Recommended Posts

DocM


Thread 6: http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1258838-spacex-updates-thread-6/

Starting a new thread after 15 pages and Chris Bergin's tweet about something big coming from SpaceX going viral and making the news worldwide.

There are few details, and what few there are have to stay in L2 for now. 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/spacex-annouce-mars-mission-094029845.html#vhtkoMf

Is SpaceX About To Annouce A Mars Mission?

A vague tweet has hinted that Elon Musk’s SpaceX has a huge announcement to make, leading to speculation that a Mars mission could soon be unveiled.

The hint was dropped on Twitter by Chris Bergin (@NASASpaceflight), the managing editor and founder of NasaSpaceflight.com, a popular space news site which is not affiliated with the American space agency.

His tweet read: 

Tease: it may takes weeks, or even months, to be announced, but what I’ve been shown is THE most exciting thing EVER. #SpaceX”.

The reason that this is so intriguing is that Musk has previously stated that the company would be revealing a new spacecraft destined to travel to Mars and that it would be unveiled before the end of the year.

As ScienceAlert.com points out, earlier in the year Musk said on an AMA on Reddit:

The Mars transport system will be a completely new architecture. Am hoping to present that towards the end of this year. Good thing we didn’t do it sooner, as we have learned a huge amount from Falcon and Dragon.

The tech entrepreneur also stated that the company would be unveiling a new spacesuit design before the end of the year

SpaceX is a privately-funded aerospace firm run by Tesla CEO Elon Musk and already completed several successful launches - plus a few casualty-free disasters - with its Falcon launch vehicle and unmanned Dragon spacecraft.
The company has flown six resupply missions to the International Space Station and has also been awarded the contract to build a manned spacecraft for NASA’s Commercial Crew Programme.

Bergin confirmed to curious followers on Twitter than the news isn’t related to Elon Musk’s Hyperloop transportation system, and definitely refers to space travel of some kind.

Surprised by the widespread reaction to his initial tease,  Bergin later tweeted an image of Star Trek’s Captain Jean-Luc Picard looking slightly perplexed alongside the words: “That feeling when one of your vaguest tweets is the one that goes semi-viral”.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

I'm not going to speculate either, at this point. I want it to remain where it belongs for now and when there's something to announce we'll have the big celebration with everyone else. :yes:

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

I'm not going to speculate either, at this point. I want it to remain where it belongs for now and when there's something to announce we'll have the big celebration with everyone else. :yes:

Quite right.....we have a RTF, a CRS, an FH demo and a mess of a backlog to get churning out which will include top notch multiple launch crews, as the cadence ramps up....gotta pay the bills....., right now, the rest is gravy....:D

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Misc tweets.....

 

 

 

:)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

misc bits.....

 

SpaceX raps ULA bid to get U.S. waiver for Russian engines

Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, has slammed a bid by United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing Co, to get a waiver from a U.S. ban on Russian rocket engines for military use.

Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of Tesla Motors and chief executive of SpaceX, told Defense Secretary Ash Carter that federal law already allowed ULA to use "a substantial number" of engines.

ULA's threat to skip an upcoming Air Force competition to launch a GSP satellite unless it got a waiver was "nothing less than deceptive brinkmanship for the sole purpose of thwarting the will of Congress," he wrote in a letter dated Oct. 5. A copy was obtained by Reuters on Thursday.

Frank Kendall, the Pentagon's chief arms buyer, this week said the Defense Department expects to decide "fairly soon" whether to waive the law to allow ULA to continue using Russian RD-180 rocket engines on its workhorse Atlas 5 rocket.

ULA CEO Tory Bruno told reporters last week that without some relief from the ban, the company would be unable to bid in the GPS satellite competition, or for any other new national security launches until a new American-built engine was ready in 2019.

The ban still affects nine of 29 engines that ULA ordered but had not paid for before Russia annexed Crimea. Bruno said five other engines approved for ULA's use by Congress last year had already been assigned to other commercial or civil missions, and were not available for use in a bid for the new GPS launch.

A defense policy bill passed by both the House and Senate gives ULA permission to use four of the nine remaining engines, but the legislation faces a veto threat and is unlikely to be enacted before Nov. 16, when bids are due for the competition.

In his letter, Musk said Bruno's argument was irrelevant since nothing prevented ULA from ordering more RD-180 engines for commercial or civil missions.

ULA spokeswoman Jessica Rye had no immediate comment on the SpaceX letter. She said ULA had not placed its typical yearly engine order from Russia's Energomash due to uncertainty about its ability to use any more of the RD-180 engines, but the company continued to ship the engines that have already been ordered on time and schedule.

Musk said both the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate had put limits on use of the engines to gradually reduce U.S. reliance on Russia, at a time when tensions between Moscow and Washington are running high.

A waiver is allowed for national security reasons, but only if "the space launch services and capabilities covered by the contract could not be obtained at a fair and reasonable price without the use of rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation."

Musk said a waiver was unnecessary since SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket, and ULA's Delta rockets were also available.

ULA has said it plans to discontinue production of all except the heaviest Delta 4 rockets because they are not and cannot ever be competitive with SpaceX's lower prices.

 http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/08/us-space-ula-spacex-idUSKCN0S22Y920151008

--------------------------------------

A nonprofit just booked a trip to the moon with SpaceX

It looks like we may have a new kind of space race.

An Israel-based nonprofit competing for the $30 million Google Lunar X Prize now has a ride to the lunar surface and a legitimate chance to become the first private group to land a spacecraft on the moon.

SpaceIL announced Wednesday that it has a contract to fly to the moon aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.

If SpaceIL or another team competing for the X Prize succeeds, it will effectively open up access to the moon, which was once only accessible for nations.

SpaceIL’s rocket ride is scheduled to blast off in the second half of 2017. If the mission is a success, it will be the first time an Israeli spacecraft has gone to the moon. The nonprofit bought the launch from Spaceflight Industries, which purchased the Falcon 9 that SpaceIL's lander will fly to space aboard.

“It is a great feeling of accomplishment, but we still have a long way to go," Eran Privman, SpaceIL CEO, told Mashable via email. "Although it is a private mission, we feel that the whole nation is behind us, feeling proud."

 

 SpaceIL_3.thumb.jpg.6dedb66a8b2f300523cd

This is the first time a Google Lunar X Prize team has had its launch contract verified by X Prize itself, though it isn’t the first time a team has announced a contract with a launch provider.

The teams Moon Express and Astrobotic have also announced contracts for launch, though neither team has gone through the verification process, according to Google Lunar X Prize.

Astrobotic announced its intention to fly to the moon aboard a Falcon 9, while Moon Express plans to launch its first of five moonshots aboard Rocket Lab’s Electron rockets in 2017.

SpaceIL’s launch contract cost more than $10 million, which the nonprofit fundraised. It was purchased through Spaceflight Industries, Privman said.

The team still has a lot to do before launch in a couple years.

 

SpaceIL_2.thumb.jpg.8d0a3fd0e11934acb1b5
SpaceIL

“On the fundraising aspect, we still need to raise about $10 million in the next two years,” Privman said. “On the engineering side, we need to continue with the development of all the spacecraft's components, run different tests and bring all the parts to the integration lab (where our spacecraft will be assembled).”

The remaining 15 teams now have until the end of 2016 to verify (and acquire) launch contracts that would have them touching down on the lunar surface before Dec. 31, 2017 in order to be eligible to win the grand prize.

Once on the moon, teams need to show that their robotic crafts can send high-definition videos and photos to Earth and move at least 500 meters.

 

 http://mashable.com/2015/10/07/spaceil-google-lunar-xprize-spacex/#NPw_NKRdxgq_

:)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

ULA can't do it on their terms so they're crying and whining about it -- and all the while, trying to make everyone forget that they had been handed boatloads of taxpayer money to develop a new engine for five years prior to this debacle, and couldn't produce anything (or were unwilling to do so). And now they're being called out on their B.S. as they should be because they can't compete.

Naysayers have become the punchlines of the bad jokes. What a shame, and a sheer lack of ability to innovate. Now it's come down to the Atlas and Delta lines being retired; all but the Delta Heavy which use U.S. Engines. ULA deserves whatever happens next.

Adapt or perish ... looks like ULA chose to perish.

Elon called it right down the middle, as always.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

A few posts ago, ULA made mention of trying to get a waiver....this is the responce...

UPDATE 2-Pentagon denies Russian rocket engine waiver for Lockheed-Boeing venture

Oct 9 (Reuters) - The Pentagon on Friday declined to waive a U.S. law banning the use of Russian rocket engines for military and spy satellite launches, rejecting an urgent request from United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing Co.

ULA, the monopoly provider of such launches since its creation in 2006, has said it needs the waiver to compete against privately held Space Exploration Technologies Corp, or SpaceX, in a new U.S. Air Force competition for satellite launches. Bids are due for the competition by Nov. 16.

The U.S. Defense Department said it would continue to monitor the situation, and was looking at a range of options, including possible sole-source contract awards, to keep both companies in business and ensure more than one supplier was available in the event of failures.

Prompted by Russia's annexation of Crimea last year, U.S. lawmakers banned the use of Russian RD-180 rocket engines for military and spy satellite launches after 2019.

ULA and SpaceX declined to comment on the decision.

Pentagon spokeswoman Lieutenant Commander Courtney Hillson said the department remained committed to maintaining two sources of launch services. But she said its approach could evolve, given market conditions, a desire to move away from the Russian RD-180 rocket engine as soon as possible, and the possibility that only one competitor could survive in the U.S. space launch market.

She said the Pentagon also remained committed to competition as a way to control cost "to the maximum extent possible."

ULA Chief Executive Tory Bruno last week said his company would be unable to compete for any new national security launches until 2019, without some relief from the ban on use of the Russian RD-180 engine on its workhorse Atlas 5 rocket.

SpaceX, which has invested heavily to develop its own rocket and engine, told Defense Secretary Ash Carter in a letter this week that federal law already allowed ULA to use "a substantial number" of the Russian engines.

SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk said ULA's threat to skip an upcoming Air Force competition was "nothing less than deceptive brinkmanship" aimed at subverting the will of Congress.

The ban affects nine of 29 engines that ULA ordered but had not paid for before Russia annexed Crimea. Bruno said five other engines approved for ULA's use by Congress last year were needed for commercial or civil missions, and were unavailable for use in a bid for the new GPS launch.

A defense policy bill passed by both the House and Senate would allow ULA to use four of the nine remaining engines, but the legislation faces a veto threat and is unlikely to go into force before bids are due for the Air Force launch competition.

She said Frank Kendall, the Pentagon's chief arms buyer, was developing a long-term acquisition strategy with the U.S. Air Force to reduce reliance on the RD-180 engine. Kendall is due to brief top Pentagon officials by the end of the year. (Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Bill Rigby and Richard Chang)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/09/space-launch-ula-idUSL1N1292CB20151009

----------------

Confirmation article for investigation....as per tweet....

 SpaceX Wrapping Up Falcon 9 Failure Investigation

LAS CRUCES, N.M. — SpaceX expects to complete its final report on the June 28 failure of its Falcon 9 launch vehicle within a month, but does not yet have a firm timetable for resuming flights, a company official said Oct. 8.

Josh Brost, a business development executive with SpaceX, said at the International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight here that the final report on the failure should be delivered to the Federal Aviation Administration, which licensed the launch, “maybe in the next month.”

On that launch, of a Dragon cargo spacecraft bound for the International Space Station, the vehicle broke apart less than two-and-a-half minutes after liftoff. In a July 20 briefing, SpaceX Chief Executive Elon Musk said a strut holding down a helium bottle inside a propellant tank in the rocket’s upper stage broke. That caused the tank to overpressurize and burst, destroying the vehicle.

That explanation has held up during later phases of the investigation, Brost said. “The early reports you saw in the press, where we talked about it being caused by a strut, those have born out,” he said.

The company has not offered a specific timetable for resuming Falcon 9 launches. “We’re hoping to return to flight in the next couple of months,” he said. That launch is expected to also be the first flight of an upgraded version of the rocket with increased thrust from its nine first-stage engines.

Once the Falcon 9 does return to flight, Brost said, the company will ramp up launch activities quickly. “We’ll start launching at a fairly high cadence next year,” he said.

 

http://spacenews.com/spacex-wrapping-up-falcon-9-failure-investigation/

--------------------------------------

funny one......

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

The Senator may well be correct.

SpaceX has received an FCC license for  the SES-9 Return To Flight stage landing radio frequencies. The license window opens November 15, 2015.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
FloatingFatMan

ULA can't do it on their terms so they're crying and whining about it -- and all the while, trying to make everyone forget that they had been handed boatloads of taxpayer money to develop a new engine for five years prior to this debacle, and couldn't produce anything (or were unwilling to do so). And now they're being called out on their B.S. as they should be because they can't compete.

Naysayers have become the punchlines of the bad jokes. What a shame, and a sheer lack of ability to innovate. Now it's come down to the Atlas and Delta lines being retired; all but the Delta Heavy which use U.S. Engines. ULA deserves whatever happens next.

Adapt or perish ... looks like ULA chose to perish.

Elon called it right down the middle, as always.

Seeing as they were given public money to develop a new engine, and they haven't done so, why aren't they being prosecuted for misappropriation of public funds?

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

Good question. Assured Access funds were also used to keep the lights on during periods of low launch rates, among other things,  via waivers. Congresses for the last decade are also to blame because Russia has been saber rattling about banning USAF RD-180 launches long before this Ukraine business blew up. Plenty of blame to go around.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

Just realised - Chris was mistaken. That was a House hearing on NASA's exploration goals, budgets etc. The statement was by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif: Dist 48), and he said that the way NASA and Congress are going SpaceX will beat NASA to Mars.

Quote starts at 02:16:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDRyEhSdbFU

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

That's how it needs to be. Private ventures need to be the ones leading the way now.

NASA has relegated itself to being part middleman, Facilities Provider, R&D, and Regulatory Agency. Let NASA do the Science Missions (New Horizons, Cassini, Juno, Dawn, Mars Rovers, etc) -- they're really good at those most of the time. Let NASA take care of the Research & Development of the EM Drive (which is showing promise!) and the Ion Engine advances (which will work great as RCS once the power levels become usable) and the other tedious R&D that Commercial R&D won't have the patience or funding to develop.

Hey, there's an idea. NASA does R&D on technology. The private companies then bid on this technology once it's been developed. The highest bidder wins the rights to that technology for a certain period of time with the understanding that they MUST use it, NASA recoups some (or all) of the funding put into that technology (or *gasp* even makes a profit from it) and everyone's happy.

In a perfect Multiverse ... :D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

Rohrabacher's questions start at 00:55:00 in the video link. Pretty tough on them.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Rohrabacher's questions start at 00:55:00 in the video link. Pretty tough on them.

I thought that was a pretty good hearing...bit of squirming now and again....thank's for the link....entertaining.....:D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

mmmmmmm......long time still, I'm on launch withdrawls......:s

SpaceX to fly in December

The long-delayed return to flight of SpaceX’s Falcon rockets is likely to happen in December, according to Lee Rosen, SpaceX’s VP/mission and launch operations, speaking in Jerusalem this week.

The SpaceX Falcon-9 rocket exploded moments after lift-off on June 28th and has been identified as being caused by a failed strut on a high-pressure Helium tank which created the catastrophic explosion.

A number of satellite owners have been patiently waiting for the past four months for the rocket to be given the all clear and for launches to re-commence.

Top of the list is Luxembourg-based SES which is likely to see its SES-9 launched on a slow journey to geo-stationary orbit, and using a more powerful Falcon-9 ‘Heavy’ rocket.

The ‘slow’ journey to orbit is because SES-9 is an all-electric satellite and will thus take 4-6 months to reach its 108.2 deg East spot.

Clients with satellites waiting to be launched include SES (SES-9), Japan Satellite (JCSAT-14 and 16), Eutelsat (117 WB), ABS (2A), Thaicom and others.

 http://advanced-television.com/2015/10/15/spacex-to-fly-in-december/

:(

--------------------------------------

Due to the SpaceX component...thought I would post this here.....

Veto would complicate phase-out of Russian engines


 

WASHINGTON – Efforts to stop using Russian-made engines on rockets carrying U.S. military satellites have run into trouble because of partisan battles over Pentagon budgeting and the terrorist detention camp at Guantanamo Bay.

Language to continue the phase-out of the RD-180 engines by the end of the decade is part of a defense authorization bill that President Obama has threatened to veto. His reasons: The bill also contains Republican provisions that would prevent Obama from closing the prison camp in Cuba and would try to sidestep automatic “sequestration” spending cuts at the Pentagon.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said last week that GOP lawmakers are being "irresponsible” in seeking to exempt defense programs from the cuts while the rest of government — including the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency — must abide by them.

It’s “certainly not the most effective way to provide for the national defense of the United States,” Earnest told reporters.

Obama’s threat to veto the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act comes as lawmakers are pressuring the Air Force to ramp up competition in the satellite program and limit the use of RD-180s — proposals the Pentagon supports. The engines have powered dozens of launches by United Launch Alliance (ULA), a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

The measure would allow ULA to buy four more Russian engines — up from five now. The company has for years launched all national security satellites for the Pentagon. Its Atlas V rocket uses the RD-180.

But the authorization bill also is designed to spur competition between United Launch Alliance and SpaceX, the upstart aerospace firm that uses a domestically produced engine for its Falcon 9 rocket capable of delivering some national security payloads into orbit. SpaceX recently became the only other firm to win Air Force certification for the work.

Under the bill, the  $1 billion annual payment that United Launch Alliance receives under its arrangement with the Pentagon — SpaceX calls it a subsidy — would end by 2019. At that point, ULA would have to begin factoring the payment into its bids, a requirement that SpaceX officials say would make their company even more competitive.

Air Force officials have relied solely on ULA for nearly a decade to carry national security spy hardware into orbit. The alliance celebrated its 100th launch earlier this month, when an Atlas V carried a Mexican communications satellite into orbit fromCape Canaveral in Florida.

But the landscape has changed since ULA launched its first satellite for the Pentagon in 2006.

SpaceX has emerged as a viable and aggressive competitor, and it's eager to show it can launch satellites for a fraction of the cost when the next round of bids is submitted in the coming weeks. In addition, increasing tensions between Moscow and Washington over Russia’s aggression in Ukraine and Syria have prompted lawmakers to phase out use of the RD-180.

Those efforts have been led by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz., who said earlier this year that continuing to buy the engines would send “hundreds of millions of dollars to (Russian President) Vladimir Putin and his cronies.”

If ULA runs out of those engines too soon, it also could run out of the time and money it needs to develop a rocket powered by new American engines. ULA chief Tory Bruno said that could produce the same monopolistic environment the Pentagon wants to eliminate, except that SpaceX instead of ULA would be handling all the launches.

"Without those engines, we are unable to fly Atlas in the national security marketplace," Bruno told reporters this month. "So that would take the workhorse of what has put two-thirds of the nation's most critical capabilities in orbit out of that market, and really almost kill competition before it's had a chance to get started."

ULA also operates a Delta IV rocket powered by U.S. company Aerojet Rocketdyne’s RS-68 engine. But the bulk of ULA's satellite launches for the Air Force have used the Atlas V.

Bruno also said the four new RD-180 engines the defense bill would provide isn't enough. He said the company needs 14 more to bridge the gap until its new, domestically produced Vulcan rocket is ready.

The bill (as well as existing law) allows the secretary of Defense to waive the restriction and grant ULA permission to buy more Russian engines if it's necessary "for the national security interests of the United States” and Congress is notified.

On Friday, ULA learned the Air Force had rejected its latest request for more engines.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/10/14/veto-would-complicate-phase-out-russian-engines/73926044/

Later..... 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

Still don't know what Bruno is crying about. They had five years and a lot of taxpayer money to develop a new engine, and they sat around on their laurels and did nothing. It's not that difficult, Tory. You've got the brains and the talent at ULA to do this work yourselves, but your company would rather spend its' time whining to whomever will listen. You've also got the means to R&D the engine yourselves, in-house, but you want everyone else to pay for it.

ZERO sympathy for ULA. Nothing. I'd use the tears to make chili. That's about as much of a flying fleep as ULA has shown to the American People when it squandered the monies they were given to R&D a new engine.

I hope SpaceX does become the monopoly ULA fears so much, if for no other reason then spite. I support SpaceX in everything they do; and ULA getting the shaft because they couldn't innovate (or otherwise do what they were supposed to do) is, in my view, justice served on a silver tray.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

I'm thinking the post-RTF period could be interesting. Musk said at the reddit AMA that info about MCT would be forthcoming late this year. I'm sure that CRS-7 moved that right, and with RTF out of the way and Chris' tweets.... Another point of interest over the next few months is that the FAA DragonFly test permit runs out in July 2016. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

There is a crowdfunding program on the go for space related info...found two SpaceX items there....

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/space-exploration-cgi-short-film#/

SpaceX | Falcon Heavy - Flight 1080p CG
video is 0:16 min....nice thrust attempt though....

 

and a 3D image of Dragon2....

pxyspl6o66zaky1z9kdl.thumb.jpg.637ff5b37

from link.....
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/space-exploration-cgi-short-film#/

I know it's not much....but.........:)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

ORBCOMM-2 it is for RTF, which will be the bulk launch of 11 OG2 communications satellites..

As we prepare for return to flight, SpaceX together with its customers SES and Orbcomm have evaluated opportunities to optimize the readiness of the upcoming Falcon 9 return-to-flight mission.  All parties have mutually agreed that SpaceX will now fly the Orbcomm-2 mission on the return-to-flight Falcon 9 vehicle.

The Orbcomm-2 mission does not require a relight of the second stage engine following orbital insertion. Flying the Orbcomm-2 mission first will therefore allow SpaceX to conduct an on-orbit test of the second stage relight system after the Orbcomm-2 satellites have been safely deployed. This on-orbit test, combined with the current qualification program to be completed prior to launch, will further validate the second stage relight system and allow for optimization of the upcoming SES-9 mission and following missions to  geosynchronous transfer orbit.

This change does not affect the timeline for SpaceX’s return-to-flight mission which is still targeted to take place in the next 6-8 weeks. The SES-9 launch is currently targeted for late December 2015.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

They need that S2 relight system to work -- likely there are planned Falcon Heavy launches that will require multiple relights, and this is part of the redesign of the S2 that will make those missions happen.

And I like how they're making the most of each flight like this. Qualify a system while filling orders. Yeah ... :yes: 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

S2 could already relight several times, but if they upgraded it (likely for "CommX" and BEO missions) it needs a good on-orbit test before use on a paying mission. ORBCOMM doesn't need a relight, so this is a good opportunity.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

mmmmmm........

 

LightSail and Prox-1 Start Testing and Integration Process

2015/10/16 16:25 UTC

Topics: LightSail

On opposite sides of the United States, teams are starting the testing process to prepare two spacecraft for a one-of-a-kind in-space rendezvous.

In Pasadena, California, The Planetary Society’s LightSail CubeSat sits partially disassembled in the clean room of Ecliptic Enterprises Corporation, as engineers start final hardware testing of the spacecraft’s individual components. From torque rods to batteries, everything must be in working condition before it is installed in the spacecraft chassis.

And at Georgia Tech in Atlanta, student-engineers recently ran checkout tests on the Prox-1 spacecraft’s thermal and visual camera systems. Prox-1 will deploy LightSail and hunt it down 720 kilometers above the Earth, watching as the CubeSat deploys its solar sails.

Subsystem testing kicks off a busy four months for both teams, culminating with the mating of both spacecraft and delivery to the Air Force Research Laboratory in Albuquerque, New Mexico in February 2016. Launch of Prox-1 and LightSail aboard a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket from Cape Canaveral, Florida remains on track for September 2016. The early launch date is September 15.

 

 20151016_Prox1_Integration_and_Testing_f
Georgia Tech

Prox-1 integration and testing

Prox-1 team members (left to right) Louis Williams, Mike Veto, and Jack Bush test out imaging instruments that will will be used for navigation during automated proximity operations relative to the LightSail spacecraft. The smaller instrument in the foreground is the visible camera, and the larger instrument is the infrared imager. The instruments were designed and fabricated by Mike Veto, a Ph.D. student at Arizona State University. The visible camera will be used to provide on-orbit inspection of the LightSail solar sail deployment.

The basic workflow for each spacecraft is the same: Test out individual subsystems, assemble the spacecraft, and perform system-level testing. But the similarities largely end there. Both LightSail and Prox-1 have unique challenges ahead on the schedule.

Ecliptic’s Riki Munakata, LightSail’s integration and testing lead, says the spacecraft’s cameras are being sent home to The Aerospace Corporation for a final firmware upgrade and checkout. This inspection is meant to spot potential image processing problems that were seen during the LightSail-A test mission.

Spacecraft integration and assembly could wrap up as soon as mid-November, when LightSail heads north to Cal Poly San Luis Obispo for full system testing. A vigorous test suite is planned, including communications tests, a trip to the anechoic chamber for radio checks and a boom-only deployment that could occur before Thanksgiving.

Munakata notes any delivery delays for LightSail’s final hardware set—such as the cameras or an all-new payload interface board—could push back the current schedule. But if timelines hold, a full day-in-the-life test may happen before the end of the year. Cal Poly engineers would then integrate LightSail into its P-POD in January, with the spacecraft potentially delivered for integration into Prox-1 that same month.

Meanwhile, next up for Prox-1 are subsystem tests leading up to a pre-integration review in mid-December. Pre-integration review milestones include a cross-campus communications test, a run-through of all spacecraft commands in a flight-like scenario, a solar panel battery charging test, and a day-in-the-life test prior to LightSail installation.

Dave Spencer, the Prox-1 principal investigator and LightSail mission manager, said assembly should wrap up in January. Final system-level testing of both spacecraft at the Air Force Research Laboratory is scheduled for mid-to-late February.

http://www.planetary.org/blogs/jason-davis/2015/20151016-lightsail-prox-1-it.html?referrer=http://planetary.org/

Extra mission data
http://sail.planetary.org/

:D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

Yup. It's in the way as they appear to be intent on cladding the fixed service structure (tower), and they need to add some levels. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DocM

Chris at NSF has started to raise the curtain on his excited tweet. Just 2 short paragraphs, but with huge implications. 

Key points,

* SpaceX scouting missions to Mars. My $0.02 - probably FH/Dragon 2 based.

* an evolving BFR/MCT campaign

* details after the F9 returns to flight.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2015/10/robotic-missions-in-situ-resource-identification-human-mars/

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By zikalify
      UKSA and Rolls-Royce to study nuclear-powered space travel
      by Paul Hill



      The UK Space Agency (UKSA) and Rolls-Royce have signed a research contract that will bring the two together to investigate nuclear energy as a source for deeper space exploration. UKSA said that nuclear is a plentiful source of energy that could propel spacecraft at huge speeds which could “revolutionise” space travel.

      In terms of results, nuclear propulsion is expected to be twice as efficient as chemical engines which are in use today and a trip to Mars could be cut in half and take just three to four months. According to the government, the new agreement will also generate skilled employment across the country.

      Commenting on the partnership, UKSA Chief Executive Dr Graham Turnock said:

      Aside from faster travel, nuclear propulsion would help cut astronauts’ dosage of radiation that they get hit with when in space. UKSA said that the longer you spend in space, the greater the amount of radiation that you’re exposed to so faster journeys would mean less radiation exposure.

      In the outer Solar System, the sunlight is too dim to power solar panels and fuel cells are not a reliable store of energy according to UKSA. Using nuclear power, therefore, would help to enable more missions in the outer Solar System.

    • By indospot
      How to create recovery media for your Windows 10 PC
      by João Carrasqueira



      Computers and their operating systems are incredibly complex pieces of technology, and they may just last you a good number of years from the day you buy it. Because of that, at some point, there's a very good chance you'll run into some problems or performance may just not be as good as it used to be, so you might just need a fresh start for your OS.

      There are many ways to go about restoring your system to a blank slate, as most computer manufacturers offer some sort of recovery tool, but in this guide, we'll show you how to get started by creating recovery media, so you can always get back to a functional state later. This guide should work on any computer running Windows 10 and while it specifically refers to Windows 10 version 20H2, these features should be available in most of the recent versions of the OS.

      Backing up your drivers
      Performing a clean installation of Windows means you'll probably be installing the OS without the appropriate drivers for your PC. In some cases, you may be alright with the generic drivers in Windows, and from there, you can connect to the internet to download the drivers that are missing from Windows Update. However, you'll be dependent on whether drivers are available on Windows Update if you even manage to connect to the internet with the built-in generic drivers.

      Most of the bigger OEMs will likely provide driver downloads from their support website, but that may not always be the case. Thankfully, you can backup the drivers you're using right now, and you can just install them later. You'll want an external drive, be it a flash drive or an external HDD/SSD. You may want to create a new folder in the drive you're using to back up the drivers, so you can find them more easily.

      To backup your current drivers, you'll need to use Command Prompt or PowerShell. You can right-click the Start icon or press the Windows key + X, then choose either Command Prompt (Admin) or Windows PowerShell (Admin) from the context menu.

      To backup your drivers, you need to enter the following command: dism /online /export-driver /destination:"{Path}", where {Path} is the location of the folder you want to use on your external drive. You can copy the path from the address bar in File Explorer when the folder is open. In our example, we're using a Drivers folder on the root of drive E:, so the command is dism /online /export-driver /destination:"E:\Drivers". It should look like this:



      If all goes well, the folder you chose will look something like this once the process is done (you will see more folders depending on how many drivers are backed up):

      Creating installation media
      Finally, you'll want to create installation media for Windows 10. For this, you'll need another external USB drive, and it can't be the same you used to backup your drivers and data. Creating installation media will delete all other data on the drive, so you need a drive with no important data. The drive also needs at least 8GB of capacity for the latest version of Windows 10.

      Option 1 - Using the Media Creation Tool

      The easiest way to create Windows 10 installation media is to use Microsoft's Media Creation Tool. You can download it by going to this page and using the Download tool now button (not the Update now button).

      Open the file you downloaded and accept the license terms that show up. You'll then be asked whether you want to upgrade now or create installation media, and in this case, we want to do the latter. You can then choose which language, architecture, and edition of Windows 10 you want to install. The program will automatically apply the settings that match your current system, but you can always change them if you want to.



      Then, you get the option to either create an ISO file or use a USB flash drive as installation media. An ISO file can be used to create installation media later, which we'll get to in a bit. For now, we want to use a USB drive, which needs to have at least 8GB of space for the latest version of Windows 10. Then, choose the flash drive you want to use. Remember that this will erase all the data on the drive, and that it can't be the same drive you used to backup your drivers.

      At this point, the tool will begin downloading the latest version of Windows 10 and flashing it onto the drive you chose. This will take a while, but you can just leave the program open and wait for it to finish, and you'll be good to go.

      Option 2 - Using Rufus

      Using the Media Creation Tool is the most straightforward way to create installation media, but it's not ideal for everyone. It may happen that you don't have an internet connection available at the same time you have the flash drive, so you use the Media Creation Tool to download an ISO file first, and then flash it later. Or you may already have an ISO file for a specific version of Windows, or even a different operating system.

      If that applies to you, a tool like Rufus can help you flash an ISO file to a USB flash drive, though the most recent versions also give you the option to download some operating systems from the internet. We'll be focusing on using an ISO file you already have, whether you created it with the Media Creation Tool or got it elsewhere.

      First, download the latest version of Rufus from this page (it should be the first file on the list). Install it and run it, and you'll see this interface:



      There are plenty of options here, but for most people, you should be fine focusing on a couple of items. At the top, you can choose the USB flash drive. Just like with the Media Creation Tool, remember this process will delete all data on the drive, so you'll need to make sure you don't need it for anything else. For the Boot selection option, you'll want to choose Disk or ISO image (Please select) then click the SELECT button to find the ISO file you want to use. The arrow next to the button allows you to switch to download mode, so you can download the operating system you want instead. In our example, this isn't what we want.

      Once you have selected an ISO (image) file, some of the default options in the app will change to match. You shouldn't need to worry about any of this, and you can simply click START at the bottom to begin flashing the image to the flash drive. Once the process is fully completed, you should be able to use the drive to install the operating system you chose.

      Option 3 - Create a recovery drive

      If the PC you want to recover is still fully functional, you can create a recovery drive through existing methods in Windows 10. Some manufacturers, such as Dell and (naturally) Microsoft, actually recommend this as the method to create a recovery drive for their PCs. This will create a drive containing not only the operating system but programs bundled with the original installation, so if you have a brand-new PC, you can use this as a failsafe in case the computer fails later.

      The easiest way to access this is by opening the Start menu or Windows search and typing "create a recovery drive". Otherwise, you can open the legacy Control Panel, choose System and Security, then Security and Maintenance, Recovery, and finally, Create a recovery drive. Click Next in the first window and you'll be able to choose a drive to store the backup.



      As usual, this process will delete all the content in the drive. Choose the flash drive you want to use as a recovery drive, which will need to be at least 16GB in size, though the requirements vary depending on your laptop brand. Dell, for example, recommends a minimum of 32GB. If you meet the requirements, start the process and wait for it to finish.

      OEM-specific solutions
      Many PC manufacturers offer tools that let you create recovery images for your specific device. If you'd rather go that route, here are some options for the biggest PC manufacturers out there.

      For Microsoft's Surface devices, you can download a recovery image from here. You need to select your Surface model and provide your serial number to be able to download it, then you can unzip the file to a flash drive. This requires a flash drive with at least 16GB of storage, or 8GB if you're using a Surface RT or Surface 2.

      HP offers the Cloud Recovery Tool, which can be used to create a recovery image for your specific PC. You can download the app from the Microsoft Store and follow the instructions in the app. HP also provides instructions on how to use the tool here. Bear in mind you'll need a flash drive with at least 32GB of storage, since these recovery images include more than just a Windows installation, but also all the drivers and software that would come in an HP PC out of the box.

      Lenovo has a similar tool, called Digital Download Recovery Service. First, you need to go to Lenovo's recovery website to request a digital download for your PC. You'll need your serial number and Machine Type Model (MTM). Then, you'll need Lenovo's USB Recovery Creator tool, which you can download here for Windows 7 and here for Windows 8 or later (including Windows 10). Download the appropriate version and follow the instructions in the app to download the image and create recovery media for it.

      Finally, Dell also has a similar tool, the Dell OS Recovery Tool. You can download it here, and then follow the instructions to create the recovery media. You'll have to provide the service tag for the device you want to recover, and you need a flash drive with at least 16GB of data.

      That should cover every option you could want for creating recovery media for your PC. These are the things you need in order to have an operational computer after the recovery process. We'll have a separate guide focused on the actual process of restoring a PC later, but you'll want to follow these steps first.

      Did you try any of the methods listed above? Did you find them helpful? Is there another method you prefer? Let us know in the comments!

    • By Ather Fawaz
      "Mars, here we come!!" exclaims Elon Musk despite explosive ending to Starship's test flight
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via Trevor Mahlmann (YouTube) The Starship initiative by SpaceX is meant to make spaceflights to Mars a reality. After a scrubbed launch yesterday courtesy of an auto-abort procedure in the Starship's Raptor engines, once again, SpaceX geared up for a re-run of the test a few hours back. This time, Starship SN8 successfully took flight from its test site in Boca Chica, Texas. A trimmed version of the complete event is embedded below from Trevor Mahlmann's YouTube channel.

      Compared to the scrubbed launch, things went better on this one, but not entirely. The gargantuan 160-feet tall rocket, propelled by three Raptor engines, took flight, and intended to rise to a height of 41,000 ft (12,500 m). SpaceX founder Elon Musk called the ascent a success, but it's not clear whether the rocket reached its intended altitude. Nevertheless, after reaching its highest point, the rocket began its journey back to its earthly test site.

      Image via Trevor Mahlmann (YouTube) The SN8 prototype performed a spectacular mid-air flipping maneuver to set itself on course to land vertically back to the earth—a feat we've all grown accustomed to seeing with SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket. The SN8 executed the landing flip successfully, and SpaceX tweeted a closer look at the event as it happened. Impressively, SpaceX claimed that by doing so, the SN8 became the largest spacecraft to perform a landing maneuver of this sort.

      But as the rocket prepared to touch down and its boosters tried to slow down its descent to cushion the landing, the rocket's fuel header tank pressure got low. This caused the "touchdown velocity to be high & RUD," during the landing burn, Musk tweeted. Unfortunately, this meant that upon touchdown, the Starship SN8 prototype exploded into flames.

      Image via SpaceX Livestream Notwithstanding the fiery, unfortunate event right at the final few moments, SpaceX and Musk hailed the test as a success. For the company, "SN8 did great! Even reaching apogee would’ve been great, so controlling all way to putting the crater in the right spot was epic!!" Musk tweeted, "We got all the data we needed. Congrats SpaceX team hell yeah!!", he continued; before following up with another tweet exclaiming "Mars, here we come!!"

    • By Ather Fawaz
      NASA approves SpaceX and the Crew Dragon for regular crewed missions to the ISS
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via NASA/SpaceX It has been a big year so far for SpaceX. Back in May, its Crew Dragon spacecraft completed its first manned voyage to the International Space Station (ISS). With Elon Musk accrediting Starship as the top priority for the company, the famed project has also picked up pace. So has the Starlink initiative, with its recent expansion to include more beta customers. The firm is also gearing up for Dragon's second manned mission, Crew-1, to the ISS in a few days as well. Amidst all this, it has now finally gained NASA's approval that it has been striving towards with the Commercial Crew program.

      The approval came after NASA signed the Human Rating Certification Plan for SpaceX’s crew transportation system yesterday. The signing was completed after conducting a thorough flight readiness review ahead of the agency’s Crew-1 mission, with astronauts onboard, to the space station. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine commended the success of the Commercial Crew Program and the achievements of both companies, stating:

      The founder and CEO of SpaceX, Elon Musk marked it as an honor and a motivating force in the company's vision to make flights to the Moon and Mars a reality:

      This is a milestone for both companies. For SpaceX, this system of the Crew Dragon plus the Falcon 9 rocket along with the associated ground systems is the first to be NASA-certified for regular manned flights since the space shuttle nearly 40 years ago. This obviously means that SpaceX's hefty investment in the Commercial Crew program has paid off. For NASA, this is the first time that the agency has certified a commercial spacecraft system in history that is capable of transporting humans to and from the ISS. This directly means that astronauts can regularly make trips to the ISS to and from American soil, which could be a vital step towards commercializing space flights.

    • By indospot
      SpaceX's Starlink internet beta expands to more customers, and it's expensive
      by João Carrasqueira



      SpaceX, the space exploration company owned by Elon Musk, has been working on its satellite-based internet service, Starlink, for a few years now, but it's taken some time for it to come to fruition. Today, the company is inviting customers to test the service in what it calls the "Better Than Nothing Beta", as reported by CNBC.

      The name of the test program doesn't lie, and SpaceX is fairly upfront about what users are signing up for, telling users that it's "trying to lower" their initial expectations. The company says users can expect to see speeds varying from 50Mb/s to 150Mb/s, and latency ranging from 20ms to 40ms over the next few months, as it continues to improve the system. At times, it's possible that service won't be available at all.

      On top of the spotty internet service, the initial Starlink price is not for the faint of heart. Customers need to buy the Starlink kit to get set up, which includes a terminal to connect to the satellite network, a Wi-Fi router, and a mounting tripod. That costs $499, and on top of that, the service itself costs $99 per month. To help users get set up, a Starlink app is now available for Android and iOS, meant to help users find the best place to install the terminal, check for obstructions, and more.

      Naturally, this isn't something that's meant for everyone to subscribe to just yet, and it remains to be seen how things will look when the service is fully available. On that note, the description for the app mentioned above says that this beta program will enable service in the United States and Canada this year, with near global coverage being attainable in 2021. Of course, that too is yet to be seen.