[OFFICIAL] Windows 10 Insider Program

By Ian S.
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41

  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3

  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

Anyone managed to get the logon screen changed? I don't like the new hero wp as a background.

 

I haven't seen that done yet, someone might have to modify some login screen file like they would do for vista and 7, iirc.  Or maybe MS will just let us set what we want at some point.

Grand Master

Draggendrop Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I actually like the new log on screen.......much more appealing than a colored background for now.....and I also imagine someone will come up with a way to place your own there sometime.....So far build 10162 has been much better than 58/59 for me anyway....Cheers

Veteran

Ian S.

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I actually like the new log on screen.......much more appealing than a colored background for now.....and I also imagine someone will come up with a way to place your own there sometime.....So far build 10162 has been much better than 58/59 for me anyway....Cheers

For me the login screen is to fancy. I mean... it's a login screen not something users are going to be staring at all day. I definitely want to be able to customize the background that way I can set a solid color. that would be a unique feature to Windows.

 

In other news:

Interesting new sites from Microsoft:

http://www.msftdiagnostics.com/

 

and 

http://www.researchnews.com/

  • Draggendrop
  • Like 1
Mentor

dragontology

Posted
Posted

Question: For those running on a tablet, does Windows 10 default to tablet mode, or do you have to select it? and can you use desktop mode just fine, or are there caveats?

 

Happy with 10159 in my VM. I'm wondering if it's possible to have VMWare Player play a VM at startup. Kidding, but only partially. My wife really does not like 10, and I told her, I am moving forward with 10, and if she wants, I can build her a virtual Windows 7 that will run just as well as it does now (it's our installed OS). This is why I built with a Xeon 1231v3 instead of an i5 and went with 16GB of RAM instead of 8. My VM for Windows 10 is actually using 8GB and two of my cores, so it's performing wonderfully, especially with Intel's vt-x or whatever it's called, turned on. I think it's running just as well as it would be natively. Metro apps have a slight delay, but didn't they always? You stare at that bold, high contrast icon for a good five seconds before you get the app's UI.

 

We skipped Windows 8, so the paradigm shift from Windows as an offline OS to Windows as an online service is kind of jarring. I can roll with the punches, but my wife still thinks XP is the best Microsoft's done. And, like I've been saying, they've been shifting to online since Windows 97 (what I call the third edition of Windows 95 that bundled IE and had the IE-inspired file manager, in 1997

Grand Master

+Anarkii Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Are you guys able to download apps from the Store on build 10162? I tried downloading Wunderlist and it says: Try again later. Something happened on our end.

I tried with Phone Companion, it says incorrectly installed, so I uninstalled it and it keeps telling me when re-downloading unable to do so. Same error as you get.

Veteran

Studio384

Posted
Posted

Question: For those running on a tablet, does Windows 10 default to tablet mode, or do you have to select it? and can you use desktop mode just fine, or are there caveats?

 

Happy with 10159 in my VM. I'm wondering if it's possible to have VMWare Player play a VM at startup. Kidding, but only partially. My wife really does not like 10, and I told her, I am moving forward with 10, and if she wants, I can build her a virtual Windows 7 that will run just as well as it does now (it's our installed OS). This is why I built with a Xeon 1231v3 instead of an i5 and went with 16GB of RAM instead of 8. My VM for Windows 10 is actually using 8GB and two of my cores, so it's performing wonderfully, especially with Intel's vt-x or whatever it's called, turned on. I think it's running just as well as it would be natively. Metro apps have a slight delay, but didn't they always? You stare at that bold, high contrast icon for a good five seconds before you get the app's UI.

 

We skipped Windows 8, so the paradigm shift from Windows as an offline OS to Windows as an online service is kind of jarring. I can roll with the punches, but my wife still thinks XP is the best Microsoft's done. And, like I've been saying, they've been shifting to online since Windows 97 (what I call the third edition of Windows 95 that bundled IE and had the IE-inspired file manager, in 1997

  • dragontology
  • Like 1
Grand Master

Dot Matrix

Posted
Posted

I prefer to have Start open on boot, but when I go into the Navigation settings, Show Start when I log in is greyed out. Any way around this? I'd much rather see a selection of programs to run than a blank desktop when I fire up the system.

You can boot to Start via the Tablet settings page in Settings.

Windows 10 has really grown onto to me to the point where I don't want to have to clean install 8.1 just to get my free upgrade. I wish there was a way they could just validate my Win 8 key and activate RTM when it's released and even give me an ISO download.

Then it wouldn't be an "upgrade", would it? If you don't want to re-install, you could always purchase a retail copy and install that.

Grand Master

Southern Patriot

Posted
Posted

Ok so just did an upgrade on my main 8.1 install (created an image backup first with Acronis) to 10162. Everything is working fine, except I cannot activate, even with product key listed on microsoft page - http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso

 

8N67H-M3CY9-QT7C4-2TR7M-TXYCV

 

Anyone else having this issue?

I'm having that problem on EVERY machine in my house right now. Some were upgrades from previous installs, but two were upgraded to 10162 from clean installs of Windows 8.1 and Windows 7. NONE of my machines will activate. I'm starting to think that there is a serious activation bug in this build, or there is a problem with Microsoft's activation servers (which seems unlikely since the clean installs of previous OSs activated fine).

  • xendrome and vipanonymous
  • Like 2
Grand Master

patseguin Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

You can boot to Start via the Tablet settings page in Settings.

Then it wouldn't be an "upgrade", would it? If you don't want to re-install, you could always purchase a retail copy and install that.

 

Yes, it would be an upgrade if they had a system to validate your license key. Just like for example when I had the Adobe CS6 upgrade. When I had to do a Windows reinstall I didn't have to reinstall CS5 then CS6. I installed CS6 and it recognized it as an upgrade an asked me for my CS serial and then it installed.

Grand Master

Dot Matrix

Posted
Posted

Yes, it would be an upgrade if they had a system to validate your license key. Just like for example when I had the Adobe CS6 upgrade. When I had to do a Windows reinstall I didn't have to reinstall CS5 then CS6. I installed CS6 and it recognized it as an upgrade an asked me for my CS serial and then it installed.

The term "upgrade" infers that you have something to upgrade from - IE: an installed, and activated copy of Windows 8.1. Anyone can have a key.

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
Posted

I'm having that problem on EVERY machine in my house right now. Some were upgrades from previous installs, but two were upgraded to 10162 from clean installs of Windows 8.1 and Windows 7. NONE of my machines will activate. I'm starting to think that there is a serious activation bug in this build, or there is a problem with Microsoft's activation servers (which seems unlikely since the clean installs of previous OSs activated fine).

 

OK per this thread and a reply from an actual Microsoft Employee - http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/insider_wintp-insider_install/cant-activate-in-preview-build-10162-even-change/6cc99621-6108-4161-a770-5da4138cbeff?auth=1

 

 

 

We are doing some testing and work on the Activation process.  That message is expected and we hope it will go away in the next day. When we have the service back up and running, it should attempt to activate automatically.  Until then you can ignore it because I believe other than the UI showing its not activated, its not affecting any other use of the system.

 

So I am going to just carry on as usual.

 

EDIT: Mine is now activated, it must have done it on it's own. So everyone else having an issue check your system properties.

Grand Master

patseguin Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

The term "upgrade" infers that you have something to upgrade from - IE: an installed, and activated copy of Windows 8.1. Anyone can have a key.

Wrong. Upgrade means you have a licensed previous version. I have several pieces of software that are upgrades and I don't need to have the previous version installed. It validates the old key then installs.

Grand Master

trek

Posted
Posted

Wrong. Upgrade means you have a licensed previous version. I have several pieces of software that are upgrades and I don't need to have the previous version installed. It validates the old key then installs.

it's not like that idea is foreign to them... In the 98SE days, you could clean install from a 98SE upgrade media and it would prompt for the CD of a full version 95/98 disc during the process. I wish they still had a process like that... Obviously evolved slightly.
Grand Master

Stokkolm

Posted
Posted

I have 10162 running on my SP3 and the tablet mode really takes getting used to. But I think I'll be able to live with it as of this build.

Agreed, I prefer Windows 8.1's "tablet mode" to Windows 10's. I'll get used to it though and probably end up liking it better after a while. On the desktop side of things Windows 10 is far superior.

Grand Master

Dot Matrix

Posted
Posted

Wrong. Upgrade means you have a licensed previous version. I have several pieces of software that are upgrades and I don't need to have the previous version installed. It validates the old key then installs.

Windows upgrade versions are designed to install on top of a currently activated install - you're "upgrading" that install with an upgrade license, as opposed to a retail or OEM license.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Microsoft released new Defender update for Windows 11, 10, Server ISO installations

      By skinnyJM · Posted

      Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4

      By Copernic · Posted

      Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • AMD 9070XT

      By Steven P. · Posted

      NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • AMD 9070XT

      By cooky560 · Posted

      TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!