Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Over miles of horizontal scrolling? Absolutely. 

 

 

I think it should be removed from both and be put in settings where it belongs. Probably coming soon.  Falls under "polish" which they're still doing. 

 

 

Click a letter. 

 

Miles? The full-screen presentation allowed much more room than the thin strip, so far less scrolling was needed. So little scrolling was actually needed, unlike the confined view we're getting. Why restrict the view to an inch or two wide on a 23" screen? This kind of presentation is useful on phones, but not on tablets or desktops.

 

You're in favor of fewer choices and fewer ways of doing things?

 

Letters: Oh, so they finally have that working. I'm used to it from Windows Phone, but clicking wasn't working on earlier builds when I tried it. I still think inline lists are only good for phones.

 

Edit: Trying it on the laptop, and with siah1214's suggestions its slightly more tolerable. I still miss fullscreen All Apps and Charms, though. I still may not upgrade unless there's some Universal Apps that are good enough to offset being stuck with Frankenmenu.

Miles? The full-screen presentation allowed much more room than the thin strip, so far less scrolling was needed. So little scrolling was actually needed, unlike the confined view we're getting. Why restrict the view to an inch or two wide on a 23" screen? This kind of presentation is useful on phones, but not on tablets or desktops.

I much prefer 10's method of grouping tiles than 8's.  In 8 you could make a group as big as you wanted and it would expand to the right, however, if you made that group small (so if I only had 2 tiles in it) the space under it was wasted.  In 10 you can fit a lot more in one screen and still have it all grouped together.  I wish the spacing was tighter and you could fit 2 wide tiles together but it looks like that's coming. I love it on my 24" 1080p monitor because you can have a bunch of columns and groups, it feels a lot more flexible and personal 

 

Ultimately I feel as though 10's start screen is a much better use of space.  Most 8 start screens I saw were just a massive block of tiles in one big group.  10 makes it much easier to sort them and not have nearly as much blank space. 

 

Keep playing with it, I think ultimately you'll like it. 

I agree, its spacing and vertical orientation is much better.  Its a little less fun than the horizontal, but much more practical.  Vertical lists just made more sense.

 

I like the new record icon for Music too. In fact, I like the soft, yet edgy nature of most of the new ones.

Because it makes no sense. They themselves said that they want Windows 10 in the hands of as many people as possible and are even making the free upgrade possible on pirated versions of Windows. Why would they cater to known pirates but not people who beta tested their OS?

 

I have always owned fully licensed copies of MS OS's. If you're an insider, why can't they just give some kind of serial number verification for the free upgrade? Why would they just leaves us out in the lurch?

 

I guess it's not a huge deal, because I can just clean install Windows 8.1 when they go RTM and then just be set for the upgrade when it's avilable.

Here's the thing:

  1. It is NOT being made available for pirates running pirated versions of their software.  Microsoft isn't that stupid to give people something because they stole their previous version of Windows.
  2. If you're beta testing the OS, it's because you volunteered to.  No one made you do it.  So why would they now give it to your free just because you volunteered to beta test it.  Whether you gave feedback or not is irrelevant, since your feedback wasn't logged as being posted by you personally.
  3. No one is being left out in the lurch. You act like Microsoft is now going to remove all versions of Windows from your computer forever or something.  What are you, running Windows XP, and now you want the OS they release 14 years later to be free for you?  That is what makes no sense, frankly.
  • Like 4

Goodbye Windows Insiders. It's not me, it's you.

 

 

Come Windows 10 RTM, I've decided that I think it's time to leave the Windows Insiders program. This program has turned out to be quite a guise after users submitting so much feedback, that Microsoft, quite frankly, has ignored, and it turn is now shipping a product that is not what people wanted, especially on mobile. Looking through the feedback on touch mode, and tablet applications, you'll see thousands of people all saying the same things - the UX sucks, and isn't the right way forward. I agree. The touch UX is awful, and ignoring that feedback will be nails in the coffin for Microsoft. What good is the program, if Microsoft is going to ignore top feedback? 

 

With Windows 8, we had a series of great blogs behind the development and decision making process, with Windows 10, we've gotten nothing but silence as Microsoft worked to remove everything Windows 8, and replace it with desktop functionality, with many Insiders and non-Insiders alike wondering why. Windows 8.1 feels great to use on tablets, and on smartphones, while touch with Windows 10 feels tacked on, and mostly an afterthought. The full screen UX on Windows 8.1 is an amazing UX that no other OS offers, and now that's gone, replaced with largely desktop workflows that feature buttons, controls, and gizmos all cluttering up your screen. Gone is the rich and dynamic UX - the edge swipes, the radial menus, and the unified Charms. OneNote, for example, now features a desktop only workflow, which is awful to use with touch, and honestly, just isn't as fun as it was with the Radial Menu and chromeless UX. Again, many people have submitted the feedback, and asked for this back (looking at the feedback for OneNote, it is the number 1 request for the app!), only to be met with silence from Gabe Aul, and Microsoft.

 

The overall appearance of Windows 10 also lacks personality. With Windows 8, we had a rich UI with Metro elements that could be personalized: The Metro elements had colors that could be set to match your desktop wallpaper, or mood, and Start had an excellent selection of static or animated tattoos that gave the OS some life to it. All of these have been removed in Windows 10, and replaced with a largely black, dull, and lifeless UI that leaves much to be desired. Settings is the worst offender, and doesn't match anything in the OS. Legacy desktop applications all feature a bright, colorless titlebar/chrome, and there hasn't been any indication this will be changing any time soon. Again, the feedback was submitted by Insiders for Microsoft to fix this, and again they've been met with silence. 

 

The biggest straw I have with Windows Insiders is how few builds we were pushed, resulting in little time to test, and submit feedback. Edge, for example, didn't appear in builds until a few months ago, which I feel has resulted in Edge not being up to par as it should, heck even now it still retains it Project Spartan codename. Microsoft promised more builds for fast ring users, a promise which hasn't been kept. As I write this, fast ring users are still sitting on b10130, which is a month old at this point, and I'm starting to doubt whether or not we'll see another build before RTM. The program has been nothing but broken promises after broken promises.

 

While I have no doubt many will adopt Windows 10, especially on desktops, it's clear that largely overall, Windows Insiders have little part to play in the design process, and that Microsoft will be Microsoft when it comes to developing the next OS. Mistakes will be made, and under the guise of accepting feedback, they'll try to cover up the damage - "Look, we have glass and the Start Menu back!".

There are still things to like and look forward to in the OS. Cortana, for one, will be an excellent addition, along with the Xbox additions, but these features aren't going to have a huge consumer impact on the OS overall, and many businesses will be disabling these features for their workers.

 

I have a feeling we'll be seeing more changes at Microsoft before long, as people are shuffled around, fired, or forced out, and possibly even the death of the Surface and Lumia lines. Quite frankly, that scares me as they are two great products, now hampered by horrible management, and poor design decisions. Ignoring much of the feedback in this area, coupled with Microsoft's quick abandonment of Windows RT, It's clear to me that Microsoft's way forward on mobile devices is through iOS and Android, and not through their own product line. Windows 10 feels nothing more than a silent exit from the mobile competing arena. Unfortunately, desktops aren't where the competition is anymore. Consumers aren't lining up to purchase the latest Samsung, HP, or Dell desktops. No, they're waiting in line for the newest iPads, iPhones, Galaxies, etc. It's a shame, really, Windows 10, Surface tablets, and Lumia phones could be a real competitor to these devices - people could be waiting in line for Microsoft tablets and phones too, if Microsoft would listen - the feedback is there.

 

So, I guess this is goodbye, Windows Insiders. It's not me, it's you.

 

- Dot

Goodbye Windows Insiders. It's not me, it's you.

 

 

Come Windows 10 RTM, I've decided that I think it's time to leave the Windows Insiders program. This program has turned out to be quite a guise after users submitting so much feedback, that Microsoft, quite frankly, has ignored, and it turn is now shipping a product that is not what people wanted, especially on mobile. Looking through the feedback on touch mode, and tablet applications, you'll see thousands of people all saying the same things - the UX sucks, and isn't the right way forward. I agree. The touch UX is awful, and ignoring that feedback will be nails in the coffin for Microsoft. What good is the program, if Microsoft is going to ignore top feedback? 

 

With Windows 8, we had a series of great blogs behind the development and decision making process, with Windows 10, we've gotten nothing but silence as Microsoft worked to remove everything Windows 8, and replace it with desktop functionality, with many Insiders and non-Insiders alike wondering why. Windows 8.1 feels great to use on tablets, and on smartphones, while touch with Windows 10 feels tacked on, and mostly an afterthought. The full screen UX on Windows 8.1 is an amazing UX that no other OS offers, and now that's gone, replaced with largely desktop workflows that feature buttons, controls, and gizmos all cluttering up your screen. Gone is the rich and dynamic UX - the edge swipes, the radial menus, and the unified Charms. OneNote, for example, now features a desktop only workflow, which is awful to use with touch, and honestly, just isn't as fun as it was with the Radial Menu and chromeless UX. Again, many people have submitted the feedback, and asked for this back (looking at the feedback for OneNote, it is the number 1 request for the app!), only to be met with silence from Gabe Aul, and Microsoft.

 

The overall appearance of Windows 10 also lacks personality. With Windows 8, we had a rich UI with Metro elements that could be personalized: The Metro elements had colors that could be set to match your desktop wallpaper, or mood, and Start had an excellent selection of static or animated tattoos that gave the OS some life to it. All of these have been removed in Windows 10, and replaced with a largely black, dull, and lifeless UI that leaves much to be desired. Settings is the worst offender, and doesn't match anything in the OS. Legacy desktop applications all feature a bright, colorless titlebar/chrome, and there hasn't been any indication this will be changing any time soon. Again, the feedback was submitted by Insiders for Microsoft to fix this, and again they've been met with silence. 

 

The biggest straw I have with Windows Insiders is how few builds we were pushed, resulting in little time to test, and submit feedback. Edge, for example, didn't appear in builds until a few months ago, which I feel has resulted in Edge not being up to par as it should, heck even now it still retains it Project Spartan codename. Microsoft promised more builds for fast ring users, a promise which hasn't been kept. As I write this, fast ring users are still sitting on b10130, which is a month old at this point, and I'm starting to doubt whether or not we'll see another build before RTM. The program has been nothing but broken promises after broken promises.

 

While I have no doubt many will adopt Windows 10, especially on desktops, it's clear that largely overall, Windows Insiders have little part to play in the design process, and that Microsoft will be Microsoft when it comes to developing the next OS. Mistakes will be made, and under the guise of accepting feedback, they'll try to cover up the damage - "Look, we have glass and the Start Menu back!".

There are still things to like and look forward to in the OS. Cortana, for one, will be an excellent addition, along with the Xbox additions, but these features aren't going to have a huge consumer impact on the OS overall, and many businesses will be disabling these features for their workers.

 

I have a feeling we'll be seeing more changes at Microsoft before long, as people are shuffled around, fired, or forced out, and possibly even the death of the Surface and Lumia lines. Quite frankly, that scares me as they are two great products, now hampered by horrible management, and poor design decisions. Ignoring much of the feedback in this area, coupled with Microsoft's quick abandonment of Windows RT, It's clear to me that Microsoft's way forward on mobile devices is through iOS and Android, and not through their own product line. Windows 10 feels nothing more than a silent exit from the mobile competing arena. Unfortunately, desktops aren't where the competition is anymore. Consumers aren't lining up to purchase the latest Samsung, HP, or Dell desktops. No, they're waiting in line for the newest iPads, iPhones, Galaxies, etc. It's a shame, really, Windows 10, Surface tablets, and Lumia phones could be a real competitor to these devices - people could be waiting in line for Microsoft tablets and phones too, if Microsoft would listen - the feedback is there.

 

So, I guess this is goodbye, Windows Insiders. It's not me, it's you.

 

- Dot

 

I'm glad Microsoft decided to focus more back on the Desktop users, after all, we were pretty much neglected with Windows 8/8.1.

  • Like 1

They way they did the music icon, it could represent vinyl, CD and hard disk. All depends on the age of the user.

 

Just my opinion

 

Well it's music so it's not a HDD. and it has an arm so it's a vinyl. of course younger kids who never seen a vinyl will think if it as a CD with a reflection or something because they don't know. But the actual representation is of a vinyl on a player. 

Came to say this and add.  Also a white turntable with black 45rpm disc complete with label and center hole (for stacking).  I'm guessing an early Beatles single

 

That was exceptionally specific. I think you "may" be taking the iconography a bit far but hey :)

 

Here's the thing:

  1. It is NOT being made available for pirates running pirated versions of their software.  Microsoft isn't that stupid to give people something because they stole their previous version of Windows.
  2. If you're beta testing the OS, it's because you volunteered to.  No one made you do it.  So why would they now give it to your free just because you volunteered to beta test it.  Whether you gave feedback or not is irrelevant, since your feedback wasn't logged as being posted by you personally.
  3. No one is being left out in the lurch. You act like Microsoft is now going to remove all versions of Windows from your computer forever or something.  What are you, running Windows XP, and now you want the OS they release 14 years later to be free for you?  That is what makes no sense, frankly.

 

Well, you should do your research before typing an angry self righteous post. Microsoft IS making Windows 10 available to "unlicensed" copies in an effort to get it onto as many machines as possible.

 

http://www.cnet.com/news/windows-10-launches-this-summer-targets-current-pirates-with-free-update/

?

I've run every legal version of Windows since 3.11. Yes, I do believe we testers deserve a free Windows 10 upgrade. If they are making it free to 7/8 and users AND pirates they could at least make it available for free to insiders. You mean to tell me that you think that while they are opening the upgrade to pirates, beta testers should not get the upgrade? That is what makes no sense.

 

What I think they should do is allow Windows 10 Insiders to input their Win 7/8 product key and it will generate a Windows 10 key. I usually like to clean install my new OS's and I don't want to have to roll back and install Windows 8.1 and then do an upgrade. in the case of Windows 10, I clean installed it so once it goes RTM I would have liked to have been given a product key somehow and just upgrade to it.

 

As it stands now, I have to reinstall my LICENSED copy of Windows 8.1 and wait for release then do the upgrade.

 

EDIT: General question to everyone. My last few versions of Windows were from when I was a TechNet member . Am I correct in assuming that a TechNet product key will still upgrade to Windows 10?

Goodbye Windows Insiders. It's not me, it's you.

 

So, I guess this is goodbye, Windows Insiders. It's not me, it's you.

 

- Dot

 

TLDR Version : "Microsoft doesn't listen to me specifically, my ideas are best ideas and my needs are more important then everyone elses so I must stomp my feet and pout"

 

I think Windows 10 is coming along nicely, and no one forced you into the insider program. You complain about stuff way too much.

TLDR Version : "Microsoft doesn't listen to me specifically, my ideas are best ideas and my needs are more important then everyone elses so I must stomp my feet and pout"

Lol, no. Go look at the feedback app, and listen to the posts made here - the feedback is all the same - mobility is lost on Windows 10, Windows 10 lacks a decent look and feel, it's incomplete, etc -  and Microsoft has done nothing to correct it. This is all top feedback submitted, and nothing has come as a result.

Well, you should do your research before typing an angry self righteous post. Microsoft IS making Windows 10 available to "unlicensed" copies in an effort to get it onto as many machines as possible.

 

http://www.cnet.com/news/windows-10-launches-this-summer-targets-current-pirates-with-free-update/

?

I've run every legal version of Windows since 3.11. Yes, I do believe we testers deserve a free Windows 10 upgrade. If they are making it free to 7/8 and users AND pirates they could at least make it available for free to insiders. You mean to tell me that you think that while they are opening the upgrade to pirates, beta testers should not get the upgrade? That is what makes no sense.

 

What I think they should do is allow Windows 10 Insiders to input their Win 7/8 product key and it will generate a Windows 10 key. I usually like to clean install my new OS's and I don't want to have to roll back and install Windows 8.1 and then do an upgrade. in the case of Windows 10, I clean installed it so once it goes RTM I would have liked to have been given a product key somehow and just upgrade to it.

 

As it stands now, I have to reinstall my LICENSED copy of Windows 8.1 and wait for release then do the upgrade.

 

EDIT: General question to everyone. My last few versions of Windows were from when I was a TechNet member . Am I correct in assuming that a TechNet product key will still upgrade to Windows 10?

 

You have been told many times now that MS is not giving away Win 10 to pirates. Why do you keep repeating this lie?

 

Insiders get Win 10 for free just like everybody else, as long as they have a valid version of Win 7/8.x.

Well, you should do your research before typing an angry self righteous post. Microsoft IS making Windows 10 available to "unlicensed" copies in an effort to get it onto as many machines as possible.

 

http://www.cnet.com/news/windows-10-launches-this-summer-targets-current-pirates-with-free-update/

?

I've run every legal version of Windows since 3.11. Yes, I do believe we testers deserve a free Windows 10 upgrade. If they are making it free to 7/8 and users AND pirates they could at least make it available for free to insiders. You mean to tell me that you think that while they are opening the upgrade to pirates, beta testers should not get the upgrade? That is what makes no sense.

 

What I think they should do is allow Windows 10 Insiders to input their Win 7/8 product key and it will generate a Windows 10 key. I usually like to clean install my new OS's and I don't want to have to roll back and install Windows 8.1 and then do an upgrade. in the case of Windows 10, I clean installed it so once it goes RTM I would have liked to have been given a product key somehow and just upgrade to it.

 

As it stands now, I have to reinstall my LICENSED copy of Windows 8.1 and wait for release then do the upgrade.

 

EDIT: General question to everyone. My last few versions of Windows were from when I was a TechNet member . Am I correct in assuming that a TechNet product key will still upgrade to Windows 10?

Repeat after me: THEY ARE NOT LICENSING PIRATES!

  • Like 1

You have been told many times now that MS is not giving away Win 10 to pirates. Why do you keep repeating this lie?

 

Insiders get Win 10 for free just like everybody else, as long as they have a valid version of Win 7/8.x.

I believe someone running Windows 10 insider preview can stay in the preview after RTM and they won't need a valid Win7/8 key to keep getting Windows 10 insider builds, if they then drop out of the preview they then need a valid Win7/8 key to stay on Windows 10.

I believe someone running Windows 10 insider preview can stay in the preview after RTM and they won't need a valid Win7/8 key to keep getting Windows 10 builds, if they then drop out of the preview they then need a valid Win7/8 key.

 

True, but with that option you can't keep running a stable version of Win10. The preview builds will keep coming.

So not the best option for your main pc

True, but with that option you can't keep running a stable version of Win10. The preview builds will keep coming.

So not the best option for your main pc

The builds are timed bombed along with that, so you have no choice but to install new builds when they are released.

True, but with that option you can't keep running a stable version of Win10. The preview builds will keep coming.

So not the best option for your main pc

I can see pirates opting to stay in the 'slow ring' though thus staying on windows 10.

Goodbye Windows Insiders. It's not me, it's you.

 

/

 

So, I guess this is goodbye, Windows Insiders. It's not me, it's you.

 

- Dot

 

Sooooo...you felt the need to post this here?  Maybe it is you and not them?

  • Like 3

Sooooo...you felt the need to post this here? Maybe it is you and not them?

He had to post it because we hadn't been told how much he despises Windows 10 for tablets and how wonderful Windows 8.1 was for that matter.

He had to post it because we hadn't been told how much he despises Windows 10 for tablets and how wonderful Windows 8.1 was for that matter.

 

You can say what you want but he has some valid points.

It's not just him bringing these points up, If you look at the feedback app, there are loads of people making these same comments.

 

Win8.1 was wonderful to use with touch, I understand the desktop crowd wasn't to happy, but to just abandon most of the nice touch features is pushing it way back to the other side. We don't even have a full screen browser anymore!

  • Like 2

Well, you should do your research before typing an angry self righteous post. Microsoft IS making Windows 10 available to "unlicensed" copies in an effort to get it onto as many machines as possible.

 

http://www.cnet.com/news/windows-10-launches-this-summer-targets-current-pirates-with-free-update/

?

I've run every legal version of Windows since 3.11. Yes, I do believe we testers deserve a free Windows 10 upgrade. If they are making it free to 7/8 and users AND pirates they could at least make it available for free to insiders. You mean to tell me that you think that while they are opening the upgrade to pirates, beta testers should not get the upgrade? That is what makes no sense.

 

What I think they should do is allow Windows 10 Insiders to input their Win 7/8 product key and it will generate a Windows 10 key. I usually like to clean install my new OS's and I don't want to have to roll back and install Windows 8.1 and then do an upgrade. in the case of Windows 10, I clean installed it so once it goes RTM I would have liked to have been given a product key somehow and just upgrade to it.

 

As it stands now, I have to reinstall my LICENSED copy of Windows 8.1 and wait for release then do the upgrade.

 

EDIT: General question to everyone. My last few versions of Windows were from when I was a TechNet member . Am I correct in assuming that a TechNet product key will still upgrade to Windows 10?

First of all, I'm in no way angry, and certainly not self-righteous.  You do realize that in fact your attitude is more that way than mine, right?

So, if you had a Technet subscription (I did too, actually), you have all this software needed to do a proper upgrade to Windows 10.  Actually, even though I can't download from them, they do update license keys for Windows. I got keys for 8, 8.1 and 10 TP from my Technet Product keys page.

Secondly, they are not making Windows 10 available to pirates.

I agree, it would be great to allow Windows 7/8 users to generate a new key and get an ISO to download for Windows 10.  But that's probably not going to happen. 

 

As far as Window

Well it's music so it's not a HDD. and it has an arm so it's a vinyl. of course younger kids who never seen a vinyl will think if it as a CD with a reflection or something because they don't know. But the actual representation is of a vinyl on a player. 

 

OK, Mr. Know-It-All, I guess I have to explain why I think it was done in a way to represent vinyl, CD and hard disk. Even though I think it's a little obvious:

 

There are older model CD players that had an arm that stuck out above the disc that would resemble a record player. When looking down on it

 

What's the inside of a hard disk look like? The actual disk and the arm that reads the data. Looks like a record player doesn't it?

 

See where I'm coming from now? Also, you 100% sure that it can only represent a vinyl? Can you prove that? I said it was JUST MY OPINION. Didn't say it was 100% fact. So take the "have to prove this guy wrong" attitude elsewhere. You constantly do that to people here and it gets old.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!