Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Has anyone tried to run BioShock in buld 10041? Crashing instantly for me.

I haven't. Which one? The original or any of the sequels?

The current AMD display drivers being installed via Windows Update are extremely buggy in most cases and cause freezes, hangs, crashes and blue screens in multiple games on numerous systems, desktops and laptops both. R9 290X, R9 270X, Radeon 7660D, Radeon 8660D, R7 250, and more. (Over 20 systems I've personally tested). The last stable ones were released in January 2015 or November 2014 (depending on which GPU we're talking about). There are numerous reports of this in the Feedback app and yet it is not listed as a known issue officially and no workaround or fix has been promised or released yet. I am not at all a MS hater. I mostly like Windows 10 and what MS has been doing lately, but... the AMD driver thing is causing me major grief. I've reported these issues to AMD as well btw. I am hopeful that MS and AMD can work together to fix this for their mutual users/customers asap. :) Or at least pull the awful buggy video drivers from Windows Update until fixed.

Try disabling all the video enhancement and hardware acceleration on Catalyst and see if it works better that way.

@Jackaluichi It's trhe original one. I think it might be related to what MyNamesTheDoctor said. AMD sucks. And CCC won't even open with the latest ASMD driver from Windows Update.

 

@Dot Matrix I'm pretty sure that's for everything that you have open, why wouldn't it work with Spartan?

@Jackaluichi It's trhe original one. I think it might be related to what MyNamesTheDoctor said. AMD sucks. And CCC won't even open with the latest ASMD driver from Windows Update.

@Dot Matrix I'm pretty sure that's for everything that you have open, why wouldn't it work with Spartan?

Something else must be causing you troubles. I can open and use CCC. Moreover, I've been playing some games with build 10041 and my R9 290X.

Have a look at this and see if you can improve your system reliability:

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/insider_wintp-insider_install/how-to-repair-your-system-files-using-dism-and-sfc/1021b42a-09ff-41a0-a95a-48f3ee3ae699

I have a much older GPU though (Mobility Radeon HD 6470M, rebranded to 7400M series). My driver is version 15.200 and something, installed through WU and CCC crashes instantly on start, it didn't do this with Catalyst Omega (Which included driver version 14.500).
 

I will try that nonetheless.

I have a much older GPU though (Mobility Radeon HD 6470M, rebranded to 7400M series). My driver is version 15.200 and something, installed through WU and CCC crashes instantly on start, it didn't do this with Catalyst Omega (Which included driver version 14.500).

I will try that nonetheless.

Good luck, and yes we all know how buggy AMD drivers can be, so imagine with a WIP OS and an updated WDDM.

I hope so because some if not most are the same since Windows 9x, it's time for them to change.

Honestly though, reworking the entire dialog system in Apple release speak would be a "brand new release" in and within itself, it is an extensive project.

Honestly though, reworking the entire dialog system in Apple release speak would be a "brand new release" in and within itself, it is an extensive project.

I agree, they might not get many of them in this release but they should keep at it, maybe with a Windows 10.1 release next year they'll have most changed.

The current AMD display drivers being installed via Windows Update are extremely buggy in most cases and cause freezes, hangs, crashes and blue screens in multiple games on numerous systems, desktops and laptops both. R9 290X, R9 270X, Radeon 7660D, Radeon 8660D, R7 250, and more. (Over 20 systems I've personally tested). The last stable ones were released in January 2015 or November 2014 (depending on which GPU we're talking about). There are numerous reports of this in the Feedback app and yet it is not listed as a known issue officially and no workaround or fix has been promised or released yet. I am not at all a MS hater. I mostly like Windows 10 and what MS has been doing lately, but... the AMD driver thing is causing me major grief. I've reported these issues to AMD as well btw.  I am hopeful that MS and AMD can work together to fix this for their mutual users/customers asap. :)  Or at least pull the awful buggy video drivers from Windows Update until fixed. 

 

Currently AMD drivers on Windows 10041 can destroy the whole OS without the chance of recovery, if you happen to have a laptop with switchable graphics and the following rough specs: Intel HD first gen + AMD Mobility 5xxx.

 

Hard to use the feedback app if you cannot even get into safe mode because of a bootloop.

 

Let us hope that AMD ups their game.

 

the_matrix__divx__110_0001_1769.jpg

 

 

I have a much older GPU though (Mobility Radeon HD 6470M, rebranded to 7400M series). My driver is version 15.200 and something, installed through WU and CCC crashes instantly on start, it didn't do this with Catalyst Omega (Which included driver version 14.500).

 

I will try that nonetheless.

 
Count yourself lucky Indo ;)

The current AMD display drivers being installed via Windows Update are extremely buggy

 

Then don't use them!!!  I've been using the 14.12 Omega drivers in both 9926 and 10041 for my 7850 without a hitch.  WU tried to install an older driver a few weeks back but I didn't let it.

In Windows 8 - Modern Applications are slow to load. Did MS fix the modern application slowness yet? That is are all the modern apps opening for you within 1/10 to 1/1000 of a second?

In Windows 8 - Modern Applications are slow to load. Did MS fix the modern application slowness yet? That is are all the modern apps opening for you within 1/10 to 1/1000 of a second?

 

They are still slow (or at least slower than their w32 counterparts).

 

They are still slow (or at least slower than their w32 counterparts).

 

yes, but there is a bit of improvement. At least it's about 2-3 seconds mostly (on SSD), while even on previous 9926 I think it was 5 seconds and more

In the Charms bar, the user never even had to lift their finger from the brightness button or the mouse button, and they could just slide the pointer or their finger up or down to adjust the brightness.  It worked with the mouse wheel too.

 

There was even a line that appeared, connecting the slider and the mouse pointer/user's finger, giving the user a visual cue as to what was going on.  It also accounted for things like how much the pointer/finger was moving around on the screen, and compensated for that, so the user didn't have to struggle with moving their mouse/finger slightly to avoid the brightness jumping from max to min.

 

The volume slider worked the same way.

 

Frankly, this was brilliant, fluid, and very easy.

 

 

How is changing brightness handled now, in the Action Center?  Is it like Windows phone, where it just toggles between Auto/Low/Medium/High?

Yes, 16x16 icons have outlived their usefulness. Our screens aren't 800x600 anymore. Nothing should be 16x16 pixels anymore.

 

Some tablets and plenty of laptops are still made with 1280x800 screens, small icons still have their place in Windows. And from what I can see there really aren't that many small icons in Explorer anyway, most of the ribbon icons and the shell icons default to 32x32 which is fine even on a 1080p display.

Some tablets and plenty of laptops are still made with 1280x800 screens, small icons still have their place in Windows. And from what I can see there really aren't that many small icons in Explorer anyway, most of the ribbon icons and the shell icons default to 32x32 which is fine even on a 1080p display.

 

Giggles and goes back to his perfect windows 7 desktop

Some tablets and plenty of laptops are still made with 1280x800 screens, small icons still have their place in Windows. And from what I can see there really aren't that many small icons in Explorer anyway, most of the ribbon icons and the shell icons default to 32x32 which is fine even on a 1080p display.

 

No kidding.  I believe QuickLaunch uses 16x16 (or maybe its 20x20) ... and that is how I launch majority of my programs.  16x16 still has its place...even on 1080p monitors.  Dot Matrix just likes to think bigger is better.

Giggles and goes back to his perfect windows 7 desktop

Oh, you mean the one that Windows 8 improved?

 

No kidding.  I believe QuickLaunch uses 16x16 (or maybe its 20x20) ... and that is how I launch majority of my programs.  16x16 still has its place...even on 1080p monitors.  Dot Matrix just likes to think bigger is better.

Quick Launch is not a recent feature and isn't even enabled by default in more recent versions of Windows. A large option is even available, so I don't know what your point is.

But it's nice to know that features such as the Quick Access Toolbar of the Ribbon have their place even on 1080p monitors.

No kidding.  I believe QuickLaunch uses 16x16 (or maybe its 20x20) ... and that is how I launch majority of my programs.  16x16 still has its place...even on 1080p monitors.  Dot Matrix just likes to think bigger is better.

QuickLaunch was last seen in Vista...

Oh, you mean the one that Windows 8 improved?

 

Quick Launch is not a recent feature and isn't even enabled by default in more recent versions of Windows. A large option is even available, so I don't know what your point is.

But it's nice to know that features such as the Quick Access Toolbar of the Ribbon have their place even on 1080p monitors.

 

 

I am seriously not an old man who hates change and can not adjust.

 

I just love everything about Windows 7 and mad at Microsoft for forcing me to use an older OS. Ok MS didn't force me at gunpoint ... but MS just went apesh** change for the sake of it when Windows 7 was at it's peak. I hate the new explorer, icons, flat look, colors, lack of shadows, 100% cpu usage spikes in explorer when I go up an down, schizophrenic UI with 2 versions of everything modern and non, and the list goes on and on. Windows 7 is consistent in UI and do not have to worry when I click around of something out of place.

 

True it is my opinion. But I do not understand what the fuss is with the icons in 10 for example? They already ARE FINE IN 7??!

 

I love WIndows which is why I am here at Neowin but I left Linux as a result of gnome 3 becoming flat and cell phone like. Windows 7 just came out by 2011 and it was love. ... now this?? NO

 

This thread should not even be he here. In an ideal world minor changes on top of the hood should be present with the real work underneath.

 

I do not want to run an outdated OS forever but I have no choice as I keep obsessing over the GUI when I use 8 because it keeps getting in my face instead of my work. To me it is that bad.

yes, but there is a bit of improvement. At least it's about 2-3 seconds mostly (on SSD), while even on previous 9926 I think it was 5 seconds and more

Disappointment © Microsoft.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!