Recommended Posts

So far it's been fine, fast, usable, and relatively pain free. In fact the only thing that's been a pain is updating legacy code that still uses browser strings (hello from 1999!). Bad habits from previous developers. For general browser usage, it seems faster in both usability and in use than Chrome. Haven't run any benchmarks though I've read that it's still not up to par with Chrome. And I *hate* IE prior to version 10. So for me to not be annoyed by Microsoft Edge is... surprising.

Too basic, as other said.

I often work with the browser and need specific extension for productivity, not to mention an adblocker, pinned tabs, a better font rendering engine (AA is inferior to Chrome) and other search engine support. 

Other than the lack of extensions, the inability to change the search engine to Google is why I refuse to use it.

It seems intentional, too. Edge allows both Twitter and Wikipedia as search engines, but still won't allow you to add Google in any easy or meaningful way. I also noticed that under a fresh install of Windows 8.1 recently, it was nearly impossible to add Google as the default search engine for IE, either.

 

Why would you want to use Google? We have to do a lot of image searches at work and we have never found Google to be superior at all. Bing consistently returns the best results nearer the top. Why do you think Google copied Bing's image search layout? (Of course, Bing copied some of Google's refinement's too, but the basic layout was originally Bing's.) I reckon over the last two or three years I have got half the news room using Bing over Google, based purely on results. In general searches, whenever Bing has been unable to find something for me and I've resorted to Google, it has never found what I was looking for, either. Not once.

 

My nephew put me onto Bing 6 or 7 years ago and, to be honest, I stuck with it mostly because I love the Image of the Day but for the past few years I reckon it has gotten as good as Google, or near enough that it doesn't matter any more.

 

And you can't blame Microsoft for trying to get back at Google, given the way Google treat Windows Phone.

 

 

Still IE no matter what they call it, will still only be good for downloading a real browser 

Spoken like an ignorant fool! (And I know, I've been there myself.) I use Firefox, Chrome and Safari at work and none of them are a patch on IE 11. IE11 feels faster, looks better, is definitely more stable and has by far the best reading mode. Being a Netscape devotee since the 90s, I had always avoided IE like the plague but when I started installing Win8 previews on my old netbook, I decided to give it a go and found it to be fantastic. In the end, I just got so sick of all the effort required to make Firefox work the way I want it to, which is how IE 11 works out of the box, that I just couldn't see the point in bothering. So I've been an extremely happy IE 11 user at home for more than 3 years now.

 

 

... a better font rendering engine (AA is inferior to Chrome) and other search engine support. 

That's a laugh! Try using Chrome on any PC with Quadro graphics - you get no AA at all. It renders Chrome unusable on my laptop and work PCs.

 

 

Anyway, to answer the original question - as a replacement for the Modern UI version of IE 11, Edge is a joke. I can see it's (ugly) UI, which is at the wrong end of the screen. It's reading mode is quite poor compared to IE 11 and it is no more usable with touch than any desktop browser. It is the no. 1 reason I will not be upgrading to Windows 10.

  • Like 2

Couldn't really tell you what I think of it as on my machine it did nothing but crash. Only got it to stay open 1 time and then the first thing I did was download Firefox!

 

From my experience with version 10130, I think was the build number, all of Windows 10 is nothing but one big POS!

 

Replaced Windows 10 with the new version of Debian!

Why would you want to use Google? We have to do a lot of image searches at work and we have never found Google to be superior at all. Bing consistently returns the best results nearer the top. Why do you think Google copied Bing's image search layout? (Of course, Bing copied some of Google's refinement's too, but the basic layout was originally Bing's.) I reckon over the last two or three years I have got half the news room using Bing over Google, based purely on results. In general searches, whenever Bing has been unable to find something for me and I've resorted to Google, it has never found what I was looking for, either. Not once.

 

My nephew put me onto Bing 6 or 7 years ago and, to be honest, I stuck with it mostly because I love the Image of the Day but for the past few years I reckon it has gotten as good as Google, or near enough that it doesn't matter any more.

 

And you can't blame Microsoft for trying to get back at Google, given the way Google treat Windows Phone.

 

 

Spoken like an ignorant fool! (And I know, I've been there myself.) I use Firefox, Chrome and Safari at work and none of them are a patch on IE 11. IE11 feels faster, looks better, is definitely more stable and has by far the best reading mode. Being a Netscape devotee since the 90s, I had always avoided IE like the plague but when I started installing Win8 previews on my old netbook, I decided to give it a go and found it to be fantastic. In the end, I just got so sick of all the effort required to make Firefox work the way I want it to, which is how IE 11 works out of the box, that I just couldn't see the point in bothering. So I've been an extremely happy IE 11 user at home for more than 3 years now.

 

 

That's a laugh! Try using Chrome on any PC with Quadro graphics - you get no AA at all. It renders Chrome unusable on my laptop and work PCs.

 

 

Anyway, to answer the original question - as a replacement for the Modern UI version of IE 11, Edge is a joke. I can see it's (ugly) UI, which is at the wrong end of the screen. It's reading mode is quite poor compared to IE 11 and it is no more usable with touch than any desktop browser. It is the no. 1 reason I will not be upgrading to Windows 10.

 

Having actually tried to use Edge, I stand by my comment, still not good or capable above anything else I've used 

Did you say something incomprehensible?  IE11 is none of those things.

 

It can be good, but it's nowhere near any of that.

 

Edge, Chrome and Firefox stomp on IE11.

 

Not all system configurations are same...  

 

You: Edge is faster than IE 11 on your system.

 

Other: IE11 is faster than Edge on theirs.

 

You can not judge them... unless you are at their house for proof that IE11 is faster than Edge on that system... 

 

 

It's about preferences and browser is working for him/her.  Like "Oh, I like Firefox better because it's quick enough and stable for me."   They test Chrome or whatever that they find that they have browser glitches or slowness... something like that. "Hell, I go back to IE11 because ti's quick."

 

I understand that those browser you mentioned are better than IE11.  But based on the configuration anyone has... it may be different story.

I don't like the fact that you can't sign-out easily and if you do, you'll be singed-in back again; I'm sick of "personalized experience" everywhere and for me this is a serious privacy issue. That's the first thing, the second is lack of extensions - say whatever you like, but browsing web nowadays without protection from tracking elements and intrusive ads is like sadomasochism caused either by choice or ignorance.

 

Layout is nice - it reminds me both Firefox and Chrome, and also I like the simplified options but there's still lots of stuff that should arrive - like better bookmarks support.

It lacks a tablet mode like Modern IE.

Once it has that option i'll probably like it a lot more

It's designed to be functional for tablets and desktop users alike. Here's a side-by-side of Safari from my iPad compared with Edge. As you can see, it's very usable as a tablet browser. Note that the scaling isn't the same between the two images.

post-22691-0-38583200-1436038287.png

I don't like the fact that you can't sign-out easily and if you do, you'll be singed-in back again; I'm sick of "personalized experience" everywhere and for me this is a serious privacy issue. That's the first thing, the second is lack of extensions - say whatever you like, but browsing web nowadays without protection from tracking elements and intrusive ads is like sadomasochism caused either by choice or ignorance.

 

Layout is nice - it reminds me both Firefox and Chrome, and also I like the simplified options but there's still lots of stuff that should arrive - like better bookmarks support.

I hope you're not an Android user...

It's designed to be functional for tablets and desktop users alike. Here's a side-by-side of Safari from my iPad compared with Edge. As you can see, it's very usable as a tablet browser. Note that the scaling isn't the same between the two images.

 

I'm not saying it's not usable, but it's a step back from Modern IE.

In my opinion there is not a better browser then Modern IE11 for browsing on a tablet/laptop with touch screen.

it got rid of all the chrome so your webpage can take up the whole screen. If I need the chrome, it's just a swipe away

I'm not saying it's not usable, but it's a step back from Modern IE.

In my opinion there is not a better browser then Modern IE11 for browsing on a tablet/laptop with touch screen.

it got rid of all the chrome so your webpage can take up the whole screen. If I need the chrome, it's just a swipe away

I do wish they'd add gesture support, that would be really nice. It's at least as useable as Safari on iPad is the only point I was trying to make. I agree that having the address bar fade away in Metro IE is nice, but it did have it's problems...especially if you were using a Surface with the keyboard attached. It was really difficult to swipe up from the bottom in that case. Maybe leaving the address bar on top and swiping down from the upper edge would be a good way to go, either way it's fine for me as is right now.

what stop me from using Edge is extenisons

 

ADBlock + lastpass (being lazy these days to renumber that kind of stuffs :s )

 

- snip - 

 

I'm in the same boat. I don't mind the UI, but the lack of availability of these two extensions (or rather, extensions in general) is what's keeping me from using it at the moment. 

I do wish they'd add gesture support, that would be really nice. It's at least as useable as Safari on iPad is the only point I was trying to make. I agree that having the address bar fade away in Metro IE is nice, but it did have it's problems...especially if you were using a Surface with the keyboard attached. It was really difficult to swipe up from the bottom in that case. Maybe leaving the address bar on top and swiping down from the upper edge would be a good way to go, either way it's fine for me as is right now.

 

You know you can sweep from the top down to get the address bar and tabs too. That way you avoid the KB at the bottom

At the moment it is more of a tech preview than a real competitor to Firefox and Chrome but I think this time next year, once it has extension support and more options to tweak it will be decent.

 

What we need to remember is that Microsoft decided to release Windows 10 before Edge is truly ready for release. While it might be stable enough to use as your day to day browser on July 29th it certainly isn't ready from a feature set to be most peoples primary browser.

You know you can sweep from the top down to get the address bar and tabs too. That way you avoid the KB at the bottom

 

Yes, but the address bar is still on the bottom which isn't as natural as it should be.

At the moment it is more of a tech preview than a real competitor to Firefox and Chrome but I think this time next year, once it has extension support and more options to tweak it will be decent.

 

What we need to remember is that Microsoft decided to release Windows 10 before Edge is truly ready for release. While it might be stable enough to use as your day to day browser on July 29th it certainly isn't ready from a feature set to be most peoples primary browser.

 

I think for most people it will be just fine, it's power users that want all of the missing features.

Did you say something incomprehensible?  IE11 is none of those things.

 

It can be good, but it's nowhere near any of that.

 

Edge, Chrome and Firefox stomp on IE11.

 

I assume you use each on a regular basis? As I said, I do and that is an accurate reflection of my experience. To be fair, it's just as likely that OS X makes Firefox and Chrome feel worse but I absolutely prefer IE 11 to any of them.

Replaced Windows 10 with the new version of Debian!

Probably OK if you don't use your computer for anything but, for better or worse, I do so I need an OS that supports the software applications I use to earn a living and for my hobbies. That completely rules out Linux and even OS X.

Probably OK if you don't use your computer for anything but, for better or worse, I do so I need an OS that supports the software applications I use to earn a living and for my hobbies. That completely rules out Linux and even OS X.

2016, the year of the Linux desktop! /s

  • Like 1

It's designed to be functional for tablets and desktop users alike. Here's a side-by-side of Safari from my iPad compared with Edge. As you can see, it's very usable as a tablet browser. Note that the scaling isn't the same between the two images.

Here is a better comparison - Edge and IE 11 (Modern UI) at the same resolution and scaling. To show you more precisely, I've isolated the touch targets for switching tabs and adding a new tab. In case it needs to be spelled out, the blue boxes are Edge, the orange ones are IE 11. You can see how small they are in Edge by comparison. I find it no easier to use on my tablet than any desktop browser, even running the tablet at 150% (which I never have to do with W8, because it's smart enough to scale the Modern UI, as appropriate, automatically).

 

rrcxJ4D.png

 

The text on the site is also rendered slightly larger in IE11, even though I grabbed that from my 15" laptop and the Edge pic from my 10" Yoga 2 (both at default zoom level). I'd also point out that it's not just the size of the touch targets that causes hassles, it's that they are packed so close together in places. e.g. The close tab and new tab buttons.

I consider Edge to be one of Microsoft's worst designs, it looks like a forgotten application from Windows 95. I know they're trying to make one browser work for both desktop and tablet but it fails at both.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!