The Ashley Madison hacked ruined people's lives.


Recommended Posts

The Ashley Madison hack is indeed ripping apart marriages.

It's exposing affairs, confirming suspicions, and keeping cheaters up at night in cold sweats.

 

Several people who were directly affected by the data breach of the cheating website AshleyMadison.com have reached out to CNNMoney. Their identities and details have been independently verified, but they have spoken on condition of anonymity.

The mistress

"Ana" is a highly educated business woman in her 40s who is finalizing a divorce with her husband.

She stayed up late Thursday rapidly texting eight married men with whom she had relationships after finding them on Ashley Madison.

She said the men are all worried their wives will use search tools now available online to find the email addresses they used to sign up for the cheating site.

Meanwhile, Ana is concerned about her job in finance. Her clients are couples and small businesses. These are highly personal relationships. If they plug in her email address into any of the available Ashley Madison searches, she'll be exposed. And maybe even fired.

"I would lose business, contracts... I'm not even sure if my contract with my employer has a morality clause," she told CNNMoney on Friday. "It could be very damaging."

Ana claims to have had more than 50 encounters -- everything ranging from "a benign flirtatious lunch" to "three days in a hotel room and ordering room service." To her, Ashley Madison was a playground.

"Honey, I devoured them," she said.

Source and more: http://money.cnn.com/2015/08/21/technology/ashley-madison-ruined-lives/index.html

Their lives were already ruined, now they've been caught and probably feel like #### like they should.

Pretty much. Their lives were already ruin.

This just add more reasons to divorce.

-----------------------------------------

I do wonder how the spouse that got cheated on feels.

I am not even married, but if I find out that my girlfriend (whom I love so much) cheated on me, I would be very very hurt.

Why wouldn't they create a separate email address? I don't understand why you'd sign up for something like this using credentials that your partner knows, especially in this era of data theft. Not particularly bright, are they?

"Ana" is a highly educated business woman in her 40s who is finalizing a divorce with her husband.

Further proof that education and intelligence are mutually exclusive.

  • Like 2

Wrong - it's basically that *justice* is in the eye of the beholder.  If it's someone else that is the victim, you enjoy watching them go "splat" - if it's YOU, you want the hacker's head.  (How many of you that are vicariously enjoying this are also followers of TMZ or read tabloids?)  It's why TMZ has the reputation of "tabloid TV".  I'm NOT defending the cheaters - however, those that hacked the site are no better.

Wrong - it's basically that *justice* is in the eye of the beholder.  If it's someone else that is the victim, you enjoy watching them go "splat" - if it's YOU, you want the hacker's head.  (How many of you that are vicariously enjoying this are also followers of TMZ or read tabloids?)  It's why TMZ has the reputation of "tabloid TV".  I'm NOT defending the cheaters - however, those that hacked the site are no better.

Couldn't agree more PGH, well said.

Meh if you were in to that sort of thing any way, you'd think you'd have pre-checked your works contract to see if there was a morality clause, and surely you'd have taken stock on how it may affect your life if you were found out.

It seems to me that not only were those people lying cheaters, but many of them lacked the intelligence not to put their entire lives outcome in the hands of a company that ran a website that specialized in lying :/

Anyone on there caught by their wives or husbands is fair enough, they cheated on them and they can face the music.

But to lose a job over it is way too far, why should your work dictate what you can and can't do in your love life? It's got nothing to do with them. Pretty sure there would be a huge uproar if there were companies that fired anyone that was gay and had relationships with the same sex - this is no different, leave their job out of it.

  • Like 3

Their lives were already ruined, now they've been caught and probably feel like #### like they should.

Zero sympathy for anyone caught on there. 

 

If you don't want to be caught, leave your partner and don't cheat 

Pretty much. Their lives were already ruin.

This just add more reasons to divorce.

-----------------------------------------

I do wonder how the spouse that got cheated on feels.

I am not even married, but if I find out that my girlfriend (whom I love so much) cheated on me, I would be very very hurt.

The hack ruined no one. Them joining the site is what ruined them, idiots.

 

 

And I DO NOT feel sorry for those idiots what so ever either!

What about couples that used the website? What about people that made accounts out of curiosity? I'm all for exposing cheaters but posting people's personal information on the Internet isn't the right way to go about it because not everyone involved is "guilty". It's easy to have the "They deserved it because they're cheaters." mentality but it's more than that. Innocent people have been affected by this and that isn't fair.

  • Like 3

Anyone on there caught by their wives or husbands is fair enough, they cheated on them and they can face the music.

But to lose a job over it is way too far, why should your work dictate what you can and can't do in your love life? It's got nothing to do with them. Pretty sure there would be a huge uproar if there were companies that fired anyone that was gay and had relationships with the same sex - this is no different, leave their job out of it.

 

If you accept an employment contract containing a morality clause, you have no one to blame but yourself. That being said, if she gets fired and there was no such clause then she has grounds to sue. In any event, her problems were brought on herself and I have zero sympathy.

 

If you accept an employment contract containing a morality clause, you have no one to blame but yourself. That being said, if she gets fired and there was no such clause then she has grounds to sue. In any event, her problems were brought on herself and I have zero sympathy.

Is this morality clause an american thing because I've never seen such a thing in any UK contracts I've been involved in?

No sympathy here either, and it is indeed further proof that education and common sense are often inversely proportional.  Not always, but often enough to be entertaining.

Some of these folks are also in big legal trouble as they used government computers to access the site. Offenders in the White House, Congress, the Military and other federal agencies, as well as state and local level employees and officials. Security clearances are at risk, and jail time is very possible.

Time to kick back and keep the popcorn maker at the ready.

 

 

  • Like 4

No sympathy here either, and it is indeed further proof that education and common sense are often inversely proportional.  Not always, but often enough to be entertaining.

Some of these folks are also in big legal trouble as they used government computers to access the site. Offenders in the White House, Congress, the Military and other federal agencies, as well as state and local level employees and officials.

Time to kick back and keep the popcorn maker at the ready.

 

 

I've always believed that this can be boiled down to 

Intelligence

Common Sense

Morality (From a Consequentialism viewpoint)

We can have a massive amount of 1 to all three of these, and lack in 1 to all three of the categories.

...and here is the problem.  Private lives being thrust out into the public eye.  No one has any right to judge what these people did aside from their family and other parties directly involved.  

Further proof that education and intelligence are mutually exclusive.

She was "finalizing" a divorce...and you know that can take a while.  Is it cheating if you and your spouse decide that it is over with no chance of reconciling?  Nope...not in opinion.  But yea...your private life warrants possibly getting fired from your job.  /sarcasm

Anyway, this will become an "all you can eat" buffet for the news outlet.  Shame really.

  • Like 2

I'm joining the no sympathy crowd, it's way too easy to have joined the site with an alternate email and a fake name, yet many so called smart people did the opposite

 

Then there's what the site was for

What about couples that used the website? What about people that made accounts out of curiosity? I'm all for exposing cheaters but posting people's personal information on the Internet isn't the right way to go about it because not everyone involved is "guilty". It's easy to have the "They deserved it because they're cheaters." mentality but it's more than that. Innocent people have been affected by this and that isn't fair.

 

...and here is the problem.  Private lives being thrust out into the public eye.  No one has any right to judge what these people did aside from their family and other parties directly involved.  

She was "finalizing" a divorce...and you know that can take a while.  Is it cheating if you and your spouse decide that it is over with no chance of reconciling?  Nope...not in opinion.  But yea...your private life warrants possibly getting fired from your job.  /sarcasm

Anyway, this will become an "all you can eat" buffet for the news outlet.  Shame really.

 

Being a "couple" or finalizing a divorce is totally irrelevant! The site is 99% made up of people who are cheaters. Why would "couples" and people finalizing a divorce need to be looking for people cheating on their partner? There are a number of mainstream dating sites you can join and many don't even require a credit card.

Saying that... Anyone using their personal email was really stupid! I don't feel sorry for the people who had their information exposed and hopefully the criminals who exposed it are caught.

Edited by oldtimefighter

Being a "couple" or finalizing a divorce is totally irrelevant! The site is 99% made up of people who are cheaters. Why would "couples" and people finalizing a divorce need to be looking for people looking to cheat on their partner? There are a number of mainstream dating sites you can join and many don't even require a credit card.

Saying that... Anyone using their personal email was really stupid! I don't feel sorry for the people who had their information exposed and hopefully the criminals who exposed it are caught.

Who cares?  Also, being a couple(s) and finalizing divorce(s) could be relevant.  No one can look at the list and completely understand the reasoning ... yet in eyes of the internet they are all guilty of being "cheaters".  

How does what they do in their private lives affect you in anyway shape or form?

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!