Louisiana won't Recognize Same-Sex Marriages


Recommended Posts

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/opponents-divided-on-how-or-whether-to-resist-supreme-court-ruling/ar-AAcbVTX

 

Linky without the code box.

 

Anyway...have you read the decision?  It is 103 pages long.  No doubtedly Louisiana looked at it and said ... "oh no...TL:DR".   :)

 

Supreme Court's Decision

 

 

And another link regarding the same subject:  http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/06/bobby_jindal_administration_sa_1.html

I can't wait to see the first gay divorce, who will be the one to get alimony?

 

That's a billion dollar question. They prolly have certain rules of their own. Sleep Facing each other = Ongoing fight. One sleeps the other way = Everything Good   :p  :rofl:

Not issuing marriage licenses yet because the courthouses still need to get their legal ducks in a row and update forms and things, that makes sense, but to pout and throw a tantrum and say that you're going to refuse to issue marriage licenses to everyone? That's just mean-spirited.

Not issuing marriage licenses yet because the courthouses still need to get their legal ducks in a row and update forms and things, that makes sense, but to pout and throw a tantrum and say that you're going to refuse to issue marriage licenses to everyone? That's just mean-spirited.

That "Buddy" Caldwell guy is clearly showboating for the next election. He thinks he can get notoriety for being the same-sex marriage equivalent of the last Japanese WWII holdout.

Pretty pathetic of them to fight it, it was only a matter of time before this was going to happen 

 

And most of the religious reasons are not Biblical, even the verse used has been completely misrepresented to what it really meant 

Pretty pathetic of them to fight it, it was only a matter of time before this was going to happen 

 

And most of the religious reasons are not Biblical, even the verse used has been completely misrepresented to what it really meant 

That's the thing about the bible, it can be interpreted many different ways, often in a way that aligns with and supports the existing beliefs of the interpreter.

That's the thing about the bible, it can be interpreted many different ways, often in a way that aligns with and supports the existing beliefs of the interpreter.

The only way to "biblically" justify their assurances require a complete disregard for the context of the passage, but even that doesn't matter, they aren't Jews following Judaism, but Christians that should be following the New Testament

  • Like 1

Some attorney generals need to re-read a certain amendment of the constitution: hint, it is the sixth one.

 


This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

Kinda tired of seeing rainbow crap all over the net... can't wait for it to die down and people stop pushing their beliefs onto others.

 

Really ? I think you missed the /s or maybe you are simply not understanding the situation.

  • Like 1

That's the thing about the bible, it can be interpreted many different ways, often in a way that aligns with and supports the existing beliefs of the interpreter.

 

Well according tot he bibble the israelites are descendants or zombies/white walkers...

 

 

 

The hand of the Lord was on me, and he brought me out by the Spirit of the Lordand set me in the middle of a valley; it was full of bones. 2 He led me back and forth among them, and I saw a great many bones on the floor of the valley, bones that were very dry. 3 He asked me,
  • Like 2

Kinda tired of seeing rainbow crap all over the net... can't wait for it to die down and people stop pushing their beliefs onto others.

 

You mean like how religions have been doing to -everyone- for the past few thousand years? :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft kills AI-powered history search feature in Edge by Usama Jawad In June 2025, Microsoft began rolling out AI-powered history search functionality with Edge 138. The idea was simple: allow customers to use natural language phrases and synonyms to find their desired history items rather than matching keywords exactly. Although the company had already rolled out this capability in a phased manner, it has now decided to cancel it. In an update on its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has announced that it has decided not to move forward with AI-powered history search. The company has not detailed the exact reasoning behind this move, but it has apologized to customers for the inconvenience. The move is rather interesting as it seemingly could have improved user productivity. Edge users wouldn't have to worry about typos or exact keywords, and just focus on what they were trying to locate in their browser history. Microsoft had also assured users that an on-device AI model would be leveraged for this functionality, and no data would be sent to the cloud. IT admins also had the ability to control its availability through the EdgeHistoryAISearchEnabled policy. When the feature began rolling out last year, many of our readers called it creepy, noting that they couldn't trust Microsoft to keep their data on their device. Others also questioned its usefulness, saying that it's simply a way for Microsoft to insert more AI bloat into its products. Although the Redmond tech giant had stated that it will be more mindful about surfacing Copilot features in Windows 11 apps, we later discussed how this is mostly a rebranding exercise rather than an actual axing of AI functionalities. Indeed, a Microsoft executive later emphasized how they want to reshape Windows for the agentic AI era. That said, it does seem like at least AI-powered Edge history search isn't a part of that vision.
    • For you to jump on and defend your sweetheart? I agree, it didn't.
    • Not likely, of course, that we will see routine citizenship checks as they only involve compliance with existing federal voting laws already on the books for decades. This seems a non-issue entirely. Only fools would have the government rush headlong into an AI program few can understand or predict, or even debug...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!