Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

does anyone have any idea how I get this new OneNote app?  I still have the old one.

 

Edit: Nevermind - I uninstalled it and installed from the 'new' Store.

Who the hell is designing the apps at MS? Are we going to have different design languages every damn year?

 

Apparently, it's pretty much individual per application. For example, the Maps one has its settings "panel" on the left side of the app.

 

0c7222ce17.jpg

they showed os wide sharing at the event though

Hmm, I must have missed that portion. Although based on the new apps' disposition, it seems that even sharing will be done within the app itself, rather than from the charms bar or so. For example, driving distance or so in the Maps app will be shareable underneath its field, along with printing it. In a way that would make sense, but you'll have to search for those buttons yourself.

Apparently, it's pretty much individual per application. For example, the Maps one has its settings "panel" on the left side of the app.

 

0c7222ce17.jpg

Hmm, I must have missed that portion. Although based on the new apps' disposition, it seems that even sharing will be done within the app itself, rather than from the charms bar or so. For example, driving distance or so in the Maps app will be shareable underneath its field, along with printing it. In a way that would make sense, but you'll have to search for those buttons yourself.

 

The way they showed it the sharing charm bar or whatever you call it pops up inside the app on the right side, it was pretty much identical to the old sharing list inside the charms bar except within the app on windowed mode. 

God dammit.

Not only that, but if you switch into satellite mode, the whole thing turns into dark mode. That's right. Satellite mode = dark theme mode. Road view = light theme mode. I am so lost with that one.. :/

82416b8f1b.jpg

The way they showed it the sharing charm bar or whatever you call it pops up inside the app on the right side, it was pretty much identical to the old sharing list inside the charms bar except within the app on windowed mode. 

That is still true. For now, anyhow. My point is, that you can't just share contents from an app from the charms bar (or hamburger menu), at least with certain newer ones, like you used to with Windows 8.1, but instead it needs to be trigged from a button from the app itself. It is true that it then invokes the charms bar, but I suspect that will be changed with something else.

 

And printing happens in its own window that's derived from the main one. Not exactly modal, but it kind of behaves that way, that until then you can't do anything on the main app unless you deal with the printing functionality.

Windows 10 shaping up nicely all but start menu which is total garbage.

 

either bring back windows 7 start menu or u might as well do away with it entirely as nobody will want it.

youve given me no choice but to use a 3rd party application to bring back original start menu that people like.

 

not this new garbage you put on build 9926.

 

keep up with the start menu trash like build 9926 and windows 10 will be an instant fail.

Windows 10 shaping up nicely all but start menu which is total garbage.

 

either bring back windows 7 start menu or u might as well do away with it entirely as nobody will want it.

youve given me no choice but to use a 3rd party application to bring back original start menu that people like.

 

not this new garbage you put on build 9926.

 

keep up with the start menu trash like build 9926 and windows 10 will be an instant fail.

 

Thank you for the insightful majority feedback & market analysis.

Thank you for the insightful majority feedback & market analysis.

Yeah, I'm going to have to disagree with him as well. I find the Start Menu in build 9926 to be a nice compromise. It works great in desktop mode as well as tablet mode. I'm using it extensively on my Surface Pro 3 and the more I use it the more I like it.

Windows 10 shaping up nicely all but start menu which is total garbage.

 

either bring back windows 7 start menu or u might as well do away with it entirely as nobody will want it.

youve given me no choice but to use a 3rd party application to bring back original start menu that people like.

 

not this new garbage you put on build 9926.

 

keep up with the start menu trash like build 9926 and windows 10 will be an instant fail.

You're kidding right? You know how many issues that thing had? Besides not being expandable, or all that customizable, let me refresh your mind...

I'll be reading this thread, but I am done with Win 10 until an RTM-like release is made.

 

Was expecting iterative updates and all that, not complete changes of direction and design. Especially the new "Universal" apps. If they can even be called Universal apps.

I'll be reading this thread, but I am done with Win 10 until an RTM-like release is made.

 

Was expecting iterative updates and all that, not complete changes of direction and design. Especially the new "Universal" apps. If they can even be called Universal apps.

Well... its not even a consumer preview so don't expect the updates to be like the OSX Yosemite DP ones, you have to expect huge changes and overhauls.

I'm going to sound really arrogant with post, but it seems like many of the people complaining about the state of Windows 10 at this point of time are exactly the people who shouldn't be running beta software, because they don't seem to understand how it works. It's not directly at anyone specific here, and it's especially prevalent on the Feedback app. People moaning and complaining about inconsistent icons, the Start menu not being resizeable. You know, people complaining about the very things Microsoft has already stated are being worked on and refined for future builds.

 

Sigh...

  • Like 3

I'm going to sound really arrogant with post, but it seems like many of the people complaining about the state of Windows 10 at this point of time are exactly the people who shouldn't be running beta software, because they don't seem to understand how it works. It's not directly at anyone specific here, and it's especially prevalent on the Feedback app. People moaning and complaining about inconsistent icons, the Start menu not being resizeable. You know, people complaining about the very things Microsoft has already stated are being worked on and refined for future builds.

 

Sigh...

Agreed. However, the people complaining about the style of the icons themselves are different from the people complaining about the inconsistency of the icons across the board. Those complaining about the styles have a point.

I'm going to sound really arrogant with post, but it seems like many of the people complaining about the state of Windows 10 at this point of time are exactly the people who shouldn't be running beta software, because they don't seem to understand how it works. It's not directly at anyone specific here, and it's especially prevalent on the Feedback app. People moaning and complaining about inconsistent icons, the Start menu not being resizeable. You know, people complaining about the very things Microsoft has already stated are being worked on and refined for future builds.

 

Sigh...

 

Disagree, the purpose of the insider program (according to Microsoft) is to provide feedback on changes and based on that feedback they might change a thing or two (hopefully). For instance the direction they are going in with regards to the touch side of things, which in my mind will turn out into a disaster full of avoidable compromises. If we complain and provide feedback after the fact, it would have been too late.

 

Now is the time to complain and hopefully being able to alter the course a little bit here or there. Because quite frankly, Windows 10 seems to be moving from touch first to touch last, and it doesn't need to be that way. Windows 8 had touch to the tee, no need to reinvent the wheel, just disable most aspects when in desktop mode, enable when in tablet mode.

Disagree, the purpose of the insider program (according to Microsoft) is to provide feedback on changes and based on that feedback they might change a thing or two (hopefully). For instance the direction they are going in with regards to the touch side of things, which in my mind will turn out into a disaster full of avoidable compromises. If we complain and provide feedback after the fact, it would have been too late.

 

Now is the time to complain and hopefully being able to alter the course a little bit here or there. Because quite frankly, Windows 10 seems to be moving from touch first to touch last, and it doesn't need to be that way. Windows 8 had touch to the tee, no need to reinvent the wheel, just disable most aspects when in desktop mode, enable when in tablet mode.

 

There is a huge difference between complaining and providing feedback.  There is also a massive difference between the stability of a preview and the stability of final release.

 

Feedback to me, is comments such as 'I find it difficult to use the taskbar as the primary task switcher when using the OS on a tablet, because the buttons are two small, it requires too much hand movement and feel that it wastes precious screen real estate', not 'Windows 8 was perfect for tablets, why are you changing it and making it worse for us? Put it back, and right now' (possibly a little more dramatic than some of the feedback), but you get the idea.

 

Furthermore, the number of people complaining on this thread about the software being unstable, slow, no longer working properly in a VM or the new Start Menu/Screen being unusable should be providing feedback (detailed feedback as to what, and why you have the feedback).

 

I think the Insider programme itself is a double edged sword.  Generally the feedback from the industry has been very positive which is good marketing, but making it available to the wider public has resulted in people that don't understand the software is beta (and technically not even beta) and should be expected to be unstable, inconsistent and very much unpolished.

  • Like 3

Disagree, the purpose of the insider program (according to Microsoft) is to provide feedback on changes and based on that feedback they might change a thing or two (hopefully). For instance the direction they are going in with regards to the touch side of things, which in my mind will turn out into a disaster full of avoidable compromises. If we complain and provide feedback after the fact, it would have been too late.

 

Now is the time to complain and hopefully being able to alter the course a little bit here or there. Because quite frankly, Windows 10 seems to be moving from touch first to touch last, and it doesn't need to be that way. Windows 8 had touch to the tee, no need to reinvent the wheel, just disable most aspects when in desktop mode, enable when in tablet mode.

Have you read some of the posts in the feedback tool in Windows 10? A lot of those people do not grasp the meaning of 'technical preview'.

 

There is a major difference between complaining for the sake of complaining and constructive feedback. Microsoft are after the latter, not incessant whining about how the new start menu doesn't work the way (yet) user x wants it to. Be patient, report bugs, post constructive criticism and wait for improvements in future builds. But for the love of Zarquon, quit your bitching already.

You guys ever stop to think that the different UI layouts in the new universal apps is them trying new things to get feedback on what people like the best instead of them just "being stupid"?

 

The last thing I expect is the UIs between the core apps not to match, once they have one people like they'll all share it.

  • Like 2

I have provided limited feedback so far and it has been about installation. I still need to prepare a WIMboot image for my tablet :( and feedback was relevant (Windows should automatically do a WIMboot install on SSDs). :D I need to check out other feedback sections for these fun posts you guys keep on referring.

There is a huge difference between complaining and providing feedback.  There is also a massive difference between the stability of a preview and the stability of final release.

 

Feedback to me, is comments such as 'I find it difficult to use the taskbar as the primary task switcher when using the OS on a tablet, because the buttons are two small, it requires too much hand movement and feel that it wastes precious screen real estate', not 'Windows 8 was perfect for tablets, why are you changing it and making it worse for us? Put it back, and right now' (possibly a little more dramatic than some of the feedback), but you get the idea.

 

Furthermore, the number of people complaining on this thread about the software being unstable, slow, no longer working properly in a VM or the new Start Menu/Screen being unusable should be providing feedback (detailed feedback as to what, and why you have the feedback).

 

I think the Insider programme itself is a double edged sword.  Generally the feedback from the industry has been very positive which is good marketing, but making it available to the wider public has resulted in people that don't understand the software is beta (and technically not even beta) and should be expected to be unstable, inconsistent and very much unpolished.

 

Actually I am complaining AND providing feedback. You would notice I have never complained about stability, as I do understand that to come as things progresses. I do complain about the clear direction they have taken between build 9901 and build 9926 which to me is wrong and will lead to only compromises and dissatisfied users. The reason I am pointing out that Windows 8 already had the tablet experience covered is obvious, there is no need to waste resources on it, they should use that code and improve the desktop only.

 

No amount of fixes and improvements will ever get that xaml startscreen to fly on tablets. And the reason is painfully obvious, you cannot make a start menu that appeals to both Desktop and Tablet users, due to the obvious differences in both screen real estate and input methods. The pre build 9926 previews didn't try to shoehorn the two into one, and that's the way they should have continued it. You offer the user the choice between a start experience fully tailored for the desktop and one for the tablet.

 

If that means the tablet mode isn't automatic, that's a price I am more than willing to pay.

Have you read some of the posts in the feedback tool in Windows 10? A lot of those people do not grasp the meaning of 'technical preview'.

 

There is a major difference between complaining for the sake of complaining and constructive feedback. Microsoft are after the latter, not incessant whining about how the new start menu doesn't work the way (yet) user x wants it to. Be patient, report bugs, post constructive criticism and wait for improvements in future builds. But for the love of Zarquon, quit your bitching already.

 

Maybe you should stop bitching about other people bitching, if you don't like it, ignore it, it's really that simple.

Maybe you should stop bitching about other people bitching, if you don't like it, ignore it, it's really that simple.

No. I've had it with immaturity and sense of entitlement.

 

You and I both want Windows 10 to be the best version of Windows yet. Microsoft are closely listening to any usable feedback they get. I.e. bug reports, detailed suggestions, constructive criticism. Pretty sure they feel the same way I do about 'start menu is broken, plz fix or else' bitching. Again, this is a tech preview - things will break or be unfinished. Have some patience for Zarquon's sake.

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!