Recommended Posts

Just like Doc mentioned......

SpaceX To Debut Upgraded Falcon 9 on Return to Flight Mission

Falcon-9-DSCOVR-Launch-879x485.thumb.jpg
A SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 rocket launches from Cape Canaveral, Florida. The Falcon 9 return-to-flight mission will be the first of an upgraded version with increased performance. Credit: SpaceX

PASADENA, Calif. — The return to flight of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, still a “couple of months” away, will also be the first launch of an upgraded version of the vehicle with increased performance, the company’s president said Aug. 31.

Speaking at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics’ Space 2015 conference here, Gwynne Shotwell said the company was working through a series of intensive reviews of the Falcon 9 after its June failure while preparing the latest upgrade to the vehicle to increase its performance.

“Our next flight will be both the return to flight and the first flight of the upgraded vehicle,” she said. “So whenever people ask me what keeps me up at night, it’s getting ready for that flight.”

 

SpaceX had been working for some time on a upgrade to the current Falcon 9 v1.1, sometimes called v1.2, that features engines with increased thrust, providing an increase in performance of about 30 percent. That first launch of the upgraded Falcon 9 was scheduled for September before the June 28 launch failure.

Shotwell said after her panel session that there is a payload assigned to that return-to-flight mission, but could not name it without the permission of the customer. Prior to the launch failure, SES was scheduled to launch its SES-9 satellite on the first upgraded Falcon launch.

SpaceX blamed the June launch failure on a broken strut holding down a helium bottle in a propellant tank in the rocket’s upper stage. Helium leaking from the bottle then caused the tank to overpressurize and burst. Shotwell said SpaceX still believes that is the root cause of the failure.

Shotwell added that while this problem is relatively straightforward to correct, SpaceX is also examining the vehicle for other potential issues. “What we wanted to do was to take advantage of the lessons that we learned from that particular failure and make sure we’re not seeing something like that anywhere throughout the vehicle,” she said. That includes a series of top-down reviews, and having the work done by every company engineer checked by another engineer.

That additional investigation has delayed the vehicle’s next launch. While SpaceX Chief Executive Elon Musk said in July the vehicle could return to flight in September, Shotwell suggested it may be November before that launch takes place. “It’s taking more time than we originally envisioned to get back to flight,” she acknowledged. “We’re a couple of months away from the next flight.”

Shotwell remained optimistic about not just returning the Falcon 9 to flight this year, but also successfully landing the vehicle’s first stage, either on an oceangoing platform or a pad on land, as part of SpaceX’s efforts to develop a reusable version of the vehicle. The company has attempted landings of the first stage on its “autonomous spaceport drone ship” after launches in January and April, but neither was successful.

“I want to see a Falcon 9 first stage land on a drone ship or land on my landing site this year,” she said. “I want to stick a landing this year.”

 

 

 http://spacenews.com/spacex-to-debut-upgraded-falcon-9-on-return-to-flight-mission/

Ed_the_Sock.thumb.jpg.1f45808560b15e164f

 

  • Like 1

And the v1.2 is going to be significantly taller, about 4.5 meters +/-, with the standard 5.2x13.1 meter fairing. This will also translate to a longer Falcon Heavy. A stretched fairing for future large USAF payloads or Bigelow habitats has also been rumored, which would make it several more meters taller.

  • Like 2

Booyah....  

Court order...

http://www.geekwire.com/2015/blue-origins-rocket-landing-patent-canceled-in-victory-for-spacex/

Blue Origin’s rocket-landing patent canceled in victory for SpaceX

Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin space venture has capitulated to Elon Musk’s SpaceX in a dispute over a Blue Origin patent covering the landing of rockets at sea.

In an order made public today, the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board granted a motion to cancel the remaining 13 of 15 claims in the Blue Origin rocket-landing patent. Blue Origin itself had made the motion to cancel those claims, effectively acknowledging that its case was lost.
>

  • Like 2

Yessssss....Although this took awhile :)

Ed_the_Sock.thumb.jpg.e7354eea10635357ae
/s..commentary by Ed the sock..."The only Blue Origin I know is what comes out after pretzels and beer"

Ed gets a little grumpy at times.....:woot:

 

Not sure where Blue Origin got the idea that they could patent "Rocket landings at sea". Glad they saw the light and dropped it.

So there are, what 2/15 claims left to deal with in court? Or are those already dealt with?

The rest were dropped by the court months ago, with comments that hinted strongly that this was coming. Way too much prior NASA and AIAA art, sci-fi depictions, novel descriptions etc. Also it flunked the obviousness test.

  • Like 1

Actually, I can't fathom why one would even attempt to patent "idea's", knowing full well that they had no pioneering work in such "idea's". Leads me to one of two conclusions....problems with the patent process itself, being "watered down", or too much time hanging around Bruno.....:/ 

  • Like 1

Newer article with a bit of goodies...

Falcon 9 rocket to be grounded longer than expected

 

15897064804_37f0f388ec_k.thumb.jpg.3a04c
File photo of a Falcon 9 launch in February 2015. Credit: NASA/KSC

The beginning of November will be the earliest SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket can resume launching after a June 28 failure blamed on a deficient structural support brace inside the the vehicle’s second stage, a SpaceX executive said Monday.

The next launch will be the 20th flight of a Falcon 9 rocket and the first with up-rated engines operating at higher thrust levels than previous missions, according to Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX’s president and chief operating officer.

“Obviously, we’ve got a return-to-flight sitting in front of us here coupled with the latest upgrade to the Falcon 9 launch vehicle,” Shotwell said Monday at a conference in California sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. “Our next flight will be both the return-to-flight and the first flight of the upgraded vehicle, so whenever people ask me what keeps me up at night, it’s that flight — getting ready for that flight.”

Speaking to reporters in July, SpaceX chief executive Elon Musk said he expected the Falcon 9 could resume flying as soon as September.

“We’re taking more time than we originally envisioned to get back to flight, but I don’t think any one of our customers wants us to race to the cliff and fail again,” Shotwell said. “So we’re a couple of months away from the next flight and we will have been through a pretty thorough top-down single-point failure review.

“Every engineer in the company is having a buddy check their work, and we’re doing deep dives throughout our supply chain to make sure we don’t see what we saw on our last flight,” Shotwell said.

Shotwell said Monday the diagnosis of the failure shared by Musk in July still stands. The investigation into the June 28 launch failure, which is led by SpaceX with support from federal agencies, narrowed in on a strut supporting a helium pressurant tank suspended inside the second stage liquid oxygen tank.

Engineers believe the strut broke under launch loads, causing the high-pressure helium gas tank to break free, leading to the disintegration the liquid oxygen tank and the upper stage.

Musk said the strut came from a supplier and future structural braces will be more stringently tested by SpaceX to ensure they meet specifications.

“What we’re trying to do is not only go fix that particular problem,” Shotwell said. “That’s an easy problem to go fix, but what we wanted to do is to take advantage of the lessons we had learned from that particular failure and make sure we’re not seeing something like that anywhere throughout the vehicle or the supply chain.”

A Dragon supply ship heading for the International Space Station was destroyed in the crash. SpaceX holds a multibillion-dollar contract to NASA to ferry cargo, provisions and experiments to and from the space station.

The flight was the seventh in a series of at least 15 resupply missions SpaceX has under contract with NASA.

SpaceX says it has more than 50 missions on its manifest in the coming years. The company’s customers say their payloads set to go up on the next few Falcon 9 flights are complete as they await a launch date from SpaceX.

Shotwell did not identify which mission would fly next, but it is expected to be the SES 9 television broadcasting satellite, which was set to go up on the first upgraded Falcon 9 from Cape Canaveral before the June failure. SES officials did not respond to questions on the matter.

The eighth Dragon resupply launch from Florida could follow SES 9. Its launch is expected no earlier than mid-November, according to former Apollo astronaut Tom Stafford, chairman of the International Space Station Advisory Committee.

Mike Suffredini, NASA’s outgoing space station program manager said in an interview with Spaceflight Now he expects SpaceX can be ready to launch its next cargo flight to the complex around December. Suffredini told Spaceflight Now that NASA has requested not to be be first in line to fly on the Falcon 9’s new upgraded configuration.

The new Falcon 9 will have nine Merlin 1D first stage engines qualified to run at higher throttle settings, reaching a maximum power of about 170,000 pounds of thrust, up from 147,000 pounds of thrust at its current levels.

An up-rated Merlin vacuum engine on the second stage will generate 210,000 pounds of thrust, according to presentations by NASA officials.

The engines will burn kerosene fuel chilled to give it greater density, a metric that improves rocket performance.

Other Falcon 9 missions that could fly before the end of the year include a launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California with the U.S.-French Jason 3 oceanography satellite, which was supposed to launch in early August before delays due to the June rocket mishap.

A NASA spokesperson said the Falcon 9 second stage set to launch the Jason 3 spacecraft was shipped back to SpaceX’s factory in Hawthorne, California, from its launch site at Vandenberg.

And 11 new satellites for Orbcomm’s mobile communications and asset tracking fleet are expected to be aboard the second or third launch of the new full-thrust Falcon 9, according to Marc Eisenberg, Orbcomm’s CEO.

 

 http://spaceflightnow.com/2015/09/01/falcon-9-rocket-to-be-grounded-longer-than-expected/

:laugh:

  • Like 1

“We’re taking more time than we originally envisioned to get back to flight, but I don’t think any one of our customers wants us to race to the cliff and fail again,” Shotwell said. “So we’re a couple of months away from the next flight and we will have been through a pretty thorough top-down single-point failure review.

“Every engineer in the company is having a buddy check their work, and we’re doing deep dives throughout our supply chain to make sure we don’t see what we saw on our last flight,” Shotwell said.

This. I saw this statement and I smiled. For those of us who know just how involved a "deep-dive" is in Engineering terms, I'll explain it. They're checking every part, every process, and every Engineer is doing peer-review with one or more Engineers (and even Specialists) to make sure everything is up to snuff. It's a safe bet that every worker in the assembly process is triple-checking every rivet, weld, joint, fitting, and assemblage to make sure there's nothing on their station that's out of sorts (and likely running it through a peer-review procedure of their own) before it's sent off to the next station to continue the assembly process.

Yeah ... do your thing, SpaceX. No such thing as being too careful. :yes:

  • Like 2

Now we are getting somewhere....can't wait......Is that a photo of the "real deal" without the landing legs?

Sure looks real enough, but I doubt it. Unless they've got a Test Launch planned that they haven't said anything about.

Sure looks real enough, but I doubt it. Unless they've got a Test Launch planned that they haven't said anything about.

 

Thats an excellent bit of artwork by one of NSF's resident graphics guys. Even SpaceXers download their images for desktops etc, and they love 'm. You should also see their guesstimated L2 BFR and MCT images....wow, just wow. Really drives home what beasts they'll be.

Now for SpaceX's own artwork of F9 v1.2 and FH v1.2 on LC-39A. They're going to remove the Shuttle Rotating Service Structure (RSS) and enclose the Fixed Service Structure (FSS tower). A new transporter erector (TE) and enclosed ramp and rails for the TE. The FSS will also get 2 more levels to house the Dragon 2 crew access structure and a few other goodies.

The hangar looks small in these images,  but it can hold 5 Falcon 9's or a Falcon Heavy and 2 Falcon 9's for processing. The idea is to eventually have a Run 'n Gun rapid launch capability. 1 hour from rollout to T-0.

The hangar and launch mount are up, the ramp is graded but not yet fully clad, the rails are going in, and the TE is under construction. FSS tower work is also being done, but remoing RSS will wait a while.  Full sized images on their FB page.

3f260a87506830da5f1cd2a1f5ffde6e.jpg

438c3cc06f02ad766b19c82116afe9ed.jpg

 

  • Like 3

Doc...The guys do great work there......hard to wait for the real deal when you know it is just around the corner.....

// On another note.....:(

"there back........"

2DrEvil.thumb.jpg.3ef6c2a1c152cea28d43fc

Colorado Lawmaker Pushes U.S. Air Force To Scrutinize SpaceX

blah...blah...blah

http://spacenews.com/colorado-lawmaker-pushes-u-s-air-force-to-scrutinize-spacex/

This article doesn't deserve any "air time".

I feel frustrated when "these people" continually bash SpaceX for personal gain. If they have something of "merit", we're all ears.....but not this. I must admit, SpaceX handles this well by not retaliating and referring to the proper authorities for analysis. Actions speak louder than words for Spacex, and they will do well for themselves, as other startups are doing.

All that I can hope, is that knowledgeable American taxpayers can see through the ongoing ruse(s).

Later.....:(

  • Like 1

Yup. If it weren't for the money Boeing wouldn't be building CST-100, and proof is they did little beyond paper milestones, and recertifying hardware they'd already certified for other projects,  before they got their CCtCap contract. Only after did they bend metal. All else was plywood and Styrofoam mockups.

SpaceX was going to build Crew Dagon 2 regardless, it'd just take longer.

  • Like 1

More proof that what Trump said during the debate was true. The U.S. Political System, top to bottom, is horribly broken. He stopped just short of saying it was an Oligarchy. I don't want to mix politics with Science and Space Exploration, but sadly the two are intertwined and have been since the beginning; and it needs to change. It's always about money and power, ultimately -- and it's a crime against humanity because Space Exploration and Achievement benefits all of us, not just one power group (or nation) over another. The pi**ing contests need to end. YESTERDAY.

Sorry, everyone .. those of us who grew up during the Cold War Era are tired of the old rivalries being rekindled, and new ones popping up because the "Old Guard" can't function without their arbitrary "Us-Versus-Them" mentality. Some of us have actually evolved past the need to have an enemy.

  • Like 1

In politics, there will always be an enemy for the need to fill the "gravy train"...In science...no...case in point, North America, most of South America, the European union, many far east countries and especially Russia, all want to co-operate and exchange scientific data...has been for a long time, it's the politicians inflicting the damage. Science has NO seats for politicians.

:)

  • Like 1

But have our past enemies moved past needing an enemy? No sign yet that some have. 

And this really is the problem. Everyone has legitimate issues with everyone else. Everyone is messing with someone else, to one degree or another. Some more than others, but no single Nation is free of wrongdoing. Until everyone can honestly agree to cease any and all "shenanigans" and stick to it, stop poking others with sharp sticks, and decide that we're all better off together than apart, things will only continue to deteriorate.

The old mentalities, mindsets, backstabbing and "being ugly towards one another" will destroy Humanity. It's not if, but when.

Maybe that's the whole plan. We certainly have it in ourselves to evolve and accomplish great things; but we need to overcome this petty, barbaric, and childish compulsion to destroy first.

  • Like 1

I'm not sure having "enemies" is totally a bad thing as long as we don't spend all our time fighting each other.  I think of "enemies" as more of a competitor.  The science and studies will eventually get shared one way or another.  Competition often brings out the best in people (and sometimes the worst too).  If we didn't get into a space race with Russia, would have we been on the moon already?  I'm not so sure we would have, or if we did, it would have took many years longer to get there and loads of more money.  I think we would all get lazy if it weren't for competition or enemies.

 

Just my 2 cents..

We have healthy competition in the workplace all the time, competing against the projects "enemy"........But, it does Not mean we want to Kill them....For the 21st century, this ludicrous attitude has to stop. Just my opinion here, but as a cold war veteran, after the patriotism wears thin, you begin to realize that you are a lunch box worker, pawn or drone...who is no different than any lunch box worker in other countries....at the end of the day, all you want to do is care and feed your family......lunch box workers have a common bond, one to take care of our families, and the other, a dislike how politicians treat others. If you have ever sat  on a bar stool, in a foreign country, and "talked" to others from many countries...you know what I am talking about.  We have enough resources to put a big dent in poverty, sickness and malnutrition, world wide and still explore for the betterment of mankind......once you reign in the (insert verb) military/industrial/political network. Others may have different views and they are entitled to them. My view has been formed from my personal experience...nothing more...nothing less.

Later.....:)

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!