Recommended Posts

I consider Edge to be one of Microsoft's worst designs, it looks like a forgotten application from Windows 95. I know they're trying to make one browser work for both desktop and tablet but it fails at both.

Really? I actually think it's a decent enough desktop browser, especially in the latest build. I like the way the settings are laid out and it has enough features for the basics. It only fails for me as a replacement for the Modern UI version of IE.

It's pretty fast and is pretty good at what I want a browser to do. 

Browse the web without too much bloat features.


I don't like the fact that you can't sign-out easily and if you do, you'll be singed-in back again; I'm sick of "personalized experience" everywhere and for me this is a serious privacy issue. That's the first thing, the second is lack of extensions - say whatever you like, but browsing web nowadays without protection from tracking elements and intrusive ads is like sadomasochism caused either by choice or ignorance.

 

Layout is nice - it reminds me both Firefox and Chrome, and also I like the simplified options but there's still lots of stuff that should arrive - like better bookmarks support.

I browse the web without any extensions... Apparently I'm a sadomasochist?

Nah, not really. I'm just not as paranoid! Ads are the reason many of the services I use are free, so yeah :) same for Neowin. Blocking these would go against my principles, really.

I actually think it's a decent enough desktop browser

 

I don't like having less favourites displayed on screen of that opening a sub folder goes to that folder rather than expanding it which every other browser including IE does.

I think it has potential, and that it's unfair to judge an unfinished product. As of now, I like it. It can go black right from the start, and the layout isn't terrible, it's just... spartan. Pun intended.

 

I was an IE 6 loyalist for the longest time. I had it set up just right and I didn't care about blocking ads, though when I switched to Firefox, ad blocking hadn't really taken off, though, once it did, that was about it for IE. But before then I found it perfectly serviceable to my needs.

 

I don't hate any browser. I've never hated IE. I have found IE 7 and IE 8 lacking, but IE 9 is a decent browser for the average user, if you can forgive the lack of an ad blocker, and most folks can. I understand web developers have valid grievances with it, but for the average user, that doesn't really matter (whether it should or not is beside the point).

 

Currently I use two browsers. Opera and Chrome. I also keep Firefox because it's my wife's first, last, and only choice for a browser (though, she uses Chrome on Android). And I don't mind Firefox, but it can't handle Facebook. Scroll down a page or two and it just gives up. This is on a Xeon 1231v3 with 16GB of RAM. It's just sloppy code, and I'm willing to lay a good portion of that at Facebook's door, but Chrome and Opera can handle it just fine, so I prefer them. I've been a loyal Firefox user for years, but it just doesn't scratch my itch anymore. I prefer Opera on my phone (Android), and on the desktop, it's just as good as Chrome. I currently sync both browsers, and try to keep Opera "work friendly." No adult sites, no torrent sites, no sites I wouldn't be willing to show my boss. And I use Portable Opera at work. I use Chrome for much more. (I do have Portable Chrome, and Portable Firefox. Options are good, and space isn't a factor. Not at the size of these applications, anyway.)

 

Edge has a chance of becoming my go-to browser if two unlikely conditions are met. One, Portable Edge becomes available. Microsoft never supported portability with its main applications, favoring tight system integration. They're sticking with Windows 7 at work, so it would need to support that as well. Two, Edge needs to come to Android, or I need to go to Windows Phone. I need my browser with me in three places, and if Edge can't follow, I can't hang with it. Though, that won't make me hate it, or stop using it. I'll use it occasionally, and I'll fully customize it to my needs. I used to stick with just one browser, and using another was jarring. That doesn't work for me anymore. We need to diversify our tools. Especially us older geeks. You get stuck in one thing, when that road runs out, what then? But, that's getting a bit off-topic.

I don't like having less favourites displayed on screen of that opening a sub folder goes to that folder rather than expanding it which every other browser including IE does.

If that's the biggest problem Edge has, then I\it must be a lot better than I thought it was, because I don't think that's a problem at all. If I am looking at a folder full of favourites related to one subject, why would I care that I can or cannot see unrelated favourites?

Why would you want to use Google? We have to do a lot of image searches at work and we have never found Google to be superior at all. Bing consistently returns the best results nearer the top. Why do you think Google copied Bing's image search layout? (Of course, Bing copied some of Google's refinement's too, but the basic layout was originally Bing's.) I reckon over the last two or three years I have got half the news room using Bing over Google, based purely on results. In general searches, whenever Bing has been unable to find something for me and I've resorted to Google, it has never found what I was looking for, either. Not once.

 

My nephew put me onto Bing 6 or 7 years ago and, to be honest, I stuck with it mostly because I love the Image of the Day but for the past few years I reckon it has gotten as good as Google, or near enough that it doesn't matter any more.

 

And you can't blame Microsoft for trying to get back at Google, given the way Google treat Windows Phone.

Because in my experience, Google consistently finds what I'm searching for, whereas Bing is downright terrible at finding relevant results. There's also the matter of being able to access my search history on whatever device I use.

Plus, a lot of my services (primary e-mail, primary calendar, primary contacts, etc) use Google as the provider, because I use several different platforms, and Google is far better at platform agnostic services than others, such as iCloud or Microsoft's offerings. It's certainly not perfect, but it works on pretty much every platform I use.

In the end, even if I could use Google as my default search engine, I'd still use Chrome over Edge, because it doesn't support extensions, and a browser without having quick and easy access to Lastpass is absolutely useless to me.

I really don't like to judge something until I see the finished product.  Right now, I am not terribly impressed.  It's not that it's a bad browser (it's pretty good).  I just never liked the minimalistic style when it came to browsers on the desktop (one of the main reasons I never liked Chrome).  I run Cyberfox (a Firefox fork) on Windows and I personally like the ability to customize every inch of my browser to fit me.  The only new browser that has raised an eyebrow is Vivaldi.

 

I am interested to see their extension API there are 3 extensions that I am about to upload to the AMO, then I will port one of them to Chrome.  The other 2 won't work with Chrome's API.  I wonder how open this Spartan API will be.  If they have rich depth of FX and support something similar to XUL then I will get all my extensions over there.  If it is largely the same as Chrome, then I will still port my Chrome extension over.

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't know what to think - the UI is not very good. I like the dark theme for no other reason but because it is dark. On my Lenovo X1 (14" touch screen) it is still not that easy to hit most touch targets. I can only imagine what it must be like on something like a Surface 3 or god forbid some 7-8" tablet. Then from a mouse and keyboard point of view, the UI is way too big and wastes too much space. So for me it is a "neither-nor" design. I was hoping it would scale better between desktop and tablet mode but it really doesn't. Maybe they will update it to further optimize it but who knows. Actually I used to use IE a lot more in Windows 8 than I see myself using Edge with Win 10 so Chrome it is but god damn those white title bars are horrendous and not easy to change (modifying the theme doesn't produce a polished outcome either)...

Because in my experience, Google consistently finds what I'm searching for, whereas Bing is downright terrible at finding relevant results. There's also the matter of being able to access my search history on whatever device I use.

 

This is completely at odds with  my own experience. I've been using Bing for seven years or so now and it has been three or four years Since I found something on Google that I couldn't find on Bing. i.e. 100% of the time in the last several years, if Bing can't find something, niether can Google. What I like about Bing is that it consistently puts the best results nearer the top, especially with image search (which is probably 80% of my search usage).

I haven't used it much, mostly because I've been testing through a VM so you can't get a good idea of performance that way.  Still, I'd like to see a few changes, A little dab of color to the UI wouldn't hurt for example, and more features that are still missing.  I'm not a big extension user but I know others are waiting for that to come, just hope they don't take forever to bring it.

 

I think performance is fine, not much they need to worry about in that area, just standards support and features.

Edge suffers from one of the same problems that plagued IE - an incomprehensible UI.

 

The reason Chrome is so popular is because the interface is minimalistic. Everything is there for a reason and there aren't unnecessary buttons floating about. You have:

  • navigation buttons - back, forward, refresh
  • navigation bar - with a star to favourite a website
  • hamburger button - hides various menu option

With Edge you have:

  • navigation buttons - same as Chrome
  • navigation bar - it has two buttons, the favourite star and a faded out book icon; the navigation bar also fades out when not selected, which means the buttons look like they're not related to it
  • favourites menu button - the icon is a series of different length lines that gives no indication as to what it does
  • OneNote button - presumably Office adds this (?) but it shouldn't be a default button
  • share button - brings up the Metro sidebar, which is horribly out of place in Windows 10
  • menu button - the icon is three dots, which is inconsistent with standard app design

There's simply too much clutter and there's no way to infer what the buttons do other than to click on them and hope for the best. I also dislike Microsoft's icon design, which isn't limited to Edge - the Settings panel icons are appalling. Microsoft's icon design has taken a step backwards.

horrendous

 

tried using it few times, MS should really give up trying to make a browser. 

 

Couldn't agree more, granted IE11 desktop / metro both had failings but one did the job for desktop and the other for touch screen. This thing does 1/2 a job for each and looks bloody ugly while doing it.

Edge suffers from one of the same problems that plagued IE - an incomprehensible UI.

 

The reason Chrome is so popular is because the interface is minimalistic. Everything is there for a reason and there aren't unnecessary buttons floating about. You have:

  • navigation buttons - back, forward, refresh
  • navigation bar - with a star to favourite a website
  • hamburger button - hides various menu option
With Edge you have:
  • navigation buttons - same as Chrome
  • navigation bar - it has two buttons, the favourite star and a faded out book icon; the navigation bar also fades out when not selected, which means the buttons look like they're not related to it
  • favourites menu button - the icon is a series of different length lines that gives no indication as to what it does
  • OneNote button - presumably Office adds this (?) but it shouldn't be a default button
  • share button - brings up the Metro sidebar, which is horribly out of place in Windows 10
  • menu button - the icon is three dots, which is inconsistent with standard app design
There's simply too much clutter and there's no way to infer what the buttons do other than to click on them and hope for the best. I also dislike Microsoft's icon design, which isn't limited to Edge - the Settings panel icons are appalling. Microsoft's icon design has taken a step backwards.

Three dots is actually consistent on phone... well that's about it. :/

Edge suffers from one of the same problems that plagued IE - an incomprehensible UI.

 

The reason Chrome is so popular is because the interface is minimalistic. Everything is there for a reason and there aren't unnecessary buttons floating about. You have:

  • navigation buttons - back, forward, refresh
  • navigation bar - with a star to favourite a website
  • hamburger button - hides various menu option

With Edge you have:

  • navigation buttons - same as Chrome
  • navigation bar - it has two buttons, the favourite star and a faded out book icon; the navigation bar also fades out when not selected, which means the buttons look like they're not related to it
  • favourites menu button - the icon is a series of different length lines that gives no indication as to what it does
  • OneNote button - presumably Office adds this (?) but it shouldn't be a default button
  • share button - brings up the Metro sidebar, which is horribly out of place in Windows 10
  • menu button - the icon is three dots, which is inconsistent with standard app design

There's simply too much clutter and there's no way to infer what the buttons do other than to click on them and hope for the best. I also dislike Microsoft's icon design, which isn't limited to Edge - the Settings panel icons are appalling. Microsoft's icon design has taken a step backwards.

 

Really?  That's what you're going with?

zN32YIW.png

 

It's not that different and edge seems a lot friendlier.  The favorites icon is the exact same setup. 

The hub could use a more descriptive icon, and probably will by RTM.  But it's not just favorites, it's favorites, downloads, reading list, and history.  Which to me is better than chrome's shoving EVERYTHING into the hamburger menu then hiding behind sub menus. At least Edge doesn't have submenus, which I think is a huge step forward. 

It's the friendliest browser UX out there IMO.  Yeah there's not a lot of advanced settings yet but that's ok. 

 

The onenote icon is there no matter what, just fyi, and yes it's a default feature. Why shouldn't it be?  

The only thing I agree with is the legacy share charm, I was hoping they'd have something friendlier by now.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!