Recommended Posts

I wonder what sort of procedure they have for removing the side booster nose cones from the interstage, they usually place that cap on it that locks itself to the stage after which they can lift it... but i suppose now they need some guys in a cherrypicker going up to unlock that nosecone first.

  • 2 weeks later...
2 minutes ago, DocM said:

That's not a booster, it's the new beefed up center core.

 

 It's rumored at least one FH booster will be a previouslycflown stage. 

I was going to say. Is it wider than a normal core?

  • Like 1

Thicker hull, massively beefed up Octaweb to take the loads, Octaweb mounts & longerons for the lower ends of the boosters, and a new beefed up "Sport" interstage with upper mounts for the boosters. 

  • Like 3

Nothing official, but gathered from tweets and recent articles...

 

1) Appears 39A was scheduled to be ready in November 2016, just not for FH, F9 could launch though.

 

2) FH requires new tracking systems for multicore landings, ordered from Orbital Systems, to be received on January 1, 2017 and will be installed then. This would conclude that FH would not have been able to launch in November 2016. Presently only have one tracking antenna at the cape, two more coming in so that all 3 stages can RTLS. (SpaceX payed for the gear)

 

3) Rumor of a "previously enjoyed" booster to be used on initial flight. No idea of the accuracy, but S1 has been proven to be the toughest stage ever built...unless someone has landed and tested one as much....(crickets)...

 

4) Have not heard anything on the construction at LZ-1 for the additional core landings.

 

5) Rumor has it that the damage at LC-40 is "moderate"...which I take as being a lot better than "nuked".

 

Anyone have anything else?

 

Thought this was a good article...will bring a reality smile

 

Why Exploding Rockets Are Not Always a Bad Thing

http://www.space.com/34051-exploding-rockets-arent-always-bad.html?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Twitter&utm_campaign=socialtwitterspc&cmpid=social_spc_514648

 

:)

  • Like 2
  • 4 months later...

Going back to the cross feed system, or lack of it. I know it was talked about nearly a year ago. But I heard it mentioned somewhere fairly recently and was curious how they would manage the fuel in the centre booster. I presume they cant run all 3 at full power or all 3 will run out of propellant at the same time so will the centre booster be throttled back while the side boosters are in action then have it's power increased as those boosters prepare to and do detach?

With the cross feed system I think the idea was to run all three cores at full throttle but feed fuel from the outer cores to the inner core, so at the time the outer cores separate the inner core would still have lots of fuel.
With that plan dropped I'm not entirely sure how they will do it, I think it depends on the mission. They could drop the two boosters early with enough fuel to return and let the middle one burn for longer and land it on a barge. But like I said, that would probably depend on the mission, whenever it is possible to send the three boosters back that would probably be the cheapest solution.

I think they'll do it the "Delta-IV" way. Center Core will be in a partial-thrust mode until a bit after the two Side Cores separate, then it's a "Full Thrust" mode (see what I did there? :D) until it's spent and staging occurs. No reason to abandon what works. :p 

16 minutes ago, DocM said:

And we need to remember that 100% on that center core will be the Block 5 thrust of 1.9 million lbf.  Early FH's will likely use the Block 4 for a few launches for reuse testing.

Sweet, we'll get to see the performance of a Block-IV for a few launches. :yes: Even if it's on a FH, it'll fly. Works for me.

  • 2 weeks later...

HEADS UP!!

 

A Falcon Heavy side booster left Hawthorne last night!! Obvious because it had a nose cone in place of the interstage, and the front dolley wheels were repositioned.

 

 

I said a rude word as I was watching that video the first time haha

 

"Ok there's the engines....then the stage....still normal stage...NOSE CONE OMFG!"

Soon, Daniel-san ... soon.

 

Show me wash car. Hei. Show, wax-on, wax off ... hei. Show, paint the fence ... yosh'. Now show sand the floor ... hei. 

 

*Bow* You ready now. :D

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!