Recommended Posts

looks like you moved your theme from "start menu is dead" to now "desktop" is dead. What will be next for you?

Did you see anything where they're returning to desktop only paradigms?

Care to prove me wrong? Today has showed that Windows 10 is all about responsive computing. Universal apps, cloud computing, and mobility is driving Windows forward. Not once did I see anything related to the classic desktop. Not even a hint of anything forthcoming. Microsoft is moving past the desktop. It's dead.

 

Prove me wrong.  Where did Microsoft proclaim:  "Desktop is dead" ?  You do understand that "universal apps" can run windowed on a...wait for it.............DESKTOP?

 

Per the Microsoft Windows 10 page:  "The next version of the Office desktop suite is also currently in development, more on this in the coming months."

 

Yea, the desktop is dead.   :rolleyes:

  • Like 3

Prove me wrong.  Where did Microsoft proclaim:  "Desktop is dead" ?  You do understand that "universal apps" can run windowed on a...wait for it.............DESKTOP?

 

Per the Microsoft Windows 10 page:  "The next version of the Office desktop suite is also currently in development, more on this in the coming months."

 

Yea, the desktop is dead.   :rolleyes:

I think you and I have two different definitions of "Desktop". The desktop only stuff you saw in Windows 9x, XP, and 7? Yeah, all that's gone now. Universal apps, and the cloud are the future of Windows.

As for Cortana, its focus is clearly mobile and tablet devices. Also I'm pretty sure MS doesn't give a rats ass about people with old desktop pc's, their target clearly is

 

Their target, I think, is in encouraging app development by a broader ecosystem.

 

The lines are already so blurred between the larger smart phones, phablets, tablets, Surface etc, and laptops that a unified OS is much more functional than anything restricted to one set of devices.

 

I think they do care about desktops... they just view the desktop alongside every other system. They are making it work in concert, not in competition.

I think you and I have two different definitions of "Desktop". The desktop only stuff you saw in Windows 9x, XP, and 7? Yeah, all that's gone now. Universal apps, and the cloud are the future of Windows.

 

uh what?  The desktop is...the desktop?   :huh:

 

Your definition is apparently wrong since you're referring to applications/programs or whatever.  Not the same thing.

 

If anything, with Windows 10, Microsoft is bringing the desktop back into focus by allowing windowed Modern UI apps.  

I think you and I have two different definitions of "Desktop". The desktop only stuff you saw in Windows 9x, XP, and 7? Yeah, all that's gone now. Universal apps, and the cloud are the future of Windows.

 

This could be the source of the misunderstanding and clear definaitions can clear things up a lot. 

 

 To most, a desktop is what you see when you sit (or some stand) at a desk/table/couch/chair and use a computer to navigate the web, use programs, through chat, using a keyboard/mouse/or touch while viewing on a large (15+" typically)  screen....

 

Could you define what a "Desktop" is you? This whole time you weren't talking about apps that can be used on all devices have you?

  • Like 2

Google Voice and Siri are used on mobile devices which have built-in microphones so I can actually use it, I don't have a microphone on my desktop PC.

 

edit: Its seems that my post which just asked what the purpose of Cortana was on a desktop PC was deleted.. that is odd..

Do you have a keyboard on your desktop PC?  Do you have a webcam?

 

Either can be used to leverage Cortana - it's not limited to voice-only.

 

And if it were, it can use the mic built in to your webcam - if you have a working webcam at all.

Doesn't matter if you have a mic now, you will soon. It isn't like it is a huge investment. I've had a USB mic that I rarely touch for years.

I have a rather common beamforming mic (came with my Recon3D in PCI Express - it's the same one that ships with current Creative sound cards).  Even if I didn't, if you have a webcam, Cortana can leverage its built-in mic (just like Skype - or any application that supports audio-in - can leverage that same mic).  You're thinking of Google Now or Siri (which use ONLY vocal input, can't leverage keyboards - which Cortana can - and are limited to mobile hardware).  If you use ANY sort of voice application (TeamSpeak or Razer Comms or Curse Voice), what do you use with it?

let's not disparage others. we want good honest dialog. some may have bad info, be nice and correct that. but we should never disrespect others. opinions are just that, opinions.

 

I'm saddened by the apparent trashing of msstyles. I can't see msstyles in modern UI, just might not be feasible. I'm a hobby user and gamer. straight up. I don't need frills or eye candy as they tend to get old fast.

 

if I had a tablet like surface, I'd strictly use modern UI and some mix of desktop for browsing. as a gamer, a combo of desktop and DX12 is my specialty. I'll do what I can to completely alter the look of the default desktop and add some sort of theme for my enjoyment. can one install icons? reason I ask is, most sites i saw today shocked me with flat icons that should fit 8.1 and 10. 

Well, I wasn't saying the use in Windows would be limited. I already use Cortana for non-voice on WP8.

 

On Teamspeak etc I usually use headset with a mic, but when Win10 is installed, I'll definitely use my desktop mic always on.

 

Regarding someone last page who said Win has had voice control for several versions... yea, it did, but that voice control sucked and was very limited in application.

This could be the source of the misunderstanding and clear definaitions can clear things up a lot. 

 

 To most, a desktop is what you see when you sit (or some stand) at a desk/table/couch/chair and use a computer to navigate the web, use programs, through chat, using a keyboard/mouse/or touch while viewing on a large (15+" typically)  screen....

 

Could you define what a "Desktop" is you? This whole time you weren't talking about apps that can be used on all devices have you?

To me, "Desktop" is the whole ecosystem. Programs. Workflow. Etc. - All that encompasses "desktop" in my books. What Microsoft used to do with Windows XP back in 2004, they're not doing today with Windows 10. The difference between the two is like night and day. While we still have familiar concepts such as the taskbar, and 'windows' on the desktop, they are still very much different, and point to a future where the 'desktop' is no longer a player in computing. Manual window management, manual file management, manual searching through the Start Menu, Mouse only navigation, etc - None of these are primary "features" anymore. Microsoft is very much wading away from the desktop everyone here is referring to.

I don't quite understand why "desktop" and "cloud" are mutually exclusive. The main functional use of "desktop" is running multiple apps simultaneously in the same space. The second is the file system. Both are sorely lacking on mobile systems.

 

Just keep the taskbar and windowed apps. This is essential in work and play.

 

I have everything of that on my Surface without having to go into a masterrace mancave.

I think you and I have two different definitions of "Desktop". The desktop only stuff you saw in Windows 9x, XP, and 7? Yeah, all that's gone now. Universal apps, and the cloud are the future of Windows.

 

Can you see the wallpaper in front of you with start menu on your left hand side of your screen on your Windows 10 TP build on your PC right now?

 

Yes? Then you have the desktop. It's right there with the taskbar at the bottom.

 

No? Then you must be a troll staring at the start screen and saying "Oh, That's neat! Mommy, look at the live tiles all over the screen! Yay!"

 

:rolleyes:

  • Like 2

To me, "Desktop" is the whole ecosystem. Programs. Workflow. Etc. - All that encompasses "desktop" in my books. What Microsoft used to do with Windows XP back in 2004, they're not doing today with Windows 10. The difference between the two is like night and day. While we still have familiar concepts such as the taskbar, and 'windows' on the desktop, they are still very much different, and point to a future where the 'desktop' is no longer a player in computing. Manual window management, manual file management, manual searching through the Start Menu, Mouse only navigation, etc - Microsoft is wading away from the desktop everyone here is referring to.

 

You're describing an operating system called Microsoft Windows, which has undergone many changes since Windows 1.0.  You're not, however, describing the desktop.

 

I guess Microsoft is "wading" so far from the desktop it ...

 

 

 

Microsoft is giving us an early look today at how Windows 10 will run on tablets, and it

I have everything of that on my Surface without having to go into a masterrace mancave.

 

Good for you? I can't seem to find the file system and taskbar on my phone. My masterrace mancave is sadly lacking, I suppose. All I have is a desk.

Care to prove me wrong? Today has showed that Windows 10 is all about responsive computing. Universal apps, cloud computing, and mobility is driving Windows forward. Not once did I see anything related to the classic desktop. Not even a hint of anything forthcoming. In fact, Microsoft went out of their way to decommission old desktop only paradigms from Windows past. Microsoft is moving past the desktop. It's dead.

I wouldn't say the desktop is dead, but it is dying or at least taking a back seat. There have been no mouse specific features added to the OS or new utilities (yet) same old disk management, device management, and defragment and clean disk dialogs. Hopefully that will change. I also want proxy icons and spring loaded folders.

The Windows Desktop is vital to content creators and anyone needing large, complex or high performance software. To say that this is unimportant, dead or something Windows is moving away from shows a profound misunderstanding of the software industry and how computers are used. As a major player in this industry Microsoft understands this better than anyone.

 

If anything the Windows Desktop has seen more evolution in Windows 8 and 10 than in Windows 7. Its interface and functionality are increasingly catering to the needs of power users, virtual desktops being an obvious example.

 

Of course Windows has done extremely well on the desktop so far and not so well in the mobile space, so that's where most of the low-hanging fruit is and that's what gets most of the attention right now especially in a consumer-oriented event like yesterday's conference. To go from there to saying that Microsoft is neglecting or letting the desktop die is simply unwarranted.

 

Then again, this discussion will pointlessly go on for 20 more pages at least.

looks like you moved your theme from "start menu is dead" to now "desktop" is dead. What will be next for you?

Cloud computing and Metro is dead.

Some years down the line, he will switch to a Mac. :p

Whats the purpose of Cortana on desktop PC?

 

Who has a microphone connected to their desktop PCs? 

 

 

Personally I think we're screwed. the search bar on the taskbar is probably even uglier than metro and I sure hope there's a way to remove it cause I'd rather chew glass than look at this every day. my two cents

 

 

 

I do for skype. of course your point still stands it's freaking useless (just like it is for mobiles except the novelty probably wears out even quicker)

 

Did you both watch the video? If you did, you would know why Cortana will be good for the desktop.

It's not the desktop that's dead. Windows 10 clearly shows MS is listening to user feedback and improving the desktop with virtual desktops, Cortana integration and what have you.

 

No, what we will see (IMHO) is a push away from Win32 and towards universal applications. It would not surprise me if not too far from now even Office for the desktop will be turned into a universal application. 

 

Win32 apps will still be supported for some time to come, but they'll be relegated to legacy status.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!