Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Make sure you have the following updates installed so you will receive the new build when it is released.

 

https://t.co/jP9ACKniuf

https://t.co/0XwB5KN8iJ

 

tells me there's no hotfix available. I'll keep trying

No new build in February it looks like, I'm guessing they might release a new build after their GDC and MWC events either Monday or Tuesday.

I'm betting Monday. Of course i'm not actually going to hand over any money...

Those are some odd concepts. Not sure I like Cortana hiding in the corner like that.

That clock area is a mess too. I like to glance quickly at the clock to see the time, not to see a life history of the earth as we know it.

  • Like 1

Cortana being part of the start menu window/UI makes the most sense to me. While having it and the notification center together saves space, they don't really fit in the same place. You go to notifications to see past events, you go to Cortana to look for something now or set it for a future event, one is past the other is present and future event wise.

 

Hitting the windows key and just typing away is the best option for Cortana.

Ian W. - the article could very easily have been written about Vista; one-third negative hype and one-third unwillingness to leave the comfort of XP.  Of the hardware known to have had issues with Vista at launch, how much of the actual installed hardware base was active and running - with the problem hardware in place?

 

Then there is the issue of most (though not all) of the honest complaints center specifically around the lack of a Start menu.  However, nobody (among the critics) has much positive to say about the menu itself other than it's familiar  Sounds like a cross between "Shallow Hal" and Learned Hand.  (To paraphrase one of the most controversial jurists in all law, "I can't say objectively what is bad, but I know what IS bad when I see or hear about it.")  Subjectivity AND misrememberance, combined with nostalgia - yeesh!

Cortana being part of the start menu window/UI makes the most sense to me. While having it and the notification center together saves space, they don't really fit in the same place. You go to notifications to see past events, you go to Cortana to look for something now or set it for a future event, one is past the other is present and future event wise.

 

Hitting the windows key and just typing away is the best option for Cortana.

Yup. I think this concept is inspired from iOS' pull down screen which I truly hate.

George P. - that is also the way to use the non-Cortana Search metric (for the StartScreen/AppScreen, mini-Start, and un-Cortana-related searching), which needs to be kept separated from Cortana.  If possible, I'd prefer a Cortana bar (similar to the Address Bar, but replacing it) as an option; I want the keyboard-driven Search (as it debuted in 8) to remain.

 

Speaking of Search - the fact that keyboard-driven Search has been so readily dismissed actually horks me off.  The fact that the StartScreen and AppScreen are so easily Searchable - and using the keyboard - has been basically pooh-poohed.  What I want to know is *why*.  It's harder to do using touch - and can't be done at all via pointing device without major reliance on mark one mod zero human eyeball.  Keyboard?  Depressingly easy.  (Keyboard-driven Search helped make - at least for me - the Start menu - and organization thereof - completely irrelevant.)  And it doesn't matter one bit HOW big the AppScreen gets.  All you need is the first CHARACTER of what you are searching for.  (In other words, it works just as easily for numeric-characters as it does for first-letter searching.)

  • Like 2

George P. - that is also the way to use the non-Cortana Search metric (for the StartScreen/AppScreen, mini-Start, and un-Cortana-related searching), which needs to be kept separated from Cortana.  If possible, I'd prefer a Cortana bar (similar to the Address Bar, but replacing it) as an option; I want the keyboard-driven Search (as it debuted in 8) to remain.

 

Speaking of Search - the fact that keyboard-driven Search has been so readily dismissed actually horks me off.  The fact that the StartScreen and AppScreen are so easily Searchable - and using the keyboard - has been basically pooh-poohed.  What I want to know is *why*.  It's harder to do using touch - and can't be done at all via pointing device without major reliance on mark one mod zero human eyeball.  Keyboard?  Depressingly easy.  (Keyboard-driven Search helped make - at least for me - the Start menu - and organization thereof - completely irrelevant.)  And it doesn't matter one bit HOW big the AppScreen gets.  All you need is the first CHARACTER of what you are searching for.  (In other words, it works just as easily for numeric-characters as it does for first-letter searching.)

 

That my friend is my number 1 complaint so far. I understand they want cortana but in Windows 7 I hit the Windows key and type away. I do not want to use the mouse or trackpad each time and have bing display results of control panel first. I want control panel listed first etc.

  • Like 1

That my friend is my number 1 complaint so far. I understand they want cortana but in Windows 7 I hit the Windows key and type away. I do not want to use the mouse or trackpad each time and have bing display results of control panel first. I want control panel listed first etc.

sinetheo - I was referring to the Modern UI critics, not Cortana.  I want Cortana separated because the focus of Cortana and the internal search (of the StartScreen and AppScreen) is different.  While notifications (from either) can (and should) go to the Notification Center (that is why it exists), the two ways of search themselves should remain separate. (That is why I suggested a Cortana Bar in the first place, so Cortana's input area is separate from both the Address Bar and Runbox.)

 

sinetheo - Search didn't exist in the same fashion in Windows 7; for example, the Start menu wasn't searchable except via mark 1 mod zero eyeball.  Worse, you had to organize the Start menu yourself.  Even if you stick to strict alphanumberic organization, unless you have a stock laptop (with the standard paltry capacity platter drive), it's a pain in the rear.  And the more applications you have, the bigger the pain.  Ghu help you in a large enterprise (the Department of Homeland Security's Transportation Security Administration or Border Patrol, for example).  Keyboard-driven internal Search launched with Windows 8 - and was dismissed "why"?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Happens to the best of us, bro. 😛 
    • Thanks to some of the other recent Windows improvements, I'm optimistic about this one. My quick wishlist would be: perf like the older menu, merge both menus or at the very least, the older menu should be a flyout, not a simulated click to the old menu, and lastly, a customization window to let users move items from one menu to another, so I could bring Send To back to the main menu, and the OneDrive settings to the older.
    • This Gigabyte AMD RX 9070 XT is very good deal despite the launch of 9070 GRE by Sayan Sen Recently we reviewed AMD's latest 1440p gaming card, the Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12GB, for $549. The card is in stock too at that price, though if you want significantly better performance and don't mind spending a bit more, the Gigabyte Gaming model of RX 9070 XT is currently on sale for just $650 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The card employs Gigabyte's WINDFORCE cooling system which combines multiple design elements such as alternate-spinning Hawk fans, a vapor chamber, and composite heat pipes to manage heat dissipation. The Server-grade Thermal conductive gel further helps in this department. The inclusion of a semi-passive cooling mode allows the fans to remain inactive under low workloads, which allows for reduced noise operation during lighter usage. There is dual BIOS switch that allows toggling between performance and silent modes. The technical specifications of the Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT GAMING OC 16G are given in the table below: Specification Value Core Clock Boost Clock: up to 3060 MHz Game Clock: up to 2520 MHz Stream Processors 4096 Memory Clock 20 Gbps Memory Size 16GB Memory Type GDDR6 Memory Bus 256-bit Card Bus Interface PCI Express 5.0 Maximum Resolution 7680 × 4320 Multi-View Support 4 displays Card Dimensions L=288 mm, W=132 mm, H=56 mm Recommended Power Supply 750W Power Connectors 3 × 8-pin Video Outputs 2 × DisplayPort 2.1a 2 × HDMI 2.1b Get it at the link below: GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16GB Graphics Card, GV-R9070XTGAMING OC: $649.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $740) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why does this kind of tactic not surprise me?
    • They used AI based TOOLS to convert the JavaScript engine (the main rendering engine is still C++) and it was not fully automated but was human reviewed. Other subsystems will be looked into to also be converted to Rust in the future. I have no problem with any of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      80
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      63
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!