Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

I don't need my music player to do anything but play music.  I don't need it to watch videos view photos or fix the kitchen sink, so as you say personal preference.  Haven't had any glitches with either the main app or the preview.  Very much disagree about other apps being 'superior.'

 

I'm not saying it's for everyone, I'm saying it may have notable advantages.

I agree; that's why I use Dopamine :D

Could someone please tell me if the app development model is VERY different compared to 8.1?

 

I am currently doing my thesis about cross-device location-aware search thingy, and I am not sure if I should upgrade to Windows 10 and do it there, or stick to 8.1. :/

 

Just an idea, you may already have considered this, why not try it in a VM?

As much as users ask them to, MS is not going to call it Spartan now, it's going to be named Edge, there's a few reasons for this.  First off, the Edge name is used for the new engine, so no need to mix naming up.  Second, and more important, they can keep using the big blue E logo for it, lots of people out there know that you hit the blue E to go online, now they don't have to change the icon that the majority of average users know.

As much as users ask them to, MS is not going to call it Spartan now, it's going to be named Edge, there's a few reasons for this.  First off, the Edge name is used for the new engine, so no need to mix naming up.  Second, and more important, they can keep using the big blue E logo for it, lots of people out there know that you hit the blue E to go online, now they don't have to change the icon that the majority of average users know.

 

I don't care if they call it Spartan or Edge or Iguana Sam but that logo is the worst possible thing for it.

 

"Hey come look at our new browser!  It's still IE!"  is not the message they should be sending.

As much as users ask them to, MS is not going to call it Spartan now, it's going to be named Edge, there's a few reasons for this.  First off, the Edge name is used for the new engine, so no need to mix naming up.  Second, and more important, they can keep using the big blue E logo for it, lots of people out there know that you hit the blue E to go online, now they don't have to change the icon that the majority of average users know.

People know Spartan, those who update to Windows 10 will have some technology knowledge, and Spartan is cool IE is not. 

I think you're overestimating how many people even know which OS they are using. Clicking the blue e is all they know, which is why they are still using generations old versions instead of upgrading.

 

I agree that the logo is horrible, but they can't step away from that property. Maybe different style on the e, but it needs to be similar.

I think you're overestimating how many people even know which OS they are using. Clicking the blue e is all they know, which is why they are still using generations old versions instead of upgrading.

 

I agree that the logo is horrible, but they can't step away from that property. Maybe different style on the e, but it needs to be similar.

The old blue E will be hidden, I think. People will learn eventually. I taught my grandma how to click Chrome instead of IE

I think you're overestimating how many people even know which OS they are using. Clicking the blue e is all they know, which is why they are still using generations old versions instead of upgrading.

 

I agree that the logo is horrible, but they can't step away from that property. Maybe different style on the e, but it needs to be similar.

 

^This,  it has to be a blue E or some form of it because it's what the average consumer knows after 20 years.   I don't see anything wrong with the new Edge icon, it's familiar yet new at the same time.  Could it be better? Maybe? 

I swear I saw like a million posts here on Neowin about how Spartan is a terrible name for a browser and Microsoft should never use it.

What happened? :huh:

I haven't seen any post that said Spartan was a bad name.

 

^This,  it has to be a blue E or some form of it because it's what the average consumer knows after 20 years.   I don't see anything wrong with the new Edge icon, it's familiar yet new at the same time.  Could it be better? Maybe? 

No. People will adjust to new icons and names. Google launched Chrome. Apple launched iCloud. They are well known now.  IE is also well know for being the worst browser on the planet that everyone should avoid the blue e.

Chrome was a first version for Google, they didn't have brand recognition to build on. Apple iCloud 1) used the i-whatever prefix of Apple, 2) used the word "cloud", and 3) was pretty much forced on every user who uses it.

 

 

EDIT

 

Hell, in tech support, I've had clients not know if they had Windows or Mac. I've had people call their Android their iPhone and not know the difference.

 

This is why MS was sued for packaging IE with Windows and why early browser shortcuts were "Access the Internet" or other such phrases - people are idiots and use whatever icon is on the desktop.

Edited by Zagadka

Chrome was a first version for Google, they didn't have brand recognition to build on. Apple iCloud 1) used the i-whatever prefix of Apple, 2) used the word "cloud", and 3) was pretty much forced on every user who uses it.

 

 

EDIT

 

Hell, in tech support, I've had clients not know if they had Windows or Mac. I've had people call their Android their iPhone and not know the difference.

 

This is why MS was sued for packaging IE with Windows and why early browser shortcuts were "Access the Internet" or other such phrases - people are idiots and use whatever icon is on the desktop.

 

Exactly, which is why they did away with the start menu since few people actually used it. But of course, it's back and people can still ignore it, I guess.

It's also why the save icon is still a floppy disk after all these years, I don't see people complaining about changing that, nor is there a need to.   Could MS make the Edge icon better?  Sure, one thing I'd like to see is for Edge to have a live tile that actually shows info this time.  Maybe a preview image of the tab it's open to and also a number of how many tabs are open as well.

 

They could maybe even let different extensions send info to the live tile, or heck, for starters maybe the download manager in it can post info as it's downloading files.

The continued use of the floppy for save is just one of those things. We also use trash cans, icons of rotary phones, Hell, the fact that we still rely on "folders" and "files" is a tremendous throwback. And the use of a 8 1/2 x 10 piece of paper as the default icon for a file. And none of that will change, since it just works and retraining people would be silly.

Wow 17,416 people really are trying to waste every bodies time. 

Really its to see how much they listen. Obviously they thought Edge would have some type of effect or they wouldn't have stopped using Spartan. This is probably why you are not in charge of renaming the browser. :p

Really its to see how much they listen. Obviously they thought Edge would have some type of effect or they wouldn't have stopped using Spartan. This is probably why you are not in charge of renaming the browser. :p

 

Actually 17,416 people failed to realise what the point of these suggestions is for, branding isn't one of them.

Branding has no business in the hands of the people, never has and never will. Those people should spend less time moaning that the browser they probably won't use, has a name they probably don;t like. What they need to realise is with six months they won't care any more. They need to stop wasting their own time and move on now.

Actually 17,416 people failed to realise what the point of these suggestions is for, branding isn't one of them.

Branding has no business in the hands of the people, never has and never will. Those people should spend less time moaning that the browser they probably won't use, has a name they probably don;t like. What they need to realise is with six months they won't care any more. They need to stop wasting their own time and move on now.

indeed.. functionality and feel matter over tthe name anyway

Actually 17,416 people failed to realise what the point of these suggestions is for, branding isn't one of them.

Branding has no business in the hands of the people, never has and never will. Those people should spend less time moaning that the browser they probably won't use, has a name they probably don;t like. What they need to realise is with six months they won't care any more. They need to stop wasting their own time and move on now.

Until Microsoft actually realizes that people recognize the new browser as "Spartan" from all the news floating around. Believe it or not, people actually read tech news outside of tech sites.

Not most people though, that's the point here. Yeah there's a few million insiders who recognise Spartan, but compare that to the potential market reach of Windows 10 and it's really not that much. Besides the insiders are more experienced and technical users anyways so the name isn't really going to make much difference to them.

 

To be honest I'd like to thing the marketing guys at Microsoft who no doubt have years of experience with this type of thing have got a better idea of what to do than a few people complaining on the internet.

  • Like 1

indeed.. functionality and feel matter over tthe name anyway

 

Exactly. All the moaning in the user voice page is just noise getting in the way of the real issues.

I'm hoping the edge team have a little button on the uservoice page that they can click that mutes stupid threads like the "rename back to spartan" and "redesign logo" ones.

 

We need them to concentrate on standards and things like no <picture>, no filters, no will change,  no html templates... etc etc. Make the Edge engine a truly modern, up-to-date engine and a contender to Blink.

 

 

Until Microsoft actually realizes that people recognize the new browser as "Spartan" from all the news floating around. Believe it or not, people actually read tech news outside of tech sites.

 

Don't kid yourself. A tiny minority of the public actually know about "Spartan". and of those people, not all them want it to remain as Spartan. 

Even those that do will be over it in a few months, and then there will be the sort of people who still use XP (and once 10 is released, 7) who will never be happy any way.

 

There's far more important things the Edge team need to be looking at, the branding isn;t one of them, it's just noise in the feedback channels getting in the way of the real issues.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!