Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

 

 

Note the Office folder!

And unfortunately, there is advertising on the start menu now.

 

Yes! Tile folders from Windows Phone 8.1 Denim!

Anyone notice...Cortana seems a little different. It looks more like part of the taskbar and less a toolbar that's on it. Also, new Skype icon? and People looks different, as well...and Messaging is back. So many things...

 

Is it possible this is an old concept, or could this be a concept of things to come?

How about that "Phone Companion" app, eh? Was that a thing before?

 

Nope. Closest thing I can come up with is the Windows Phone app.

Let's take my finest example : FIFA Online 3 .

On Windows 8.1 it works like a charm .

On Windows 10 January TP - 9926 it makes my mouse to not be detected when I exit from it [ form the game , obviously ] .

If that seems better for you , I have nothing to say ...

By the way ... None of my games [ that I play daily ] haven't got any boost while I was running any version of Windows 10 so far ... So , you guys , just trust some lies [ and only because they are written ] , and not some true facts because are being said by a kid , like me . 

 

It's hard to tell whether or not you're trolling. You have already mentioned having low-end hardware and that you haven't seen any increase in performance. What exactly is your setup? Here's my current desktop and laptop specs and I have seen an increase on both and neither of them are high-end at all.

 

Desktop:

AMD FX-6300 6 Core at 3.5ghz

8gb's RAM

Nvidia GeForce GT 610 2gb

 

Laptop:

Intel Core i3-2730M at 2.40ghz

4gb's ram

Intel HD 3000 Which can use up to 2gb's of my RAM for video if I remember correctly

 

Neither of those are powerful by todays standards at all, but I have clearly gotten a performance increase on both with the most coming from the desktop since it has a slightly more recent video card. That laptop can actually run the Unreal Tournament Pre-Alpha on medium to high settings at 1366x768. Eventually starts to get a little hot, but I bet if I were to put 8.1 back on this it would lag like crazy. It lagged with Assassin's Creed on 8.1. It runs perfectly smooth with the Technical Preview installed.

 

You're either trolling, have no idea what you're actually talking about or think that since it doesn't work right for you then everyone else HAS to experience the same or else they are lying. I believe it's a combination of all of that to be perfectly honest with you.

 

They have clearly done something with the Technical Preview that works wonders with gaming. If you're not seeing it (and it seems like almost everyone else has) then quit trolling or admit you might not know exactly what you're talking about or just have too weak a system to see the performance gain.

 

I mean my freaking laptop is a business class Dell Inspiron 3520 that I bought in Feb. of 2013 and it's not built for gaming at all, yet I can run Assassin's Creed 1 and 2, the Batman Arkham games, Unreal Tournament Pre-Alpha and many others perfectly fine. I eventually get heat issues if I go too long, but that is expected. I don't do a lot of heavy gaming on this thing. That's on my desktop/consoles.

Yeah, really maybe a system thing, protruding from the Start Menu :D   Nice Rs covering.  

 

The illustration/concept is self evident.  Whether it makes to a public release we can't say now, but it would seem essential to me, so that Taskbar icons for Modern apps can become 'live'.   'Live' info on the Desktop?  We've been there before, and it made no sense without a side-bar reservation (i.e, Vista was better than 7 in that respect).

 

I already stated earlier that they could be anything from tiles to system items, so what was I covering again..

It's up to the developer but any store app can extend it's UI into the title bar instead of having it be a distinct object. It's a simple line of code from what I remember. Apps that don't will default to whatever is set, i'd like to see more extend into it though, we don't really need it to be separate like before.

It's hard to tell whether or not you're trolling. You have already mentioned having low-end hardware and that you haven't seen any increase in performance. What exactly is your setup? Here's my current desktop and laptop specs and I have seen an increase on both and neither of them are high-end at all.

 

Desktop:

AMD FX-6300 6 Core at 3.5ghz

8gb's RAM

Nvidia GeForce GT 610 2gb

 

Laptop:

Intel Core i3-2730M at 2.40ghz

4gb's ram

Intel HD 3000 Which can use up to 2gb's of my RAM for video if I remember correctly

 

Neither of those are powerful by todays standards at all, but I have clearly gotten a performance increase on both with the most coming from the desktop since it has a slightly more recent video card. That laptop can actually run the Unreal Tournament Pre-Alpha on medium to high settings at 1366x768. Eventually starts to get a little hot, but I bet if I were to put 8.1 back on this it would lag like crazy. It lagged with Assassin's Creed on 8.1. It runs perfectly smooth with the Technical Preview installed.

 

You're either trolling, have no idea what you're actually talking about or think that since it doesn't work right for you then everyone else HAS to experience the same or else they are lying. I believe it's a combination of all of that to be perfectly honest with you.

 

They have clearly done something with the Technical Preview that works wonders with gaming. If you're not seeing it (and it seems like almost everyone else has) then quit trolling or admit you might not know exactly what you're talking about or just have too weak a system to see the performance gain.

 

I mean my freaking laptop is a business class Dell Inspiron 3520 that I bought in Feb. of 2013 and it's not built for gaming at all, yet I can run Assassin's Creed 1 and 2, the Batman Arkham games, Unreal Tournament Pre-Alpha and many others perfectly fine. I eventually get heat issues if I go too long, but that is expected. I don't do a lot of heavy gaming on this thing. That's on my desktop/consoles.

 

My Desktop is weaker than your laptop ; in fact , I said it before ... MS ignores those who haven't recent PCs and they do nothing with making them somehow equal [ with this OS , at least ] along everyone which has a better configuration .

Any respectful producer should make '' justice '' along all their customers ...

We're not rich persons like most of real gamers are ... we just want a decent and somehow equal experience with others , especially when we talk about a new OS and if they won't do that they will got a refuel and another financial breakdown ... much bigger then that one form 2012 - 2013  .

Don't you wonder why most of PC users still using Windows 7 [ or even Vista / XP ] ?

My Desktop is weaker than your laptop ; in fact , I said it before ... MS ignores those who haven't recent PCs and they do nothing with making them somehow equal [ with this OS , at least ] along everyone which has a better configuration .

Any respectful producer should make '' justice '' along all their customers ...

We're not rich persons like most of real gamers are ... we just want a decent and somehow equal experience with others , especially when we talk about a new OS and if they won't do that they will got a refuel and another financial breakdown ... much bigger then that one form 2012 - 2013  .

Don't you wonder why most of PC users still using Windows 7 [ or even Vista / XP ] ?

if technology advances then users should try to do some kind of upgrade to accommodate these advances in technology, don't you think?

You wouldn't expect that the next 2 iterations of Windows to have the same requirements as XP had, would you?

If you don't have the money to upgrade, stick with 7 and wait for the moment to upgrade to a smoother experience or use Linux (which I hate BTW).

Users still using XP and Vista have way too older PC's and/or do not want to upgrade to something better or they are restricted in doing so. As for companies it is either down to lack of funds for doing the HW/SW upgrades or plain stupidity or compatibility issues (which still should not be a valid reason though).

It's well known that you can't advance [ on Hardware although ] just with a component ... So , for a maximum experience from 10 I'd need a completely new PC [ along a GPU with a DX 12 , a DDR4 RAM and so on ] which would mean extraordinary expensive for a student like me .

You said you hate Linux ...

How can it still be a very used OS and innovative too [ also for all PCs ] !? - and Windows 10 not ?

Why MS don't take its example ?

It's well known that you can't advance [ on Hardware although ] just with a component ... So , for a maximum experience from 10 I'd need a completely new PC [ along a GPU with a DX 12 , a DDR4 RAM and so on ] which would mean extraordinary expensive for a student like me .

You said you hate Linux ...

How can it still be a very used OS and innovative too [ also for all PCs ] !? - and Windows 10 not ?

Why MS don't take its example ?

if you're a student it is understandable that you do not have money to make the upgrade; BTW it is not mandatory to have a DX12 video card, but it's preferable if you have a new system nonetheless; getting back to the point of the OS performance, it is true Win10 is still not as fast as it should be IMO...

Windows is simply more popular and user friendly (you can interpret these interchangeably).

 

Stack up some money to get a better machine.. Windows10 will launch this year so next year you might be able to do something on this.

if you're a student it is understandable that you do not have money to make the upgrade; BTW it is not mandatory to have a DX12 video card, but it's preferable if you have a new system nonetheless; getting back to the point of the OS performance, it is true Win10 is still not as fast as it should be IMO...

Windows is simply more popular and user friendly (you can interpret these interchangeably).

 

Stack up some money to get a better machine.. Windows10 will launch this year so next year you might be able to do something on this.

 

Straight to the point .

Why I had to post so much to get an enjoyable answer like this ? [ which I hope it will make others to understand my point of view and that I'm not kidding / or trolling either . ] .

Let's take my finest example : FIFA Online 3 .

On Windows 8.1 it works like a charm .

On Windows 10 January TP - 9926 it makes my mouse to not be detected when I exit from it [ form the game , obviously ] .

If that seems better for you , I have nothing to say ...

By the way ... None of my games [ that I play daily ] haven't got any boost while I was running any version of Windows 10 so far ... So , you guys , just trust some lies [ and only because they are written ] , and not some true facts because are being said by a kid , like me . 

 

Then go tell EA to fix their crap.

It's up to the developer but any store app can extend it's UI into the title bar instead of having it be a distinct object. It's a simple line of code from what I remember. Apps that don't will default to whatever is set, i'd like to see more extend into it though, we don't really need it to be separate like before.

 

As of 8.1, you can only do a few things with the status bar on WP but nothing on Win, like change colours, opacity, or hide it and use the space it takes. Hopefully 10 will allow us to do a bit more in both cases.

 

It's well known that you can't advance [ on Hardware although ] just with a component ... So , for a maximum experience from 10 I'd need a completely new PC [ along a GPU with a DX 12 , a DDR4 RAM and so on ] which would mean extraordinary expensive for a student like me .

You said you hate Linux ...

How can it still be a very used OS and innovative too [ also for all PCs ] !? - and Windows 10 not ?

Why MS don't take its example ?

 

Well, no kidding, a new OS requires a bit newer hardware, who would have thought? Heresy, I say!

Straight to the point .

Why I had to post so much to get an enjoyable answer like this ? [ which I hope it will make others to understand my point of view and that I'm not kidding / or trolling either . ] .

 

Because when you talk about technical stuff, people either expect you to actually have read and explored what you're talking about, or just not post nonsense.

Sadly, not yet. :/

 

Happy birthday! :fun:

 

This has become a daily joke on his Twitter account. :laugh:

Define '' a bit newer '' , please .

P.S : When Windows 8 or 8 . 1 came out no upgrade was needed for a completely functional PC on Windows 7 , so why to change the rule ?

Like that proverb says : '' If it's not broken , don't fix it '' .

 

P.S.S : I was expecting from you to actually know what I'm referring to ...

I'm looking at you like at some pro's , guys ...

You suppose to have enough [ more than me ] experience to know exactly what I say and don't request a proof [ link , source and so on ] for any of my post ... I'm not a newbie either : http://pctroubleshooting.ro/user/31597-terror/ .

Happy birthday! :fun:

 

This has become a daily joke on his Twitter account. :laugh:

Thank you! :D

 

Sadly, yes. I feel his pain, but at least he's willing to be so open.

 

Define '' a bit newer '' , please .

P.S : When Windows 8 or 8 . 1 came out no upgrade was needed for a completely functional PC on Windows 7 , so why to change the rule ?

Like that proverb says : '' If it's not broken , don't fix it '' .

Eventually, you have to make a leap to move forward. Windows 7 era hardware is long in the tooth. There's new class of hardware on the market today, that was only a dream in 2009.

Straight to the point .

Why I had to post so much to get an enjoyable answer like this ? [ which I hope it will make others to understand my point of view and that I'm not kidding / or trolling either . ] .

 

I cannot understand a portion of this whole posting.  The reason I cannot is, the OS (Windows 10 Preview) runs very, very well on a Dell Latitude that is a decade old.

 

Is it the fastest thing around?  No it is not.  But the OS Supports it, and brings the updates that it can to the OS.  The other updates will only appear on the hardware that I have that is newer.

 

DX12 is a combination issue.  To fully support DX12, you need a hardware update.  To fully support HD on a TV, you need a hardware update if you have a mid-range TV from a decade ago.  Cellphones, same issue.  Apple just did it with the IPhone 5S vs IPhone 6.  You cannot use Apple Pay on an IPhone 5S, because it does not have the required hardware.  Software is there though.

 

As for the rest of the upgrades, do it when your financial situation allows, but that does not mean the OS will not run well on your machine, as well if not better than Windows 7, with all of the updates that can be done.

I cannot understand a portion of this whole posting.  The reason I cannot is, the OS (Windows 10 Preview) runs very, very well on a Dell Latitude that is a decade old.

 

Is it the fastest thing around?  No it is not.  But the OS Supports it, and brings the updates that it can to the OS.  The other updates will only appear on the hardware that I have that is newer.

 

DX12 is a combination issue.  To fully support DX12, you need a hardware update.  To fully support HD on a TV, you need a hardware update if you have a mid-range TV from a decade ago.  Cellphones, same issue.  Apple just did it with the IPhone 5S vs IPhone 6.  You cannot use Apple Pay on an IPhone 5S, because it does not have the required hardware.  Software is there though.

 

As for the rest of the upgrades, do it when your financial situation allows, but that does not mean the OS will not run well on your machine, as well if not better than Windows 7, with all of the updates that can be done.

 

Even better than Windows 8 . 1 ? [ comparatively with the RTM Windows 10 ] ?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!