Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Useless conversation about absolutely nothing.

 

Does anyone read the dev blogs at all?

 

Does anyone here actually know or care why the current Start Menu is a XAML implementation as opposed to the older one in the previous build?!

 

... or that it can still be re enabled?!

 

The ignorance here is mind blowing.

I noticed my version went from 9726 yesterday to 9926 today. I like cortana. gimmicky. yet useful. quite useful for mornings before the kids go to school for deciding if they need jackets. Reno is awfully cold right now. low 20's upper teens lately.

Well, I am sorry..  if you don't like that, you might want to go back to Windows 8 for the time being.

 

Or just wait until third party developers will create better way to add all apps...   just like they did in the past versions of Windows since '95.

 

You might want to replace the menu with classic shell if you want.

 

I'm back in 8.1.1 right now. 10 is a VM. And if I don't make my displeasure over the lack of choice known, how is MS supposed to know that some people want a proper Start Screen? I support the menu coming back for others, but I don't want to use it myself. 

 

And Classic Shell won't help - I don't like any version of the menu! I thought it stunk in 1995, and my opinion never changed.The killer feature of 8 for me was the Screen, a welcome change after 17 years of a barely-usable menu design.

  • Like 2

Useless conversation about absolutely nothing.

 

Does anyone read the dev blogs at all?

 

Does anyone here actually know or care why the current Start Menu is a XAML implementation as opposed to the older one in the previous build?!

 

... or that it can still be re enabled?!

 

The ignorance here is mind blowing.

 

I haven't however, I like how it scrolls down so as to NOT eat up screen space.

This is interesting, please bear with me. I installed Ghost Recon advanced warfighter in windows 8/8.1 and my saved maps in the work folder at " C:\Users\Christopher\AppData\Local\VirtualStore\Program Files (x86)\Ubisoft\Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter\custom_levels\work_temp\1\data\levels\custom_levels\garbanzo beans. inside are my world.xml, units.xml and zones.xml files.

 

it didn't work in Windows 8/8.1 but now works in 10, go figure. But this is great news.

 

as for modern UI people/fans, I noticed that the install to 9726 installed my system to be strictly desktop centric. which bodes well for both camps. which is what I had hoped for all along. the open true connection between the two is the link between both UI's via the start menu. so I think both camps can find a happy medium and everyone can be happy. I have to say AND admit, in your viewing I was wrong with Windows 10. there are some strong but also subtle changes that I can deal with. listen, I'm writing a report on ghost reconners who want to know if in windows 10, they can play the 2001 version of Ghost Recon as there are still loyal gamers. I'll get back to you guys later. thanks for reading my post here.

 

That's not the Start Screen - that's the Menu made full-screen. I want the intelligent use of space 8 gave us, not All Apps crammed in the corner! We don't have 640x480 screens anymore, so economy of space - packing everything in like sardines - is completely unnecessary!

 

huh , what's the difference between a full screen start menu and a start screen? your being pedantic now. only difference I see from windows 8 is that there is a little task bar on the left

 

 

Does anyone here actually know or care why the current Start Menu is a XAML implementation as opposed to the older one in the previous build?!

 

... or that it can still be re enabled?!

 

 

Not particularly. I don't care about the Menu at all. For my purposes I couldn't care less if it ever came back - I don't want it!

 

It's the Start Screen I want! It was the first decent launcher I'd seen since Program Manager was retired. The ability to re-enable the earlier version of the Menu is absolutely useless to me.

huh , what's the difference between a full screen start menu and a start screen? your being pedantic now. only difference I see from windows 8 is that there is a little task bar on the left

 

And that's the problem. I don't want the list, and I certainly don't want All Apps crammed into that sidebar like sardines. We have huge screens these days - why not USE that? Shoving everything into a corner is a total waste of space! Let me turn that 7-style element off, and use the whole screen for All Apps like in 8.x!

  • Like 3

Not particularly. I don't care about the Menu at all. For my purposes I couldn't care less if it ever came back - I don't want it!

 

It's the Start Screen I want! The ability to re-enable the earlier version of the Menu is absolutely useless to me.

 

And that's the problem. I don't want the list, and I certainly don't want All Apps crammed into that sidebar like sardines. We have huge screens these days - why not USE that? Shoving everything into a corner is a total waste of space!

 

but it's early days yet, as you can see that part on the left can't be configured at all at the moment, they're obviously gonna change it and will probably let you remove it altogether.  Oh, I get what you mean by the all apps bit, I can see how you'd find that annoying if you like windows 8's way

 

I'm glad the old style start menu is back though hooray, I hated that damn start screen.  

I agree with +DConnel, the all apps list is a pain to work with at the moment.

 

Has anyone managed to get RSAT working in build 9926? (or are we stuck waiting for an updated release?)

but it's early days yet, as you can see that part on the left can't be configured at all at the moment, they're obviously gonna change it and will probably let you remove it altogether.  Oh, I get what you mean by the all apps bit, I can see how you'd find that annoying if you like windows 8's way

 

I'm glad the old style start menu is back though hooray, I hated that damn start screen.  

 

Choice is a good thing. I'm glad you're getting yours and I hope the feedback I've given will help me get mine.

I initially had that image with many LEDs as the lock screen background, but I switched from it to a custom one. Then, I selected  " Windows Default"  again, and the image changed once more. My question is: does this change daily, or can it be customized in some other way? I certainly can't see it anywhere...

 

 

 

lockscreen.PNG?psid=1

Choice is a good thing. I'm glad you're getting yours and I hope the feedback I've given will help me get mine.

 

oh no the start menu at the moment is far from perfect, like I said, early days.  If it's like this come release day we can both complain together :p

oh no the start menu at the moment is far from perfect, like I said, early days.  If it's like this come release day we can both complain together :p

 

Over some beers? Sounds good.

 

But if the final release looks like this I'll likely stay on 8.1.1 for a while

Currently, the new store is a mess. It scrolls both vertically AND horizontally. So currently with a mouse it is difficult to use. 

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dn554295(v=vs.85).aspx

 

Some WinRT APIs can now "officially" be used from desktop apps. Hadn't noticed this before. I still don't like that so many APIs are not documented with examples, and you have to smack your head against the wall every time something is missing from WinRT. Things as simple as TextBox.Clear() are missing, that you have to do silly things like TextBox.Text = String.Empty; and afterwards handle the focus so that the stupid keyboard doesn't show up again. Dammit.

 

EDIT: "X API / control is currently not available. We may add it in a future version." FFFFFUUUUU!

I want my start screen back!

(On my tablet, as it was in Windows 8.1).

 

I loved:

- The charms bar swipe from left, and the full screen start screen.

- The swipe down to close an app

- Metro Internet Explorer (swipe to go back)

- Auto full screen Metro apps

 

On a tablet, 8.1 was approaching total ease of use. Sad that they chose to abandon this paradigm.

 

But I guess the majority vote counts. I doubt these abilities will be back.

 

Build 9926 is unusable on a tablet (and mine has an 11.6 inch screen)

 

We'll see what happens in future builds, I guess, but it seems as though Microsoft is overcompensating for desktop users.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Happens to the best of us, bro. 😛 
    • Thanks to some of the other recent Windows improvements, I'm optimistic about this one. My quick wishlist would be: perf like the older menu, merge both menus or at the very least, the older menu should be a flyout, not a simulated click to the old menu, and lastly, a customization window to let users move items from one menu to another, so I could bring Send To back to the main menu, and the OneDrive settings to the older.
    • This Gigabyte AMD RX 9070 XT is very good deal despite the launch of 9070 GRE by Sayan Sen Recently we reviewed AMD's latest 1440p gaming card, the Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12GB, for $549. The card is in stock too at that price, though if you want significantly better performance and don't mind spending a bit more, the Gigabyte Gaming model of RX 9070 XT is currently on sale for just $650 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The card employs Gigabyte's WINDFORCE cooling system which combines multiple design elements such as alternate-spinning Hawk fans, a vapor chamber, and composite heat pipes to manage heat dissipation. The Server-grade Thermal conductive gel further helps in this department. The inclusion of a semi-passive cooling mode allows the fans to remain inactive under low workloads, which allows for reduced noise operation during lighter usage. There is dual BIOS switch that allows toggling between performance and silent modes. The technical specifications of the Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT GAMING OC 16G are given in the table below: Specification Value Core Clock Boost Clock: up to 3060 MHz Game Clock: up to 2520 MHz Stream Processors 4096 Memory Clock 20 Gbps Memory Size 16GB Memory Type GDDR6 Memory Bus 256-bit Card Bus Interface PCI Express 5.0 Maximum Resolution 7680 × 4320 Multi-View Support 4 displays Card Dimensions L=288 mm, W=132 mm, H=56 mm Recommended Power Supply 750W Power Connectors 3 × 8-pin Video Outputs 2 × DisplayPort 2.1a 2 × HDMI 2.1b Get it at the link below: GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16GB Graphics Card, GV-R9070XTGAMING OC: $649.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $740) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why does this kind of tactic not surprise me?
    • They used AI based TOOLS to convert the JavaScript engine (the main rendering engine is still C++) and it was not fully automated but was human reviewed. Other subsystems will be looked into to also be converted to Rust in the future. I have no problem with any of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      80
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      63
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!