lesson too) for thinking this is ok... :spam: 

but not smart enough to stay away

 

But..but.. but... I love him! (as is the usual response)

 

Anyway good thinking on the part of the caller and the dispatch officer being clever enough to recognise what was happening.

Hopefully the gentleman learns a lesson (maybe gets a lesson too) for thinking this is ok... 

 

You call this person a gentleman? You realize what it means right?

 

Also, were you not the person who has always said "forgive and not be angry"? When you say "hopefully...maybe gets a lesson", that's called revenge. Kind breaks your code. I do hope he gets the crap kicked out of him, but i don't claim what you claim so i can say that without conflict of previous positions.

You call this person a gentleman? You realize what it means right?

 

Also, were you not the person who has always said "forgive and not be angry"? When you say "hopefully...maybe gets a lesson", that's called revenge. Kind breaks your code. I do hope he gets the crap kicked out of him, but i don't claim what you claim so i can say that without conflict of previous positions.

 

...  don't take my words and twist them... getting a lesson and learning a lesson does not have to equate to revenge... And getting a lesson doesn't have to be physical

 

getting a lesson is not revenge...

 

Some people... wow...

But..but.. but... I love him! (as is the usual response)

This happens SO often it's sickening, and many victims are men. There's some bat#### crazy women out there too.

Anyway good thinking on the part of the caller and the dispatch officer being clever enough to recognise what was happening.

Yup. Very good performance on 911's part.

...  don't take my words and twist them... getting a lesson and learning a lesson does not have to equate to revenge... And getting a lesson doesn't have to be physical

 

getting a lesson is not revenge...

 

Some people... wow...

 

your words exactly quote: "learns a lesson (maybe gets a lesson too) "

 

So, to you, what would be the difference of "learning a lesson" to "getting a lesson"?

 

Did i twist the "this gentleman" as well?

your words exactly quote: "learns a lesson (maybe gets a lesson too) "

 

So, to you, what would be the difference of "learning a lesson" to "getting a lesson"?

 

Did i twist the "this gentleman" as well?

 

Learn a lesson: Doing things like this will have consequences...(arrested)

 

Getting a lesson: Jail time that has mandatory counseling.. that has to be taken all the time... even on his spare time... when those in jail get free outside time, he has to be learning about behavior... when they eat, he has to eat in counseling...  

 

Gentleman: i was just trying to be respectful... even when someone doesn't deserve it...

 

There is nothing wrong with discipline at all... Especially if it will make for a better person at the end of it...

 

I'm thankful for every spanking...  

  • Like 1

I thought "ordering a pizza" was kind of well-known code for "I'm in trouble, I need help, but I can't say it because the person(s) who is/are a threat to me is/are listening"?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!