Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

When was Windows 8 feature complete? before BUILD? Is there a possibility that they continue adding features after BUILD?

 

They might do that if those new features don't impact APIs in any dramatic way.  I expect all the new APIs to be locked down at BUILD so the SDK they give out, updated version because there's a preview SDK out right now iirc, should be near final.

They might do that if those new features don't impact APIs in any dramatic way.  I expect all the new APIs to be locked down at BUILD so the SDK they give out, updated version because there's a preview SDK out right now iirc, should be near final.

 

Well I think what you see now is what we will get.

 

new features will be in threshold 2016. It is nearly May and this thing goes RTM in June?! Ya aint gonna happen. Unless they mean freeze at June and fix the bugs with Windows Update when on August 31st it comes on new pcs.

 

I think I will sadly stick with the now outdated WIndows 7 longer as the current builds are not stable quality at all unlike Windows 7 which were rock solid with just 1 bug  (mp3) before it went RTM!

 

Lets hope for Aero and real icons that are not flat. I will be mad if I have to wait until 2016 office 2013 style where they made it ugly on purpose right before freeze to make no colors and flat become familiar. I had to pay for office twice as office 2010 was removed from office 365 too

Well I think what you see now is what we will get.

 

new features will be in threshold 2016. It is nearly May and this thing goes RTM in June?! Ya aint gonna happen. Unless they mean freeze at June and fix the bugs with Windows Update when on August 31st it comes on new pcs.

 

I think I will sadly stick with the now outdated WIndows 7 longer as the current builds are not stable quality at all unlike Windows 7 which were rock solid with just 1 bug  (mp3) before it went RTM!

 

Lets hope for Aero and real icons that are not flat. I will be mad if I have to wait until 2016 office 2013 style where they made it ugly on purpose right before freeze to make no colors and flat become familiar. I had to pay for office twice as office 2010 was removed from office 365 too

I am still largely expecting dramatic new features in the tablet mode. If not...

When was Windows 8 feature complete? before BUILD? Is there a possibility that they continue adding features after BUILD?

At Build 2011, when Windows 8 was shown, we got the first Windows Developer Preview and that build was all but feature complete. A lot of new things where added for the Windows 8 Consumer Preview, and after that, a lot of changes where applied to the Windows 8 Release Preview. And after that, even the Windows 8 RTM got a bunch of additional changes too. So no, it was far from feature complete.

 

Looking at http://ms-vnext.net/Flights/, it seems that 10066, which is now in the fast ring, is the last one before 10100. Wonder which one we'll get.

Actually no, build 10066 comes AFTER 10100. It's just like the previous jump. All branches jumed from 9926 to 10000 except the fbl_awesome1501 branch, which continued to go up to 9942. fbl_impressive seems to be doing the same thing, as it is the only branch with a 10066 build.

 

Well I think what you see now is what we will get.

 

new features will be in threshold 2016. It is nearly May and this thing goes RTM in June?! Ya aint gonna happen. Unless they mean freeze at June and fix the bugs with Windows Update when on August 31st it comes on new pcs.

 

I think I will sadly stick with the now outdated WIndows 7 longer as the current builds are not stable quality at all unlike Windows 7 which were rock solid with just 1 bug  (mp3) before it went RTM!

 

Lets hope for Aero and real icons that are not flat. I will be mad if I have to wait until 2016 office 2013 style where they made it ugly on purpose right before freeze to make no colors and flat become familiar. I had to pay for office twice as office 2010 was removed from office 365 too

*Sigh*

 

Again, we're far from seeing eveything Microsoft is building, by far not all branches got already merged with the branch that goes out to the public, and a lot will follow in the coming weeks. Microsoft has at least another 2,5 months of time according to rumours. And if you realy don't like it that much, just stick to Windows 7.

I agree, if Windows 10 is due in June, then they have ALOT of work to do between now and then. 
I love the improvement of Windows 10 has over Windows 7 and Windows 8/8.1 was just crap anyway but I can't possibly see how they intend to release it in June in a final polished state. MAYBE September, or October but there's no way in hell it can be feature complete and bug free come the end of june.  

I agree, if Windows 10 is due in June, then they have ALOT of work to do between now and then. 

I love the improvement of Windows 10 has over Windows 7 and Windows 8/8.1 was just crap anyway but I can't possibly see how they intend to release it in June in a final polished state. MAYBE September, or October but there's no way in hell it can be feature complete and bug free come the end of june.  

 

I don't think they're actually aiming for it to be feature complete or bug free. I think June is more of a 'get the major features in and make it reasonably stable'. If the upcoming Redstone update is giving any indication, they're going to treat Windows more like an app (or service to use their preferred word), that's to say they'll release it now but push out more and frequent updates to it. 

I don't think they're actually aiming for it to be feature complete or bug free. I think June is more of a 'get the major features in and make it reasonably stable'. If the upcoming Redstone update is giving any indication, they're going to treat Windows more like an app (or service to use their preferred word), that's to say they'll release it now but push out more and frequent updates to it. 

 

And people ask me why I'm getting my doubts with it ...

And people ask me why I'm getting my doubts with it ...

 

I don't think it's actually much different from what we had before, in the sense they usually tried to squash the show stopper bugs in previous releases and then release a service pack a year down the line. Now, they're basically chopping that service pack into bits and delivering it over the course of the year. 

I don't think it's actually much different from what we had before, in the sense they usually tried to squash the show stopper bugs in previous releases and then release a service pack a year down the line. Now, they're basically chopping that service pack into bits and delivering it over the course of the year. 

How are they chopping it into bits while Service Packs already are packes of small updates that got released before the actual SP?

 

Windows 10 will have a 2-week long bug fix periode before RTM (as Aul said on Twitter a while ago) which should be enough to get out the latest major glitches. After the RTM, they will start working on a Roll-up release, like thye have done with every Windows up until now and release that as a day-one update. And then we have the second Threshold update later this year.

How are they chopping it into bits while Service Packs already are packes of small updates that got released before the actual SP?

 

Windows 10 will have a 2-week long bug fix periode before RTM (as Aul said on Twitter a while ago) which should be enough to get out the latest major glitches. After the RTM, they will start working on a Roll-up release, like thye have done with every Windows up until now and release that as a day-one update. And then we have the second Threshold update later this year.

 

Weren't Service Packs basically a collection of previous patches? I suppose these new updates will also include features, so even the bigger one (such as Redstone) won't quite fit the previous SP description. 

What im saying is the operating system itself should be 'complete'. That is 100% working, bug free, feature complete. Metro apps like Spartan, Mail, etc can be updated later on via the store but he OS itself, SHOULD be complete. And how it stands at the moment, considering how fast they are getting builds out, are at least 4-5 months away from being finished, Thats just the OS. Once its out, the only things that should go though Windows update are security patches, drivers, feature enhancements and definition updates. Thats what I reckon anyway. 

You guys are comparing the fast ring builds we get now to what we'll get at RTM as being the same, they're not going to be.  Once MS puts the final locks on feature sets then stability will come.  Right now these builds still have things in flux, and they're clear about how buggy they can be from the start.

 

Specially when you install a leaked build, those are going to be even more buggy than the official ones, things in those that are broke they don't fix, even when they can, because it's just for partners to test specific things on, not run as a daily work OS.

 

I expect to get more stable and less buggy builds after the BUILD conference.

Specially when you install a leaked build, those are going to be even more buggy than the official ones, things in those that are broke they don't fix, even when they can, because it's just for partners to test specific things on, not run as a daily work OS.

 

Even if I'm agree with you here , they shouldn't think like that ...

Bugs are bugs , no matter what ... Fix'em !

That's why we invest time and money on their OS .

Even if I'm agree with you here , they shouldn't think like that ...

Bugs are bugs , no matter what ... Fix'em !

That's why we invest time and money on their OS .

 

No reason to fix something unless they are absolutely sure they want to have that feature or implementation finalized, else it would be a waste of time to fix something that will be scrapped later on.

That's why a lot of things are still experimental, more and more gets finalized, but not everything is feature complete yet. George is right, though, BUILD would be the perfect time for the actual API and development kit to be stable and finalized, along with the builds themselves as well.

What im saying is the operating system itself should be 'complete'. That is 100% working, bug free, feature complete. Metro apps like Spartan, Mail, etc can be updated later on via the store but he OS itself, SHOULD be complete. And how it stands at the moment, considering how fast they are getting builds out, are at least 4-5 months away from being finished, Thats just the OS. Once its out, the only things that should go though Windows update are security patches, drivers, feature enhancements and definition updates. Thats what I reckon anyway. 

 

it's an OS, it's never 100% done, rolling or fast release cycles is far better than the old 3-4 or even more cycles. 

it's an OS, it's never 100% done, rolling or fast release cycles is far better than the old 3-4 or even more cycles. 

 

But users with XP claim it worked fine for 12 years. Windows 7  users will say it was damn solid in 2009 and still are not suffering by sticking. My point is users want stability and not changing everything all the time for the sake of it.

 

If my certifications in my MCSE next fall require WIndows 10 I will switch. Otherwise I will wait for another year or 2. My Windows 7 box is very stable and I get nervous with the thought of changes. I noticed when I tried Windows 8,1 it had issues with Update failing just as an example. Windows 7 does not have this problem. Sometimes a boring release can be pretty damn stable. I know this terrifies MS with all the business users and luddites refusing to change and holding off money and new technolotgies for folks who need to provide support to the older stuff. But from a Joe Six pack perspective his machine works just fine.

 

An OS needs to be solid on release with updates slowly or people will cling to the old like they did with XP. I got into a flamewar here with someone who is insistent XP was better than 7. He got this idea because it *looked* like Vista so it must be based on it. Do we want this from Windows 10? When redstone aka 10.1 comes out and looks like 10 they will insist 7 is better etc.

Here's my sketch on how Windows 10 could go with evolved appbar instead of hamburger menus (sorry for russian UI, but you'll get the idea):

 

post-274624-0-45278500-1429498404.jpg

 

post-274624-0-85663300-1429498422.jpg

 

post-274624-0-49175100-1429498437.jpg

 

those rounded icons could be replaced with new borderless ones, I'm not against that

 

Also in portrait mode I would place it in the bottom of the app, like WP apps have. That would be the key difference from current hamburger menus.

Only problem I see is that Windows 8 swipe from the bottom gesture wouldn't make sense with this and I really would want to have that kind of gesture back.

  • Like 2

I'm starting to believe that the option to have transparency in the titlebars is not coming, we are approaching may (rtm june or july?) and it's now or never for 10.0...

 

Has anyone heard or noticed anything about it?

 

I really hope it does, it's something I always missed in 8.x

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!