Recommended Posts

I still wonder what the purpose of that new engine (if ever made) will be. I mean, Atlas V is ULA property and if they do not want to roll with replacing the engines of it (since they rather see Vulcan developed)... then what is that new engine going to be good for?

So we have SpaceX, BO, OrbitalATK, Aerojet and ULA testifying at that hearing! SpaceX will never sell engines to 3rd parties, only sell launches on their own rocket(s). BO seems to be willing to sell theirs (to ULA at least) as well as use it for their own future rockets. Orbital... Lol, hey lets replace that Russian engine with another? What are they going to bring to the table? Aerojet just wants to soak up that government money for their AR-1 engine, which I believe ULA has no interrest in. And ULA is probably only going to be plugging their Vulcan! Should make for a very interresting hearing to watch indeed!

The funding is really for the AeroJet AR-1, which is promoted to be a drop-in replacement for RD-180 on Atlas V and ready by 2018-2019. Tony Bruno of ULA has been skeptical that AeroJet can make that date, so he went for BE-4 as the primary and AR-1 as Plan B.

The funding is really for the AeroJet AR-1, which is promoted to be a drop-in replacement for RD-180 on Atlas V and ready by 2018-2019. Tony Bruno of ULA has been skeptical that AeroJet can make that date, so he went for BE-4 as the primary and AR-1 as Plan B.

 

Who've they got working in the design & build departments? Snails? :p

I am not convinced that Bruno even wants the AR-1 as a drop in! He's on a cost lowering quest, and keeping his current rocket lines does not fit in that picture!

He has already axed D4M, said heavy would be maintained to cover its class (but very expensive) and pitched Vulcan as the ultimate replacement for both.

To add to that, he flipped off Aerojet amongst others when they went after the IP for Atlas V!

Seriously! That AR-1 is going to be just another very expensive paperweight!

Ps... FU iPhone and ur rediculous autocorrects all the time... I need 5 times as much time to even type this :x

How can the BE4 be a drop in replacement for the RD180 on Atlas V?

>

Me upthread

The funding is really for the AeroJet AR-1, which is promoted to be a drop-in replacement for RD-180 on Atlas V and ready by 2018-2019.

BE-4 would be used with parts of Delta IV (tanks etc.) to build Vulcan. Being 5 meters instead of Atlas V's 3.81 meters gives the Delta IV tanks the extra volume to make up for liquid methane's lower bulk density. Delta IV also has an insulated fuel tank for liquid hydrogen, which would also be necessary for Vulcan's liquid methane.

Me upthread

BE-4 would be used with parts of Delta IV (tanks etc.) to build Vulcan. Being 5 meters instead of Atlas V's 3.81 meters gives the Delta IV tanks the extra volume to make up for liquid methane's lower bulk density. Delta IV also has an insulated fuel tank for liquid hydrogen, which would also be necessary for Vulcan's liquid methane.

Happy B Day......... :D

Interesting article on NASA Spaceflight website......pertaining to world launch markets leaning towards reusability....

 

A couple of SpaceX  "goodies" quoted.......Check out full article below...

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2015/06/world-launch-markets-rocket-reusability/

 

 

 

That barge is in fact part of the long-range goal of proving to the United States Air Force (USAF) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that successful pinpoint landings can be achieved in routine fashion

post-546174-0-14790500-1435212769.jpg

CRS-6 landing tracking camera

http://youtu.be/NcTOTeoaafU

Article

http://www.spacex.com/news/2015/06/24/why-and-how-landing-rockets

crs6_landing4.3.jpg

>

That controlled descent was spectacular, but about 10 seconds before landing, a valve controlling the rockets engine power (thrust) temporarily stopped responding to commands as quickly as it should have. As a result, it throttled down a few seconds later than commanded, andwith the rocket weighing about 67,000 lbs and traveling nearly 200 mph at this pointa few seconds can be a very long time. With the throttle essentially stuck on high and the engine firing longer than it was supposed to, the vehicle temporarily lost control and was unable to recover in time for landing, eventually tipping over.

>

Post-launch analysis has confirmed the throttle valve as the sole cause of this hard landing. The team has made changes to help prevent, and be able to rapidly recover from, similar issues for the next attempt, which will be on our next launchthe eighth Falcon 9 and Dragon cargo mission to the space station, currently scheduled for this Sunday.

Even given everything weve learned, the odds of succeeding on our third attempt to land on a drone ship (a new one named Of Course I Still Love You) are uncertain, but tune in here this Sunday as we try to get one step closer toward a fully and rapidly reusable rocket.

Although SpaceX had a setback....things can still turn around for commercial as well as crewed launches.....

 

 

 

"You want a really, really reliable rocket before you put people on it," says Jonathan McDowell of Harvard University. Now that SpaceX has lost its perfect launch record with this rocket, it will need to quickly convince people that the rocket can be trusted, he says. "Yesterday [the Falcon 9] was 18 for 18 and looking pretty good. Now it is 18 for 19. That's a 5 percent failure rate."

But if another 10 launches of Falcon 9 proceed without incident, that will bring the failure rate to 3.5 per cent, which could be acceptable, he says.

Among almost two tonnes of supplies and equipment in the Dragon capsule atop the rocket were two docking stations, intended for Space X to dock its crewed Dragon capsule to the International Space Station (ISS). It was also carrying several plant and animal experiments.

The failure shouldn't force a delay in plans to launch the first crewed space mission on US soil since 2011, said William Gerstenmaier, NASA's associate administrator for human exploration, at a press conference. "It could help us to nail down designs and move forward," he said.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27794-spacex-rocket-explosion-is-setback-for-us-crewed-space-missions.html

 

 

McDowell says there are probably no safety procedures that SpaceX would undertake during a crewed flight that could have prevented this explosion. "But Crew Dragon would have an escape system that would save the capsule, so you wouldn't have killed the crew."

 

 

Watching from on board the ISS, US astronaut Scott Kelly summed up the sentiment in a tweet: "Space is hard."

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27794-spacex-rocket-explosion-is-setback-for-us-crewed-space-missions.html


Now that SpaceX has lost its perfect launch record with this rocket, it will need to quickly convince people that the rocket can be trusted, he says. "Yesterday [the Falcon 9] was 18 for 18 and looking pretty good. Now it is 18 for 19. That's a 5 percent failure rate."

 

IF it should turn out that the failure was due to the IDA breaking loose from its mounts, wouldn't that restore SpaceX percentages? :p  After all, that would mean it wasn't the rocket itself that failed! 

IF it should turn out that the failure was due to the IDA breaking loose from its mounts, wouldn't that restore SpaceX percentages? :p  After all, that would mean it wasn't the rocket itself that failed! 

If that would be the case...I see another problem of reporting.........LAWYERS..........the bane of society. I would assume all members in the investigation would have to come to a consensus of the cause, if a cause can be determined. Was it primary design of the launch vehicle, was it a "sloppy" install of cargo, is it a vendor quality issue. All scenarios would have a requirement of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof"...which honestly, I can't see being available...anything outright obvious would be out by now. My hunch would be an undetermined probable cause of load shift with corrective measures to be taken and the Falcon itself, partially absolved but more stringent checking of future loads and possibly a load barricade design of some form for future "trunk" use. This is probably wishful thinking on my part, being a huge SpaceX fan.....but at the end of the day...can't see anyone external being tagged....will probably go down to procedural due to it being inconclusive...and safeguards to be implemented and possibly an (*) placed by the launch to improve reliability numbers. SpaceX will take the hit, but confidence will be improved and back to work with all eyes on all launches for a while.....and like Doc mentioned...put the damn code in for the chutes on Dragon 1 abort to save the load......... If only the code was there or used if there.........no cargo loss then.....

 

Okay.......it's laugh at me time....teflon suit on........... :(

No laughing, DD, it's actually a great idea. No need for the asbestos-lined suit, buddy. *highfive*

 

Abort + "Save the shipment" procedures would have really been handy for CRS-7. I'm sure it's been brought to SpaceX's attention already.

  • Like 1

SpaceX is already planning the transition to a Cargo Dragon 2 with SuperDraco abort capability. Gwynne Shotwell mentioned it in an Aviation Week interview some time ago.

Also,

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet
  • Like 2

SpaceX is already planning the transition to a Cargo Dragon 2 with SuperDraco abort capability. Gwynne Shotwell mentioned it in an Aviation Week interview some time ago.

Also,

Excellent news on the certification......was hoping it wouldn't take a hit.......

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!