Suggestions for a good budget smartphone to test/compare Android


Recommended Posts

Hi.


I have experience using Windows Phone & iOS smartphones, including the current iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus.  However, I have never used an Android device other than briefling owning the originial Nexus 7 tablet for about a week and deciding to sell it.

I am looking to get a nice flagship smartphone, but I'm not really sure Windows Phone would work for me due to the "app gap".  An iPhone would probably work well for me, but I would really like to consider an Android device.

I am looking to buy a budget Android smartphone to test the current state of Android, apps, etc. and get an idea if I think Android would work for me.  I am in the United States.  My plan is to test and use the phone as a Wi-Fi device and not even turn on or use any cellular service, but, yes, it would be nice if I could get a device that supported the common GSM bands used in the United States.

Perhaps the best option would be a Motorola Moto G 2nd generation or possibly a Moto G LTE 3rd gen if I could get a hold of one.  For just a little more money, the JiaYu S3 (https://www.neowin.net/news/review-of-the-jiayu-s3-hands-down-the-best-smartphone-you-can-get-for-under-200) or the upcoming Oukitel U9 (https://www.neowin.net/news/the-oukitel-u9-packs-a-1080p-25d-screen-3-gb-of-ram-and-worldwide-lte-support) might be good choices.  Since this device is primarily for testing and kicking the tires of Android and the ecosystem, I don't really want to spend more than $200 or so.

Is there another really good alternative that I am not aware of?  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

-JayZJay

Are you willing to get a used phone? If so, check out swappa. You could get a used Samsung Galaxy S4, or LG G2, or HTC One M7, or Nexus 5, all for < $200. If you want new, I'd go with the Moto G or E. What carrier do you have? 

 

What do you look for in a phone OS? Android is good if you utilize Google services, and is pretty much the only mobile OS that lets you customize it to your heart's desire.

  • Like 1

I would prefer to purchase a new phone, not used.  I do not currently have any carrier or contract obligations.  Again, I'm only buying this "budget" device for testing purposes and to see what I think about the current state of Android, the apps, ecosystem, etc.  Then, I plan on making a decision as to a flagship device and going probably with iOS or Android over Windows Mobile.  I just don't see Windows Mobile as being a viable option for me at this point based on my experience with Windows Phone and the apps I desire to use in some cases. 

 

I use both Gmail and Outlook/Live email accounts, but I use more Microsoft services than Google, including Office 365 and OneDrive.  As far as my PC preferences, I'm a heavy Windows user.  So, I don't have any Apple/Mac incentives to go with an iPhone even though I like iPhones well enough.

Windows 10 is right around the corner, and will bring big improvements over the current (pathetic) state of WP. It should solve some of the app gap situation, as well as make a better experience for integration with other Windows devices. It'd be nice to hopefully see new flagships once WP10 releases, as there hasn't been a good WP flagship/mid-level phones recently. The nice thing about Microsoft is their services work great on iOS and Android, and we even get the newest app releases first ;)  

Out of the three big voice assistants, Google Now blows the other two out of the water, imo. You can try out Google Now if you have Chrome installed. 

 

To answer your phone question, I'd stick with either the Moto G/E, or the new Asus ZenFone 2.

i would say Moto G is your best bet.   Though I really don't see the point of going with the new phone, for your testing purposes.  but whatever, if you are set on getting a new phone only, moto g is likely your best bet.

 

i cannot comment on that chinese phones though, since i am not sure about compatibility with usa networks,   but since you are mostly planning to do wifi,  it seems a decent idea.

 

 

moto g you can just go and buy in bestbuy.

  • Like 1

Windows 10 is right around the corner, and will bring big improvements over the current (pathetic) state of WP. It should solve some of the app gap situation, as well as make a better experience for integration with other Windows devices. It'd be nice to hopefully see new flagships once WP10 releases, as there hasn't been a good WP flagship/mid-level phones recently. The nice thing about Microsoft is their services work great on iOS and Android, and we even get the newest app releases first ;)

Out of the three big voice assistants, Google Now blows the other two out of the water, imo. You can try out Google Now if you have Chrome installed. 

 

To answer your phone question, I'd stick with either the Moto G/E, or the new Asus ZenFone 2.

But what if you are in a situation where voice is a nonstarter?

 

THAT is where Cortana, to put it bluntly, stands both apart AND alone.

 

Cortana - unlike either Google Now OR Siri - supports typed entry via virtual keyboards on smartphones and tablets, and real keyboards where supported - such as PCs, laptops, and notebooks.

 

If Google Now and Siri are mere voice assistants, Cortana is a real Virtual Assistant.  Which would YOU rather have?

 

By the by, Cortana IS available for Android and iOS.

But what if you are in a situation where voice is a nonstarter?

 

THAT is where Cortana, to put it bluntly, stands both apart AND alone.

 

Cortana - unlike either Google Now OR Siri - supports typed entry via virtual keyboards on smartphones and tablets, and real keyboards where supported - such as PCs, laptops, and notebooks.

 

If Google Now and Siri are mere voice assistants, Cortana is a real Virtual Assistant.  Which would YOU rather have?

 

By the by, Cortana IS available for Android and iOS.

Well Google Now integrates with the Google (search) app on Android, where you definitely can type something (with Bluetooth keyboard or phone keyboard). Cortana integrates into Windows 10, while Google Now requires Chrome on a Windows PC. I would still rather have Google Now. BTW, Cortana isn't available for Android or iOS just yet, it's coming...

Let me ask this again.  If I was to go ahead and look at a very good/like new condition used phone, what would be the phones that stand out that I should perhaps look for and/or consider?  Even used, is a Moto G (2nd gen) or a Nexus 5 the best choices?

Let me ask this again.  If I was to go ahead and look at a very good/like new condition used phone, what would be the phones that stand out that I should perhaps look for and/or consider?  Even used, is a Moto G (2nd gen) or a Nexus 5 the best choices?

If luck is on your side, HTC, Samsung, Sony, all turn up their high end devices from time to time, Z2's and sometimes the occasional z3, I've seen a HTC one device, but I have no idea which model, not to mention the usual Sammy suspects GS3, GS4, etc...

 

BUT

If you like your music loud, I'll vote for a moto g (as I have done in many countless threads, in my experience, it is the only phone that rivals an iPhone for sheer volume, unmodified) 

My money? I'm waiting for the Elephone P8000 (admittedly a little out of your budget, 10 US dollars plus taxes) If I hate it, I'll pass it off onto my wife or son, and keep my moto g 4g)

  • 3 weeks later...

To test a good Android Device, then I would suggest you some best mobile phone that get more attention of people 2015, these are: Galaxy S6, Moto G, Galaxy Note 4 and Galaxy Edge. All Android mobile phone has great features and specifications that you love most.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!