Recommended Posts

The next few years will be a launch dream come true.

 

The $10 B tag for the constellation, is conservative in my opinion, and encompasses the constellation cost only. Final costs may be $15+B

 

To put this into perspective, 4409 plus  7518 is 11,927 satellites...call this 12,000 for head calc's.

 

To build these units in a vertically integrated facility and get the costs down for a very complex system, I could see these these being set up for $1M apiece...only at SpaceX....this equates to a $12 B system...no launch costs or ground infrastructure.

 

There are cube sat's being produced by 3rd parties that cost $1M, lot's of low cost mini science sat's are going up with a $20 M package of parts.

 

--------------------

 

This is a major undertaking, one in which..only SpaceX could pull off due to vertical integration, inter company co-operation...and owning the launch platform..a reusable one at that.

 

Frankly, I don't know how others will eventually compete unless a niche is carved out.

 

This constellation will rank up there with some of the larger price tag items...and will fair well...

 

ISS at $100 B so far....but is priceless...a jem in my books.

 

SLS....need I say anymore about it...

 

JWST will be over budget at $8 B...closer to $9 B and it better work...if it does and has longevity...it could pan out.

 

For anyone else to purchase this through the usual suspects, it would cost what the ISS has currently.

 

Basically, we have SpaceX pulling of a 10 cents on the dollar in house operation...the only way to make this affordable.

 

personally believe it's going to see a cost overrun of 25~40%. Real-world vs Estimates and all that ... but -- I believe that SpaceX and Investors will see huge returns fairly quickly once it's operational. Customers are not going to be disappointed and the satellites look like they're going to work great.

 

So we'll see. :) 

We have a rough idea of the timing to get launches beginning (June 2019) and a basic system operational...2020 and constellation filling after that.

 

There will be multiple satellite iterations throughout the entire launch campaign...starting with reaction components/design and satellite capabilities as expanded.

 

This is not an issue when dealing with 5 year replacements...always have fresh tech in orbit.

 

-----------------------------

 

The next order of business is satellite mass/dimensions and if mass or dimension limitations in play for the various inclinations.

 

First order of business is to forget everything you know about the Tin Tin dimensions...they are not production .

 

Instead of being picture perfect...I'll throw some data here...then some diagrams...then think of novel dispenser designs.

 

-----------------------------------

 

Insert random stuff....

 

  

 

 

 

size comparison...

main-qimg-bbbb811f1fe8dd8d7eb53f2d14ddc91e-c.thumb.jpg.d97f2526348916581e364fd8e70e4f47.jpg

 

 

799794952_X_37B_OTV-2_01copy.thumb.jpg.06397ffe82116d5ab7f176cb6469b300.jpg

 

 

IRIDIUM_Test_Prep_183_KHarris.thumb.jpg.98d2175b83e858321193a0ebcd38b944.jpg

iridium test unit

 

2015-1244-m.thumb.jpg.956cd0981f8286e8bfc844216b3d092f.jpg

A person under 2 meter for comparison

 

Falcon-fairing-drop-test-prep-100418-Pauline-Acalin-12c.thumb.jpg.941ec69690eda613be85838fe24cec21.jpg

 

That will give an appreciation for fairing size

I will throw some rough notes to play with...

 

---------------------------------------------------

Starlink satellite dimensions?

 

Apparently, each satellite in the planned constellation will weigh about 850 lbs pr 386 kg. Its size was said to be around the size of a Mini Cooper car.
https://edgylabs.com/spacex-satellite-network-soon-to-be-named-starlink

---------------------------

The primary structure for the Microsat-2a and -2b test spacecraft will be a box design measuring 1.1 m × 0.7 m × 0.7 m and carries the spacecraft flight computer, power system components, attitude determination and control components, propulsion components, GPS receiver, and broadband, telemetry, and command receivers and transmitters. The primary bus is mounted on the payload truss system, which also carries communications panels, inter-satellite optical link transmitters and receivers, star trackers, and a telemetry antenna. There are two 2 m × 8 m solar panels. Each demonstration spacecraft has a total mass of approximately 400 kg. The attitude of each spacecraft is 3-axis stabilized, and is dynamically controlled over each orbit to maintain attitude position for two pointing modes of operation: broadband antenna (antennas to nadir for testing) and solar array (solar arrays facing sun for charging). Power is provided by solar panels designed to deliver sufficient power at the predicted end of spacecraft life to not impair any test objectives. The Thermal Control System ensures that components are kept within operational temperature ranges.
https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/microsat-2.htm

-----------------------------

In the technical attachment to the FCC application ( licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/ib/forms/reports/… ), the satellite body dimensions are listed as 4.0 x 1.8 x 1.2 m, which are considerably larger than the test articles. Those won't fit nearly as well in the current F9 fairing. You might be able to get two layers of 8 if the fairing is stretched, but it's pretty iffy beyond that. – TheRadicalModerate Mar 17 at 4:06 
https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/25525/how-many-spacex-starlink-internet-service-satellites-could-be-deployed-in-a-sing

--------------------------------

Table A.11-1 page 54 of 68 page pdf belonging to "SpaceX application to FCC"
Satellite Body Dimensions
Length 4.0 m
Width 1.8 m
Height 1.2 m
Solar Array Dimensions
Length 6.0 m
Width 2.0 m
Area 12.0 m2
Quantity 2
Overall Vehicle Area
Max Vehicle Area 28.3 m2
Min Vehicle Area 2.6 m2
Average Vehicle Area 15.45 m2
Vehicle Mass
Mass 386 kg

ERRATA, ERRATUM OR ADDENDUM    11/22/2016    Space Exploration Holdings, LLC    Technical Attachment (CORRECTED)    SpaceX Application -
http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/ib/forms/reports/related_filing.hts?f_key=-289550&f_number=SATLOA2016111500118

-------------------------------------------

payload to LEO                      (expendable)   23t    64t      ?
payload to LEO                       (reusable)    10t    27t?   150t
sats/launch (due to weight)          (reusable)    24     67     375
sats/launch (due to weight,room,PAF) (reusable)    20     64     304
launches needed                      (reusable)   600    188      40
$/launch                             (reusable)   $62m   $90m      ?
$                                    (reusable)   $37b   $17b      ?

https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/25525/how-many-spacex-starlink-internet-service-satellites-could-be-deployed-in-a-sing

-------------------------------

 

 

1385707172_2016Satellitedimensions.thumb.jpg.5cd1b8565db18bddd031ef05fabeab57.jpg

 

The table, and the majority of filed data can be found here...                        (Technical Attachment (CORRECTED) of 11/22/2016 for the above table)

FCC filings for Starlink 

 

It will take some thought...the numbers for each launch will depend on many factors BUT may be irrelevant due to size of payload determining # on each launch....it's not going to be 25 from what I see so far...

 

Will post more later....this is just food for thought.

  • Like 1

Forgot a few bits of data...

 

DWpT_2gWkAESLz3.jpg

Tin Tins  These are smaller than the production units.

 

Starlink-solar-arrays-diagram-SpaceX-2-9

 

Starlink-solar-arrays-diagram-SpaceX-3-7

 

Unique solar array packaging and deployment on the demo's...will probably see this as well as tight array packaging to reduce size on dispenser...

 

images credit...

http://www.automotivetestdrivers.com/spacex-starlink-satellite-prototypes-unique-solar-arrays/

  • Like 1

images from the PAZ launch...for reference to size

 

The width of the payload will determine stagger on adapter...

 

620394309_PAZT3-03.thumb.jpg.3542f925ddac31175fdfbee52b4a44c4.jpg

 

797800373_PAZT11-02.thumb.jpg.bc37e6ddae8d6aaa27726689879598cd.jpg

 

553945918_PAZT11-20.thumb.jpg.1a657eaed07ed14b933adb6b14e5c5f0.jpg

 

Starlink-solar-arrays-diagram-SpaceX-3.thumb.jpg.a0ea5f0b64fb979e32943a6dec53743d.jpg

The arrays can be staggered...no one said they have to be in alignment on dispenser...these are the test items...smaller than production.

 

Once we have a ballpark number that will fit in the fairing, we get the minimum number of satellites to start bare bones operation....determine the number of launches and then see how many per month...on reusables.

 

Meanwhile business launches carry on as per usual...and any new boosters used will also have another stream of employment.

 

  • Like 1

Yep. All the more reason they are pushing double-time on Starship. They need it yesterday. 304+ birds/launch is very desirable and at $5~15 mil/flight (Labor, Pad, GSE, fuel + insurance (?)) they can't overlook the cost savings. Getting Starlink uphill at that low of a PPL -- two orders of magnitude cheaper compared to twenty years ago -- yeah .. they want to use Starship.

 

My guess? They'll do the low-altitude hops to shakedown the technology, do one or two medium-distance flights like Pad 1 in Boca Chica to the Cape, then back again -- yes, back again -- almost a full orbit -- as a "shakedown flight"; and if all goes well they'll send up the first 10 birds as another test run to make sure everything is good.

 

Since it can (I assume) land with the payload, 10 sats at 850 lbs (3855.54 kg total) should be fine. 

All I can say is ...hold...hold...hold...

 

Where the hoot did those numbers come from...

 

So far we have heard of a new material selection for something on Starship. We are not even sure of the final design.

 

We have no idea on final design for tankage, cargo bay or crew cabin...we have no idea on final design for cargo variant.

 

We have no idea of actual final specifications for the satellites to be launched...although they will be close...but shape can effect launch mounts.

 

summary...we have no idea of realistic sat design, Starship final design, booster design...or cargo area shape...but we have people throwing out precise numbers...with an unkown variance... and use a term like 304+

 

This is the appropriate time for me to use...WTF

 

Frazzle.thumb.jpg.4b30fe9ae99728fb9038c6271463d5cf.jpg

 

-----time out folks................

 

First satellite launches are in June 2019...mmmm...6 months....

 

Basic operation for 2020...which may be aspirational.

 

We can all be SpaceX fans...but we need to be realistic in development cycles....no "magic" or "loot boxes" are allowed.

 

SpaceX are testing a Starship prototype...not the real deal...and definitly not designed for magically popping sats into orbit at the moment.

 

Starship is several years out for a cargo version and the booster...period. SpaceX is more than aware of this.

 

We need to face the reality...F9 will be the one flying an increasingly quicker cadence solely for satellite placements. This could end up being every 3 weeks...even 2 weeks in some cases.

 

Block 5 had a purpose...we are seeing it know. Starship may finish it...but the initial burden for basic ops is on F9.

 

Folk's...we need to deal with this...

 

We know the rough satellite dimensions...have to guess on F9 launch dispenser.

Here it comes...

 

This ties into earlier reports of Air Force Research Lab interest and preliminary tests, FCC issuing permits for same, and the DARPA Blackjack program looking into using LEO constellation satellite buses for milsats (implied: wolves hiding among the sheep)

 

December 19, 2018: SpaceX-DoD contract for testing  space-2-space and space-2-aircraft communications

 

DoD...

 

Quote


Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Hawthorne, California, has been awarded a $28,713,994 competitive, firm-fixed-price, other transaction agreement for experimentation per the advanced research announcement, FA8650-17-S-9300. This agreement allows for experimentation in the areas of establishing connectivity, operational experimentation, and special purpose experimentation. Experimentation will include connectivity demonstrations to Air Force ground sites and aircraft for experimental purposes. For the proposed Phase 2, the awardee proposes to perform experiments in two other key areas: early versions of a commercial space-to-space data relay service and mobile connectivity directly from space to aircraft. Work will be performed in Hawthorne, California, and is expected to be completed by June 18, 2021.  Fiscal 2019 research, development, test and evaluation funds in the amount of $19,167,989 will be obligated at the time of award. Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is the contracting activity (FA8650-19-9-9320). (Awarded Dec. 19, 2018)

Edited by DocM

Hey Guys, not sure if it has been discussed here previously,(there is a lot of data).

 

What would the ground side of these sat constellations look like. Ie will it need to be a dish on your house, will we be able to use it in our car's with a larger receiver, or would it be like older mobile phone?

 

I dont know enough about these sorts of things to make a guess, my only thought it at those frequencies it wont penetrate anything very well.

StarLink will use a flat plased array antenna, and from any point 20+ satellites will be visible at a time. SpaceX is patenting it's own advanced phased array design.

 

If a satellite under use becomes blocked, the array can electronically steer its beam(s) to another unobstructed satellite. The phased array itself remains stationary.

 

Commercial phased array ground stations could be large, but the consumer version is said to be the size of a pizza box. Connections can be wired or WiFi etc. 

 

This means setting up a micro-ISP could become a lot easier. Stick the array, wireless hardware, batteries and solar array on a pole etc. and poof! - gigabit internet in the middle of nowhere.

 

If this works out internet backhaul moves offplanet, and SpaceX StarLink revenues could be a multiple of NASA's budget.

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

Planning for Australia

 

@IsItPluggedIn

 

Quote


The Manager, 
Spectrum Planning Section 
Spectrum Planning and Engineering Branch 
Communications Infrastructure Division
PO Box 78, Belconnen, ACT 2616

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) appreciates the opportunity to provide input in response to the Australian  Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) on their recently issued consultation 28 GHz spectrum planning: discussion paper (the Discussion Paper). 

Background

SpaceX is developing an NGSO satellite system in the Fixed-Satellite Service (FSS). In March 2018, the United States Federal Communications Commission authorized SpaceX to construct, launch, and operate a constellation of 4,425 non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) satellites operating close to the earth. That FCC license marked a major step in SpaceXs efforts to design, develop, and deploy an innovative and spectrum-efficient satellite system to deliver broadband service directly to consumers around the world.

Specifically, SpaceX was authorized to employ the following bands, including the frequencies under consideration in the current ACMA consultation:

 10.7  12.7 GHz Downlink
 14.0  14.5 GHz Uplink
 17.8  18.55 GHz Downlink
 18.8  19.3 GHz Downlink
 27.5  29.1 GHz Uplink
 29.5  30.0 GHz Uplink

SpaceX intends to seek ACMA approval to use these bands within Australia as well.

Fixed satellite service spectrum

As the ACMA notes in the Discussion Paper, the 28 GHz band (27.5-29.5 GHz) is currently used for fixed satellite service (FSS) earth stations, and this use is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. In fact, the band is receiving increasing attention as a new generation of satellite services are being developed and deployed. As noted, SpaceX intends to use the 27.5-29.1 GHz range for uplink from gateways within its ground network to its NGSO constellation to enable broadband access around the world. As such, it is crucial that the ACMA ensure continued access to the 28 GHz band for FSS use.

Nationwide deployment of satellite services

The wide geographic coverage areas of space-based systems in general make satellites optimal for broadband deployment across Australia, in metropolitan, regional, and rural areas alike. The inherent design of satellite constellations operating closer to the earth offers coverage across continents and the world and, as such, they thrive on nation-wide regulatory approaches for licensing and access to spectrum. License planning or spectrum allocation approaches that artificially limit deployment to specific geographic regions would curtail the benefits that such constellations offer to add next-generation broadband connectivity across all of Australia. 

Any licensing regime that requires broadband service providers to obtain authorizations on a city-by-city, or even regional, basis adds complexity, time and expense to the licensing process and, by extension, deters satellite-based providers from extending their service offerings everywhere at a reasonable cost to subscribers. As such, SpaceX supports a spectrum plan that would allow nationwide deployment of FSS services in Australia.

SpaceX appreciates the opportunity to provide comments in response to the Discussion Paper. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. We look forward to working with the ACMA as we both strive toward a goal of connecting all of Australias citizens to high-speed Internet services.

Very best regards,

Patricia Cooper
Vice President, Satellite Government Affairs
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
>

Edited by DocM

Thanks Doc, sounds great, however our government is not very tech savvy so wont understand.

 

I hope they don't block this, it will make many parts of Australia much easier to live in, a lot of the country areas have very limited Internet(mostly crappy satellite) and very expensive.

At the moment, SpaceX was giving a heads up for your country to consider keeping the "sat maintenance" bands available....there has been talk of spectrum shifts worldwide.

 

As far as the user equipment...treat it like a "microwave" broadband. It will be an outside fixed antenna...on tower, pole or roof mount...with the least obstructed overhead satellite viewing. The modem will probably be completely self contained at that frequency.

 

There is "no magic" to the flat panels..."beam steering" has been around since I was a young lad...a very long time ago. 

 

The average user will have no idea what is in play other than..."it works".

  • 2 weeks later...

Interesting comparison of the StarLink, OneWeb and Telesat NGEO datasat constellations 

 

CircleID...

 

Bottom line: each TeleSat satellite is faster, but the StarLink architecture overwhelms in total throughput. OneWeb seems outclassed.

 

Coverage (satellites in line-of-sight)

77115138_NGEOvisibilitycoverage-CircleID.thumb.jpg.3fb7f8708c8160ff8d055ae6ef20cf13.jpg

 

Throughput

82243948_NGEOthroughputs-CircleID-800.thumb.jpg.c7f117888bddc4636f876d2d4b42aa8b.jpg

  • Like 1

Quantity > Quality in this case, but the Starlink birds aren't anything to sneeze at on their own either. Everyone, everyone is sending up (or will be sending up) some really tasty gear. Humanity as a whole benefits no matter which provider they choose to go with; and while I personally will select Starlink as an early adopter (doing my part to ensure its success), OneWeb and Telesat are going to be quite decent services too. Demand will force OneWeb and Telesat to improve their own services, which I predict will need to increase their constellations in order to keep pace ... or lease throughput from Starlink using compatible gear.

 

Starlink will simply be the superior service, and the numbers don't lie. :D 

 

Everyone benefits.

 

What I'd personally like to see is iridium getting in on the action with SpaceX. The "Dream Team" scenario. I'm almost as much a fan of Matt and I am of Elon and Gwynne. Iridium has special skills that SpaceX could really benefit from. And the guy himself is just cool. :yes: 

Just my opinion...but these comparisons are like "play dough"....nothing is built and ready to fly, once flown then tweaked, then numbers mean little till full constellation is up and modified. Mold the facts to fit the good looking side.

 

This is just competitors jousting for position, mostly based on "bull cookies". This will go on for years.

 

Starlink is built in a vertically integrated group of companies that design, build, launch and manage the system.....the others have a right to be real worried right now...the future looks grim for them.

  • Like 2

More troubling for Telesat, OneWev and others is that the fully reusable Super Heavy and Starship are coming, and fast.

 

They'll allow SpaceX to quickly roll out larger and faster StarLink upgrades virtually at cost.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, DocM said:

More troubling for Telesat, OneWev and others is that the fully reusable Super Heavy and Starship are coming, and fast.

 

They'll allow SpaceX to quickly roll out larger and faster StarLink upgrades virtually at cost.

Even without it, it is frightful for them...give it 2 years...and that's the end of meaningful competition for them. They will have to invest in a "niche" market to stay alive.

  • 1 month later...

FCC filing: 

 

https://fcc.report/IBFS/SES-LIC-INTR2019-00217/1616678

 


>
The Commission has authorized Space Exploration Holdings, LLC (SpaceX) to launch and operate  a constellation of 4,425 non-geostationary orbit (NGSO)  satellites (call sign S2983/S3018) using Ku- and Ka-band spectrum. In doing so, the Commission recognized that granting the SpaceX  Authorization would enable SpaceX  to  bring  high-speed, reliable,  and affordable broadband service to consumers in the United States and around the world, including areas  underserved or currently unserved  by existing networks. SpaceX  intends to begin launching satellites to populate its constellation in 2019.

In this application, a sister company, SpaceX Services, Inc. (SpaceX Services) seeks a blanket license authorizing operation of up to 1,000,000 earth stations that end-user customers will utilize  to  communicate with SpaceXs NGSO  constellation. These user terminals  employ advanced phased-array beam-forming and digital processing technologies to make highly efficient use of Ku-band spectrum  resources by supporting highly  directive, steered antenna beams  that track the systems low-Earth orbit satellites. Consistent with SpaceXs space station authorization, these earth stations  will transmit in the 14.0-14.5 GHz  band and receive in the 10.7-12.7  GHz  band.
>

  • Like 1

SpaceX StarLink joins the SeattleIX Internet Exchange Point,  meaning connected to the Internet at 10Gbps. This will be one of many local ground connections, and the bandwidth will grow - a lot.

 

Reg: AS14593

 

https://www.seattleix.net

 

https://ipinfo.io/AS14593

 

Related Networks

 

MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business AS13670
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP AS14514
Marketing & Research Resources, Inc. AS25659
Bank of China AS33731
Charter Communications AS36608
C-III Capital Partners LLC AS393793
WON Communications, LLC AS395967
St. Lawrence University AS396485
Atlantic Union College AS46464
PubMatic, Inc. AS62713

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

SpaceX has filed for FCC licenses in support of a Falcon 9 B5 launch from SLC-40, with recovery on ASDS Of Course I Still Love You about 600km to the NE. 

 

NASASpaceFlight.com  reports this is the first StarLink deployment launch.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!