Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

First of all, I'm in no way angry, and certainly not self-righteous.  You do realize that in fact your attitude is more that way than mine, right?

So, if you had a Technet subscription (I did too, actually), you have all this software needed to do a proper upgrade to Windows 10.  Actually, even though I can't download from them, they do update license keys for Windows. I got keys for 8, 8.1 and 10 TP from my Technet Product keys page.

Secondly, they are not making Windows 10 available to pirates.

I agree, it would be great to allow Windows 7/8 users to generate a new key and get an ISO to download for Windows 10.  But that's probably not going to happen. 

 

As far as Window

Sorry, I probably make assumptions based on the tone of posts. People seem to be getting quite snobby with their remarks on certain subjects. I have a fully legal way to upgrade to Windows 10. I just had hoped they would have a better option for those of us who used the TP.

 

I am interested in an official citation that refutes the articles I've read on unlicensed versions being allowed to upgrade. not because I'm a pirate, but because I've read it more than one place, including Neowin.

 

EDIT: Off my topic. What is the deal with Cortana. I was happy that build 10147 had it working again and used it several times. Now just total out of the blue, it won't respond to my voice. I made sure "Hey, Cortana" is still turned on and nothing changed. I guess it's just still buggy in this beta.

What good is the program, if Microsoft is going to ignore top feedback?

Brandon used to work at MS and always interacted here excellently in regards to various extents with feedback.  I don't have his kind of social media skills, but I have pointed out (way) previously that I do work there.  Feedback hasn't been ignored: it's discussed regularly and helps inform and guide decisions where possible.

 

Part of your expressed concerns presumes that "not delivering the feature I request right now" is equivalent to "ignoring feedback".  I don't feel that that's a fair nor accurate equivalency.  If you get hung up on that kind of thing, you may find that most beta programs will be needlessly frustrating.  I'd suspect that for the most part the teams involved have a lot of stuff scheduled each release, and that excellent suggestions that don't have time allocated to handle them aren't the kind of thing that it's actually possible just throw onto the schedule without killing the devs involved.  Time is finite: taking time to account for feedback X probably means that area Y (or developer Z's life) is going to suffer.  I think once you understand that the schedule is usually fairly full to start with and that time is finite, it's easier to come to grips with the notion that larger pieces of feedback may need significant time to happen, if they happen at all.  Delivering awesome software excellently for everyone is a hard challenge.  There's always room to grow and improve.

What I don't understand is leaving us tablet users in the cold. I mean no new features? Not even the advanced grid from windows phone?

I have to say, the round user circles have grown on me. Especially due to the way they roll in on the new people love tile. Wish the app itself was smoother though. And how about the animations supposed to be in the photos app? Shown back in January.

What I don't understand is leaving us tablet users in the cold. I mean no new features? Not even the advanced grid from windows phone?

I have to say, the round user circles have grown on me. Especially due to the way they roll in on the new people love tile. Wish the app itself was smoother though. And how about the animations supposed to be in the photos app? Shown back in January?

Brandon used to work at MS and always interacted here excellently in regards to various extents with feedback.  I don't have his kind of social media skills, but I have pointed out (way) previously that I do work there.  Feedback hasn't been ignored: it's discussed regularly and helps inform and guide decisions where possible.

 

Part of your expressed concerns presumes that "not delivering the feature I request right now" is equivalent to "ignoring feedback".  I don't feel that that's a fair nor accurate equivalency.  If you get hung up on that kind of thing, you may find that most beta programs will be needlessly frustrating.  I'd suspect that for the most part the teams involved have a lot of stuff scheduled each release, and that excellent suggestions that don't have time allocated to handle them aren't the kind of thing that it's actually possible just throw onto the schedule without killing the devs involved.  Time is finite: taking time to account for feedback X probably means that area Y (or developer Z's life) is going to suffer.  I think once you understand that the schedule is usually fairly full to start with and that time is finite, it's easier to come to grips with the notion that larger pieces of feedback may need significant time to happen, if they happen at all.  Delivering awesome software excellently for everyone is a hard challenge.  There's always room to grow and improve.

I am well aware that not everything is possible at once, or immediately, but most of this feedback has been there from the beginning of the Windows 10 development cycle. That's what concerns me. Worse, I have reached out via different means of communication with various different peoples with the matter, and have been ignored each time.

 

Also, we've yet to hear anything about the supposed update for Windows RT devices. Microsoft's silence is concerning at best.

Tablet users aren't being left in the cold, I don't get where this is coming from.  The newest leaked build video shows more tweaks to tablet mode yet again, build 10154 uses the same exact snap mode from 8.1 now in tablet mode, not the desktop version of snap.   So that's yet another thing people wanted via the feedback app and here it is.  Also the start screen is now left aligned and not centered, at least in the videos of 10154 I've seen, unlike before where the tiles would be centered and waste space.  This alignment matches that of 8.x as well,  the only things left, that really don't make that big of a difference to most I bet, is a full screen all apps listing, which would probably come in a future update and not at RTM, no biggy though.  And auto-hiding the taskbar in tablet mode, another thing I expect to come.

 

As far as using it in tablet mode though, I see no issues with it at all.

  • Like 1

Tablet users aren't being left in the cold, I don't get where this is coming from.  The newest leaked build video shows more tweaks to tablet mode yet again, build 10154 uses the same exact snap mode from 8.1 now in tablet mode, not the desktop version of snap.   So that's yet another thing people wanted via the feedback app and here it is.  Also the start screen is now left aligned and not centered, at least in the videos of 10154 I've seen, unlike before where the tiles would be centered and waste space.  This alignment matches that of 8.x as well,  the only things left, that really don't make that big of a difference to most I bet, is a full screen all apps listing, which would probably come in a future update and not at RTM, no biggy though.  And auto-hiding the taskbar in tablet mode, another thing I expect to come.

 

As far as using it in tablet mode though, I see no issues with it at all.

That's great! It would be nice if a new build was pushed to Insiders so we can test it out. But that still doesn't solve the issue of Microsoft ignoring the superior full screen UX on tablets. OneNote users are still asking for the Radial Menu, and a real tablet UX like in 8.1. Edge users are also wanting a full screen UX like in 8.1, as well.  

Awesome. Suffice it to say if he hates it, Windows 10 is going to be great.

I'm not the only one hating it. If you didn't "tl;dr", you would see that.

WinBeta posted a video of build 10154:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph2VrYb0wek

 

Windows 10 tablet mode looks like it's working well to me. As for the universal apps in Windows 10, they're a massive improvement over the mostly featureless Windows 8.x modern UI apps. So.. I honestly don't understand Dot Matrix's problem.

WinBeta posted a video of build 10154:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph2VrYb0wek

 

Windows 10 tablet mode looks like it's working well to me. As for the universal apps in Windows 10, they're a massive improvement over the mostly featureless Windows 8.x modern UI apps. So.. I honestly don't understand Dot Matrix's problem.

That looks great. Can't wait to put it on my surface pro 3

That's great! It would be nice if a new build was pushed to Insiders so we can test it out. But that still doesn't solve the issue of Microsoft ignoring the superior full screen UX on tablets. OneNote users are still asking for the Radial Menu, and a real tablet UX like in 8.1. Edge users are also wanting a full screen UX like in 8.1, as well.  

 

I'm one of those not really happy with the way Edge looks. Takes way to much space on the screen. Add the task bar to it and you almost loose 20% of your screen :(

 

I also miss the sweeping in from the left to change apps.

 

Most of the other stuff I can learn to deal with I guess. But yeah, they ruined the tablet side in Win 10 compared to Win 8.1

A tablet specific version of edge is coming, look at the newest mobile preview for example, they'll work on a tablet specific mode in time, right now there's other important things that edge needs to do, UI has to take a backseat for a bit.

 

I expect to see a option for it, the desktop mode, to allow you to move the bar to the bottom, since they already moved it to the bottom on mobile, as per feedback again, and people say they don't listen, come on.   There's a difference between not listening and not making user requested changes right away, it's so "me me me" and "right now now now" that it's crazy.  There's so much work that has to go on, it's not a simple flip of a switch or a change of one line of code you know?  Just wait, users should've expected that not everything was going to make it into the first version of 10, that's why we're going to get constant updates that will keep adding more.

WinBeta posted a video of build 10154:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph2VrYb0wek

 

Windows 10 tablet mode looks like it's working well to me. As for the universal apps in Windows 10, they're a massive improvement over the mostly featureless Windows 8.x modern UI apps. So.. I honestly don't understand Dot Matrix's problem.

 

How can you from that short video conclude that tablet mode works fine and Dot is just making it up?

Not saying it's horrible or anything, but that doesn't show you at all how good/bad tablet mode is. Lots of the little nice swipes and edge UI's are all gone. They might not work great with a mouse but they could have left them in for tablet mode

A tablet specific version of edge is coming, look at the newest mobile preview for example, they'll work on a tablet specific mode in time, right now there's other important things that edge needs to do, UI has to take a backseat for a bit.

 

I expect to see a option for it, the desktop mode, to allow you to move the bar to the bottom, since they already moved it to the bottom on mobile, as per feedback again, and people say they don't listen, come on.   There's a difference between not listening and not making user requested changes right away, it's so "me me me" and "right now now now" that it's crazy.  There's so much work that has to go on, it's not a simple flip of a switch or a change of one line of code you know?  Just wait, users should've expected that not everything was going to make it into the first version of 10, that's why we're going to get constant updates that will keep adding more.

 

You know what they could have done better. Maybe have some feedback from MS on requests with over 500 or 1000 up votes.

Just to let us know how they feel about certain requests. That way people know if things will come in later versions or MS doesn't feel that point important enough.

 

That would have solved a lot I think, but we all know how bad MS is at communication with it's customers.

How can you from that short video conclude that tablet mode works fine and Dot is just making it up?

Not saying it's horrible or anything, but that doesn't show you at all how good/bad tablet mode is. Lots of the little nice swipes and edge UI's are all gone. They might not work great with a mouse but they could have left them in for tablet mode

 

Which swipes are gone though?  I don't think any are, swiping from the top down still closes apps, swiping from the left brings up a task switcher, swiping from the right brings up the new action center with the quick action buttons that replace the ones in the charms menu (which, let's be perfectly honest here, no one used or liked, those that did were in the minority of the minority).  Swiping up from the bottom will also bring up any app bars for older 8.x style apps.  So really, what edge swiping gestures are gone?  In fact, 10 adds even more, multi-fingered gestures that 8.x never had, let's not forget about those.

You know what they could have done better. Maybe have some feedback from MS on requests with over 500 or 1000 up votes.

Just to let us know how they feel about certain requests. That way people know if things will come in later versions or MS doesn't feel that point important enough.

 

That would have solved a lot I think, but we all know how bad MS is at communication with it's customers.

 

They do that, maybe not through the feedback app for the OS, which I agree should have some sort of status on things, but for other things they do, like with Edge and feature requests, the Edge teams listing shows you what's being worked on, what's under consideration and what's not etc.

 

There's so much feedback I don't think they have the time to go in and reply to it all, maybe post RTM they'll refine the process, we'll have to wait and see.

A tablet specific version of edge is coming, look at the newest mobile preview for example, they'll work on a tablet specific mode in time, right now there's other important things that edge needs to do, UI has to take a backseat for a bit.

 

I expect to see a option for it, the desktop mode, to allow you to move the bar to the bottom, since they already moved it to the bottom on mobile, as per feedback again, and people say they don't listen, come on.   There's a difference between not listening and not making user requested changes right away, it's so "me me me" and "right now now now" that it's crazy.  There's so much work that has to go on, it's not a simple flip of a switch or a change of one line of code you know?  Just wait, users should've expected that not everything was going to make it into the first version of 10, that's why we're going to get constant updates that will keep adding more.

 That's great that they've moved it to the bottom. That's where it should be on tablets.

Which swipes are gone though?  I don't think any are, swiping from the top down still closes apps, swiping from the left brings up a task switcher, swiping from the right brings up the new action center with the quick action buttons that replace the ones in the charms menu (which, let's be perfectly honest here, no one used or liked, those that did were in the minority of the minority).  Swiping up from the bottom will also bring up any app bars for older 8.x style apps.  So really, what edge swiping gestures are gone?  In fact, 10 adds even more, multi-fingered gestures that 8.x never had, let's not forget about those.

 

I liked switching apps better before with the little swipe from the left. They could have left that one and swapped the funny left then back right to get to the full task switcher they have now

Swiping up to get to All apps was also very nice.

 

Swiping left/right on a page in Edge to go to the previous/next page 

 

See some of them are missing :) Ones I use on a daily basis

I liked switching apps better before with the little swipe from the left. They could have left that one and swapped the funny left then back right to get to the full task switcher they have now

Swiping up to get to All apps was also very nice.

 

Swiping left/right on a page in Edge to go to the previous/next page 

 

See some of them are missing :) Ones I use on a daily basis

 

You might get the left side swipe to switch apps when they add the option to autohide the taskbar. Right now it is redundant as you just have to poke the right icon at the bottom lol.

I liked switching apps better before with the little swipe from the left. They could have left that one and swapped the funny left then back right to get to the full task switcher they have now

Swiping up to get to All apps was also very nice.

 

Swiping left/right on a page in Edge to go to the previous/next page 

 

See some of them are missing :) Ones I use on a daily basis

 

The swiping in Edge that IE had should come back, at some point, I don't expect them to leave it out, it's just low on the list of features to add.  I think it's more important to them to work out rendering bugs and so on, with this first RTM release and then add more features.

 

All apps is now just a button press though, with the new icon on the screen, which is much like pressing the arrow button.  Sure the swipe is gone but you can hit the all apps button just as easily with your left thumb, it isn't harder or more work IMO.

I liked switching apps better before with the little swipe from the left. They could have left that one and swapped the funny left then back right to get to the full task switcher they have now

Swiping up to get to All apps was also very nice.

 

Swiping left/right on a page in Edge to go to the previous/next page 

 

See some of them are missing :) Ones I use on a daily basis

 

I for one absolutely hated swiping from the left to get another app. I always had to make myself remember to swipe back to the left to actually see all the open apps.

Well, you should do your research before typing an angry self righteous post. Microsoft IS making Windows 10 available to "unlicensed" copies in an effort to get it onto as many machines as possible.

 

http://www.cnet.com/news/windows-10-launches-this-summer-targets-current-pirates-with-free-update/

?

 

Old article based on faulty assumptions. all the tech sites wrote that that day, then the next day everyone had to write corrections that MS was not giving windows to pirates. Don't trust everything on the internet.

 

Here's an article from 2 days later from the same least credible tech site on the net.

 

http://www.cnet.com/news/windows-10-pirated-upgrades-will-still-be-considered-pirated/

 

Thurrot, slightly less less credible.

https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-10/2190/sorry-microsoft-is-not-giving-free-windows-10-to-pirates

I for one absolutely hated swiping from the left to get another app. I always had to make myself remember to swipe back to the left to actually see all the open apps.

 

That was an option.  The setting was either show all the running apps, or switch immediately.  The latter is the one you hate, but the former didn't require you to swipe back.

WinBeta posted a video of build 10154:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph2VrYb0wek

 

Windows 10 tablet mode looks like it's working well to me. As for the universal apps in Windows 10, they're a massive improvement over the mostly featureless Windows 8.x modern UI apps. So.. I honestly don't understand Dot Matrix's problem.

 

Still want at least 3 things

1: quick task switcher when swiping.

2: back and forward swipe gestures in edge

3: and possibly most importantly they need to fix the keyboard so what it ACTUALLY resized the desktop/app. so that for example on neowin which has a very small footer, the keyboard doesn't go ontop of the browser and make it impossible to see what I'm writing. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!