Recommended Posts

A customer of mine, his son has a PC which got infected with this damn malware. I know there was a version 1 and 2 and that decryption keys where then made available after some time.

This version is fairly new so I dont know if those keys are out yet. This really sucks you know..

If anyone can pass along some info on this I would appreciate it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1245590-cryptowall-30-decryption-possible/
Share on other sites

As far as I know,  it's ACTUALLY using good encryption. I heard you have one of 4 options with this one

 

1) Loose all your files

2) Restore from a backup (that was not connected to your machine at the time of infection)

3) MAYBE restore from volume shadow copies

4) Pay them.

actually, didnt even think either key had been made available.   I thought a site had been setup that would decrypt individual files for ver1, but that was all i thought it was possible.

 

sorry i am not more helpful.


As far as I know, they fixed it now were it's ACTUALLY using good encryption. I heard you have one of 4 options with this one

 

1) Loose all your files  Correct

2) Restore from a backup Correct

3) MAYBE restore from volume shadow copies Nope, they got smart, Shadow Copies get erased after infection.

4) Pay them. Correct, and I truly hate those bastards.

Wow. There is nothing I can do then. This is terrible

 

The worst part is your are lucky if anyone backs up. if they do it's usually connected to the computer. Which in this case also would have gotten encrypted. Nobody ever backs up let alone has off site backups . If they had a network drive mapped to that machine with full write access. Its gone too.

 

If this were to happen to me, at worst I'd loose a few files. I have a backup in my safety deposit box that gets swapped monthly, which contains important files from ALL my drives in my system and server. But sadly that's not normal :(

  • Like 3

The worst part is your are lucky if anyone backs up. if they do it's usually connected to the computer. Which in this case also would have gotten encrypted. Nobody ever backs up let alone has off site backups or ones that are connected to the computer. Or shared network drives on other PC's in the house with full write access. They are gone too.

 

If this were to happen to me, at worst I'd loose a few files. I have a backup in my safety deposit box that gets swapped monthly, which contains important files from ALL my drives in my system and server. But sadly that's not normal :(

Yes you are not the norm and I wish more were like you. They had an external disc connected to the machine with just files and all those got encrypted also.

Ohhh boy! :s

The hard lesson of not having a backup!  What I would do is wipe their machine for them, and show them how to perform a backup.  Either get them an external backup disk, get them with one of the online backup services.  Both prob better idea!!

 

Keep in mind only critical files really need backup.. Stuff you can not recreate or get again, etc.  This would include pictures and home videos mostly..  Pretty much everything can be gotten again..

 

Depending on amount of these types of files your backup might be a couple of thumbdrives..

 

If you want to do the community and your customers a real service in IT.. Backup Backup Backup!!  Every customer you deal you should be asking them how they backup up their critical files - sorry but that video of Kevin's fist steps are not something you can get again.  Those pictures of trip to Cabo, same thing..

  • Like 3

Actually BudMan I do ask the majority and I stress to them backups and a UPS system in case the power goes out. Here in Florida that can happen often.

I leave it up to them though as I cannot force anyone to do something and there have been times when I had to say I told you so. They had to learn the hard away unfortunately.

The hard lesson of not having a backup! 

Well technically, its a hard lesson of not having an offsite, or one you don't keep connected to the computer backup. Which Even if a person has, because it's not being done automatically they tend to forget about it and not keep that backup current. In my case I turn it into a routine where the disconnected 2TB drive in my office and the one in my safety deposit box gets swapped on the last Friday of every month.

 

I will agree with you a cloud service would be a good choice, especially one which offers versioning such as carbonite.

Actually BudMan I do ask the majority and I stress to them backups and a UPS system in case the power goes out. Here in Florida that can happen often.

I leave it up to them though as I cannot force anyone to do something and there have been times when I had to say I told you so. They had to learn the hard away unfortunately.

 

I had one person ask me if I could transfer some stuff off of a desktop PC that wasn't working. I said what do you want me to put them on? I think it was a bunch of photos, music and stuff .. it was a bunch. So I said, well why don't you go buy an external hard drive I can put them on that and you can hook that up to your new computer. Then you can use that as a backup drive seeing how you dont' have one. Because at the moment the only copy of her stuff was on that PC, I told her, had that drive died you would have lost it all.

 

So then I backed up her files onto one of my spare drives, and was able to resurrect her PC. Then she said "oh well maybe i'll buy that external some day" ..I cant remember what she said exactly, but she was really trying to get out buying the drive....I was like ... oh whatever, I give up.

 

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.

You can try one thing... reverting to previous version of files...

 

It'll hopefully let you go to a version of the file that was there before the CryptoWall files... I did this at work and it worked amazing..

 

Go to a file that you know was affected, Right click, Properties, Previous Version tab.. hopefully there's something there.

Cryptowall versions past 1.0 you're pretty screwed without backups.

The news of CW 3.0 is why I started backing up everything into the cloud

SOMETIMES it apparently fails to delete the Shadow Copies, but often not.

NFVF5rW.png

Hello,

One thing you might want to do is check with your anti-malware vendor:  They may have some suggestions, tips or tricks to help recover files that they're not broadcasting in order to make it harder for the criminal gang behind this malware to fix any flaws in it.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

  • 2 months later...

Hello, new to this forum.  I have now had 4 clients hit with this virus.  One was saved with Carbonite -104 GB of server data -it took a week but we restored to a previous version.  One we reformatted and two I am working on but it is looking more like reformat is the only option.  

 

I have found that Bitdefender has an immunization utility that runs on Windows startup and prevents the Ransom viruses (all of them) from encrypting anything.  After you run/install it -make sure you turn on all the features and the IMMUNIZATION.   Bitdefender is a leader in this field so I have to trust that this utility really works.

 

http://labs.bitdefender.com/projects/cryptowall-vaccine-2/bitdefender-offers-cryptowall-vaccine/

 

Good Luck.

 

John

  • 6 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!