The Ashley Madison hacked ruined people's lives.


Recommended Posts

"Ana" is a highly educated business woman in her 40s who is finalizing a divorce with her husband.

She stayed up late Thursday rapidly texting eight married men with whom she had relationships after finding them on Ashley Madison.

She said the men are all worried their wives will use search tools now available online to find the email addresses they used to sign up for the cheating site.

Meanwhile, Ana is concerned about her job in finance. Her clients are couples and small businesses. These are highly personal relationships. If they plug in her email address into any of the available Ashley Madison searches, she'll be exposed. And maybe even fired.

"I would lose business, contracts... I'm not even sure if my contract with my employer has a morality clause," she told CNNMoney on Friday. "It could be very damaging."

Ana claims to have had more than 50 encounters -- everything ranging from "a benign flirtatious lunch" to "three days in a hotel room and ordering room service." To her, Ashley Madison was a playground.

"Honey, I devoured them," she said.

There are several things to note here.

1) She was in the process of a divorce, meaning it should not be considered cheating.
2) She should have used a disposable email address if she was concerned about her privacy.
3) She should know what's in the employment contract she signed.
4) Businesses shouldn't have morality clauses, as one's personal life should remain personal.
5) Her calling the website a 'playground' and saying she "devoured" encounters hardly makes her endearing.

As for the hackers exposing such information, while I have absolutely no respect for people who cheat on others I also have zero respect for any group that would make such information public. This information is not in the public interest.

  • Like 1

Who cares?  Also, being a couple(s) and finalizing divorce(s) could be relevant.  No one can look at the list and completely understand the reasoning ... yet in eyes of the internet they are all guilty of being "cheaters".  

How does what they do in their private lives affect you in anyway shape or form?

I don't really care... Doing laundry so killing some time online and wanted to point out her finalizing a divorce is really irrelevant and not the "real" reason why she was on that site. Yes, what people do in their private lives is of no business to us. Why do you care so much you need to try to justify why this woman was on this site?

Oh yeah, If you don't have a  counter-argument never go with "Why do you care?". It's kinda a dumb thing to say when you are here commenting yourself.

What about couples that used the website? What about people that made accounts out of curiosity? I'm all for exposing cheaters but posting people's personal information on the Internet isn't the right way to go about it because not everyone involved is "guilty". It's easy to have the "They deserved it because they're cheaters." mentality but it's more than that. Innocent people have been affected by this and that isn't fair.

 

The entire purpose of the site is to help people cheat on their partners. There are no innocent victims except those who were cheated on.

  • Like 2

I don't really care... Doing laundry so killing some time online and wanted to point out her finalizing a divorce is really irrelevant and not the "real" reason why she was on that site. Yes, what people do in their private lives is of no business to us. Why do you care so much you need to try to justify why this woman was on this site?

Oh yeah, If you don't have a  counter-argument never go with "Why do you care?". It's kinda a dumb thing to say when you are here commenting yourself.

You cared enough to quote my post hence the reason I asked.  Why do I care?  Because I do not think people's private lives should be scrutinized by the public.  Case in point, your comment of wanting to point out finalizing a divorce is irrelevant and not the "real" reason she used this site.  What is the real reason?  Do you know this lady or the consensual partners she had to understand or know what the "real" reason is?

 

Being a "couple" or finalizing a divorce is totally irrelevant! The site is 99% made up of people who are cheaters. Why would "couples" and people finalizing a divorce need to be looking for people cheating on their partner? There are a number of mainstream dating sites you can join and many don't even require a credit card.

Saying that... Anyone using their personal email was really stupid! I don't feel sorry for the people who had their information exposed and hopefully the criminals who exposed it are caught.

Of course it's relevant. We don't know the details of everyone involved in the leak. You can't say that they all had it coming because there were people that used it for other reasons.

 

The entire purpose of the site is to help people cheat on their partners. There are no innocent victims except those who were cheated on.

Just because it was marketed to people in committed relationships doesn't mean the entire purpose of the site was for that purpose. I read about people in open relationships that met other people in open relationships through that site well before the leak. No one marketed Q-tips for cleaning the inside of your ear but the majority of people that buy it use it for that purpose. So no, there are other innocent victims in addition to those that were cheated on. I'm finding it hard to understand why you'd say something like that given your stance on religion. Be the logical person that I know, FloatingFatMan. Don't be emotional.

And don't mistake what I'm saying as an apology for the cheaters. I absolutely despise cheating. I think it's inexcusable and I'd never forgive anyone for it. With that said, I also despise invasion of privacy and it just so happens that a smaller group of innocent people were "caught in the crossfire". That doesn't sit well with me.

Your personal thoughts on cheating aside as I agree with what most have posted here, this is still f'd.  I know someone who already had been caught by their spouse cheating a few years ago, they dealt with it.....and have moved on with their lives.  That as between he two of them.  He was on the site, and now he has to go through the exercise in public.  It is not just the "######" cheater who is going to go through hell it is his innocent wife who already had to deal with this. It does ruin lives, and it ruins the innocent one in many situations. 

You cared enough to quote my post hence the reason I asked.  Why do I care?  Because I do not think people's private lives should be scrutinized by the public.  Case in point, your comment of wanting to point out finalizing a divorce is irrelevant and not the "real" reason she used this site.  What is the real reason?  Do you know this lady or the consensual partners she had to understand or know what the "real" reason is?

 

 

Of course it's relevant. We don't know the details of everyone involved in the leak. You can't say that they all had it coming because there were people that used it for other reasons.

 

Guys, take a look at the main graphic on the website --> https://www.ashleymadison.com/

Ashley Madison

Life is short. Have an affair.

 

What valid reason would a "couple" or someone finalizing a divorce be on this site? Yes, there is always THAT person that does things that make so sense. I am a single person who is looking for signal people but I signed up on Ashley Madison. LOL Just as worse is the single people who sign up to get with married people which is just as bad as the cheaters.

Look, cheaters are liars. I am suggesting maybe this woman is lying.

Do I care? No... I am not scrutinizing the private lives of anyone. This woman made public statements so that opens her up to people questioning them. Hey, you cheat on your partner and want to sign up to a site to do it? It's your life... When that site is hacked and your information is on the web? I am not going to feel sorry for you.

Edited by oldtimefighter

What about couples that used the website? What about people that made accounts out of curiosity? I'm all for exposing cheaters but posting people's personal information on the Internet isn't the right way to go about it because not everyone involved is "guilty". It's easy to have the "They deserved it because they're cheaters." mentality but it's more than that. Innocent people have been affected by this and that isn't fair.

Playing with fire can get you burned, regardless of how innocent and curious you are.

Curiosity killed the cat...

AS for couples using it, that goes back to lack of intelligence again. What kind of innocent person thinks it is a good idea to use a site that has a motto of "Life is Short, Have an Affair"? Someone who is borderline special needs, maybe.  There are no shortage of dating sites out there that aren't primarily for cheating.

 

 

So you are using anecdotal evidences to make your case?

That's not a sign of being either very intelligent.

You made my case for me ;)

Here, let me help you.

If you are successful, highly educated, and don't want to put your career or the career and life of others in jeopardy, don't do something stupid like create an online account that can point back to your activity. Don't write it on your calendar. If you do, you run the risk of being caught and putting it all at risk. The woman obviously used personal details to track back to herself. That doesn't sound very intelligent to me.  Does it to you?  Who in their right mind believes that is an intelligent move?

That isn't anecdotal, that is a case of lack of common sense.  It cannot be taught, hence my comment.

Edited by adrynalyne

 

 

Guys, take a look at the main graphic on the website --> https://www.ashleymadison.com/

Ashley Madison

Life is short. Have an affair.

 

What valid reason would a "couple" or someone finalizing a divorce be on this site? Yes, there is always THAT person that does things that make so sense. I am a single person who is looking for signal people but I signed up on Ashley Madison. LOL Just as worse is single people who sign up to get with married people just because... 

Look, cheaters are liars. I am suggesting maybe this woman is lying.

Do I care? No... I am not scrutinizing the private lives of anyone. This woman made public statements so that opens her up to people questioning them. Hey, you cheat on your partner and want to sign up to a site to do it? It's your life... When that site is hacked and your information is on the web? I am not going to feel sorry for you.

Curiosity?  Spur of the moment following some heated argument.  Could be numerous reasons.  Just because someone signed up for the site doesn't mean that they cheated on their spouse.  Just because your name is on the list doesn't mean you took part (did they verify identifications?).

 

Yep, there are many Govt. employees even used their .gov email ... and also searched the site when they were at work. 
Nobody ruined their lives.  All these dumb ass did that to themselves.

Why are these idiots using their personal email address for this service anyway? If they want to remain someone under the radar, just make another email account solely for the purpose of being a scumbag

 

 

Morons

 

 

Curiosity?  Spur of the moment following some heated argument.  Could be numerous reasons.  Just because someone signed up for the site doesn't mean that they cheated on their spouse.  Just because your name is on the list doesn't mean you took part (did they verify identifications?).

 

Even if curious, you don't do something like that without accepting and understanding the risks.

Right?  If you speed, you can get caught. Don't cry to the cop writing your ticket, you knew what you were doing.

Anyway, texting married men in a panic after the leak hardly sounds innocent.

...and here is the problem.  Private lives being thrust out into the public eye.  No one has any right to judge what these people did aside from their family and other parties directly involved.  

She was "finalizing" a divorce...and you know that can take a while.  Is it cheating if you and your spouse decide that it is over with no chance of reconciling?  Nope...not in opinion.  But yea...your private life warrants possibly getting fired from your job.  /sarcasm

Anyway, this will become an "all you can eat" buffet for the news outlet.  Shame really.

How about all those married men she was messing with?  Think they were finalizing their divorce?

It's funny how some of the people posting here have no sympathy for these people getting exposed,  but they are the same people who are afraid of the NSA because they have something to hide.

  • Like 3

Too many idiots here judge people, like they're the morality police. Basically there must be something wrong with the relationship for the person(s) too cheat.

There's lots of reasons why people stick with their partner and cheat, most of the idiots here that are quick to judge are probably single or have never been in a long term relationship.

Anyhow I'm not one of the cheaters, I've never used the site, but I don't judge people so quickly.  People lives have or are going to be ruined because of this, but AM should've had better security in place and also should've wiped the profiles of people who paid to have their profile wiped.

 

 

  • Like 2

 

 

Guys, take a look at the main graphic on the website --> https://www.ashleymadison.com/

Ashley Madison

Life is short. Have an affair.

 

What valid reason would a "couple" or someone finalizing a divorce be on this site? Yes, there is always THAT person that does things that make so sense. I am a single person who is looking for signal people but I signed up on Ashley Madison. LOL Just as worse is the single people who sign up to get with married people which is just as bad as the cheaters.

Look, cheaters are liars. I am suggesting maybe this woman is lying.

Do I care? No... I am not scrutinizing the private lives of anyone. This woman made public statements so that opens her up to people questioning them. Hey, you cheat on your partner and want to sign up to a site to do it? It's your life... When that site is hacked and your information is on the web? I am not going to feel sorry for you.

You don't need to tell me to take a look at something I've already seen. I've done my research on the site and I know what kind of people they've marketed it to. Just because you can't think of a reason why someone would use that site doesn't mean every single person using it is guilty of cheating. You're making a vast generalization about millions of members. I could've easily made an account out of sheer curiosity before the data breach and with my partner's consent. In your mind, my personal information being leaked onto the Internet is something I had coming. Is it so hard to understand that people could've used that website without the intention of cheating? I really do find your lack of sympathy troubling.

I don't feel sorry for the cheaters. I feel sorry for anyone that was curious enough to make an account. I feel sorry for anyone that was lonely enough to make account. I even feel sorry for couples that were looking for a bit of fun. I'm not gonna sit here and impose my morality on others. I can't judge people that I don't know. Hell, we don't even have all the details. It's so weird to me that people are quick to get a justice boner instead of thinking about the fact that millions of people's private information was leaked. That's a huge concern and it's something that could happen to Match.com or eHarmony. Of course, some of you would feel sorry for them despite the fact that cheaters also use other dating sites.

Zero sympathy for anyone caught on there. 

 

If you don't want to be caught, leave your partner and don't cheat 

It's not that easy to just "leave" your partner without getting screwed economically and mentally in the divorce proceedings. The institution of marriage is definitely not in a man's favor when things get ugly.

The people using the site were pretty dumb in the way they used it, and also dumb for getting married in the first place. They used it because it was more convenient than going through the trouble of divorce because they wanted instant gratification. They should have stayed single.

Too many idiots here judge people, like they're the morality police. Basically there must be something wrong with the relationship for the person(s) too cheat.

There's lots of reasons why people stick with their partner and cheat, most of the idiots here that are quick to judge are probably single or have never been in a long term relationship.

Anyhow I'm not one of the cheaters, I've never used the site, but I don't judge people so quickly.  People lives have or are going to be ruined because of this, but AM should've had better security in place and also should've wiped the profiles of people who paid to have their profile wiped.

 

 

Whats wrong with getting out of a relationship beforehand then?  If there wasn't something wrong with the relationship before, there sure as heck is now.  I'd call them idiots before I'd call people in this thread idiots.  Just sayin.

Even if curious, you don't do something like that without accepting and understanding the risks.

Right?  If you speed, you can get caught. Don't cry to the cop writing your ticket, you knew what you were doing.

Anyway, texting married men in a panic after the leak hardly sounds innocent.

Speeding is breaking the law.  Not sure the similarities between a illegal hack/release of information and getting busted for speeding. 

How about all those married men she was messing with?  Think they were finalizing their divorce?

Not sure.  Does the leak have information regarding that?  That is the problem...no one knows except for the people affected.  It shouldn't be under the scrutiny of the public to come up with their own conclusions.

...and just to clarify my position on this.  I particularly do not care about the website ... what I do care about is that hackers maliciously and deliberately released personal information which in turn can bring harm (be it physically, mentally or other) to the victims (which includes the innocent and their families) of this leak.  The hackers should be hunted down and a message needs to be delivered that they (and all hackers) will bear full responsibility for their actions.

  • Like 2

 

It's not that easy to just "leave" your partner without getting screwed economically and mentally in the divorce proceedings. The institution of marriage is definitely not in a man's favor when things get ugly.

The people using the site were pretty dumb in the way they used it, and also dumb for getting married in the first place. They used it because it was more convenient than going through the trouble of divorce because they wanted instant gratification. They should have stayed single.

Ironically, the main character in this morality tale is a female.

Speeding is breaking the law.  Not sure the similarities between a illegal hack/release of information and getting busted for speeding. 

Not sure.  Does the leak have information regarding that?  That is the problem...no one knows except for the people affected.  It shouldn't be under the scrutiny of the public to come up with their own conclusions.

...and just to clarify my position on this.  I particularly do not care about the website ... what I do care about is that hackers maliciously and deliberately released personal information which in turn can bring harm (be it physically, mentally or other) to the victims (which includes the innocent and their families) of this leak.  The hackers should be hunted down and a message needs to be delivered that they (and all hackers) will bear full responsibility for their actions.

Speeding has consequences. Cheating has consequences too.  Law has nothing to do with it.

 

It doesn't matter if the article has details on these men or not.  Assuming they are innocent too is just downright silly.  If the parties here are innocent, then why the panic?

Here is pro advice for those who want to have affairs:

Don't give information to a web site that can lead back to you.

 

Edit:  Seriously Neowin. Fix your forum, it is embarrassing. This is the third time I've had to delete images that automagically attached themselves to a totally irrelevant thread.

 

 

 

Speeding is breaking the law.  Not sure the similarities between a illegal hack/release of information and getting busted for speeding. 

Not sure.  Does the leak have information regarding that?  That is the problem...no one knows except for the people affected.  It shouldn't be under the scrutiny of the public to come up with their own conclusions.

...and just to clarify my position on this.  I particularly do not care about the website ... what I do care about is that hackers maliciously and deliberately released personal information which in turn can bring harm (be it physically, mentally or other) to the victims (which includes the innocent and their families) of this leak.  The hackers should be hunted down and a message needs to be delivered that they (and all hackers) will bear full responsibility for their actions.

That's my main concern. The fact that the vast majority of them were/are cheaters doesn't mean it's okay to plaster their private information over the Internet.

Speeding has consequences. Cheating has consequences too.  Law has nothing to do with it.

 

It doesn't matter if the article has details on these men or not.  Assuming they are innocent too is just downright silly.  If the parties here are innocent, then why the panic?

Here is pro advice for those who want to have affairs:

Don't give information to a web site that can lead back to you.

Capture.PNG

Capture2.PNG

Capture3.PNG

There's a difference between assuming everyone that has an account is a cheater and assuming that a tiny percentage of members had no intentions of cheating. One is significantly more likely than the other. Also, women used the site too.

As for the images in your post, they didn't load but I don't think anyone should be giving advice on how to cheat.

That's my main concern. The fact that the vast majority of them were/are cheaters doesn't mean it's okay to plaster their private information over the Internet.

There's a difference between assuming everyone that has an account is a cheater and assuming that a tiny percentage of members had no intentions of cheating. One is significantly more likely than the other. Also, women used the site too.

As for the images in your post, they didn't load but I don't think anyone should be giving advice on how to cheat.

The images in my post loaded for me and then I edited and deleted them.  They are from an entirely different thread that Neowin's forum software decided needed to be here (windows 10 related).

I am not giving advice on how to cheat, so cut it out with the assumptions.

 

I have never stated its ok to plaster personal details on the net. Lacking sympathy for it is not the same thing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      227
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!