Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Just as I'm skeptical that a lot of people used the Menu as often as they claimed. Many just use desktop links or pinned items. I've seen far too many desktops with literally every inch of the screen covered in icons. Personally I'd rather use the organization tools in the Screen, or even the Menu :x , over just dumping everything on the desktop, but a lot of people seem to like that.

 

Me, I use the main part of the Screen for my most frequent items, and All Apps for the rest I do use All Apps at least a couple times a day, and would really prefer the 8.x layout.

What makes it even sillier is that pinning went nowhere with 8, 8.1, or even 10.  In the absence of the Start menu, you could pin from the StartScreen, etc.

 

Due to the migration from Control Panel to Settings being incomplete, you can add a shortcut for Control Panel to the desktop. (Added in 10130)

Same applies to This PC.

 

Is it workflow, or complacency?

Imho seeing how effortless Windows 10 is to use in comparison (even though far from perfect at this point) despite remnants of the Metro/Win32 dichotomy illustrates in retrospect just how annoying Windows 8 was to use. They're now years into (and far from finished) into fixing Windows 8 which should probably never have gotten into customers' hands.

So tell the OEMs that - they are the ones that (according to you and the other critics) put computers that support touch into user hands with Windows 7 - which didn't support it.

 

If Windows didn't support features OEMs out into their hardware you would (rightly) call Windows a hardware laggard.  Guess what?  Windows 7 was, indeed, a hardware laggard by NOT supporting touch - which was included in a fair-to-decent amount of customer hardware.

 

YOU may not have noticed OR cared (because you didn't move) - however, the OEMs won't stand still just because users do - they can't sell new hardware if they stay put.

 

So how much choice did Microsoft really have with 8 other than going the way they did?  Surprisingly, practically none - despite user recalcitrance.

 

When I evaluated the Developer Preview, I knew about the touch support (and my hardware's lack of it) - however, I didn't evaluate it as a touch-optimized OS.  I evaluated it as a straight upgrade from what I was running at the time (7 Ultimate x64, for those picking nits).  I evaluated newer software (including ModernUI software) compared to existing software (Win32 software for the most part). If it was usable, and beat the existing Win32 software out there, it stayed - isn't that the usual measuring stick?  I didn't use any Start menu bringbacks/alternatives, either - that was an acid-test for ME; could I actually use the OS as-is?

 

Here's what I discovered:

 

Windows 8 (even as a Developer Preview) was just as usable (if not more so) than 7 Ultimate.  (Surprise #1.)

ModernUI software was quite usable despite no touch support in the hardware - while it could use it, it largely didn't need touch to be useful.  (Surprise #2 AND Wrong Assumption #1.)

The Modern UX/StartScreen likewise was usable without touch - even more surprising, it was usable without either touch OR a pointing device; it was actually - yeeks - KEYBOARD-driven.  (Surprise #3.)

Upshot - Windows 8 is less biased hardware-wise than 7. (Necessary going forward, as pointing-device bias was going away in newer hardware.)  However, folks without touch could not only still use the OS, but can use software designed to take better advantage of new feature support (touch, for example) - even if they DON'T have touch support. (Surprise #4 and Wrong Assumption #2.)

 

That led DIRECTLY to my mea culpa with the Consumer Preview.  I was skeptical - I took what Microsoft said with a saltmine, not a mere grain of salt.  However, I was wrong - and was I ever.  And I owned up to BEING wrong.

Trying to use Windows 10 as a daily driver, but just can't. It's in many ways still inferior to Windows 8.1.

 

I still don't understand Microsoft's rational for destroying the superior (user configurable) Win8.1 All Apps UX - 

attachicon.gifScreenshot (302).png

 

 

Why not just search for the app you want to use?

 

I never liked the all app screen. it was an overwhelming cluster

Why not just search for the app you want to use?

I never liked the all app screen. it was an overwhelming cluster

That's something I'll never understand. Even though I like the approach of Windows 8.1 and its Start Screen full app list, I don't have to browse using the narrower counterpart on Windows 10 because of the built-in search.

The only annoyance for me is not being able to configure it for just searching my computer and get rid of the Bing thing.

I'm sure, however, that in the future it will be possible - either officially or not.

I have no idea where but I don't think it will be stored in HDD but I think it will be in somewhere on your system.  I think BIOS or something...

 

I am sure the key is stored on HDD for system info lookups. ... Right now, you have a preview key...

That doesn't sound right to me. Software won't write to the BIOS and I doubt it would store they key on the hard drive. My guess is that insiders will be emailed product keys. I hope it's that way, otherwise I'll just use the regular 8.1 to 10 upgrade and get a key.

Why not just search for the app you want to use?

 

I never liked the all app screen. it was an overwhelming cluster

 I agree, but I shouldn't have been forced to do a search to find a program quickly. That it was necessary proves the UI was not optimal.

 I agree, but I shouldn't have been forced to do a search to find a program quickly. That it was necessary proves the UI was not optimal.

 

If you know you want to open the Calculator, why go into all apps and scroll down to Calculator when you can just hit the start button, type calc, confirm that the first hit was the calculator and hit enter? 

 

This has been the way it works since Windows 7. You can even hit enter before you see the result visually, and it starts the application right up. Your computer won't run out of resources doing this little task for you. Personally I never went into the start menu in Windows 7 unless I only vaguely remember the application I was looking for (say, if I was looking for on of the utilities included with Visual Studio). In Windows 8/8.1 and now Windows 10 it's the same thing.

 

All that aside, I would have no problem allowing the all apps to be wider for those rare moments when you venture into it to try and remember what that desktop recorder program was called again.

That was a poor example, because I have a calc key on my keyboard I would simply press to launch the calculator.  However, to address your question: With Windows 7/Start8/Start10 I pin frequently used apps on the left, and I manually edit the contents  of my start menu folders by pulling the programs out of subfolders and into the root folder, deleting the folders created by programs I install after Windows and getting rid of links to readmes, websites, uninstallers, etc.  This creates a less cluttered all programs menu that makes it very easy to find my programs.  I will type to find a program if I am already using the keyboard, but when using a mouse I find it inconvenient to have to relinquish it so that I can type to find a program.  The whole point of the start menu was that it was designed for mouse navigation.

If you know you want to open the Calculator, why go into all apps and scroll down to Calculator when you can just hit the start button, type calc, confirm that the first hit was the calculator and hit enter? 

 

This has been the way it works since Windows 7. You can even hit enter before you see the result visually, and it starts the application right up. Your computer won't run out of resources doing this little task for you. Personally I never went into the start menu in Windows 7 unless I only vaguely remember the application I was looking for (say, if I was looking for on of the utilities included with Visual Studio). In Windows 8/8.1 and now Windows 10 it's the same thing.

 

All that aside, I would have no problem allowing the all apps to be wider for those rare moments when you venture into it to try and remember what that desktop recorder program was called again.

No, since Windows Vista.

post-483058-0-19070100-1426533204.png

No, since Windows Vista.

post-483058-0-19070100-1426533204.png

 

Snap, you are right, but it's the same idea.

 

 

That was a poor example, because I have a calc key on my keyboard I would simply press to launch the calculator.  However, to address your question: With Windows 7/Start8/Start10 I pin frequently used apps on the left, and I manually edit the contents  of my start menu folders by pulling the programs out of subfolders and into the root folder, deleting the folders created by programs I install after Windows and getting rid of links to readmes, websites, uninstallers, etc.  This creates a less cluttered all programs menu that makes it very easy to find my programs.  I will type to find a program if I am already using the keyboard, but when using a mouse I find it inconvenient to have to relinquish it so that I can type to find a program.  The whole point of the start menu was that it was designed for mouse navigation.

 

I can see that point, same with touch really then.

That doesn't sound right to me. Software won't write to the BIOS and I doubt it would store they key on the hard drive. My guess is that insiders will be emailed product keys. I hope it's that way, otherwise I'll just use the regular 8.1 to 10 upgrade and get a key.

I said I have no idea... The post I made is my guess.

Gabe Aul knows more to tell us soon before release.

If you know you want to open the Calculator, why go into all apps and scroll down to Calculator when you can just hit the start button, type calc, confirm that the first hit was the calculator and hit enter? 

 

This has been the way it works since Windows 7. You can even hit enter before you see the result visually, and it starts the application right up. Your computer won't run out of resources doing this little task for you. Personally I never went into the start menu in Windows 7 unless I only vaguely remember the application I was looking for (say, if I was looking for on of the utilities included with Visual Studio). In Windows 8/8.1 and now Windows 10 it's the same thing.

 

All that aside, I would have no problem allowing the all apps to be wider for those rare moments when you venture into it to try and remember what that desktop recorder program was called again.

 

Keep this in mind... not many people know more than you do about getting more out of Windows....  they could look up on book or videos....  not smart like you are... 

 

I know more than my family do... 

 

I usually use hotkeys most of  time instead of clicking clicking clicking...

Hmm interesting. I wonder how it "stores" they key? If I wipe my hard drive and do a clean install, where is it getting my key from? Insiders don't get a special installer with the key embedded do they? I imagine that would be pirated beyond belief.

 

only logical explanation is that its tied to your Microsoft account, and you have to sign in to activate. like you said, it cant store it on disk, because you're going to format. its not going in TPM or UEFI because not all devices have that, and they certainly aren't going to flash legacy bios either.

Yeah, I just grab the ESD from the Windows Update servers and convert it to an ISO and install cleanly.

How do I do both of these things? I'm thinking of putting Win10 on my ThinkPad, which still has 8.1 on it. I've got a DVD of Build 10074, IIRC, so I'd rather not have to install another whole build on top of that.

You know, the ability to pin apps you use the most is still there in the new start menu, it's just on the right side, as a tile, and not on the left in a list.  There's no missing functionality at this point, specially now that you can add more things like music, downloads and so on at the bottom, which used to be on the right side and so on.   Now that jump lists are back in I don't see what else is missing from the new menu that was in the old one.

 

I do agree that there should be a more "full screen" all apps option, for those that want it, but that's about it, feature wise, that comes to mind.

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • They couldn't have done a better job, this is beautiful!
    • Oh, of course not. The real "victims" are the people who snipe kids in the head, have killed more journalist than all the worlds wars combined, do double tap strikes on medical personnel, claim history started on October 7th, have a $700 million dollar annual Hasbara budget and pay influencers $7k a post to spout exactly this kind of propaganda. How dare you question the most moral army in the world. Victimhood belongs to these genocidal freaks alone. Anyone who denies that is literally Hitler. If you're going to support a terrorist state, the least you could do is come up with better talking points.
    • Gears of War: E-Day brings 12-player co-op, smoother traversal mechanics, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Right as the Xbox Games Showcase came to an end today, The Gears of War developer The Coalition took over to show off its next project: E-Day. This prequel project was announced back in 2024, but now we have a lot more details about its campaign, new gameplay mechanics, and even a release date. The studio says this is the first time it has managed to get the time to build the entire game in a new engine, as it had worked non-stop on new titles for years while porting classic code and assets. With Unreal Engine 5 now powering Gears of War: E-Day, The Coalition says it started completely anew, with all assets, animations, environments, and others being built from scratch. The campaign will take place across three days in the city of Kalona. The story will follow the events through the eyes of Bravo Squad. This is made up of the returning classic duo Marcus and Dom, as well as the new characters Mags Carter and Lucas Reyes. Watch the trailer below to see Marcus in action without his iconic armor and gear, just as the Locust invasion kicks off. The story will draw on classic Gears novels like Aspho Fields as well, with the studio even collaborating with author Karen Traviss. "That continuity is what makes the destruction land," says the studio. "In E-Day, you watch a living city torn apart—homes still lit, meals half-finished—while people abandon their cars and run for cover. Small details—a child’s toy, an uneaten dinner—make the loss real as everyday places collapse under the Locust assault." The movement system is getting a big overhaul here. Players will be able to slide while running, jump across gaps, climb head-height covers, and even crawl on the ground to avoid fire from enemies. As for the returning horde mode, The Coalition teased a new 12-player PvE mode. This will involve three squads of Gears going up against the incoming Locusts in larger city maps than usual. The studio says that it is going to reimagine the classic formula just as co-op games are going through a resurgence. Multiplayer was touched on today too, where Versus is coming back touting four versus four Gears PVP action set across Kalona maps. More details about multiplayer will be revealed later. Open beta weekends are kicking off this August for fans wanting to jump in early too. Gears of War: E-Day is releasing on Xbox Series X|S and PC on October 6 with pre-orders available now. It will also be a part of Xbox Game Pass on day one. Microsoft has confirmed this as an Xbox platform exclusive, as there are no plans to bring it to PlayStation or Switch.
    • Microsoft announces the return of Xbox exclusives with Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft had plenty of announcements to make today at the Xbox Games Showcase celebrating 25 years of the gaming brand. Now, under the leadership of the new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, Xbox games are going back to their original release methods. She appeared in the livestream itself to announce the return of Xbox console exclusives. This means two major upcoming games from first-party studios won't be coming to PlayStation or Nintendo consoles: Gears of War: E-Day from The Coalition and Clockwork Revolution from InExile. Both titles will only be coming out on Xbox Series X|S consoles and Windows PCs, ditching any plans they had for PlayStation. "These are not timed exclusives," confirmed Microsoft. "We’re committed to investing in and growing XBOX both on console and beyond." The company confirmed that any already announced Xbox titles for PlayStation, under previous leadership, will continue to arrive for the rival platform. This means games like the new Halo remake, Forza Horizon 6, Fable, and State of Decay 3 will still be available on PlayStation, either at launch or later. It sounds like any new projects announced by the company will avoid other consoles in the same way. Microsoft first opened the floodgates by bringing titles like Sea of Thieves, Grounded, Hi-Fi Rush, and Pentiment to PlayStation and Nintendo consoles back in 2024. Since then, almost every new game release from Xbox Game Studios has arrived for rival consoles alongside Xbox and PC. This decision follows Sony's plans to ditch its own multiplatform releases too. Outside of multiplatform live service titles, the PlayStation maker is even abandoning its PC porting endeavors that started years ago.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!