Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

I didn't know this until today, but did anyone else notice that there is no GUI way to set wireless network priority in Windows 8.1?

ff847520.Davies_CG_0710_Fig6%28en-us,MSD

 

UserVoice:

https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions/suggestions/8140008-add-back-wireless-network-priority

That is what I had presumed..was not sure though...I thought the only penalty was on start-up...delay for registry read....Cheers

I think the biggest thing that contributes to "rot" is filling up disk space over time and disk fragmentation. SSDs help for the most part, but they still have their own kind of rot as well. That is why you can do clean install of the OS, load up all the programs you want and it still performs better than if you had used that system for 2-3 years with pretty much the same apps.

  • Like 1

Seems rumor has it Windows 10, will RTM in July. Seems too soon. Windows 10 still has many rought edges that Microsoft seems to have no plans on fixing.

 

No horizontal alignment options.

Tablet Mode is 10 steps backwards from Windows 8.1

Start is a mess yet.

All Apps is pitiful.

Explorer was never replaced/upgraded to fit the new look and feel.

It's a game of roulette on whether or not Start will open.

Edge is featureless and bland. Won't ship with extension support.

Persistent, always-on taskbar is frustrating to say the least.

Built in Apps are still missing a lot of features, and even some apps are missing yet.

 

This isn't good.

We need opacity (transparency) & blur sliders in Windows 10! In current situation, we're stuck with a fixed level of transparency & blur. Here's a UserVoice suggestion for it, Please vote: https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions/suggestions/7022877-opacity-and-blur-effect-sliders-for-themes

 

:)

  • Like 2

We need opacity (transparency) & blur sliders in Windows 10! In current situation, we're stuck with a fixed level of transparency & blur. Here's a UserVoice suggestion for it, Please vote: https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions/suggestions/7022877-opacity-and-blur-effect-sliders-for-themes

 

:)

 

 

Transparency levels should be coming, they're in the mobile version so I see no reason they're not in the desktop version as well.

Seems rumor has it Windows 10, will RTM in July. Seems too soon. Windows 10 still has many rought edges that Microsoft seems to have no plans on fixing.

 

No horizontal alignment options.

Tablet Mode is 10 steps backwards from Windows 8.1

Start is a mess yet.

All Apps is pitiful.

Explorer was never replaced/upgraded to fit the new look and feel.

It's a game of roulette on whether or not Start will open.

Edge is featureless and bland. Won't ship with extension support.

Persistent, always-on taskbar is frustrating to say the least.

Built in Apps are still missing a lot of features, and even some apps are missing yet.

 

This isn't good.

I assume you are talking about desktop/laptop operation...correct me if I am wrong. I also noticed "start" button glitches (10122 with AMD) but since my system is set up for desktop, I used "Classic Shell" and problem is gone, as well as having full control of "start menu" configuration. For the taskbar, I assume you are talking about the quick launch, which can be on "auto hide", mine is. As far as "Explorer", there are much better browsers out there to use and the future is limited for Explorer anyway. Overall, in desktop mode, this build, even with AMD glitch's, is rock solid for me and will definitely be ready in July for desktop users. Edge is a work in progress and is installed so we can play with it as it develops...which is fun....Cheers... :)

...there are much better browsers out there to use and the future is limited for Explorer anyway.

He means Explorer as in the Windows shell/file manager, not Internet Explorer. I personally hope they have some super-secret redesign of Explorer that some other group is working on in parallel. They're probably keeping it a tight-lipped secret till closer to RTM if they are. That's my five cents*.

 

* Canada doesn't use pennies anymore. Had to round it :p

He means Explorer as in the Windows shell/file manager, not Internet Explorer. I personally hope they have some super-secret redesign of Explorer that some other group is working on in parallel. They're probably keeping it a tight-lipped secret till closer to RTM if they are. That's my five cents*.

 

* Canada doesn't use pennies anymore. Had to round it :p

My mistake.....oooops..... :huh:

If Microsoft wants for Windows 10 to succeed they have to actually finish this product and not release it in the current form. Right now it suffers from same problem Windows 8 suffered. Half of stuff are in Universal Apps half still in Win32 which also same applies to overall UI. I hope they do not think they should leave File Explorer in the current state because it would be seriously wrong decision. Either release modern File Explorer or don't bother with any modern UI in Windows 10 but re-release Windows 7. What i really like Windows 7 UI or Windows 10...that i will keep for myself.

If Microsoft wants for Windows 10 to succeed they have to actually finish this product and not release it in the current form. Right now it suffers from same problem Windows 8 suffered. Half of stuff are in Universal Apps half still in Win32 which also same applies to overall UI. I hope they do not think they should leave File Explorer in the current state because it would be seriously wrong decision. Either release modern File Explorer or don't bother with any modern UI in Windows 10 but re-release Windows 7. What i really like Windows 7 UI or Windows 10...that i will keep for myself.

What exactly is wrong with file explorer other than cosmetics. The drop down tool pane gives you plenty of options..even emailing items. There isn't a file I can't find with it on my system. It has selection options, cut, paste, move, re-order, path-copy, quick or easy access and pinning to name a few...It's a "file explorer" and it does it's job great on my build (10122). As far as Win32/64 programs....they won't be going anywhere soon, almost all of my engineering programs (some at 8Gb) have modern versions and many legacy versions that will need future support for large companies. It's a beta build, we have to expect bugs, things are getting better.....Cheers........ :)

  • Like 1

No horizontal alignment options.

Tablet Mode is 10 steps backwards from Windows 8.1

Start is a mess yet.

All Apps is pitiful.

Explorer was never replaced/upgraded to fit the new look and feel.

It's a game of roulette on whether or not Start will open.

Edge is featureless and bland. Won't ship with extension support.

Persistent, always-on taskbar is frustrating to say the least.

Built in Apps are still missing a lot of features, and even some apps are missing yet.

 

This isn't good.

 

 

He means Explorer as in the Windows shell/file manager, not Internet Explorer. I personally hope they have some super-secret redesign of Explorer that some other group is working on in parallel. They're probably keeping it a tight-lipped secret till closer to RTM if they are. That's my five cents*.

 

* Canada doesn't use pennies anymore. Had to round it :p

 

 

If Microsoft wants for Windows 10 to succeed they have to actually finish this product and not release it in the current form. Right now it suffers from same problem Windows 8 suffered. Half of stuff are in Universal Apps half still in Win32 which also same applies to overall UI. I hope they do not think they should leave File Explorer in the current state because it would be seriously wrong decision. Either release modern File Explorer or don't bother with any modern UI in Windows 10 but re-release Windows 7. What i really like Windows 7 UI or Windows 10...that i will keep for myself.

*cough* Longhorn *cough*

Guys, do you not remember the last time MS tried to convert the whole UI to XAML in one go? They tried and failed with Longhorn.

You simply cannot replace the entirety of the UI to some XAML framework in a timeframe that works with faster release cycle. Either wait 5 years for a new OS or move to an agile development model and do it in phases. Which makes more sense?

Redoing Explorer would have been dumb at this timeframe. What would have gained you? Oh some fancy looking new thing that has no functionality, yay. Existing Explorer works great on desktop as is and is not critical on tablets or phones.

Their number one goal with Windows 10 was to fix the severe gaps in the Universal App Framework (WinRT 2.0 if you will) that caused Windows 8 to have such crappy apps in the first place. Once it's feature rich, it will make it easier and better to continue to port Windows GUI over to it.

 

 

 

 

*cough* Longhorn *cough*

Guys, do you not remember the last time MS tried to convert the whole UI to XAML in one go? They tried and failed with Longhorn.

You simply cannot replace the entirety of the UI to some XAML framework in a timeframe that works with faster release cycle. Either wait 5 years for a new OS or move to an agile development model and do it in phases. Which makes more sense?

Redoing Explorer would have been dumb at this timeframe. What would have gained you? Oh some fancy looking new thing that has no functionality, yay. Existing Explorer works great on desktop as is and is not critical on tablets or phones.

Their number one goal with Windows 10 was to fix the severe gaps in the Universal App Framework (WinRT 2.0 if you will) that caused Windows 8 to have such crappy apps in the first place. Once it's feature rich, it will make it easier and better to continue to port Windows GUI over to it.

True, it's not really a huge deal, and your reasons for why they wouldn't do it (or haven't done it yet) are good ones. But we can't prove they're not working on it so anything's possible, if you'll forgive my slight logical fallacy here.

Guys, do you not remember the last time MS tried to convert the whole UI to XAML in one go? They tried and failed with Longhorn.

I think it should be noted that the XAML in use in Windows 10 is different from the pre-release .NET XAML that was in use at the time. Microsoft was trying to build the operating system ("Longhorn" / Vista) on components (or pillars, as they were known) that were not even complete themselves.

I want to see resume on failed file transfers. Why is this not a thing yet? 

This is also an area that has been addressed by third-party downloaders (both Free Download Manager and IDM, for example, excel at this).

In both cases, it STILL requires support form the server end for download resumption (something which is becoming less and less common, especially for video).

Seems rumor has it Windows 10, will RTM in July. Seems too soon. Windows 10 still has many rought edges that Microsoft seems to have no plans on fixing.

 

No horizontal alignment options.

Tablet Mode is 10 steps backwards from Windows 8.1

Start is a mess yet.

All Apps is pitiful.

Explorer was never replaced/upgraded to fit the new look and feel.

It's a game of roulette on whether or not Start will open.

Edge is featureless and bland. Won't ship with extension support.

Persistent, always-on taskbar is frustrating to say the least.

Built in Apps are still missing a lot of features, and even some apps are missing yet.

 

This isn't good.

 

You act like they aren't working on those things and haven't been. Just because they haven't been fixed in any of the builds released yet.

 

Good grief you're being such a Negative Nancy in this thread. 

You act like they aren't working on those things and haven't been. Just because they haven't been fixed in any of the builds released yet.

 

Good grief you're being such a Negative Nancy in this thread. 

I'm not the only one saying "too soon".

And? Just because your priorities and theirs (microsofts) aren't aligning this time is no reason to be such a whiner.

I agree with Dot that it is way too soon and wont get released, but since Windows 8.1, Dot has always maintained it's the perfect OS. But he fails to realise that 90% of Windows users have this awesome thing called a desktop computer, that doesnt have touch. Windows 10 fixes the mess that was 8.1 for those 90% of users and gives us back the features we need. Desktop is the priority here, once thats complete, im sure MS will get around to making those people who brought Surface tablets happy. 

Edited by zhangm

I agree with Dot that it is way too soon and wont get released, but since Windows 8.1, Dot has always maintained it's the perfect OS. But he fails to realise that 90% of Windows users have this awesome thing called a desktop computer, that doesnt have touch. Windows 10 fixes the mess that was 8.1 for those 90% of users and gives us back the features we need. Desktop is the priority here, once thats complete, im sure MS will get around to making those people who brought Surface tablets happy. 

 

Yawn! * again *

Except there are plenty of people that have never used Windows 8 with touch and still maintain that it is very good OS.  Windows 10 is a paradigm shift from Windows 8, but that doesn't mean Windows 8 is a bad paradigm.

 

I'd appreciate in future if you wouldn't talk on my behalf.... especially when spouting this BS.

  • Like 2

Yawn! * again *

Except there are plenty of people that have never used Windows 8 with touch and still maintain that it is very good OS.  Windows 10 is a paradigm shift from Windows 8, but that doesn't mean Windows 8 is a bad paradigm.

 

I'd appreciate in future if you wouldn't talk on my behalf.... especially when spouting this BS.

Never once mentioned your name mate. And Windows 8 was great - for touch enabled devices, but it was (and still is) absolute s**t on a desktop. EVERYONE knows that. The numbers speak for themselves on that matter. Hell, even Microsoft know how bad it is (FOR DESKTOPS). That is the real reason why they are distancing themselves from Windows 8. They know if they want users to jump from Windows 7 and Windows 8, they need to distance themselves as much as possible from that operating system. 

I'd appreciate in future if you wouldn't take what I say as directed directly at you, because it's not. It was directed at Dot... especially when I even mentioned that 4 words in to my 'BS'. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!