Apple products are priced too high?


Recommended Posts

Apple products are built very well, there is no doubt about it.  My biggest issue with their pricing model is things like RAM.  You get a Mac Pro with 12 GB of RAM, but another 12 GB costs $200 more.  Where in the universe would you ever pay that for 12 GB of memory?  It shouldn't even cost half that.  Or a 'SuperDrive' - basically a DVD/CD Burner for $150 extra.  There's a piece of hardware you should be able to get for, what, $35?  That's what's ridiculous to me.  Apple knows that a large cross-section of their customers have zero knowledge about the actual cost of hardware (these people don't shop on Newegg or Amazon for such things), and many of them have a lot of money and like the status it gives them to have an Apple product.

Apple products are built very well, there is no doubt about it.  My biggest issue with their pricing model is things like RAM.  You get a Mac Pro with 12 GB of RAM, but another 12 GB costs $200 more.  Where in the universe would you ever pay that for 12 GB of memory?  It shouldn't even cost half that.  Or a 'SuperDrive' - basically a DVD/CD Burner for $150 extra.  There's a piece of hardware you should be able to get for, what, $35?  That's what's ridiculous to me.  Apple knows that a large cross-section of their customers have zero knowledge about the actual cost of hardware (these people don't shop on Newegg or Amazon for such things), and many of them have a lot of money and like the status it gives them to have an Apple product.

 

Why do people keep getting on Apple about this?  I had similar pricing with Dell, HP, Lenovo, ...  It isn't just Apple that charges that amount for RAM.  You have to keep in mind that they usually do not have hundreds of variations in stock, so when you get RAM upgrades, and other upgrades, sometimes they need to change it.

I don't know about the MacBooks, but I do know the PowerBook and iMac line was plagued with bad batteries (first battery in mine was recalled, got a replacement and that was recalled as well), extreme overheating (mine would get so hot it would burn my hand), and other problems. Almost every iPhone has also had 'gate' issues. Every one I know that has an iPhone has had the screen crack while no one with a Galaxy has. So I'm not too sure about the "build quality", however, the builds are certainly sleek and aesthetically pleasing.

 

Yeah I am not saying Apple are perfect. They have had their fair share of build problems too. Personally I have found Apple products more reliable than equivalent Dell, Lenovo, etc. products. Even Dell business laptops like the Precision series have a lot of problems with GPU failures, bad batteries, over heating (especially with the quad-core models of late but that is an Intel thing which is true for pretty much every laptop with a quad i7 I have found). You also hear much more about an Apple problem than say a Dell Latitude E6450 problem although I have had many problems with said Latitude.

 

Ya, but the common problem with mac is not how users looked after them. It was a flaws in the engineering and design.

 

I think most users treat their laptops the same. Which is pretty badly. Then they complain something is broken when they dropped it on the floor! One thing I really don't like with newer laptops is how everything is soldered or epoxied into the machine. This sucks so much as a dodgy RAM module means a return of the whole unit and a week or two wait for it to be fixed. Really sucks. One thing I love about Dell/HP/Lenovo business machines over a MacBook Pro is that I can change the RAM, battery, screen, CPU, keyboard, etc. so easily and for pretty cheap. Doing that on a MBP is impossible. Batteries are a real pain in the ass as they can be ruined so quickly. People working from their desk for 8 hours a day yet leaving it plugged in at 100% all the time. Even with newer batteries with charge limits and the ability to run bypassing the battery on main if the battery is charged can still be worn down to 50% within a year then you can stuck with a built in battery. Awful.

Why do people keep getting on Apple about this?  I had similar pricing with Dell, HP, Lenovo, ...  It isn't just Apple that charges that amount for RAM.  You have to keep in mind that they usually do not have hundreds of variations in stock, so when you get RAM upgrades, and other upgrades, sometimes they need to change it.

 

Yeah pretty much all companies do this. They easily charge 100%+ on RAM but they can get away with it because these days you have to buy how much RAM you will ever need on day one as upgrading is impossible.

I recently tried a new MBP Retina, and found that it didnt match the quality I was used to from Apple...It ran hot, slow, and killed battery fast.  I will say the Retina's do seem to have some sort of performance issue which is why Im looking at a Surface 4 or something this year. 

 

The first MacBook (at the time they were called PowerBooks) that I owned in 2004 was awesome. I knew going in that the G4 processor wouldn't match the performance of a comparable Windows laptop with Intel processor, but the build quality especially for the time was great. It was a silent machine compared to the Dells I had been using with noisy fans that would start every time I launched a browser. Unfortunately, I think Apple's computer quality control took a hit after Apple became the iPhone company they are today.

 

The last MacBook Pro I purchased, a $3000 top of the line 2011 model, also gave me the same feeling as you. It was too hot and ran very slow. Apple told me the temps were normal and would not replace or service the laptop. It eventually died shortly after it was out of warranty. At least I didn't have the battery problems. After that experience, I stopped buying Apple (although I still invest in them because I like to make money). Fortunately, some PC manufacturers have caught on to the concept of elegant design and high res displays so if you pay a bit more, you should get a really nice quality device. But if all you want to spend is $300, prepare to get garbage.

+1

 

I'm vested in the Apple ecosystem myself and it has served me well for the most part.  The only reason I would use Windows is for Office because Apple versions remains crippled (even with the improved upcoming version).  With that said, Apple did increase the prices outside of the US due to strong dollar which kind of sucks but can't really fault Apple for that.

 

With certain products though, you do need to step back and see if the apple sticker is worth the price.  For example, I don't have an issue buying the airport extreme, but I probably wouldn't buy the Time Capsule.

 

In terms of longevity, it really depends on the kind of user you are and what you need out of your system.  Other than the iPhones that I upgrade every 2 years, rest of the hardware can easily go 3~4 years without replacement (fairly long time in the tech world).

 

Right, you see great value in what they have to offer, so you spend the money and not really think about it. Since I'm moved away from a job that required Access, the Mac version of Office suits my needs. Heck, I prefer to fire up the online version when I'm working between my Windows 8.1 machine and my Surface 2 because the applications I really get any use out of is Word, and OneNote (if you want to count that.)    

 

Hardware wise, you should really get close to 10 years. That's if you take care of it, and you don't run into any faulty hardware. My mother-in-law is using a computer I built in early 2008, that's running Windows 8.1, and soon Windows 10 without issues. My brother-in-law is using an iMac that I bought in early 2009 and running Mavericks I think without issues. I started buying parts for an i5 system that I built for myself in December of 2011, and the thought of upgrading it has not crossed my mind at all. It runs everything as smoothly as it did the day I bought it. It handles any Illustrator or After Effects project I throw at it. My only complaint is that it could render things faster, but the cost per performance isn't really worth it right now.  

 

Apple products are built very well, there is no doubt about it.  My biggest issue with their pricing model is things like RAM.  You get a Mac Pro with 12 GB of RAM, but another 12 GB costs $200 more.  Where in the universe would you ever pay that for 12 GB of memory?  It shouldn't even cost half that.  Or a 'SuperDrive' - basically a DVD/CD Burner for $150 extra.  There's a piece of hardware you should be able to get for, what, $35?  That's what's ridiculous to me.  Apple knows that a large cross-section of their customers have zero knowledge about the actual cost of hardware (these people don't shop on Newegg or Amazon for such things), and many of them have a lot of money and like the status it gives them to have an Apple product.

 

As it's been pointed out to you before, what Apple is charging for RAM is not much different than what the other companies are charging. Also, Apple doesn't offer the Mac Pro in a 24GB of RAM configuration, so they're not charging you $200 for 12GB of additional RAM.  But, for 1866MHz DDR3 ECC RAM, Apple is charging roughly $100 for 4GB. You can compare that to HP, who charges $80 for a 4GB bump with 1600MHz DDR3 RAM, and Dell who also offers 1600MHz DDR3 RAM, but for $100 per 4GB. (Edit: Looked at it wrong. It's $50 per 4GB for 1600)

 

If you're a DIY type person, you can get 1866MHz DDR3 ECC RAM from Newegg and Amazon for around $40 per 4GB, but not everyone knows how to swap out the RAM, what type they need, or where to buy it, so it's just easier to pay the company a, "convienece tax," to take care of all of that for you.  

Apple products are competitively priced if you really dig into the options and featureset and try to match it. A $500-$800 mac mini I think is the best performance to footprint device out there still, and when I was looking at high end laptops the MBP was ahead of the game on battery life, weight, screen resolution, and a touch faster clock speeds with about a +$200 price difference to an equal windows based machine. I can't just take my windows machine to the windows store to fix in a day like I can with my apple device, so it all factors in. I won't even get into the QA issues I had with laptops by companies like HP, Acer, Toshiba, Samsung, etc. and the hassle of shipping laptops off for repair.

I find most Apple products to be pricey only if you look at the price. Currently the only Apple product I own is the iPhone since I'm perfectly fine with an old Lenovo netbook. I've used my friends MacBooks and iMacs and they're phenomenal but not something I have a use for. Years ago I worked in retail and dealing with most manufacturers when it came to warranties was a nightmare. Apple customer service and warranty is exceptional, definitely one of the best.

I feel 50/50 about it I suppose.

 

I've owned Apple products over the years (iPods, iPhones) but a couple of years ago I took the plunge on a Macbook Air - a maxed out 11" (i7, 8GB, 512GB SSD). Most expensive computer I've ever bought.

 

It was a perfect example of why it's so difficult to decide how I feel. Unquestionably the prices are too high.. there's no other way that Apple could be so wealthy, if they simply were not charging excessively for their products. But whilst it's the most expensive computer I ever bought, it's also the best. I love my Air. The performance is superb, it's exceptionally reliable both as a day to day proposition (like it resumes from sleep perfectly every time in a second, and always 'just works') and as an overall proposition (no weird issues, nothing has broken, always does what I expect it to). 

 

I would, without question, love another Apple notebook to replace it as and when it gives up the ghost.. but I'll really be griping and bitching about the price as I go through the ordering process. 

 

All that said - I do worry they're going to start losing their way. The pricing on the Apple Watch is insane. The Sport edition I can stomach.. the others I think are just ludicrous cash grabs. 

Yes, they're pricier, spec-for-spec, than most other computer models, but not as far as you may think.

 

But, the reason everything (gadget-wise) I own is made by Apple is because of how it all works together, with practically zero configuration. The ecosystem is worth its weight in gold, and for me, makes the purchase decision easy. 

 

Plus, there's the much smaller design considerations, that often get overlooked by other manufacturers. Like the magsafe adapter, the asymmetrical fan on the MacBook Pro which reduces noise levels, and the fact that the lid forms part of the LCD, meaning the display's thinner, and there's no reflective glass layer over the LCD. And the trackpad - I've never ever found a laptop which even comes close to Apple's trackpad.

 

Finally, there's support. I can't walk into a Samsung store if my samsung phone breaks and get it repaired/replaced right there and then, nor can I take my Dell laptop to a Dell store and have them repair it onsite. I can do that with Apple.

 

Edit: This is what I mean by attention to detail.

 

This is the side of the Dell XPS 15 (current gen):

 

ScreenShot2015-05-17at21.42.12.png

 

And this is the side of the current MBP (some are on the other side):

 

ScreenShot2015-05-17at21.44.13.png

 

Everything on the Dell is misaligned. The power connector is centred. The HDMI, MiniDP and USB are top aligned, and the headphone jack is centred again. The power adapter label has no margin, and is aligned just above half way. The HDMI label has a small margin, and are bottom (almost aligned. The USB labels are bang in the middle, and the headphone jack icon looks way brighter than the rest.

 

Then there's the MBP. Everything aligned properly - all centred. The icons are all the same colour, all centred, and all the same distance from their respective port. The ports are all rounded off the same too, so the USBs have the same rounded corners as the thunderbolt, and the magsafe ports. It's all well thought out.

I've never ever found a laptop which even comes close to Apple's trackpad.

 

You make many good points, but it's especially hard to argue with this one. The trackpad on my Air is a revelation. Any other track pad I use just feels like going back to dialup from broadband! 

  • Like 2

With student discount when I purchased my 13" Macbook Air in 2012 it was a fair bit cheaper than any Windows ultrabook equivalent, but yes in general I agree Apple products are usually over priced, especially the little things such as ram upgrades.

 

I don't feel I have to be totally invested in Microsoft, Apple, Google or anyone else though. I buy what I perceive to be the best product at the time in the price range i'm going to pay.

Apple knows that a large cross-section of their customers have zero knowledge about the actual cost of hardware (these people don't shop on Newegg or Amazon for such things), and many of them have a lot of money and like the status it gives them to have an Apple product.

 

That's what irks me most about Apple.  They prey upon the ignorance of their customers to such a disgusting extent.

  • Like 2

Take one apart and you will see a level of engineering and quality that is 100% missing in all PC manufacturers.

Hardware isnt the problem - its the software that caters to the braindead populous that keeps me away.

That level of detail doesn't make it work any different from something lacking the detail. 

 

That is what a lot of people forget. how many people open their machines to admire how pretty the internals look?

 

Most people do not know this anyway. They just take Apple's word for it.

Yes, they're pricier, spec-for-spec, than most other computer models, but not as far as you may think.

 

But, the reason everything (gadget-wise) I own is made by Apple is because of how it all works together, with practically zero configuration. The ecosystem is worth its weight in gold, and for me, makes the purchase decision easy. 

 

Plus, there's the much smaller design considerations, that often get overlooked by other manufacturers. Like the magsafe adapter, the asymmetrical fan on the MacBook Pro which reduces noise levels, and the fact that the lid forms part of the LCD, meaning the display's thinner, and there's no reflective glass layer over the LCD. And the trackpad - I've never ever found a laptop which even comes close to Apple's trackpad.

 

Finally, there's support. I can't walk into a Samsung store if my samsung phone breaks and get it repaired/replaced right there and then, nor can I take my Dell laptop to a Dell store and have them repair it onsite. I can do that with Apple.

 

Edit: This is what I mean by attention to detail.

 

This is the side of the Dell XPS 15 (current gen):

 

ScreenShot2015-05-17at21.42.12.png

 

And this is the side of the current MBP (some are on the other side):

 

ScreenShot2015-05-17at21.44.13.png

 

Everything on the Dell is misaligned. The power connector is centred. The HDMI, MiniDP and USB are top aligned, and the headphone jack is centred again. The power adapter label has no margin, and is aligned just above half way. The HDMI label has a small margin, and are bottom (almost aligned. The USB labels are bang in the middle, and the headphone jack icon looks way brighter than the rest.

 

Then there's the MBP. Everything aligned properly - all centred. The icons are all the same colour, all centred, and all the same distance from their respective port. The ports are all rounded off the same too, so the USBs have the same rounded corners as the thunderbolt, and the magsafe ports. It's all well thought out.

You are comparing a wedge design to a flat one. Of course there will be different alignments.

I find most Apple products to be pricey only if you look at the price. Currently the only Apple product I own is the iPhone since I'm perfectly fine with an old Lenovo netbook. I've used my friends MacBooks and iMacs and they're phenomenal but not something I have a use for. Years ago I worked in retail and dealing with most manufacturers when it came to warranties was a nightmare. Apple customer service and warranty is exceptional, definitely one of the best.

Agreed, ignoring the price makes nothing look pricey ;)

  • Like 2

You make many good points, but it's especially hard to argue with this one. The trackpad on my Air is a revelation. Any other track pad I use just feels like going back to dialup from broadband! 

I can argue with this one. I don't care how good a trackpad is, they're all awful.

 

As for the Mac ports - I see an entirely different set of ports on one chassis vs. the other so any comparison would be invalid.

Laptops:  My macbook air is the first laptop to last me over 1 year, its 2 years old now and is serving me well. 

What are you doing to your laptops? I'd be ###### if I only got a year out of one and even more ###### if I only made it 2 years with a Macbook.

 

I've had an iPhone for a few months now and I like it, but I've already grown tired two particularly stupid, artificial limitations built in by Apple because they think it'll force me to spend more money on iTunes.

 

*30 Sec Ringtones and can't be in mp3 format

*iTunes mandatory. No direct access to anything but photos

 

The first one is trivial, but annoying. I have a big problem with #2 though. You shouldn't have to install iTunes on every PC that interacts with your phone. No other OS on the market makes the user jump through hoops like that. I should be able to plug the thing in and the phone get picked up as mass storage, like WP and Android. In Apple's defense, I knew this going in. I thought I could live with, but it pisses me off every time I think about it. Honestly, I'm surprised Apple tolerates mp3's on their devices.

 

My phone has also become somewhat buggy in the short time I've owned it. My Jay Bird Bluetooth earbuds will randomly cut out during use. I've triggered it by using the phone while listening to music. Moving back/forth through menus and such sometimes make the audio cut out on bluetooth. It also happens while running and I'm not even touching the phone. Animations will also stop working during txt messaging sometimes. Finally, for some reason, if I'm playing a song and rotate my phone to see the album, its stuck on whatever the album art id for the song that played first. People recommend restore phone as new through iTunes, but given that its only a few months old, I find that a ridiculous fix. It's 2015 and we should be long past this by now.

 

This will probably be my first/last iPhone. It's an a great phone but as much as I enjoy it, the limitations above and the asking price of a new iPhone, especially 64Gb every couple of years is more than I want to deal with. Hopefully, Microsoft has established a solid WP user base by then and more importantly, have decent phones available.

That's what irks me most about Apple.  They prey upon the ignorance of their customers to such a disgusting extent.

 

That is just good business though. Nothing wrong with helping people who can't or don't want to learn the ins and outs of their phone or computer. They want it to "just work" and that is exactly what Apple delivers. I bought my toaster for convenience, same with my TV and my car and my microwave. I don't care how they work just that they do. Many people look at computers exactly the same way. They want something they turn on and post some photos of the kids on Facebook or Dropbox for their parents to see. If it does what they want what is wrong with that?

*30 Sec Ringtones and can't be in mp3 format

*iTunes mandatory. No direct access to anything but photos

 

If you let your phone ring longer than 30 seconds something is wrong with you :p

 

And iTunes is just a part of life just like how a Microsoft Account is for Windows Store Apps. Can't get away from these things anymore.

That is just good business though. Nothing wrong with helping people who can't or don't want to learn the ins and outs of their phone or computer. They want it to "just work" and that is exactly what Apple delivers. I bought my toaster for convenience, same with my TV and my car and my microwave. I don't care how they work just that they do. Many people look at computers exactly the same way. They want something they turn on and post some photos of the kids on Facebook or Dropbox for their parents to see. If it does what they want what is wrong with that?

 

If you let your phone ring longer than 30 seconds something is wrong with you :p

 

And iTunes is just a part of life just like how a Microsoft Account is for Windows Store Apps. Can't get away from these things anymore.

Yes. Admire them from a business standpoint, you must.

 

Regarding iTunes, thats not quite the same. I can download an mp3 outside of Windows Store on a Windows Phone. Try that with an iPhone or iPad that isn't jailbroken.

Yes. Admire them from a business standpoint, you must.

 

Regarding iTunes, thats not quite the same. I can download an mp3 outside of Windows Store on a Windows Phone. Try that with an iPhone or iPad that isn't jailbroken.

 

Oh you mean importing an MP3 to your phone? Yeah sucks you gotta use iTunes for that although it isn't totally awful anymore. It is better than WMP which hasn't had any real attention in the past 5 years and lacks so many features I have lost count.

If you let your phone ring longer than 30 seconds something is wrong with you :p

 

 

The length limitation causes me to have to put more thought into creating the ringtone. I use tracks ripped from games. 30 seconds isn't a lot to work with. No reason you shouldn't be able to select any mp3 or AAC file and set it as a ring tone other than Apple wanting to make it a PITA just so the brain dead will hop on iTunes and buy a 30 second clip of a song they already own the full version of.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!