Recommended Posts

So far it's been fine, fast, usable, and relatively pain free. In fact the only thing that's been a pain is updating legacy code that still uses browser strings (hello from 1999!). Bad habits from previous developers. For general browser usage, it seems faster in both usability and in use than Chrome. Haven't run any benchmarks though I've read that it's still not up to par with Chrome. And I *hate* IE prior to version 10. So for me to not be annoyed by Microsoft Edge is... surprising.

Too basic, as other said.

I often work with the browser and need specific extension for productivity, not to mention an adblocker, pinned tabs, a better font rendering engine (AA is inferior to Chrome) and other search engine support. 

Other than the lack of extensions, the inability to change the search engine to Google is why I refuse to use it.

It seems intentional, too. Edge allows both Twitter and Wikipedia as search engines, but still won't allow you to add Google in any easy or meaningful way. I also noticed that under a fresh install of Windows 8.1 recently, it was nearly impossible to add Google as the default search engine for IE, either.

 

Why would you want to use Google? We have to do a lot of image searches at work and we have never found Google to be superior at all. Bing consistently returns the best results nearer the top. Why do you think Google copied Bing's image search layout? (Of course, Bing copied some of Google's refinement's too, but the basic layout was originally Bing's.) I reckon over the last two or three years I have got half the news room using Bing over Google, based purely on results. In general searches, whenever Bing has been unable to find something for me and I've resorted to Google, it has never found what I was looking for, either. Not once.

 

My nephew put me onto Bing 6 or 7 years ago and, to be honest, I stuck with it mostly because I love the Image of the Day but for the past few years I reckon it has gotten as good as Google, or near enough that it doesn't matter any more.

 

And you can't blame Microsoft for trying to get back at Google, given the way Google treat Windows Phone.

 

 

Still IE no matter what they call it, will still only be good for downloading a real browser 

Spoken like an ignorant fool! (And I know, I've been there myself.) I use Firefox, Chrome and Safari at work and none of them are a patch on IE 11. IE11 feels faster, looks better, is definitely more stable and has by far the best reading mode. Being a Netscape devotee since the 90s, I had always avoided IE like the plague but when I started installing Win8 previews on my old netbook, I decided to give it a go and found it to be fantastic. In the end, I just got so sick of all the effort required to make Firefox work the way I want it to, which is how IE 11 works out of the box, that I just couldn't see the point in bothering. So I've been an extremely happy IE 11 user at home for more than 3 years now.

 

 

... a better font rendering engine (AA is inferior to Chrome) and other search engine support. 

That's a laugh! Try using Chrome on any PC with Quadro graphics - you get no AA at all. It renders Chrome unusable on my laptop and work PCs.

 

 

Anyway, to answer the original question - as a replacement for the Modern UI version of IE 11, Edge is a joke. I can see it's (ugly) UI, which is at the wrong end of the screen. It's reading mode is quite poor compared to IE 11 and it is no more usable with touch than any desktop browser. It is the no. 1 reason I will not be upgrading to Windows 10.

  • Like 2

Couldn't really tell you what I think of it as on my machine it did nothing but crash. Only got it to stay open 1 time and then the first thing I did was download Firefox!

 

From my experience with version 10130, I think was the build number, all of Windows 10 is nothing but one big POS!

 

Replaced Windows 10 with the new version of Debian!

Why would you want to use Google? We have to do a lot of image searches at work and we have never found Google to be superior at all. Bing consistently returns the best results nearer the top. Why do you think Google copied Bing's image search layout? (Of course, Bing copied some of Google's refinement's too, but the basic layout was originally Bing's.) I reckon over the last two or three years I have got half the news room using Bing over Google, based purely on results. In general searches, whenever Bing has been unable to find something for me and I've resorted to Google, it has never found what I was looking for, either. Not once.

 

My nephew put me onto Bing 6 or 7 years ago and, to be honest, I stuck with it mostly because I love the Image of the Day but for the past few years I reckon it has gotten as good as Google, or near enough that it doesn't matter any more.

 

And you can't blame Microsoft for trying to get back at Google, given the way Google treat Windows Phone.

 

 

Spoken like an ignorant fool! (And I know, I've been there myself.) I use Firefox, Chrome and Safari at work and none of them are a patch on IE 11. IE11 feels faster, looks better, is definitely more stable and has by far the best reading mode. Being a Netscape devotee since the 90s, I had always avoided IE like the plague but when I started installing Win8 previews on my old netbook, I decided to give it a go and found it to be fantastic. In the end, I just got so sick of all the effort required to make Firefox work the way I want it to, which is how IE 11 works out of the box, that I just couldn't see the point in bothering. So I've been an extremely happy IE 11 user at home for more than 3 years now.

 

 

That's a laugh! Try using Chrome on any PC with Quadro graphics - you get no AA at all. It renders Chrome unusable on my laptop and work PCs.

 

 

Anyway, to answer the original question - as a replacement for the Modern UI version of IE 11, Edge is a joke. I can see it's (ugly) UI, which is at the wrong end of the screen. It's reading mode is quite poor compared to IE 11 and it is no more usable with touch than any desktop browser. It is the no. 1 reason I will not be upgrading to Windows 10.

 

Having actually tried to use Edge, I stand by my comment, still not good or capable above anything else I've used 

Did you say something incomprehensible?  IE11 is none of those things.

 

It can be good, but it's nowhere near any of that.

 

Edge, Chrome and Firefox stomp on IE11.

 

Not all system configurations are same...  

 

You: Edge is faster than IE 11 on your system.

 

Other: IE11 is faster than Edge on theirs.

 

You can not judge them... unless you are at their house for proof that IE11 is faster than Edge on that system... 

 

 

It's about preferences and browser is working for him/her.  Like "Oh, I like Firefox better because it's quick enough and stable for me."   They test Chrome or whatever that they find that they have browser glitches or slowness... something like that. "Hell, I go back to IE11 because ti's quick."

 

I understand that those browser you mentioned are better than IE11.  But based on the configuration anyone has... it may be different story.

I don't like the fact that you can't sign-out easily and if you do, you'll be singed-in back again; I'm sick of "personalized experience" everywhere and for me this is a serious privacy issue. That's the first thing, the second is lack of extensions - say whatever you like, but browsing web nowadays without protection from tracking elements and intrusive ads is like sadomasochism caused either by choice or ignorance.

 

Layout is nice - it reminds me both Firefox and Chrome, and also I like the simplified options but there's still lots of stuff that should arrive - like better bookmarks support.

It lacks a tablet mode like Modern IE.

Once it has that option i'll probably like it a lot more

It's designed to be functional for tablets and desktop users alike. Here's a side-by-side of Safari from my iPad compared with Edge. As you can see, it's very usable as a tablet browser. Note that the scaling isn't the same between the two images.

post-22691-0-38583200-1436038287.png

I don't like the fact that you can't sign-out easily and if you do, you'll be singed-in back again; I'm sick of "personalized experience" everywhere and for me this is a serious privacy issue. That's the first thing, the second is lack of extensions - say whatever you like, but browsing web nowadays without protection from tracking elements and intrusive ads is like sadomasochism caused either by choice or ignorance.

 

Layout is nice - it reminds me both Firefox and Chrome, and also I like the simplified options but there's still lots of stuff that should arrive - like better bookmarks support.

I hope you're not an Android user...

It's designed to be functional for tablets and desktop users alike. Here's a side-by-side of Safari from my iPad compared with Edge. As you can see, it's very usable as a tablet browser. Note that the scaling isn't the same between the two images.

 

I'm not saying it's not usable, but it's a step back from Modern IE.

In my opinion there is not a better browser then Modern IE11 for browsing on a tablet/laptop with touch screen.

it got rid of all the chrome so your webpage can take up the whole screen. If I need the chrome, it's just a swipe away

I'm not saying it's not usable, but it's a step back from Modern IE.

In my opinion there is not a better browser then Modern IE11 for browsing on a tablet/laptop with touch screen.

it got rid of all the chrome so your webpage can take up the whole screen. If I need the chrome, it's just a swipe away

I do wish they'd add gesture support, that would be really nice. It's at least as useable as Safari on iPad is the only point I was trying to make. I agree that having the address bar fade away in Metro IE is nice, but it did have it's problems...especially if you were using a Surface with the keyboard attached. It was really difficult to swipe up from the bottom in that case. Maybe leaving the address bar on top and swiping down from the upper edge would be a good way to go, either way it's fine for me as is right now.

what stop me from using Edge is extenisons

 

ADBlock + lastpass (being lazy these days to renumber that kind of stuffs :s )

 

- snip - 

 

I'm in the same boat. I don't mind the UI, but the lack of availability of these two extensions (or rather, extensions in general) is what's keeping me from using it at the moment. 

I do wish they'd add gesture support, that would be really nice. It's at least as useable as Safari on iPad is the only point I was trying to make. I agree that having the address bar fade away in Metro IE is nice, but it did have it's problems...especially if you were using a Surface with the keyboard attached. It was really difficult to swipe up from the bottom in that case. Maybe leaving the address bar on top and swiping down from the upper edge would be a good way to go, either way it's fine for me as is right now.

 

You know you can sweep from the top down to get the address bar and tabs too. That way you avoid the KB at the bottom

At the moment it is more of a tech preview than a real competitor to Firefox and Chrome but I think this time next year, once it has extension support and more options to tweak it will be decent.

 

What we need to remember is that Microsoft decided to release Windows 10 before Edge is truly ready for release. While it might be stable enough to use as your day to day browser on July 29th it certainly isn't ready from a feature set to be most peoples primary browser.

You know you can sweep from the top down to get the address bar and tabs too. That way you avoid the KB at the bottom

 

Yes, but the address bar is still on the bottom which isn't as natural as it should be.

At the moment it is more of a tech preview than a real competitor to Firefox and Chrome but I think this time next year, once it has extension support and more options to tweak it will be decent.

 

What we need to remember is that Microsoft decided to release Windows 10 before Edge is truly ready for release. While it might be stable enough to use as your day to day browser on July 29th it certainly isn't ready from a feature set to be most peoples primary browser.

 

I think for most people it will be just fine, it's power users that want all of the missing features.

Did you say something incomprehensible?  IE11 is none of those things.

 

It can be good, but it's nowhere near any of that.

 

Edge, Chrome and Firefox stomp on IE11.

 

I assume you use each on a regular basis? As I said, I do and that is an accurate reflection of my experience. To be fair, it's just as likely that OS X makes Firefox and Chrome feel worse but I absolutely prefer IE 11 to any of them.

Replaced Windows 10 with the new version of Debian!

Probably OK if you don't use your computer for anything but, for better or worse, I do so I need an OS that supports the software applications I use to earn a living and for my hobbies. That completely rules out Linux and even OS X.

Probably OK if you don't use your computer for anything but, for better or worse, I do so I need an OS that supports the software applications I use to earn a living and for my hobbies. That completely rules out Linux and even OS X.

2016, the year of the Linux desktop! /s

  • Like 1

It's designed to be functional for tablets and desktop users alike. Here's a side-by-side of Safari from my iPad compared with Edge. As you can see, it's very usable as a tablet browser. Note that the scaling isn't the same between the two images.

Here is a better comparison - Edge and IE 11 (Modern UI) at the same resolution and scaling. To show you more precisely, I've isolated the touch targets for switching tabs and adding a new tab. In case it needs to be spelled out, the blue boxes are Edge, the orange ones are IE 11. You can see how small they are in Edge by comparison. I find it no easier to use on my tablet than any desktop browser, even running the tablet at 150% (which I never have to do with W8, because it's smart enough to scale the Modern UI, as appropriate, automatically).

 

rrcxJ4D.png

 

The text on the site is also rendered slightly larger in IE11, even though I grabbed that from my 15" laptop and the Edge pic from my 10" Yoga 2 (both at default zoom level). I'd also point out that it's not just the size of the touch targets that causes hassles, it's that they are packed so close together in places. e.g. The close tab and new tab buttons.

I consider Edge to be one of Microsoft's worst designs, it looks like a forgotten application from Windows 95. I know they're trying to make one browser work for both desktop and tablet but it fails at both.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!