Recommended Posts

WP_20141223_19_16_40_Pro.thumb.jpg.e21cc

Christmas comes to Autobot City! (last year's display)

 

WP_20141223_19_16_20_Pro.thumb.jpg.abd84

Time to catch up with old friends! Cerebros is a headmaster whose head is Spike, the Autobots' and specifically Bumblebee's oldest human friend. This miniature version doesn't have the removable head, but it still works for the scene.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

WP_20160106_10_30_39_Pro.thumb.jpg.4cf24

Energon Optimus Prime, with Legends Bumblebee. This character design was often derided as "Fattimus Prime" but I think he looks more barrel-chested than fat. He could combine with any deluxe-class Energon Autobot.

 

WP_20160106_10_34_08_Pro.thumb.jpg.54765

 

Vehicle modes

 

WP_20160106_10_34_15_Pro.thumb.jpg.b2304

Prime's gun rack.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

WP_20160120_06_09_34_Pro.thumb.jpg.05ba6

 

A Tale of Two Cities - Fortress Maximus vs. Trypticon. Fort Max is the 3rd party Infinitor figure, while Trypticon (not Mecha-@Raze!) is an original from 1986. Trypticon's electronics still work, so he walks.

WP_20160120_06_46_44_Pro.thumb.jpg.5982e

 

Communications Officers - Device Label Soundwave (Blaster Black) is a homage to the Japanese-exclusive Soundblaster figure and a functioning though basic MP3 player. His cassette door opens to reveal a mini-SD card slot (good luck tracking one of those down!).

 

Blaster on the right is a third party figure, Mega Steel "Buster". He has a spot for cassettes, but Mega Steel hasn't released any yet. He also has swappable heads - the toy-based one you see here and one based on the animation model.

  • 2 weeks later...

Starscreams

WP_20160202_14_01_32_Pro_LI.thumb.jpg.28

 

Back left is Robot Masters Starscream, part of a small Japanese line from the mid-2000s.  The other two are Legends class versions - the larger one is more recent and more posable.

 

WP_20160202_13_48_59_Pro_LI.thumb.jpg.65

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

WP_20160211_15_52_30_Pro_LI.thumb.jpg.42

 

A shot demonstrating the creative mold reuse Hasbro is up to these days. Autobots on the right, Decepticons on the left, yet only 2 basic molds between the 4 figures. The Autobots, Silverbolt and Powerglide are the originals. Cyclonus is a heavy remold of Silverbolt, and looks very different unless you know what details to check - the arms, abdomen and the front of the legs are basically the same. Cyclonus even manages to seem bigger than Silverbolt, though that might be the different head and the way I have his wings posed (angled rather than straight back).

 

Viper is a minor remold of Powerglide - only the head has changed. But the different colors are effective at distinguishing him. An interesting note - he's only the second official general release TF-GiJoe crossover toy in the 32 years TFs have been around. The first one was Titanium Megatron a decade ago.

  • Like 1

Bumblebees. On the left is KMart Legends Bumblebee, released back in G1 around 1988. Larger than the original Microman-based figure, and closer to an actual Beetle in proportions. On the right is Masterpiece Bumblebee, which manages to have both a highly-accurate Beetle mode and a robot mode very close to the animation model. Appropriately, he's also the smallest Masterpiece figure to date, around the size of a standard carded "Deluxe" figure, while most MPs are closer to the boxed "Voyager" size.

 

WP_20160215_09_48_02_Pro_LI.thumb.jpg.d8

 

WP_20160215_09_57_00_Pro_LI.thumb.jpg.26

 

(I forgot to rotate the panel on MP `Bee to hide his Autobrand in car mode. But the feature seems a little superfluous since the symbol on his foot/trunk is always visible.)

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

WP_20160314_14_36_51_Pro.thumb.jpg.b8e91

 

Shockwaves. The one on the left is the current Combiner Wars Legends class figure. He's the original G1 character, and designed to be held in gun mode by a combiner. On the right is Transformers Prime Shockwave.

On February 14, 2016 at 11:09 AM, DConnell said:

Bumblebees. On the left is KMart Legends Bumblebee, released back in G1 around 1988. Larger than the original Microman-based figure, and closer to an actual Beetle in proportions. On the right is Masterpiece Bumblebee, which manages to have both a highly-accurate Beetle mode and a robot mode very close to the animation model. Appropriately, he's also the smallest Masterpiece figure to date, around the size of a standard carded "Deluxe" figure, while most MPs are closer to the boxed "Voyager" size.

 

WP_20160215_09_48_02_Pro_LI.thumb.jpg.d8

 

WP_20160215_09_57_00_Pro_LI.thumb.jpg.26

 

(I forgot to rotate the panel on MP `Bee to hide his Autobrand in car mode. But the feature seems a little superfluous since the symbol on his foot/trunk is always visible.)

 

If this was lime green... that we know it's LimeMaster! 

 

 

:shifty:

4 minutes ago, Thomas the Tank Engine said:

There is one Transformer that I want to get my hands on, it's from the Headmaster line, and it is the original Fortress Maximus, but it costs over $1000 for MIB.

I have an original. Battered, water-stained, in desperate need of Reprolabels and missing Gasket & Grommett, but fully functional and currently in city mode on my dresser. Got it at a collector show in Atlantic City over a decade ago.

 

There's a new version coming out this year which should retail for around $125. It's a heavy remold of Metroplex from 3 years ago, but extensively redone so it is a great Max update. It even retains the double headmaster feature. There's also a reissue of the Japanese version of the original Max which you can get for around $250.

32 minutes ago, Thomas the Tank Engine said:

Why would I want reissues, when I clearly said I want the original?!

Less expensive alternatives. Most collectors would prefer the original if money were no problem, but the whole point of the reissues is to let people get these classic toys without the 4 digit pricetag.

 

Plus that G1 reissue is just like the original from the reviews. Only without the wear & tear and 25 years of plastic degradation. Mine certainly feels a bit stiff and fragile, though the thickness of the plastic makes the chance of something snapping off very slim (thankfully!)  Frankly, given the choice between my copy original and the reissue, I'd go for the reissue. And the upcoming Titans Return version is almost certainly more posable then the original figure, which is a bit of a brick to be honest. Best thing about FM is the city mode as a display area for smaller figures.

 

It really depends on what's more important to you - the actual figure released in 1987, one of the best "playsets" ever released for TFs, or simply a representation of the character,. Only the original will do for the first, but a reissue will do for the latter 2. And the TR figure will work nicely for the last.

2 hours ago, Thomas the Tank Engine said:

There is one Transformer that I want to get my hands on, it's from the Headmaster line, and it is the original Fortress Maximus, but it costs over $1000 for MIB.

there was a reissue of fortress maximus and it was a lot less that 1000.  It doesn't have the original box, but who cares other than elite collectors. 

 

http://www.bigbadtoystore.com/bbts/product.aspx?product=TAK11575&mode=retail

 

here is a comparison.  Original mold and colors, just the box  is the main difference (I am sure there are extremely minor revisions with the new one).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDgforQpRgE
 

Well some people don't know about them or their availability.  For many a reissue is the one to get because you get the actual thing and get to play with it for a fraction of the cost of what collectors are charging.  There is no point to have an original if you are going to take it out of the box, it does devalue it.  Get what you want, it is your money and wish.  For me, I would get what I could afford and wouldn't be afraid to take out.

4 minutes ago, sc302 said:

Well some people don't know about them or their availability.  For many a reissue is the one to get because you get the actual thing and get to play with it for a fraction of the cost of what collectors are charging.  There is no point to have an original if you are going to take it out of the box, it does devalue it.  Get what you want, it is your money and wish.  For me, I would get what I could afford and wouldn't be afraid to take out.

^ This. There's nothing wrong with wanting the original from 1987, even with the availability of the reissue. But there are pluses and minuses to both original and reissue. And the TR version is a different figure entirely, even if it does represent the same character.

 

For you having an actual original is important, for me less so. I only own the original because it was the only option when I found it; the reissue didn't exist and was thought unlikely to ever happen. Honestly, I'd be tempted to sell my original to buy the reissue if I thought I'd get enough to cover the cost. I might give it a shot, actually - I'd love to have a pristine, complete one made with modern plastics. More than complete, really - the domestic release didn't include the Master Sword. I just can't afford the reissue right now.

  • 3 weeks later...

WP_20160331_10_19_58_Pro.thumb.jpg.e8d5a

 

Blaster participates in "Bring your kid to work day". The big one is the 3rd party "Buster" figure I've shown before, while the small one is a genuine Hasbro Action Master version, from 1991, the final year of G1.

 

Action Masters were straight action figures of the characters, unable to transform but with transforming accessories. They made up for the loss of the transforming feature with (for the time) better articulation and sculpts which were good approximations of the animation models. Or interesting blends of the toy design and animation model, like Blaster.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!