Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

They're trying harder than ever to turn Windows into an advertising nightmare.

 

Candy Crush, then ads on the start menu, and ads on the lock screen.


Well your ideas weren't declined, it was just that was too broad. I think it would be better to make a suggestion for each bullet point.

They're trying harder than ever to turn Windows into an advertising nightmare.

 

Candy Crush, then ads on the start menu, and ads on the lock screen.

Well your ideas weren't declined, it was just that was too broad. I think it would be better to make a suggestion for each bullet point.

Ads can be disabled. My suggestion would take too long to make a new one for each suggestion. 

Having those suggestions, if you think of them as ads or not, is fine with me as long as you have options for everything, and we do.  Suggesting new apps to you on the lock screen or in the start menu is fine really,  I hardly see the lock screen as it is but for those few seconds I do, if I spot a new app that matches my interests I'll check it out.  Who knows, it could be something good I didn't know about before.

I'm sorry, but I can't help but laugh at people who complain about stuff like "extra movements" or a game that may come bundled and more than likely can be uninstalled.

 

Right click-->Uninstall. Barely any movement involved in doing that and people freaking go nuts with soo much anger it's hilarious. How lazy can a person be that they find that tiring or say that it takes too long to do? Reminds me of the high-five scene from Hot Tub Time Machine 2. Where they'll say it, but can't be bothered to actually slap another hand.

 

Here's what should really drive you nuts. Think about how much energy you used to make all the complaints like that and compare it to what you would do to get rid of those complaints. Typing a paragraph or short novel about your hate of whatever feature you want gone/turned off compared to Right Click-->Uninstall. Right Click-->Disable. One takes a mere second and barely any movement. The other is constant typing on a daily basis.

 

Oh and to the one who did the UserVoice thing. I'd decline it based just on how you said: "Here's a couple things" then went on to list 15 items. Kind of hard to take anything like that seriously. Especially when you word each one like you're telling them to do this and that and not recommending it.

 

One last thing. For the love of God when new builds are released and something has changed and somebody here recommended it somewhere, don't assume Microsoft saw that and listened to you specifically. There's 4 million people using these builds and I highly doubt that they would change anything based on one persons recommendation. Come on.

  • Like 3

I think it is more of a concern for a slippery slope leading to more inclusion of advertisements or bundled software. Just think of the horror created by browser bar adware that is frequently packaged with necessary software. Hell, a DirectX installer tried to sneak in Bing Bar on me yesterday. Java and Flash also sneak things in. Can you avoid it with just a single click? Yea, that doesn't make it good.

My suggestion would take too long to make a new one for each suggestion. 

 

That's the point of user sub though. To have specific issues per post so that users can vote on said point.

You basically put up an essay, which helps no one and MS pretty much just said 'TL:DR;' lol.

 

Break it up in to finer points and post them separately.

 

You've also given little explanation of any of the points. Preferring, instead, to just making a huge list of points.

 

I really think you should take the time out to convert your post in to a more user voice friendly format, as i pretty much agree with all of them. Maybe a few of us could leech some of the ideas and post them ourselves.

I think it is more of a concern for a slippery slope leading to more inclusion of advertisements or bundled software. Just think of the horror created by browser bar adware that is frequently packaged with necessary software. Hell, a DirectX installer tried to sneak in Bing Bar on me yesterday. Java and Flash also sneak things in. Can you avoid it with just a single click? Yea, that doesn't make it good.

How is bundling CCS any different than say Solitaire or Minesweeper? The bundled crapware is not a problem with store apps.

How is bundling CCS any different than say Solitaire or Minesweeper? The bundled crapware is not a problem with store apps.

<shrug> It wasn't my complaint, just what I think people are thinking of. Again, just thinking of what other people are thinking, the prime difference is licensed property.

 

Personally, I don't care very much one way or the other, though I would lean against bundled anything, including Minesweeper and Solitaire. I miss the days when you could select what parts of Windows to not install during installation. Put a page in the start of the Store app with the "recommended apps" or something, I much prefer having a clean install and getting the versions of software I want.

I think it is more of a concern for a slippery slope leading to more inclusion of advertisements or bundled software. Just think of the horror created by browser bar adware that is frequently packaged with necessary software. Hell, a DirectX installer tried to sneak in Bing Bar on me yesterday. Java and Flash also sneak things in. Can you avoid it with just a single click? Yea, that doesn't make it good.

 

But it depends on the way it's done, which is why I said it's about how you view it.  The suggestions on the lock screen or in the start menu are fine IF they're tied to each users history and interests.  Like if they see you install lots of games from the store, then you should get game suggestions, if you install other types of apps you should get suggestions with connections to your interests.

 

It starts to be more like an ad when it's just random stuff, but suggestions coming from individual user data is different in my mind.   It also helps when it's done in a way where it's not intrusive, last thing we need is popup notifications of xx app or xx game, something it looks like Apple does on iOS, don't know if you get the same on Android though.

Windows 10 needs a lot of work, and all they want to do is throw Candy Crush in our faces? Idiots.

 

Overreacting much?

 

Microsoft don't make Candy Crush.. so they will be diverting very few resources at it.  Most of it would be in commercial and marketing (i.e. those people that don't write code).

 

At worst, they are providing the Candy Crush developers with some support, but that helps Microsoft test their platform - it doesn't matter how good the platform is, if developers can't release apps on it then it is completely useless.

Seriously, Candy Crush? If I want that garbage I'll download it. There is 0 reason to include some dumb video game with an operating system. Why don't they worry about fixing bugs instead of what games they are going to include?

  • Like 2

I don't get all the fuss about the game being included. Yes, I'll also uninstall it (as I matter of fact, I've never even tried it out), but the OS is going to be offered as a free upgrade for a lot of people, and therefore it's only logical that they're trying to get some money from someone else.

I really wish they scrap the cube animation on the live tiles. It looks tacky and is exactly opposite of the beautiful metro animations of WP. :/

Maybe we'll get the chance to configure the kind of animation we want for tiles.

PEBJBAD.jpg

Guys whats that round icon with the dot inside in my taskbar? every so often it turns up, and then dissapears like 10 seconds later. Cant figure out what its from. Any ideas? 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!