The Ashley Madison hacked ruined people's lives.


Recommended Posts

cheeting is way different then downloading music... ok. music artists can get money back but you can't get a relationship back after cheating.

This information is no ones business except the user and their partner, and in some cases, not even the partner.. like with the several mentioned that were already in the process of divorce.

For damn sure it isn't the business of employers, coworkers, other family, friends, or anyone else who has their E-Mail address..

I'm just waiting for the inevitable story of someone killed over this. It's gonna happen.

Morality is entirely relative and people are free to do with their lives whatever they please. If people want a discreet relationship then that's entirely their prerogative - people are free to judge them, as is only fair, but that doesn't mean they don't have a right to privacy. The hackers had absolutely no right to publish such information.

The people whose information was exposed are victims, regardless of what you think of them personally. Whether they are innocent or not depends on one's perspective and the specifics of the individual case.

While morality may be relative, I cannot agree that breaking the trust of a partner in a committed relationship is anything besides wrong. If you want multiple partners, find someone who wants an open relationship and don't hurt someone like this. That said, I agree two wrongs don't make a right and as much as I am not losing much sleep for this, if they caught them and I was on the jury, I would vote for a big s

 

While morality may be relative, I cannot agree that breaking the trust of a partner in a committed relationship is anything besides wrong. If you want multiple partners, find someone who wants an open relationship and don't hurt someone like this. That said, I agree two wrongs don't make a right and as much as I am not losing much sleep for this, if they caught them and I was on the jury, I would vote for a big s

The other issue is, there will be lots of people on this site where the partner already knew. But this leak still puts that info out for anyone else who knows their email or other details.

If their sole point was to make AM feel the pain, then release all their internal emails, ###### like that, but this is just a public shaming of people, nothing more, nothing less.

I'm pretty sure their lives were already in ruin.  That's why they were on AM.

It was so shocking (sarcasm) to find Josh Duggar on there with 2 accounts.  Not only was he cheating on his lady he was also cheating on the woman he was cheating with.

  • Like 1

I'm pretty sure their lives were already in ruin.  That's why they were on AM.

It was so shocking (sarcasm) to find Josh Duggar on there with 2 accounts.  Not only was he cheating on his lady he was also cheating on the woman he was cheating with.

Whilst also fiddling with kids...

 

  • Like 2

While morality may be relative, I cannot agree that breaking the trust of a partner in a committed relationship is anything besides wrong. If you want multiple partners, find someone who wants an open relationship and don't hurt someone like this. That said, I agree two wrongs don't make a right and as much as I am not losing much sleep for this, if they caught them and I was on the jury, I would vote for a big s

The problem is your binary absolutism - everything is either right or wrong with no inbetween. What if someone was forced into a loveless arranged marriage by their parents and doesn't want to get divorced because of social stigma? What if someone is being abused by their partner and fears for their life if they were to leave them? What if someone questions their sexuality and wants to explore that before ending decades of marriage and hurting someone they love? You also have to realise that some people simply don't prescribe to social norms and do not accept that cheating is wrong. One cannot apply a blanket statement to everybody who uses the site.

For some a site like Ashley Madison is their only hope of a happy life and now hackers may have ruined that, maybe even putting people's life in danger.

  • Like 3

The problem is your binary absolutism - everything is either right or wrong with no inbetween. What if someone was forced into a loveless arranged marriage by their parents and doesn't want to get divorced because of social stigma? What if someone is being abused by their partner and fears for their life if they were to leave them? What if someone questions their sexuality and wants to explore that before ending decades of marriage and hurting someone they love? You also have to realise that some people simply don't prescribe to social norms and do not accept that cheating is wrong. One cannot apply a blanket statement to everybody who uses the site.

For some a site like Ashley Madison is their only hope of a happy life and now hackers may have ruined that, maybe even putting people's life in danger.

 

Cmon, that is reaching. There is like a million and one different dating sites out there. If the end user chooses this site they have to be judged on the fact the website isn't simply for dating or finding someone new based on it's tagline. If you are in an unhappy or forced marriage, morally, you should seek someone else who is single to try and have a better life with. Not potentially someone else who is married given the sites tagline and agenda. Sure if you find someone else in an unhappy marriage and you are both willing to the best of your abilities to break it off with your spouses, but this site will foster a lot of people who just want to cheat.

Hacked or not, the choice to use this website is dubious given the plethora of dating websites with neutral agendas. Sure you can throw the greyscale moral chart into the mix, but as humans we should know by now cheating rarely ends without a mess, even if the mess is only for someone else you've brought into the mix. Just a part of human evolution that the majority dislike lying and/or cheating. Some may not, but I'd still question why a site like this is someones only hope of a happy life when there are a ton of dating sites.

Edited by Audioboxer

The problem is your binary absolutism - everything is either right or wrong with no inbetween. What if someone was forced into a loveless arranged marriage by their parents and doesn't want to get divorced because of social stigma? What if someone is being abused by their partner and fears for their life if they were to leave them? What if someone questions their sexuality and wants to explore that before ending decades of marriage and hurting someone they love? You also have to realise that some people simply don't prescribe to social norms and do not accept that cheating is wrong. One cannot apply a blanket statement to everybody who uses the site.

For some a site like Ashley Madison is their only hope of a happy life and now hackers may have ruined that, maybe even putting people's life in danger.

Playing the what-if game again, huh?  Sorry, but arguing for fringe cases that won't even account for 0.000001% of the membership base just won't wash.  Almost everyone registered on that site was there to screw over their partners and have an illicit affair.  Whilst I don't condone the hack itself, I have zero sympathy for their marriages being wrecked by their own stupid and deplorable actions.

Cmon, that is reaching. There is like a million and one different dating sites out there. If the end user chooses this site they have to be judged on the fact the website isn't simply for dating or finding someone new based on it's tagline. If you are in an unhappy or forced marriage, morally, you should seek someone else who is single to try and have a better life with. Not potentially someone else who is married given the sites tagline and agenda. Sure if you find someone else in an unhappy marriage and you are both willing to the best of your abilities to break it off with your spouses, but this site will foster a lot of people who just want to cheat.

Do you even know how the site works? It's not simply for married people to have affairs with other married people - it is designed with single people in mind as well. Married people can seek out single people who are willing to keep any relationship confidential.

Hacked or not, the choice to use this website is dubious given the plethora of dating websites with neutral agendas. Sure you can throw the greyscale moral chart into the mix, but as humans we should know by now cheating rarely ends without a mess, even if the mess is only for someone else you've brought into the mix. Just a part of human evolution that the majority dislike lying and/or cheating. Some may not, but I'd still question why a site like this is someones only hope of a happy life when there are a ton of dating sites.

It's not for hackers to determine what is and is not morally acceptable. These people are victims. Are some of them sleazy cheats who deserve condemnation? Sure. But many others are perfectly justified in their use of the site.

Playing the what-if game again, huh?  Sorry, but arguing for fringe cases that won't even account for 0.000001% of the membership base just won't wash.  Almost everyone registered on that site was there to screw over their partners and have an illicit affair.  Whilst I don't condone the hack itself, I have zero sympathy for their marriages being wrecked by their own stupid and deplorable actions.

Nobody is suggesting you should have sympathy, nor am I suggesting that most people using the site are innocent victims. All I'm pointing out is that the people who use the site shouldn't be judged as individuals, not collectively written off as low-life cheats who deserve to be exposed.

  • Like 2

Do you even know how the site works? It's not simply for married people to have affairs with other married people - it is designed with single people in mind as well. Married people can seek out single people who are willing to keep any relationship confidential.

It's not for hackers to determine what is and is not morally acceptable. These people are victims. Are some of them sleazy cheats who deserve condemnation? Sure. But many others are perfectly justified in their use of the site.

Nobody is suggesting you should have sympathy, nor am I suggesting that most people using the site are innocent victims. All I'm pointing out is that the people who use the site shouldn't be judged as individuals, not collectively written off as low-life cheats who deserve to be exposed.

 

Don't get me wrong the hack is terrible, do not condone it at all. I'm just saying the people who are saying their lives are ruined for the most part must have had something to lose (a marriage, multiple relationships) without there being consent. We can chuck the word morality away for now I suppose, and focus on consent of your other half for an open relationship. I do feel for those in arranged marriages, but where it's possible they should be trying to build up to doing a runner and being able to support themselves, not messing around on dating sites (that early on in the task to break free of an arranged marriage).

Playing the what-if game again, huh?  Sorry, but arguing for fringe cases that won't even account for 0.000001% of the membership base just won't wash.  Almost everyone registered on that site was there to screw over their partners and have an illicit affair.  Whilst I don't condone the hack itself, I have zero sympathy for their marriages being wrecked by their own stupid and deplorable actions.

He isn't playing the "what-if" game. He's being realistic. I don't think anyone here feels sorry for the people that had affairs with the help of that website. Some of us feel sorry for those that made accounts without the intention to cheat on their partner.

  • Like 1

He isn't playing the "what-if" game. He's being realistic. I don't think anyone here feels sorry for the people that had affairs with the help of that website. Some of us feel sorry for those that made accounts without the intention to cheat on their partner.

 

Well, whatever you or I may think about this whole story, suddenly it's taken a rather tragic turn... :(

 

Two Ashley Madison clients are reported to have taken their lives after hackers published their details according to police in Canada.

The police have just held a news conference about the Ashley Madison investigation at Toronto Police Headquarters.

"Today I can confirm that Avid Life Media is offering a $500,000 (£241,065) reward to anyone providing information that leads to the identification, arrest and prosecution of the person or persons responsible for the leak of the Ashley Madison database," said acting staff superintendent Bryce Evans.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34044506

I certainly don't wish harm to come to any of the people exposed by the hack... Tragic... :(

 

Well, whatever you or I may think about this whole story, suddenly it's taken a rather tragic turn... :(

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34044506

I certainly don't wish harm to come to any of the people exposed by the hack... Tragic... :(

My goodness, that's awful. It happened in my city and the reports are unconfirmed but it isn't surprising. There's a great deal of shame associated with having an account on that website and having your personal information leaked onto the Internet for people to see.. well, it's no surprise that it pushed people to kill themselves. It's tragic and I would never wish death upon a cheater. It's an incredibly selfish and dishonest thing to do but I don't think anyone deserves to die because of it. 

really hope other people don't kill themselves because of it. This is so awful and I don't think that even one death is a price worth paying to expose millions of cheaters. :(

  • Like 3

I think the problem with this, and is something that I have had to deal with in my own personal life, the "Cheaters" the "Liars" etc are people too.   They did what they felt was the right thing for them to do in that moment.  They made a choice and went with it. While yes, it is something that "society" frowns upon and is considered awful.. it is no different than signing up for Neowin.   The problem is that in many relationships (including ones I have been in) there is almost a view of owning the other person.  A sense of "I don't want you do to that because it will make me sad".  

Really, what is bad about cheating? Like if we break it down.. yes it is based on hiding information or lying.  It leads to hurt feelings and a loss of respect.  But look at it like this: They may have cheated and lied.. but before knowing it happened did you feel any different about the person? No, the relationship you had with them was still valid and genuine (at least from your perspective) you got the love and compassion you wanted.  If you weren't getting it you would have left a long time ago... or found a place to get it.   I have been dealing with some personal things wherein I had to do a lot of reflection of the above and I've realized that regardless of what does or doesn't happen.. the feelings I felt and had for my partner were real, I felt loved, cared for, etc even though it wasn't your stereotypical relationship.. or the relationship that society says is valid.

People being hurt and sad are because they put their expectations on another person and when that person didn't meet or follow those specific expectations they were hurt.  It wasn't the act that hurt them, it wasn't their relationship that hurt them, it was the fact they put their feelings on someone else and were hurt because the other person put their feelings first.   As hard as it is (I know first hand), I know that cheating, being with other people, etc is nothing more than a choice.  It is a choice, I could be just as hurt if someone I cared about started doing drugs or chose to move to another country.

We also need to look at it like this.  If you have a friend.. just a typical go to the bar friend.. and you really like that friend they are a good solid friend.. does that stop you from having other friends? Does it stop you from going out socially because you have a good friend? No.. so why do we put that requirement and weight on someone just because we "love" them?  And really.. what is love?  Love is simply a collection of feelings we have towards someone that we group together and call love.  If you love your parents, siblings, grandparents, and your partner.. why is it all of a sudden you can't love anyone else?  No one in this world were "Made" for each other, while yes some people get along really well and can have a solid family and be happy being together.. had they never met.. the world would still go on for both of those people.  Also I think it's hard when you are the one being "Cheated on" because you are not experiencing the love and feelings your partner is.  You are simply feeling like "I wouldn't do that!" but really.. when you were single you did it.. or you would have never met your partner, so because you met someone you are no longer you? You can no longer make the choice you want to and be your own person because you care about someone else?  
Also you need to see it as.. yes they cheated, yes they lied, but that doesn't mean they don't still have feelings for you.  If they didn't they would have left, they would have just been with someone else.  However they chose to remain with you, and maintain the relationship with you.  Just because they have additional relationships doesn't mean the one you have with them no longer holds any value.

I mean.. I doubt many will read this or necessarily agree.. but as I say it's something that I have had to cope with and becoming... understanding.. of and realize that everyone, partnered or not is an individual with their own thoughts, feelings, needs, and wants.  Everyone is just trying to have the best life that they can. I mean, yes I respect my partners wishes and wants.. but I will still do what I feel is best for myself and I know that my partner is doing the same.

 

 

  • Like 3

Duggar's wife blame herself on his cheating: http://www.insideedition.com/headlines/11582-josh-duggars-wife-reportedly-blames-herself-for-his-cheating-will-stand-by-her-man

Dugger's sister (whom he molested) shares bible passage about sin after brother Josh's cheating scandal. (Oh, and she already forgave him for molesting her!): http://www.people.com/article/jessa-duggar-shares-bible-passage-sin-josh-duggar-ashley-madison

It was so shocking (sarcasm) to find Josh Duggar on there with 2 accounts.  Not only was he cheating on his lady he was also cheating on the woman he was cheating with.

 

Traditional family value at work.

Edited by illegaloperation
 

Well, whatever you or I may think about this whole story, suddenly it's taken a rather tragic turn... :(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34044506

I certainly don't wish harm to come to any of the people exposed by the hack... Tragic... :(

Sadly this was not unexpected. :no: Many who resort to using sites like Ashley Madison are unhappy with their life and do so out of desperation. It's easy to paint them all as sleazy, low-life cheaters but the reality is far more complicated. The hackers have blood on their hands and I really hope they catch the people responsible.

  • Like 2

Bet the swinger couples weren't too worried about their partners finding out :p

:shifty:

 

On topic, people really, REALLY need to look objectively on things.

Hypothetical situation I'm willing to bet my girl would be ok if I asked for a threesome (MMF, FFM) and we used Ashley madison for said services. Now imagine my personal email was leaked because it was  my email of preference for my phone notifications etc?

(And yes I know, multiple accounts can be had, but not everyone is tech savy enough to do that)

  • Like 1

:shifty:

 

On topic, people really, REALLY need to look objectively on things.

Hypothetical situation I'm willing to bet my girl would be ok if I asked for a threesome (MMF, FFM) and we used Ashley madison for said services. Now imagine my personal email was leaked because it was  my email of preference for my phone notifications etc?

(And yes I know, multiple accounts can be had, but not everyone is tech savy enough to do that)

My wife wouldn't care, I've already told you about her :p

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ditto that, I have a few Alexa devices around the house to control lighting and such for a disabled person I live with, and it shows a *lot* of ads on the display. The dots are simple but effective. A lot cheaper too.
    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!