Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Just as I'm skeptical that a lot of people used the Menu as often as they claimed. Many just use desktop links or pinned items. I've seen far too many desktops with literally every inch of the screen covered in icons. Personally I'd rather use the organization tools in the Screen, or even the Menu :x , over just dumping everything on the desktop, but a lot of people seem to like that.

 

Me, I use the main part of the Screen for my most frequent items, and All Apps for the rest I do use All Apps at least a couple times a day, and would really prefer the 8.x layout.

What makes it even sillier is that pinning went nowhere with 8, 8.1, or even 10.  In the absence of the Start menu, you could pin from the StartScreen, etc.

 

Due to the migration from Control Panel to Settings being incomplete, you can add a shortcut for Control Panel to the desktop. (Added in 10130)

Same applies to This PC.

 

Is it workflow, or complacency?

Imho seeing how effortless Windows 10 is to use in comparison (even though far from perfect at this point) despite remnants of the Metro/Win32 dichotomy illustrates in retrospect just how annoying Windows 8 was to use. They're now years into (and far from finished) into fixing Windows 8 which should probably never have gotten into customers' hands.

So tell the OEMs that - they are the ones that (according to you and the other critics) put computers that support touch into user hands with Windows 7 - which didn't support it.

 

If Windows didn't support features OEMs out into their hardware you would (rightly) call Windows a hardware laggard.  Guess what?  Windows 7 was, indeed, a hardware laggard by NOT supporting touch - which was included in a fair-to-decent amount of customer hardware.

 

YOU may not have noticed OR cared (because you didn't move) - however, the OEMs won't stand still just because users do - they can't sell new hardware if they stay put.

 

So how much choice did Microsoft really have with 8 other than going the way they did?  Surprisingly, practically none - despite user recalcitrance.

 

When I evaluated the Developer Preview, I knew about the touch support (and my hardware's lack of it) - however, I didn't evaluate it as a touch-optimized OS.  I evaluated it as a straight upgrade from what I was running at the time (7 Ultimate x64, for those picking nits).  I evaluated newer software (including ModernUI software) compared to existing software (Win32 software for the most part). If it was usable, and beat the existing Win32 software out there, it stayed - isn't that the usual measuring stick?  I didn't use any Start menu bringbacks/alternatives, either - that was an acid-test for ME; could I actually use the OS as-is?

 

Here's what I discovered:

 

Windows 8 (even as a Developer Preview) was just as usable (if not more so) than 7 Ultimate.  (Surprise #1.)

ModernUI software was quite usable despite no touch support in the hardware - while it could use it, it largely didn't need touch to be useful.  (Surprise #2 AND Wrong Assumption #1.)

The Modern UX/StartScreen likewise was usable without touch - even more surprising, it was usable without either touch OR a pointing device; it was actually - yeeks - KEYBOARD-driven.  (Surprise #3.)

Upshot - Windows 8 is less biased hardware-wise than 7. (Necessary going forward, as pointing-device bias was going away in newer hardware.)  However, folks without touch could not only still use the OS, but can use software designed to take better advantage of new feature support (touch, for example) - even if they DON'T have touch support. (Surprise #4 and Wrong Assumption #2.)

 

That led DIRECTLY to my mea culpa with the Consumer Preview.  I was skeptical - I took what Microsoft said with a saltmine, not a mere grain of salt.  However, I was wrong - and was I ever.  And I owned up to BEING wrong.

Trying to use Windows 10 as a daily driver, but just can't. It's in many ways still inferior to Windows 8.1.

 

I still don't understand Microsoft's rational for destroying the superior (user configurable) Win8.1 All Apps UX - 

attachicon.gifScreenshot (302).png

 

 

Why not just search for the app you want to use?

 

I never liked the all app screen. it was an overwhelming cluster

Why not just search for the app you want to use?

I never liked the all app screen. it was an overwhelming cluster

That's something I'll never understand. Even though I like the approach of Windows 8.1 and its Start Screen full app list, I don't have to browse using the narrower counterpart on Windows 10 because of the built-in search.

The only annoyance for me is not being able to configure it for just searching my computer and get rid of the Bing thing.

I'm sure, however, that in the future it will be possible - either officially or not.

I have no idea where but I don't think it will be stored in HDD but I think it will be in somewhere on your system.  I think BIOS or something...

 

I am sure the key is stored on HDD for system info lookups. ... Right now, you have a preview key...

That doesn't sound right to me. Software won't write to the BIOS and I doubt it would store they key on the hard drive. My guess is that insiders will be emailed product keys. I hope it's that way, otherwise I'll just use the regular 8.1 to 10 upgrade and get a key.

Why not just search for the app you want to use?

 

I never liked the all app screen. it was an overwhelming cluster

 I agree, but I shouldn't have been forced to do a search to find a program quickly. That it was necessary proves the UI was not optimal.

 I agree, but I shouldn't have been forced to do a search to find a program quickly. That it was necessary proves the UI was not optimal.

 

If you know you want to open the Calculator, why go into all apps and scroll down to Calculator when you can just hit the start button, type calc, confirm that the first hit was the calculator and hit enter? 

 

This has been the way it works since Windows 7. You can even hit enter before you see the result visually, and it starts the application right up. Your computer won't run out of resources doing this little task for you. Personally I never went into the start menu in Windows 7 unless I only vaguely remember the application I was looking for (say, if I was looking for on of the utilities included with Visual Studio). In Windows 8/8.1 and now Windows 10 it's the same thing.

 

All that aside, I would have no problem allowing the all apps to be wider for those rare moments when you venture into it to try and remember what that desktop recorder program was called again.

That was a poor example, because I have a calc key on my keyboard I would simply press to launch the calculator.  However, to address your question: With Windows 7/Start8/Start10 I pin frequently used apps on the left, and I manually edit the contents  of my start menu folders by pulling the programs out of subfolders and into the root folder, deleting the folders created by programs I install after Windows and getting rid of links to readmes, websites, uninstallers, etc.  This creates a less cluttered all programs menu that makes it very easy to find my programs.  I will type to find a program if I am already using the keyboard, but when using a mouse I find it inconvenient to have to relinquish it so that I can type to find a program.  The whole point of the start menu was that it was designed for mouse navigation.

If you know you want to open the Calculator, why go into all apps and scroll down to Calculator when you can just hit the start button, type calc, confirm that the first hit was the calculator and hit enter? 

 

This has been the way it works since Windows 7. You can even hit enter before you see the result visually, and it starts the application right up. Your computer won't run out of resources doing this little task for you. Personally I never went into the start menu in Windows 7 unless I only vaguely remember the application I was looking for (say, if I was looking for on of the utilities included with Visual Studio). In Windows 8/8.1 and now Windows 10 it's the same thing.

 

All that aside, I would have no problem allowing the all apps to be wider for those rare moments when you venture into it to try and remember what that desktop recorder program was called again.

No, since Windows Vista.

post-483058-0-19070100-1426533204.png

No, since Windows Vista.

post-483058-0-19070100-1426533204.png

 

Snap, you are right, but it's the same idea.

 

 

That was a poor example, because I have a calc key on my keyboard I would simply press to launch the calculator.  However, to address your question: With Windows 7/Start8/Start10 I pin frequently used apps on the left, and I manually edit the contents  of my start menu folders by pulling the programs out of subfolders and into the root folder, deleting the folders created by programs I install after Windows and getting rid of links to readmes, websites, uninstallers, etc.  This creates a less cluttered all programs menu that makes it very easy to find my programs.  I will type to find a program if I am already using the keyboard, but when using a mouse I find it inconvenient to have to relinquish it so that I can type to find a program.  The whole point of the start menu was that it was designed for mouse navigation.

 

I can see that point, same with touch really then.

That doesn't sound right to me. Software won't write to the BIOS and I doubt it would store they key on the hard drive. My guess is that insiders will be emailed product keys. I hope it's that way, otherwise I'll just use the regular 8.1 to 10 upgrade and get a key.

I said I have no idea... The post I made is my guess.

Gabe Aul knows more to tell us soon before release.

If you know you want to open the Calculator, why go into all apps and scroll down to Calculator when you can just hit the start button, type calc, confirm that the first hit was the calculator and hit enter? 

 

This has been the way it works since Windows 7. You can even hit enter before you see the result visually, and it starts the application right up. Your computer won't run out of resources doing this little task for you. Personally I never went into the start menu in Windows 7 unless I only vaguely remember the application I was looking for (say, if I was looking for on of the utilities included with Visual Studio). In Windows 8/8.1 and now Windows 10 it's the same thing.

 

All that aside, I would have no problem allowing the all apps to be wider for those rare moments when you venture into it to try and remember what that desktop recorder program was called again.

 

Keep this in mind... not many people know more than you do about getting more out of Windows....  they could look up on book or videos....  not smart like you are... 

 

I know more than my family do... 

 

I usually use hotkeys most of  time instead of clicking clicking clicking...

Hmm interesting. I wonder how it "stores" they key? If I wipe my hard drive and do a clean install, where is it getting my key from? Insiders don't get a special installer with the key embedded do they? I imagine that would be pirated beyond belief.

 

only logical explanation is that its tied to your Microsoft account, and you have to sign in to activate. like you said, it cant store it on disk, because you're going to format. its not going in TPM or UEFI because not all devices have that, and they certainly aren't going to flash legacy bios either.

Yeah, I just grab the ESD from the Windows Update servers and convert it to an ISO and install cleanly.

How do I do both of these things? I'm thinking of putting Win10 on my ThinkPad, which still has 8.1 on it. I've got a DVD of Build 10074, IIRC, so I'd rather not have to install another whole build on top of that.

You know, the ability to pin apps you use the most is still there in the new start menu, it's just on the right side, as a tile, and not on the left in a list.  There's no missing functionality at this point, specially now that you can add more things like music, downloads and so on at the bottom, which used to be on the right side and so on.   Now that jump lists are back in I don't see what else is missing from the new menu that was in the old one.

 

I do agree that there should be a more "full screen" all apps option, for those that want it, but that's about it, feature wise, that comes to mind.

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!