How do People Believe this Stuff?


Recommended Posts

I really don't believe stuff like this:

 

post-39459-0-29971700-1427558383.jpg

 

I mean, since 1940's?  They've managed to keep it quiet?

 

I really don't think the USA, or any other country for that matter, has a secret agency working with all this stuff.  You never hear anything about it, and in the world where our Prime Ministers' speech is leaked days before he is to make it, and the amount of leaks from phones, computers, operating systems and such, I really can't believe NOBODY has leaked anything about Area 51 or what not.

 

Perhaps there was something in the past but long gone now.

 

Unless someone can confirm Area 51 is under guard at all times?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1251592-how-do-people-believe-this-stuff/
Share on other sites

I really don't believe stuff like this:

 

attachicon.gifCapture.JPG

 

I mean, since 1940's?  They've managed to keep it quiet?

 

I really don't think the USA, or any other country for that matter, has a secret agency working with all this stuff.  You never hear anything about it, and in the world where our Prime Ministers' speech is leaked days before he is to make it, and the amount of leaks from phones, computers, operating systems and such, I really can't believe NOBODY has leaked anything about Area 51 or what not.

 

Perhaps there was something in the past but long gone now.

 

Unless someone can confirm Area 51 is under guard at all times?

Since we are talking about this, they didn't manage to keep it quiet :p Also, I think Fringe had an episode or two about this

 

"There is no group of people this large in the world that can keep a secret. I find it comforting. It's how I know for sure that the government isn't covering up aliens in New Mexico." - C.J. Cregg

The West Wing

I think the reason why people are inclined to believe this is because it's the army and the likelyhood of them experimenting with something that's quite...out there, so to speak, is pretty high. Beyond thinking this is pretty cool ( teleportation would be a pretty nifty thing to be able to do), I'm quite skeptical. 

 

Also, where's my flying car? Can I at least have that? 

I think the reason why people are inclined to believe this is because it's the army and the likelyhood of them experimenting with something that's quite...out there, so to speak, is pretty high. Beyond thinking this is pretty cool ( teleportation would be a pretty nifty thing to be able to do), I'm quite skeptical. 

 

Also, where's my flying car? Can I at least have that? 

 

Here you go.

 

th?id=HN.608040118334392191&pid=1.7

  • Like 3

How do people believe this stuff? Either lack of intelligence or desperation, or a mix of both.

 

Same reason as to why people tell campfire stories. If you try to backtrack sources, which can be difficult these days as I do try but often lead to nowhere, I noticed the ones I can backtrack well often get a start from a small article where the journalist obviously didn't research the story, mention names or anything. Others from freelance writers and in a few instances I found blog posts from authors where if you look up their name, you'll find their previous works were fiction stories, probably sold to whoever wants to publish such stories. The black eyed kids for example, I believe started on Reddit thread which snowballed from posters adding to the fiction to later readers that believed it...it has since spawned a few books and mentioned in documentaries on TV with one of the more popular stories in particular that I know of was a story written by a poster on that Reddit thread or there may be lots of Reddit threads about it now. I think the only reason why Slenderman never made it to the "real" category was due to it's popularity for being known as internet fiction so the media sites didn't get the chance to run away with it.

 

Then we come into photoshopping evidence where an enthusiast will create evidence and it keeps getting picked up on by sites like this. For example, a NASA original photo of a closeup of the moon surface shows good detail, but that same area was later blurred out by someone and said that NASA blurred it out and then photoshopped a moon base saying this is the decrypted or original...etc copy and it has to be an alien base....but it was all B.S. This particular base is now spread all over the internet .....I suspect personally that all of them are like this but I can't prove it because I never actually looked at NASA's entire photo's of the surface but it's reasonable that many may have been blurred out due to camera or conditions and that's just all that NASA has but who knows. Other evidence like Alien implants...etc are made from known metals and it's really poor as evidence but they try to show how it's impossible to manufacture due to some provided microscope level photo's....but we're not metallurgists so how is the layman to know if it's possible or not? Because some guy on Youtube told you.

 

If you read the Montauk Books by Peter Moon and whoever the other guy is and show it to someone with a degree in physics they tend to laugh at the descriptions of how these devices are built and work. The first book seems plausible to a layman like me, the others are laughable but I had a friend studying theoretical physics in college take a look at the drawings..etc in the first book back some 10 years ago or longer and he noted a couple things at least that were just false and couldn't happen....So I suspect all the books are fiction but I keep an open mind that perhaps something occurred but am just waiting for real evidence. So far the YT stories of the time travels sounds a bit daft.

 

I take everything with a grain of salt and try to remain neutral and stay to the facts without bias but you can't be so skeptical that you dismiss everything without providing a thesis showing a real reason for dismissal. Why? because it's laziness otherwise but technically a dismissal is no better or worse than the story itself. For example, to say someone imagined something or was dreaming....possible yes but unless you're a neurologist and can scientifically provide a thesis as to how this can occur without the person's knowledge then it's useless dismissal and nothing more.

How do people believe this stuff? Either lack of intelligence or desperation, or a mix of both.

 

 

I disagree. I have known a few conspiracy theorists in my time, however "stupid, deranged, dangerous or desperate" isn't how I would describe any of them. Frustrating? Yeah. Arrogant? Sometimes. Condescending? Often.

 

I think this is a pretty good summation of how conspiracy theories work & why they aren't as "unnatural" or "weird" as some might claim.

 

 

I think the biggest problem with conspiracy theorists is that it is so hard to argue them out of their position once it has set. Even when you offer them evidence which seriously damages their argument (in my personal experience, I have argued with 9/11 "truthers" & moon landing hoaxers) they won't say "OK. Your evidence and/or argument is compelling, or at least makes me reconsider my position" They will just go ahead and repeat the same debunked nonsense to someone else they argue with.

  • Like 1

If the science behind it was real (creating an electro magnetic bubble around an object) then it would of been replicated already in the scientific community and proven/disproven that teleportation of this degree exists. 
No one has done it, so I believe there is your answer whether its happened or not. It didn't. 

... or did it? ;)

I think the issue here isn't really the alleged teleportation tech itself but the secretive nature of the military. We know for certain that militaries develop technology and indeed sometimes have sophisticated, proprietary technology at their disposal, so it stands to reason that people imagine all types of technology, no matter how scientifically implausible it is, to be in the possession of the military.

 

Area 51 absolutely exists. Do they have aliens there? I am overwhelmingly certain they don't. Do they develop and/or test sophisticated military tech there? I have no doubt they do.

  • Like 1

I think the issue here isn't really the alleged teleportation tech itself but the secretive nature of the military. We know for certain that militaries develop technology and indeed sometimes have sophisticated, proprietary technology at their disposal, so it stands to reason that people imagine all types of technology, no matter how scientifically implausible it is, to be in the possession of the military.

 

Area 51 absolutely exists. Do they have aliens there? I am overwhelmingly certain they don't. Do they develop and/or test sophisticated military tech there? I have no doubt they do.

 

As I recall, Area 51 is where the U.S. Air Force tested both the F-117A "NightHawk" Stealth fighter, and the B-2 "Spirit" Stealth bomber, among other high-tech military aircraft that have been flown there.

Probably a few illegal aliens at least.

 

 

lol. I think if you want to work in Area 51 you have to be an American citizen and go through a considerable vetting process. 

 

 

As I recall, Area 51 is where the U.S. Air Force tested both the F-117A "NightHawk" Stealth fighter, and the B-2 "Spirit" Stealth bomber, among other high-tech military aircraft that have been flown there.

 

 

Probably correct. I am no expert on Area 51. But as I said earlier, there is no doubt it is a no-go-zone for the rest of us because they are developing the kind of technology they don't want anyone to get near. The Americans spend a tremendous amount of money developing their weaponry (a point which is worthy of debate) so there is no reason to believe they wouldn't have sites to develop and test it.

 

 

But, I am a good sceptic, if anyone provide evidence that there are alien craft or grey aliens (the most common alien cited by believers) being concealed by the American government I will change my opinion.

im not surprised if it was possible. You think you know everything thats going on. You only know a fraction of the stuff.

 

 

It's not about "knowing everything" it much more about how plausible such a thing is. The Phily experiment is a prime example of something that is entirely implausible and uncorroborated.

They made a movie about it! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087910/?ref_=nv_sr_2

 

It has to be real if they made a movie about it.

 

Two, actually.. Though the second was dreadful...

 

IIRC, from books I've read over the years, there actually -was- an experiment on the USS Eldridge back in the 40's.  I think it was something to do with radar, which was very very new at the time.  It certainly wasn't anything to do with teleportation or invisibility or even radar jamming as the only people who had it were the UK (we invented it!), and our allies who we shared it with.

 

From what I recall reading, I think there was some kind of accident too, but really, nothing like the myths...

While this experiment/research is a little bit out there I do not doubt that there are many top secret research projects that have been going on for 50+ years in total secrecy. For all of the leaks we see there are dozens more things that do not leak. Ever. Governments are very good at keeping secret the things they really want kept secret. Projects with only a couple of hundred people working on it are unlikely to ever leak because not only are the number of people "in the know" very small but they also know if they ever did say anything they would be dead before the end of the day.

The thing is, and I'm not saying I believe what was in the OP but at some point, something new and revolutionary will have came along and it will have blown peoples minds. 

 

Imagine what people first thought when someone came home and said they saw some people flying - most wouldn't have believed them at the time.  Or FFM's example above, when the guys came home that day and told their significant others than they could detect a ship or a plane 10KM's away or whatever its range was at the time, without actually being able to see it. 

 

People would have said they were crazy.

 

People's reaction even now, when I sometimes get my car to park itself, they are amazed still. 

 

At one point things were new, crazy and scientifically "impossible"... but not tomorrow, yesterdays impossible is tomorrows possible. So when I see things like this, I don't dismiss it as a never, I think I wonder what might have been possible.

How do people believe this stuff? Either lack of intelligence or desperation, or a mix of both.

Good Job insulting people who believe something that you don't!!!

 

As far as I'm concerned I don't have any facts to prove or disprove that these experiments took place and until I do I will hold my judgement. Could they have taken place? Yes. Did they take place? Who knows. Without the DoD declassifying documents regarding the experiments I guess we'll never know.

 

I suppose if I told you that the Nazis had a jet propelled flying wing that was almost invisible to radar you would completely dismiss it, would you?

  • Like 2

Good Job insulting people who believe something that you don't!!!

 

As far as I'm concerned I don't have any facts to prove or disprove that these experiments took place and until I do I will hold my judgement. Could they have taken place? Yes. Did they take place? Who knows. Without the DoD declassifying documents regarding the experiments I guess we'll never know.

 

I suppose if I told you that the Nazis had a jet propelled flying wing that was almost invisible to radar you would completely dismiss it, would you?

 

No, because physics.

I suggest you reread the original post a few times.

 

More like lack of brains

That's the one!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • How to Do More with Less: Future-Proofing Yourself in an AI-driven Economy —was $28 now FREE by Steven Parker Claim your complimentary copy (worth $28) of "How to Do More with Less: Future-Proofing Yourself in an AI-driven Economy" for free, before the offer ends on June 30. Description In today’s workplace, headlines about artificial intelligence can feel overwhelming. With headlines swinging between promises of utopia and warnings of mass unemployment, for most knowledge workers, the truth feels unclear. In this book, Sharon Gai cuts through the noise. Drawing from real-world examples and global insights, she explains how AI is reshaping the way we work—without hype or fearmongering. Instead of choosing between blind optimism or outright pessimism, she offers a practical, balanced perspective that helps readers make sense of the rapidly evolving AI landscape. You’ll learn how to: Reskill and future-proof your career in the face of AI disruption Identify which parts of your role can be automated, and which require human creativity and judgment Use proven frameworks to evaluate AI’s impact on your work and your organization Apply actionable tips and tools to boost productivity, make smarter decisions, and do more with less Gain clarity as a parent, leader, or professional navigating what this means for the next generation Whether you’re an employee anxious about your future, a parent concerned about your children’s opportunities, or a leader managing a lean team with tight budgets, this book provides the strategies and mindset you need to adapt so you can stop worrying and start preparing. How to download for free Please ensure you read the terms and conditions to claim this offer. Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this free offer. If you have previously made use of these offers, you will not need to re-register. Was $28, but is now FREE | Below free offer link expires on June 30. How to Do More with Less: Future-Proofing Yourself in an AI-driven Economy The below offers are also available for free in exchange for your (work) email: The Vibe Coding Playbook: Building Your Tech Business with AI ($35 Value) FREE - Expires 6/23 The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing to Understand and Win Customers ($28 Value) FREE - Expires 6/24 How to Do More with Less: Future-Proofing Yourself in an AI-driven Economy ($28 Value) FREE - Expires 6/30 Cloud Security Fundamentals: Building the Foundations for Secure Cloud Platforms ($131.95 Value) FREE - Expires 7/1 The Complete Free AI Learning: Master ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & More ($21 Value) FREE How to Build an AI Design Workflow with Gamma ($21 Value) FREE The Ultimate Linux Newbie Guide – Featured Free content Python Notes for Professionals – Featured Free content Learn Linux in 5 Days – Featured Free content Quick Reference Guide for Cybersecurity – Featured Free content We post these because we earn commission on each lead so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin The above deal not doing it for you, but still want to help? Check out the links below. Check out our partner software in the Neowin Store Buy a T-shirt at Neowin's Threadsquad Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: An account at Neowin Deals is required to participate in any deals powered by our affiliate, StackCommerce. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through the branded deals site.
    • Microsoft admits one of the most crucial Outlook features is currently broken by Sayan Sen Microsoft is making some decent progress when it comes to Windows 11. Recently we have confirmed reports of some rather useful improvements landing in the next version of the OS, 26H2, wherein GPU driver TDR crashes may finally be fixed, plus the company is also allowing users to disable web content on the Search. On the Outlook front though things have not been so rosy. Last month in May we reported several problems affecting basic functionalities on the app. These included a problem where documents would open blank or corrupt themselves. Following that, Quick Steps, a very useful feature, would no longer work correctly, and finally, Microsoft acknowledged a problem wherein images would fail to load up properly inside the email. Microsoft had resolved those bugs later and almost exactly a month after we reported on them, the company has now admitted a new similarly basic issue, this time on Macs. Users recently started noticing that Outlook would no longer display email threads properly as the original message itself was not displayed. An affected user Tsoumpas, C (ngmb) nicely described the problem in a forum post they made on Microsoft's site. They wrote: "Description of the issue: After updating Outlook for Mac [Version 16.110 (26061317)] on 18/6/2026, replying to any email no longer includes the original message in the reply window. Prior to the update, replies correctly contained the original email text below my response. Expected behavior: The original message should be included in the reply, as in previous Outlook versions and according to the configured reply settings. Actual behavior: The reply window contains only a blank composition area (or only my response), with none of the original email text included." Obviously this must be a highly frustrating for users as noted by several in that thread. The post, at the time of writing, has also been upvoted by more than 40 users indicating that is a fairly widespread bug. Thankfully Microsoft seems to have acknowledged the problem right around that time as it opened a new issue on its official website. In the support article, the company recommends switching to Outlook for Mac from the legacy app, where the problem appears to be happening.
    • PotPlayer 260622 by Razvan Serea PotPlayer is an extremely light-weight multimedia player for Windows. It feels like the KMPlayer, but is in active development. Supports almost every available video formats out there. PotPlayer contains internal codecs and there is no need to install codecs manually. Other key features include WebCam/Analog/Digital TV devices support, gapless video playback, DXVA, live broadcasting. Distinctive features of the player is a high quality playback, support for all modern video and audio formats and a built DXVA video codecs. A wide range of subtitles are supported and you are also able to capture audio, video, and screenshots. A comprehensive video and audio player, that also supports TV channels, subtitles and skins. Its been described on the Internet as The KMPlayer redux, and it pretty much is. Daum PotPlayer 260622 (1.7.22963) changelog: Removed Kakao TV Added pause function when navigating via the navigation bar Significantly improved internal stability Fixed an issue where colors appeared strange during RGB24 processing Improved playback for some HTTP streams Improved sync processing for the built-in audio renderer Fixed an issue where certain MP4 files behaved abnormally during playback Download: Daum PotPlayer (64-bit) | 54.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Daum PotPlayer (32-bit) | 61.1 MB View: Daum PotPlayer Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.44 is out.
    • Speccy 1.34.084 by Razvan Serea Speccy will give you detailed statistics on every piece of hardware in your computer. Including CPU, Motherboard, RAM, Graphics Cards, Hard Disks, Optical Drives, Audio support. Additionally Speccy adds the temperatures of your different components, so you can easily see if there's a problem! Processor brand and model Hard drive size and speed Amount of memory (RAM) Graphics card Operating system At first glance, Speccy may seem like an application for system administrators and power users. It certainly is, but Speccy can also help normal users, in everyday computing life. If you need to add more memory to your system, for example, you can check how many memory slots your computer has and what memory's already installed. Then you can go out and buy the right type of memory to add on or replace what you've already got. Download: Speccy 1.34.084 | 20.5 MB (Freeware) View: Speccy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!