Recommended Posts

You can remove it....Ps divergent sucks..

 

Untitled_1.jpg

Personally I think we're screwed. the search bar on the taskbar is probably even uglier than metro and I sure hope there's a way to remove it cause I'd rather chew glass than look at this every day. my two cents

 

 

 

I do for skype. of course your point still stands it's freaking useless (just like it is for mobiles except the novelty probably wears out even quicker)

Well, they kind of hinted to it, since they see "Windows as a service". I do not disagree with the concept, yet I'm unsure that would be the way to go about this.

 

Per this article: http://www.pcgamer.com/microsoft-windows-10-will-not-be-sold-as-a-subscription/

 

At its press event today, Microsoft announced that Windows 10 will be a free upgrade for Windows 7 and Windows 8 users during its first year of availability. There was some confusion, however, when Microsoft's Terry Myerson started talking about Windows 10 "as a service." Did that mean that after that first year of free availability, Windows 10 would cost an annual fee? I asked Myerson for clarification after the presentation, and he confirmed that there will be no additional fees attached to Windows 10, whenever you buy it.

 

Myerson clarified that Windows 10 users will still get free updates and support for the lifetime of the OS, exactly like past versions of Windows (like XP and Windows 7's Service Packs, for example). There's no subscription model for updates or support or continuing to use the OS. Myerson's reference to Windows "as a service" simply meant that Microsoft plans to update the OS with smaller, more regular updates rather than the big, chunky updates of past Service Packs.

 

 

And this article:  http://winsupersite.com/windows-10/windows-10-free-year-windows-7-windows-8x-and-windows-phone-81-upgrades

 

 

And, this clearly answers the bigger, lingering question of the day brought on through the confusion of touting Windows 10 as "Windows-as-a-Service." And that is - will Windows now come with a subscription model? The answer is 'no.' Once you choose to upgrade, the OS is yours to keep for the life of the device.

 

Well, it makes me feel better.  Can not wait until the CP comes out.

Cortana maybe useless to you, but not for me. Ill be setting calendar dates, looking up directions, setting alarms, launching programs,etc. I guess google voice and siri is useless to you too...

 

Seems like people are hating on something they know nothing about or even tested out yet. Just to bash it....

 

Even a barely functional 9901 Cortana, I can easily see myself using it.

 

Whats the purpose of Cortana on desktop PC?

 

Who has a microphone connected to their desktop PCs? 

Who doesn't have a mic  for desktop?

  • Like 1

Cortana maybe useless to you, but not for me. Ill be setting calendar dates, looking up directions, setting alarms, launching programs,etc. I guess google voice and siri is useless to you too...

 

Google Voice and Siri are used on mobile devices which have built-in microphones so I can actually use it, I don't have a microphone on my desktop PC.

 

edit: Its seems that my post which just asked what the purpose of Cortana was on a desktop PC was deleted.. that is odd..

Google Voice and Siri are used on mobile devices which have built-in microphones so I can actually use it, I don't have a microphone on my desktop PC.

 

edit: Its seems that my post which just asked what the purpose of Cortana was on a desktop PC was deleted.. that is odd..

and now cortana is on desktop......Might as well have it, since it's going to part of windows 10 laptop\tablet\phone\xbox echo system.

Google Voice and Siri are used on mobile devices which have built-in microphones so I can actually use it, I don't have a microphone on my desktop PC.

 

Google Voice and Siri are different things.

 

Google Voice is text/call.  But I think you meant Google Now which is similar to Siri.

 

Siri is voice command system similar to Cortana.

 

 

So far we have voice command systems: Siri, Cortana, Google Now, Samsung Voice (Not sure if it is the right name)

edit: Its seems that my post which just asked what the purpose of Cortana was on a desktop PC was deleted.. that is odd..

 

Your post is number 68 in this thread:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1243980-is-microsoft-ignoring-the-desktop-again/?view=findpost&p=596726338

If you mean visual styles, you can't without hacking the OS with UxStyle.

 

And theme is not the same thing as customizing window elements. This feature was clearly removed from Win 8.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Windows_8#Appearance_and_personalization

 

Stop arguing about it, its a known fact.

theme you say= "change taskbar color and background picture."

my definition =" install icon packs, wallpapers(background pictures), color schemes, Aero on/off, windows shapes (gothic, sci-fi). that's real customizing.

see here or http://customize.org/thumbnails/medium/106577.jpg

 

Yes, MS made using themes more and more complicated with every Windows release, all the while the hacks required to be able to use themes were getting ever more complicated.

 

XP: simple hack, supports very extravagant themes after that

 

Vista/7: Hack is a good bit more difficult and took a while until it was done. Possibilities for themes are reduced. You can't do the same things you could with XP themes.

 

Win Fail 8: Hack is again more difficult to do, and again took more time until people got it done. At the same time, possibilities for themes are greatly reduced over what was possible in XP.

 

10: Most likely again more difficult to hack in order to use themes, which will probably take people a good while to figure it out. Also, probably again less possibilities of what you can do with themes. Just plain pathetic.

 

Even in the case of themes, you're stuck with what the themes do, you can't customize them, e.g. changing colors, any further - not without hacking the themes, which would require a lot of knowledge about how themes are created etc.

 

Talking about something like this?

 

(9901 Build)

http://s24.postimg.org/jtefbmovp/Untitled_1.jpg

 

It's also there in Build 9879. If you could use it regularly, that would at least be a beginning. However, the problem is, MS doesn't allow you to use it for regular themes, because there, all you can change is the title bar color of the active window and taskbar.

In order for you to be able to use that color customization dialog you're showing, you must choose a High Contrast theme, and turning on High Contrast has several nasty side effects, e.g. it totally breaks the display of content in web browsers, IE and Firefox alike (I can make screenshots, if you want).

Therefore, it's impossible to use a High Contrast theme (inseparable requirement for the color configuration) for general use. If there was a possibility to turn High Contrast off while still retaining the ability for full color customization (and not just the window titlebar and taskbar), that would already be a nice start.

 

 

Personally I think we're screwed. the search bar on the taskbar is probably even uglier than metro and I sure hope there's a way to remove it cause I'd rather chew glass than look at this every day. my two cents

 

 

It's just one of many UI design decisions that have gone very, very wrong. They'd better give us an option to turn this nonsense off.

 

I do for skype. of course your point still stands it's freaking useless (just like it is for mobiles except the novelty probably wears out even quicker)

 

 

Like most desktop users, I don't have a microphone. This Cortana is definitely freaking useless, and another thing where they'd better provide an option to turn it off.

Look up^

 
Yes, MS made using themes more and more complicated with every Windows release, all the while the hacks required to be able to use themes were getting ever more complicated.
 
XP: simple hack, supports very extravagant themes after that
 
Vista/7: Hack is a good bit more difficult and took a while until it was done. Possibilities for themes are reduced. You can't do the same things you could with XP themes.
 
Win Fail 8: Hack is again more difficult to do, and again took more time until people got it done. At the same time, possibilities for themes are greatly reduced over what was possible in XP.
 
10: Most likely again more difficult to hack in order to use themes, which will probably take people a good while to figure it out. Also, probably again less possibilities of what you can do with themes. Just plain pathetic.
 
Even in the case of themes, you're stuck with what the themes do, you can't customize them, e.g. changing colors, any further - not without hacking the themes, which would require a lot of knowledge about how themes are created etc.
 
 
It's also there in Build 9879. If you could use it regularly, that would at least be a beginning. However, the problem is, MS doesn't allow you to use it for regular themes, because there, all you can change is the title bar color of the active window and taskbar.
In order for you to be able to use that color customization dialog you're showing, you must choose a High Contrast theme, and turning on High Contrast has several nasty side effects, e.g. it totally breaks the display of content in web browsers, IE and Firefox alike (I can make screenshots, if you want).
Therefore, it's impossible to use a High Contrast theme (inseparable requirement for the color configuration) for general use. If there was a possibility to turn High Contrast off while still retaining the ability for full color customization (and not just the window titlebar and taskbar), that would already be a nice start.
 
 
 
 
It's just one of many UI design decisions that have gone very, very wrong. They'd better give us an option to turn this nonsense off.
 
 
 
Like most desktop users, I don't have a microphone. This Cortana is definitely freaking useless, and another thing where they'd better provide an option to turn it off.

LMAO if you don't have a mic, how is it useless? You can just type it in instead.

 

Yes, you will be losing features like "Hey cortana turn off music" from across the room with out a mic.

Look up^

LMAO if you don't have a mic, how is it useless? You can just type it in instead.

 

Yes, you will be losing features like "Hey cortana turn off music" from across the room with out a mic.

I can type in stuff in the search box in the start menu for many, many years already.

My point still stands, Cortona is totally useless for the desktop user because it doesn't add anything useful. (Unless you're one of the few which have a microphone.)

"I can type in stuff in the search box in the start menu for many, many years already."No you cant, not to the extent of what cortana does, pure BS.

 

Your point doesn't stand "Like most desktop users, I don't have a microphone. This Cortana is definitely freaking useless," You're saying you can't use it because you have no mic, Yet you can still use it by typing it in, So that's false statement.You finding no use for it is a whole different thing.....

I can type in stuff in the search box in the start menu for many, many years already.
My point still stands, Cortona is totally useless for the desktop user because it doesn't add anything useful. (Unless you're one of the few which have a microphone.)

I can type in stuff in the search box in the start menu for many, many years already.

My point still stands, Cortona is totally useless for the desktop user because it doesn't add anything useful. (Unless you're one of the few which have a microphone.)

 

Boo Hoo. Easy. Just add a microphone to your laptop/tower.  I still have my microphone from the 90's which I used to be a beta tester for security app company years ago and it still works to this day.. which allows you to use either voice or finger/eye scanning to get in to the desktop.

 

Everyone is entitled to their preferences. It is not useless. It works either way: Type or Voice command.

 

Cortana is new. Give MS sometime to add more data to Cortana ... which is why they said in webcast that they will update on the devices for lifetime once you install/upgrade Windows 10.

 

Yes, MS made using themes more and more complicated with every Windows release, all the while the hacks required to be able to use themes were getting ever more complicated.

 

XP: simple hack, supports very extravagant themes after that

 

Vista/7: Hack is a good bit more difficult and took a while until it was done. Possibilities for themes are reduced. You can't do the same things you could with XP themes.

 

Win Fail 8: Hack is again more difficult to do, and again took more time until people got it done. At the same time, possibilities for themes are greatly reduced over what was possible in XP.

 

10: Most likely again more difficult to hack in order to use themes, which will probably take people a good while to figure it out. Also, probably again less possibilities of what you can do with themes. Just plain pathetic.

 

Even in the case of themes, you're stuck with what the themes do, you can't customize them, e.g. changing colors, any further - not without hacking the themes, which would require a lot of knowledge about how themes are created etc.

 

 

It's also there in Build 9879. If you could use it regularly, that would at least be a beginning. However, the problem is, MS doesn't allow you to use it for regular themes, because there, all you can change is the title bar color of the active window and taskbar.

In order for you to be able to use that color customization dialog you're showing, you must choose a High Contrast theme, and turning on High Contrast has several nasty side effects, e.g. it totally breaks the display of content in web browsers, IE and Firefox alike (I can make screenshots, if you want).

Therefore, it's impossible to use a High Contrast theme (inseparable requirement for the color configuration) for general use. If there was a possibility to turn High Contrast off while still retaining the ability for full color customization (and not just the window titlebar and taskbar), that would already be a nice start.

 

 

 

 

It's just one of many UI design decisions that have gone very, very wrong. They'd better give us an option to turn this nonsense off.

 

 

 

Like most desktop users, I don't have a microphone. This Cortana is definitely freaking useless, and another thing where they'd better provide an option to turn it off.

 

90% of the third party themes out there are horrible, just look in the past pages of this thread lol.

XP: simple hack, supports very extravagant themes after that

 

Vista/7: Hack is a good bit more difficult and took a while until it was done. Possibilities for themes are reduced. You can't do the same things you could with XP themes.

 

Win Fail 8: Hack is again more difficult to do, and again took more time until people got it done. At the same time, possibilities for themes are greatly reduced over what was possible in XP.

 

10: Most likely again more difficult to hack in order to use themes, which will probably take people a good while to figure it out. Also, probably again less possibilities of what you can do with themes. Just plain pathetic.

 

Even in the case of themes, you're stuck with what the themes do, you can't customize them, e.g. changing colors, any further - not without hacking the themes, which would require a lot of knowledge about how themes are created etc.

You keep saying that the "possibilities for themes are greatly reduced" with each later version.. what exactly could the theme engine in XP do that the later ones couldn't? Real examples, not anecdotal please. And how does the "difficulty" of bypassing signed themes affect you? Once it's done it's literally a couple clicks and done. There's even one already out for Windows 10, long before the OS is even released.. doesn't sound like it got super hard to do. It's funny a couple people keep mentioning that "oh we can't customize the look anymore".. while completely glossing over the simple fact you totally still can. Nothing's changed. Even stuff like Windows Style Builder, a visual editor for these "impossible-to-edit" themes is already supporting 10.
  • Like 3

Desktop is dead. There is more in today's computing other than the desktop. Today, it's all about cloud computing, and mobility. If you're hoping for an all desktop only OS, well then, I feel sorry for ya. Besides, customizing the desktop is ancient history. Windows 10 isn't comparable to Windows XP where you could easily customize everything. This isn't Microsoft locking things down, this is the industry moving away from "classic"  desktop-only computing.

Desktop is dead. There is more in today's computing other than the desktop. Today, it's all about cloud computing, and mobility. If you're hoping for an all desktop only OS, well then, I feel sorry for ya. Besides, customizing the desktop is ancient history. Windows 10 isn't comparable to Windows XP where you could easily customize everything. This isn't Microsoft locking things down, this is the industry moving away from "classic"  desktop-only computing.

The "desktop" is far from "dead".  Today wasn't just about cloud computing and mobility...it was a small, albeit long, presentation about some of the new features forthcoming.  

Edited by zhangm

Desktop = Dead equals to Windows = Dead.

 

As simple as that. Wondering when will trolls on Neowin stop seeing things through their own narrow vision. Desktop is here to stay. It may evolve but cannot go away completely or Enterprises will abandon Microsoft and it's Windows platform in a heartbeat.

  • Like 3

Desktop is dead. There is more in today's computing other than the desktop. Today, it's all about cloud computing

 

I don't quite understand why "desktop" and "cloud" are mutually exclusive. The main functional use of "desktop" is running multiple apps simultaneously in the same space. The second is the file system. Both are sorely lacking on mobile systems.

 

Just keep the taskbar and windowed apps. This is essential in work and play.

The "desktop" is far from "dead".  Today wasn't just about cloud computing and mobility...it was a small, albeit long, presentation about some of the new features forthcoming.

Care to prove me wrong? Today has showed that Windows 10 is all about responsive computing. Universal apps, cloud computing, and mobility is driving Windows forward. Not once did I see anything related to the classic desktop. Not even a hint of anything forthcoming. In fact, Microsoft went out of their way to decommission old desktop only paradigms from Windows past. Microsoft is moving past the desktop. It's dead.

Edited by zhangm

Care to prove me wrong? Today has showed that Windows 10 is all about responsive computing. Universal apps, cloud computing, and mobility is driving Windows forward. Not once did I see anything related to the classic desktop. Not even a hint of anything forthcoming. In fact, Microsoft went out of their way to decommission old desktop only paradigms from Windows past. Microsoft is moving past the desktop. It's dead.

 

looks like you moved your theme from "start menu is dead" to now "desktop" is dead. What will be next for you?

As for Cortana, its focus is clearly mobile and tablet devices. Also I'm pretty sure MS doesn't give a rats ass about people with old desktop pc's, their target clearly is

 

1) younger demographic who are being heavily courted and told that Windows is 'cool'

2) people with laptops who are willing to go all in to MS ecosystem

 

The other main revenue is from enterprise and business who have zero interest in anything shown so far and their needs will be addressed quite differently at one of the business events.

 

Windows has had voice recognition of some kind since Vista. My guess is < 0.0001% of users actually know about it and even less used it. I actually might buy a webcam/mike for my desktop pc IF the messenger integration and Cortana works properly.

 

Also I really hope they make it extensible and allow me to e.g. say 'Cortana, play my latest movie in XBMC'.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!