10 members have voted

  1. 1. Is this a surprise to you?

    • Yes
      3
    • No
      7


Recommended Posts

Longtime Internet Explorer leader Dean Hachamovitch is leaving Microsoft

5613511055_9a26b87deb_z-620x413.jpg

 

Dean Hachamovitch introducing Internet Explorer 10 in 2011. (Microsoft photo, via Flickr.)

Dean Hachamovitch is leaving Microsoft. And yes, of course, there is an IE shirt associated with this milestone, too.

Screen-Shot-2014-12-18-at-11.52.09-AM-62Dean Hachamovitch?s farewell present, an homage to the IE shirts that he wore at events over the years.

The longtime Internet Explorer leader, who led the efforts to modernize and revitalize Microsoft?s web browser, is making his departure after 24 years with the company.

Hachamovitch, most recently Microsoft?s chief data scientist, isn?t taking another full-time executive position in the short term, but he will be working as an adviser to LifeQ, a company that uses data to create digital simulations of human physiology.

?I?m overdue for a change. The company really has changed a lot,? Hachamovitch said in an interview with GeekWire this morning. ?It?s a good time to get a different point of view on tech and life.?

A former corporate vice president at the company, Hachamovitch is the latest in a series of respected Windows leaders to exit the company, as part of a broader regime change under operating systems chief Terry Myerson, who previously led the Windows Phone group and is leading a revamp of the operating system with the upcoming Windows 10 release.

Earlier departures included Jon DeVaan, the longtime Windows engineering leader; Tami Reller, who was the Windows marketing and finance chief before taking a larger marketing position inside the company; and Antoine Leblond, a Microsoft exec known for his leadership roles on the Office and Windows teams.

 

 In college I loved my Mac and had strong feelings about Microsoft Word. Making Word better sounded cool. I got a job offer from the company and thought, ?I?ll try this for a year.? ?

For years, Internet Explorer suffered from a lack of active development, serving as the bane of web developers and a high-profile target for attacks. ?I want to be clear: We messed up,? Hachamovitch said at a Microsoft conference in 2006, in a refreshing moment of candor from a Microsoft executive. ?We messed up. As committed as we are to the browser, we just didn?t do a good job demonstrating it.?

 

Under his leadership, in the following years, IE went through a series of major upgrades to adopt web standards and become a platform for modern web applications.

Hachamovitch took on the new role as chief data scientist a little more than a year ago. Mary Jo Foley of ZDNet reported in July that he was no longer in that companywide position. He originally joined Microsoft out of Harvard to work on Word for Mac.

?In college I loved my Mac and had strong feelings about Microsoft Word. Making Word better sounded cool. I got a job offer from the company and thought, ?I?ll try this for a year.?,? he writes today in a blog post announcing his decision to leave. ?The opportunity to work with strong people across the industry and to contribute to technology and products that matter has lasted much longer than that.?

Microsoft isn?t issuing a statement on his departure, but people we spoke with inside the company say Hachamovitch is leaving on good terms.

During his time leading the IE team, Hachamovitch was known for appearing on stage in shirts created by his team, featuring the Internet Explorer logo as part of a word referencing whichever IE release he was unveiling at the time. His executive assistant, Kelli Marks, continued the tradition for his departure from the company, giving him the ?bye? shirt above as a gift.

Source:

http://www.geekwire.com/2014/longtime-ie-leader-dean-hachamovitch-leaving-microsoft/

http://www.winbeta.org/news/internet-explorer-guru-dean-hachamovitch-leaves-microsoft

IE went from king of the hill with innovation and 95% market share to the horrible piece of insecure garbage that only 40% of westerners mostly corporations use.

When pooping his pants after Firefox showed how to make a decent browser then safari and Web kit passing acid tests he could not move IE forward.

Even today I can use IE 11 and it is ok but still where Firefox 7 and Chrome 13 were and is 2 years behind.

Corporations are still locked into IE 6 ando IE 8 due to him failing to innovate and follow standards. It will be a mess in corporate land for years to come as they will stay with IE 8 until 2020.

Yes IE fell from grace fast under his leadership. IE 7 needed to come in 2002 or 2003 at the latest and even then was just bug fixes

I liked 10 but I couldn't use it regularly, it was still glitchy.  11's the first one I've used since day one.

 

I may not respect the products overall history, but I definitely respect the man for getting everything back on track.

IE went from king of the hill with innovation and 95% market share to the horrible piece of insecure garbage that only 40% of westerners mostly corporations use.

When pooping his pants after Firefox showed how to make a decent browser then safari and Web kit passing acid tests he could not move IE forward.

Even today I can use IE 11 and it is ok but still where Firefox 7 and Chrome 13 were and is 2 years behind.

Corporations are still locked into IE 6 ando IE 8 due to him failing to innovate and follow standards. It will be a mess in corporate land for years to come as they will stay with IE 8 until 2020.

Yes IE fell from grace fast under his leadership. IE 7 needed to come in 2002 or 2003 at the latest and even then was just bug fixes

 

Liked for comedy.

IE went from king of the hill with innovation and 95% market share to the horrible piece of insecure garbage that only 40% of westerners mostly corporations use.

You are pulling statistics out of thin air.

Yes IE fell from grace fast under his leadership. IE 7 needed to come in 2002 or 2003 at the latest and even then was just bug fixes

Internet Explorer 7 brought many, many enhancements to the web browser, such as RSS support and the Protected Mode feature.

You are pulling statistics out of thin air.

Internet Explorer 7 brought many, many enhancements to the web browser, such as RSS support and the Protected Mode feature.

 

You mean how Firefox 1.0 and Safari had for many years before. IE 7 was soooooo horrible and was the worst browser in the world. Very different world from where IE led innovation. Ask a web developer what he or she things before spewing this.

 

It couldn't even render HTML? It needed many hacks and work arounds just to function. Not as many as 6 but Firefox just worked like it was supposed too.

You mean how Firefox 1.0 and Safari had for many years before.

Not necessarily relevant. My comment was addressing your post about IE 7 being "mostly bug fixes."

Ask a web developer what he or she things before spewing this.

I guess that rules out asking you then?

It couldn't even render HTML? It needed many hacks and work arounds just to function. Not as many as 6 but Firefox just worked like it was supposed too.

See my comment above.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!