Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

They've been making (and continue to make ) a lot of common sense changes. So that's good. :) Tabbed Explorer, Virtual Desktops, Notification Center, reduced window borders, windowed apps... all good (as OS X users will know... :p )

File Explorer has tabs now?

Meh never been a fan of tabbed file managers (not that I've heard anything about it being added but *shrug* never know), really doesn't make anything more convenient -- split window though I'd like to see, that's much more useful.
  • Like 2

They've been making (and continue to make ) a lot of common sense changes. So that's good. :) Tabbed Explorer, Virtual Desktops, Notification Center, reduced window borders, windowed apps... all good (as OS X users will know... :p )

There are no tabs in Threshold's current File Explorer as far as we know...

No tabbed file explorer yet but who knows?   It could be an option one can turn on or off in a future build maybe but for now it doesn't look to be in there.    The only app we know is getting a new UI, or we're told is, is IE12.     There's a number of things they can do still though, I want to see more things added to PC settings, advanced options you can still only find in control panel.   Then we can finally replace control panel IMO.  And why does the taskbar have it's own settings box?  I think those options/settings should be in the PC settings section as well.    Still a good number of stuff scattered around and not centralized that should be.

sorry guys, I sort of assumed tabs were coming after Neowin had reported on it... (or did I only dream that?)   :blush:  

I don't think anything has been reported, by Neowin or any other site, about File Explorer except the change in icon :)

 

 

Storage Sense is coming though.

15sauft.png

be careful if you have an Nvidia card and multi monitor. unless Nvidia has fixed it, having Hyper-V installed will make your extra monitor black.

 

what? i do have a laptop with Hyper-V enabled, multimonitors and a nvidia card and i don't have that issue at all...

 

I only heard one issue relevant to nvidida in Hyper-V which seems to be fixed now: http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3491

what? i do have a laptop with Hyper-V enabled, multimonitors and a nvidia card and i don't have that issue at all...

 

They might have fixed it in newer drivers, or you never upgraded to the latest "big" release, though it's been like 6 months or so now. 

Why would you want a tabbed file explorer... it makes no sense. you don't have thta many explorer windows open at a time, and when you do tiling them makes a lot more sense. 

Two things I would like Win9 to fix...

 

post-119000-0-51239800-1410735030.png

 

That monitor icon is beyond ugly and has been around since 9x. They redid the screen resolution options quite a while ago, they should model the wallpaper options after that.

 

post-119000-0-67325900-1410735035.png

 

Not only is that mouse icon ugly and also from the 9x era, this entire properties page is bad. Use of battleship gray clashes with the rest of the UI, and this Control Panel applet opens its own window, instead of being inline like the rest of the Control Panel applets, which also goes against the Aero guidelines Microsoft defined with Vista.

 

I just realized I could properly go on and on, because Windows is full of dozens of inconsistencies like this. These really are the things Win9 ought to fix, no matter how minor they are.

What really annoys me is the User Accounts icon in Control Panel, the ugly outdated interface of Disk Management (and other built-in OS management programs), and Performance Options, there must be a way to better organize all the performance options.

 

Also, while I was digging around in the User Accounts in CP, on the left pane I opened Change my environment variables and Configure advanced user properties to find the old battleship grey popping up in the obscure dialogue/window. Should we start a thread for just inconsistencies? 

  • Like 2

What really annoys me is the User Accounts icon in Control Panel, the ugly outdated interface of Disk Management (and other built-in OS management programs), and Performance Options, there must be a way to better organize all the performance options.

 

Also, while I was digging around in the User Accounts in CP, on the left pane I opened Change my environment variables and Configure advanced user properties to find the old battleship grey popping up in the obscure dialogue/window. Should we start a thread for just inconsistencies? 

We could, sure. And what annoys me is Microsoft surely knows these things exist, and yet seemingly has no interest whatsoever in fixing them. First impressions are important, but so is consistency. It's 2014 and I still have no idea how any given element in Windows will look or work. Will it open inline, will it spawn its own window? Will it look like it belongs in the OS or will it be a holdover from an earlier time?

 

It's like when Vista was still using the Win3x font installer. It was changed in 7, but only because Microsoft got so much ridicule for never bothering to get rid of it in the first place.

 

It's like when Vista was still using the Win3x font installer. It was changed in 7, but only because Microsoft got so much ridicule for never bothering to get rid of it in the first place.

 

It was also redundant and left in for obscure backwards compatibility, it wasn't really needed anymore. 

 

And bad icons actually server a purpose, somehow regular users don't think they should go places that don't look pretty. so it keeps idiots out of areas they shouldn't be messing.  and the sections are also used so rarely even by professionals, it doesn't serve any meaning to make them pretty, especially when they are in an UI that's being deprecated anyway. 

 

proper resource allocation, making these things "pretty" isn't it.  

 

Heck the whole screen saver is pretty deprecated as a function. 

It was also redundant and left in for obscure backwards compatibility, it wasn't really needed anymore. 

 

And bad icons actually server a purpose, somehow regular users don't think they should go places that don't look pretty. so it keeps idiots out of areas they shouldn't be messing.  and the sections are also used so rarely even by professionals, it doesn't serve any meaning to make them pretty, especially when they are in an UI that's being deprecated anyway. 

 

proper resource allocation, making these things "pretty" isn't it.  

 

Heck the whole screen saver is pretty deprecated as a function. 

If bad icons are intentionally being left in for the purpose you stated, I'm sorry, that's just really, really stupid on Microsoft's part.

 

And I realize updating icons and other aspects of the OS isn't a high priority, which brings me to a point I've asked before. Why doesn't Microsoft have a team of graphic designers whose job is to provide unified icons and ensure all areas of the OS function in a similar manner, in accordance with the HIG that Microsoft updated for the Vista era? I don't think expecting an OS to look and function in a similar fashion from one app to another is too much to ask. Not to mention, changing up graphics isn't hard, given that in the past, those changes usually appeared around the RC stage.

 

I seem to actually recall that Microsoft doesn't even have a dedicated team of graphic designers. And that the various departments don't work together, like the Windows team and Office team. I hope some of that has changed, because that's quite sad. It's one of the things that Apple does every well. Yosemite isn't even released yet and already, it has updated graphics and design. So even the oldest OS X applications look and feel in place in Yosemite.

 

I guess I just find it odd that a company as large as Microsoft somehow can't balance the essentials that need to be done (obviously this comes first and foremost) with the minor issues that would really help to give Win9 a great first impression.

lol ? 

i guess anything can be rationalized... think different, eh?  :rofl:

 

 

It could just be that while they're "bad" or old it's what people know universally for what it is, if we're talking a specific icon here or there.  Like the icon to print or the cut or to paste.  Those have hardly ever changed and are mostly if not exactly, the same in every app/OS.

if they change the icons, be prepared to hear

"windows 9 icons are too different. its too confusing for consumers. im sticking to windows 7"

Microsoft could personally make the operating system that John Q. wants, and he'd still somehow complain about it.

I really hope they just dump using the current Win32 apps and make everything an app. Sorta like how Material Design for Google is all about making a consistent design across all apps on all types of form factors. Modern UI 2.0 is their chance to do that, if they can make some changes to the guidelines, and account for all the form factors, the Modern design language would actually appeal to desktop users who think it is dull. It has evolved over the years but I think it could use a ton of improvement.

 

Imagine a Modern Internet Explorer that looks and acts like a desktop app, but on a tablet or device with a touchscreen, the app would rearrange itself to be a full-screen experience. The IE12 extensions we are hearing about could run on desktop, tablet, and phone, because it is the same Modern Internet Explorer.

 

Or an Xbox Music app that looks a lot like the one we have now but much more desktop-oriented while windowed, and action center integration on phone, tablet, and desktop.

 

The problem with Modern Windows apps is they don't look right on the desktop in windows. They look boxed up, stand out like a sore thumb. They still expect touch gestures, the app bar still is there and then it's gone. A lot more design work has to be done to the WinRT SDK APIs and Windows itself for Modern apps to coexist on the desktop. But I see the future of Windows is WinRT apps.

Honestly, I don't think judging it over screenshots seems right since it is at its early stages and could possibly be completely different by the time it reaches RTM.

I am afraid, it will look exactly like that on RTM. Microsoft has poor UI taste and sense for consistency.

They might have fixed it in newer drivers, or you never upgraded to the latest "big" release, though it's been like 6 months or so now. 

Why would you want a tabbed file explorer... it makes no sense. you don't have thta many explorer windows open at a time, and when you do tiling them makes a lot more sense. 

 

i'm using the latest drivers, but then again it seems they fixed the problem although I've never experienced any problem.

lol ? 

i guess anything can be rationalized... think different, eh?  :rofl:

 

stop trolling.

 

 I didn't say they left the old ones in on purpose for that. But its a positive aide effect. And again, spending resources changing stuff that's deprecated or getting deprecated is bad business

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!