[OFFICIAL] Windows 10 Insider Program

By Ian S.
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41

  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3

  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

+Zagadka Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Yea, I wouldn't use Windows Insiders as a barometer of how consumers will react.

 

I'm pretty sure that MS has run many, many focus groups of people who don't go out of their way to test unreleased software.

 

Spartan isn't even that good of a name. I mean, it sounds kinda good and keeps the Halo connection Cortana has, but it has no bearing on being an internet browser. Among non-nerds, Edge is a better name and is more fair to people who just know the blue e icon while also promoting the new rendering engine. It can even be called IE Edge.

  • MikeChipshop
  • Like 1
Rising Star

Pulagatha

Posted
Posted

Actually 17,416 people failed to realise what the point of these suggestions is for, branding isn't one of them.

Branding has no business in the hands of the people, never has and never will. Those people should spend less time moaning that the browser they probably won't use, has a name they probably don;t like. What they need to realise is with six months they won't care any more. They need to stop wasting their own time and move on now.

 

 

I don't know about that. The online reaction to the marketing suggested name Edge is "Meh, I guess it will do.", "I don't really like that icon.", and "It reminds me too much of Internet Explorer." And then there's another option with the people who made it using a codename that caught on and has an icon already associated with it. If I had to choose the option people felt indifferent about and the one they were excited over I think I'd choose Spartan.

 

Also, "Branding has no business in the hands of the people." The people decide what they want to buy. It's not an absolute solution, you still have to be a good craftsmen, but I'd say if you were making something you want people to buy then you should at least be curious about their opinion. Microsoft released a technical preview just to make sure they listened to what people are complaining about (and I imagine what certain factions within Microsoft are complaining about.)

Grand Master

MikeChipshop Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

I don't know about that. The online reaction to the marketing suggested name Edge is "Meh, I guess it will do.", "I don't really like that icon.", and "It reminds me too much of Internet Explorer." or option B was the people who made it used a codename that caught on and has a icon already associated with it. I think I'd choose Spartan.

 

The code name caught on with a select bunch of insiders, not the general public. The general public, who make up the majority of users in the end, know very little of the name "Spartan", and once MS markets the crap out of "Edge", which they will do, the general public will know exactly what Edge is.

Apprentice

i4mt3hwin

Posted
Posted

Yeah I think Edge is fine. The general public doesn't care about browsers, they either use what is default or what other people to tell them to use/install on their machine. The name Edge sounds fine, no one cares about what the icon looks like. As long as the experience is better, Microsoft may regain some users. 

Rising Star

Pulagatha

Posted
Posted

The code name caught on with a select bunch of insiders, not the general public. The general public, who make up the majority of users in the end, know very little of the name "Spartan", and once MS markets the crap out of "Edge", which they will do, the general public will know exactly what Edge is.

 

Well, it's nice you think that. I don't agree with it at all. They marketed all they could out of Windows 8. I saw almost all of it. That marketing campaign didn't help on it's own effort.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Wow 17,416 people really are trying to waste every bodies time. 

probably 3 votes per person, unless that's one of the places they allow 5 votes..

Until Microsoft actually realizes that people recognize the new browser as "Spartan" from all the news floating around. Believe it or not, people actually read tech news outside of tech sites.

 

I could go out and ask 100 random people on the street today avoiding those that look like obvious geeks and none of them would know what spartan is. a lot would know what IE/internet explorer is, but by far not all, everyone would know that the e is for internet.

  • MikeChipshop
  • Like 1
Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Well, it's nice you think that. I don't agree with it at all. They marketed all they could out of Windows 8. I saw almost all of it. That marketing campaign didn't help on it's own effort.

 

That's because the press was doing their best to undermine it. from tech press to regular news papers talking about ###### they didn't have a clue about and tech journalists thinking of themselves rather than the regular users who actually benefited from 8. 

  • Tuskd and MikeChipshop
  • Like 2
Grand Master

MikeChipshop Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

Well, it's nice you think that. I don't agree with it at all. They marketed all they could out of Windows 8. I saw almost all of it. That marketing campaign didn't help on it's own effort.

 

You can't really disagree with "Fact" i'm afraid, that's not how it works.

Grand Master

Tuskd

Posted
Posted

When Corporate Suits rule over popular opinion. #WillTheyListen 

 

28k7adj.png

 The feedback was posted on Oct 16 2014. So a large majority would have voted for it even before they knew what the browser would be called. I don't think its really an Edge vs Spartan thing. imo Edge is a solid name but I cant comment on its logo. I'll wait and watch.

Rising Star

Pulagatha

Posted
Posted

You can't really disagree with "Fact" i'm afraid, that's not how it works.

 

I can disagree with a choice someone made. They can still change their mind about it. There are people that like the name. I like the name.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKCmyiljKo0&t=1m6s

 

 

That's because the press was doing their best to undermine it. from tech press to regular news papers talking about ###### they didn't have a clue about and tech journalists thinking of themselves rather than the regular users who actually benefited from 8. 

 

Even at Microsoft, people really didn't like certain aspects to Windows 8. It was designed in haste and followed UI paradigms that were unproven (and different from the desktop UI.) The horizontal scrolling, the fully off-screen chrome, the empty space through out the UI, and the full-screen windowing were things people didn't really like about Windows 8. Some were more charitable than others with their opinion. Some people I don't think could identify exactly why they didn't like it and I think that just agitated people more than usual.

Rising Star

Pulagatha

Posted
Posted

No, you were saying you disagreed with me, and what i stated was a fact. Therefore you were disagreeing with fact.

 

You are stating what you think will happen and what is likely to happen, but it is not a fact until it has happened. The userbase is part of the general public. The general public likes choice. So saying they'll just like it because that's what they are marketed doesn't make something good. No one likes being force feed anything. I think if they are trying to distance themselves from Internet Explorer the logo doesn't help. I like the Edge name and the Spartan name. I like the Spartan name a little more. I could see Microsoft changing their mind about this.

Grand Master

DConnell Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

I really liked their solution for the small tablets, where they hid the left column of the start screen behind the hamburger menu

Wouldn't it be nice if we also got that option on larger tablets and 2 in 1's?

That with a full screen/start menu size solution for the All Apps section would make it a lot better for me

 

If that were made available for "larger screen" devices, I'd be a lot more likely to upgrade.

Grand Master

MikeChipshop Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

You are stating what you think will happen and what is likely to happen, but it is not a fact until it has happened. The userbase is part of the general public. The general public likes choice. So saying they'll just like it because that's what they are marketed doesn't make something good. No one likes being force feed anything. I think if they are trying to distance themselves from Internet Explorer the logo doesn't help. I like the Edge name and the Spartan name. I like the Spartan name a little more. I could see Microsoft changing their mind about this.

 

So what you're saying is that once Microsoft market 'Edge', the average user wont now it's a browser? Okaaaaaay then....  :rolleyes:

Rising Star

Pulagatha

Posted
Posted

I'm saying just because something is marketed doesn't make it better.

Pretty sure no one said that.

 

I said that. you said, "Branding has no business in the hands of the people, never has, and never will." I'm saying it matters to let the general public have a choice in branding, that marketing something without their feedback can be worse for the brand, and that marketing something just because the marketing department gets to choose the name and logo doesn't mean the general public's idea of what the brand should be doesn't matter... I could be wrong though.

 

It does make it more known though which really solves the problem.

 

It does, but marketing can backfire.

Community Regular

Mulrian

Posted
Posted

I said that. you said, "Branding has no business in the hands of the people, never has, and never will." I'm saying it matters to let the general public have a choice in branding, that marketing something without their feedback can be worse for the brand, and that marketing something just because the marketing department gets to choose the name and logo doesn't mean the general public's idea of what the brand should be doesn't matter... I could be wrong though.

 

It's not really the general public's view that they should keep the old name, it's a few thousand people on the internet, most of whom probably don't really care that much anyway.

 

Microsoft might well have considered keeping the name, but there are a load of other factors at play here so they ultimately chose Edge.

Rising Star

Pulagatha

Posted
Posted

It's not really the general public's view that they should keep the old name, it's a few thousand people on the internet, most of whom probably don't really care that much anyway.

 

Microsoft might well have considered keeping the name, but there are a load of other factors at play here so they ultimately chose Edge.

 

Microsoft chose Edge. I like the name. When the supposed names came out of what they were testing for that name was one of the best on the list. Still, I just find it kind of surprising that that a few thousand people agreed on something on the internet.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

I can disagree with a choice someone made. They can still change their mind about it. There are people that like the name. I like the name.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKCmyiljKo0&t=1m6s

 

 

 

Even at Microsoft, people really didn't like certain aspects to Windows 8. It was designed in haste and followed UI paradigms that were unproven (and different from the desktop UI.) The horizontal scrolling, the fully off-screen chrome, the empty space through out the UI, and the full-screen windowing were things people didn't really like about Windows 8. Some were more charitable than others with their opinion. Some people I don't think could identify exactly why they didn't like it and I think that just agitated people more than usual.

 

Actually none of that was unproven. the off screen chrome was the most unproven, but even that had proven history in among other things android. 

Grand Master

Draggendrop Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Since they have a way to upgrade to new builds of the OS I assume you are correct on that. Makes sense because they can keep adding new features without having to release a whole new OS and they will have tons of people to test them like they currently are for the technical preview.

Although the thread has rapidly progressed the last day..I really hope that MS keeps the builds going. I would like to have the "release" and the "builds" as well to see new stuff as it evolves and use the "release" for daily work....Cheers

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Hi my name is Olivia and I am from Australia

      By Jim K · Posted

      ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9

      By Copernic · Posted

      Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures

      By Steven P. · Posted

      DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 2026.001.21651

      By Mindovermaster · Posted

      Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along

      By ZipZapRap · Posted

      The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!