Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

vectors are infinitely zoomable, BUT they don't scale well, you can't use the same icon for 32x32 and 256x256 size icons.

 

you have a good icon at the designed size, but make it smaller and it becomes a blurry mess trying to gave to much detail, make it bigger and it's cartoon land.

 

vectors are not a magic bullet for ui and icons.

 

if the GUI is a fixed size me and to be the same physical size or relative size(relative to screen size) at different while being resolution independent, then yes vectors make sense. however that's not what people want or need. that is scalable GUI's. pro users want it small , old people want large stuff.

Thank you!

Too many people thing vector is the be all and end all of icon scaling when clearly it's no such thing.

Thank you!

Too many people thing vector is the be all and end all of icon scaling when clearly it's no such thing.

 

many don't understand that zoom is completely different from scaling.

 

sure vectors would be great for supporting, different dpi screens and/or screen sizes. BUT you'd still need the icon drawn in several different "scale"/size vectors for different scales if you want bigger or smaller icons.

  • Like 2

vectors are infinitely zoomable, BUT they don't scale well, you can't use the same icon for 32x32 and 256x256 size icons.

 

you have a good icon at the designed size, but make it smaller and it becomes a blurry mess trying to gave to much detail, make it bigger and it's cartoon land.

 

vectors are not a magic bullet for ui and icons.

 

if the GUI is a fixed size me and to be the same physical size or relative size(relative to screen size) at different while being resolution independent, then yes vectors make sense. however that's not what people want or need. that is scalable GUI's. pro users want it small , old people want large stuff.

 

 

Thank you!

Too many people thing vector is the be all and end all of icon scaling when clearly it's no such thing.

 

 

many don't understand that zoom is completely different from scaling.

 

sure vectors would be great for supporting, different dpi screens and/or screen sizes. BUT you'd still need the icon drawn in several different "scale"/size vectors for different scales if you want bigger or smaller icons.

 

Thank you for the correction although operating systems such as Irix Magic Desktop have shown that SVG based icons are doable. That being said, I really do hope that Microsoft get their act together rather than with previous versions of Windows they couldn't be bothered replacing icons that are circa Windows 95. Honestly, I wonder whether anyone at Microsoft does give a toss about fit and finish.

Also, a flat design is not as power-intensive as a 3D (even fake-3D) UI design - which is why portable  PCs (even "traditional" laptops and notebooks) benefit, due to that age-old bugbear of anything portable - battery life.

That is one thing I discovered with my own "legacy notebook" that is in the testing pool - it actually originally shipped with Vista.  The Windows 10 Pro technical Preview - for reasons of a flatter UI, among others - has better battery life than the SAME notebook running any other flavor of Windows.  (Remember, if anything, 10 will be on more styles merely of portable hardware than any previous version of Windows - and that is without including phones.)

 

That is, in fact, why I wonder if any of the critics of the flat UI (not just in Windows) even own ANY portable hardware, let alone 10-capable legacy hardware.

How exactly are the colors used in a UI power intensive? Mac OS X has always had a beautiful UI and they don't have issues with power. That seems like the thing that people who support boring flat graphics like to claim. If people are concerned about power that much, why not just drop a graphical UI completely and yo back to ms-dos?

How exactly are the colors used in a UI power intensive? Mac OS X has always had a beautiful UI and they don't have issues with power. That seems like the thing that people who support boring flat graphics like to claim. If people are concerned about power that much, why not just drop a graphical UI completely and yo back to ms-dos?

 

Effects such as glass have a massive impact on power as the calculation to blur the background elements is more than nothing.

 

Even in OS X the glass effect is sparingly used.  In the past when it was used, it wasn't so much the obfuscated glass as much as just transparency.  On my corporate Thinkpad, switching off transparency doubles the battery life.

Effects such as glass have a massive impact on power as the calculation to blur the background elements is more than nothing.

 

Even in OS X the glass effect is sparingly used.  In the past when it was used, it wasn't so much the obfuscated glass as much as just transparency.  On my corporate Thinkpad, switching off transparency doubles the battery life.

Well considering you also needed a 5xxx series of Nvidia cards to be able to use Aero Glass in 2007 says a lot too :p My card was one of the few in the lowest supported series that supported it, and that was a 5950 "Ultra" card too (cost hundreds of Euros at the time) :p

 

All of the budget cards in the next series (6xxx) did support Aero Glass though.

Effects such as glass have a massive impact on power as the calculation to blur the background elements is more than nothing.

 

Even in OS X the glass effect is sparingly used.  In the past when it was used, it wasn't so much the obfuscated glass as much as just transparency.  On my corporate Thinkpad, switching off transparency doubles the battery life.

Fair enough, I'm definitely not an expert. I just thought with recent technology, the colors used for a UI would not impact power. I wonder why they couldn't have one UI for battery powered devices and another for desktops on ac power. I suppose that would go against a unified UI concept.

How exactly are the colors used in a UI power intensive? Mac OS X has always had a beautiful UI and they don't have issues with power. That seems like the thing that people who support boring flat graphics like to claim. If people are concerned about power that much, why not just drop a graphical UI completely and yo back to ms-dos?

I'm talking about effects OTHER than color (such as Aero Glass or 3D).  Both are largely irrelevant on desktops (even servers) - because they are always plugged in.  DO the same on a laptop or notebook and you'll be looking for a plug well before you want to.

 

If anything, the Windows Server UI - I'm talking even that of 2008R2 - is flatter than that of stablemate 7 (just as Server 2012/2012R2 is flatter than that of 8 or 8.1, respectively), and that is despite Desktop Experience being installed on the server side (it's an option in all three server OSes).  Why would the UI be so flat in a server?

Effects such as glass have a massive impact on power as the calculation to blur the background elements is more than nothing.

 

Even in OS X the glass effect is sparingly used.  In the past when it was used, it wasn't so much the obfuscated glass as much as just transparency.  On my corporate Thinkpad, switching off transparency doubles the battery life.

 

Some Mac's using Yosemite experience an improvement in speed and battery life by checking 'Reduce Transparency' under 'Accessibility' the 'System Preferences' - I know for me I'm not much of a fan so I've enabled dark menu and dock along with 'Reduce Transparency' which is a whole lot nicer than the gaudy and bright interface that comes as standard on OS X.

Well considering you also needed a 5xxx series of Nvidia cards to be able to use Aero Glass in 2007 says a lot too :p My card was one of the few in the lowest supported series that supported it, and that was a 5950 "Ultra" card too (cost hundreds of Euros at the time) :p

 

All of the budget cards in the next series (6xxx) did support Aero Glass though.

 

I'd say, atleast give us Aero Glass. we will be staring at the UI on a daily basis, seems reasonable to be able to look at something that is asthetically pleasing.

  • Like 3

All of the budget cards in the next series (6xxx) did support Aero Glass though.

 

Barely...I owned a 6200, don't remind me. It was running full transparency with Windows 7 at the time  :(

New Lock Screen features coming:

 

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

 

https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-10/1198/windows-10-technical-preview-2-tip-find-hidden-lock-screen-images

 

All images (download from OneDrive):

 

http://1drv.ms/16ipfVW

  • Like 3

New windows 10 video showing off cortana. Build 10011 shown in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qI4tj1YZbiM

Leak Images from that Chinese website where real.

asf.jpg

Transparent task bar.safa.jpg

I'm actually coming around to the new icons. They really need to move Search/Cortana back into Start and off the taskbar.

I'm actually coming around to the new icons. They really need to move Search/Cortana back into Start and off the taskbar.

Like I've said 9901 had the best icons. I really hope they is those since they match Office 2013

You can do it now, Cortana has three options, the default search bar, a search button, or off in which case it goes back to being in the search menu.

Off puts search back into the menu? I'll have to try that when I get home.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!