Recommended Posts

Just found this fan trailer...I thought it was a good job, what do you think...?

 

Space X The Movie (Fan Trailer)

video is 1:46 min.

 

Quote

Published on Apr 24, 2016
Haven't uploaded a video on here in a while. Have this piece of candy.

Footage courtesy of 60 minutes, NASA, and SpaceX.

 

:)

Falcon 9 rocket wins landmark U.S. Air Force launch contract

 

23615167890_59afb23e9c_k.jpg

File photo of a Falcon 9 launch from Cape Canaveral. Credit: SpaceX

 

Quote

SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket will launch a third-generation GPS navigation satellite for the U.S. military in 2018, the Air Force said Wednesday, breaking a monopoly held by United Launch Alliance since its formation nearly a decade ago.

 

The second satellite in the Air Force’s GPS 3 series, GPS 3-2, will launch aboard a Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral in May 2018.

 

The Air Force’s announcement came hours after SpaceX unveiled a plan to send the first commercial mission to Mars in 2018, when it hopes to send an uncrewed “Red Dragon” capsule to land there.

 

The GPS 3 launch contract’s $82.7 million value covers launch vehicle production, mission integration, and launch operations and spaceflight certification, the Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center said in a press release.

 

SpaceX was expected to win the contract after rival ULA declined to bid in the competition, citing a congressional restriction pushed by Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, to keep the Atlas 5 rocket’s Russian RD-180 engines from launching sensitive, costly U.S. military satellites. ULA also said it did not have proper accounting methods to comply with requirements levied the Air Force procurement notice issued Sept. 30.

AFG-100825-006.jpg

Artist’s concept of a GPS 3 navigation satellite. Credit: U.S. Air Force

 

much more at the link...

http://spaceflightnow.com/2016/04/27/falcon-9-rocket-wins-landmark-u-s-air-force-launch-contract/

 

:woot:

  • Like 1

Got a few numbers from this article...

 

SpaceX wins $82 million contract for 2018 Falcon 9 launch of GPS 3 satellite

 

falcon9_jason3-rollout_2016-01-15-879x48

The April 27 award of an $82.7 million U.S. Air Force contract to launch a GPS-3 satellite gives SpaceX and its Falcon 9 rocket (shown above rolling out for the January launch of Jason-3) an important foothold in the national security launch market. Credit. SpaceX

 

Quote

WASHINGTON — SpaceX has won an $82.7 million contract from the U.S. Air Force to launch a next-generation GPS satellite aboard its Falcon 9 rocket in May 2018, the first of nine launch contracts the Defense Department plans to put out for bid over the next three years.

 

The award announced April 27 by the Pentagon was all but certain to go to SpaceX since the only other qualified bidder, United Launch Alliance, sat out the competition saying, in part,  it didn’t think it could win a cost shootout with SpaceX.

 

The contract also marks a significant first for Elon Musk’s rocket company, which DoD had previously only entrusted with small, experimental satellites. The deal is SpaceX’s first award under the Air Force’s Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Program, which since its inception has divided the launch of big-ticket national security satellites between the Atlas and Delta rockets.

 

“This GPS 3 Launch Services contract award achieves a balance between mission success, meeting operational needs, lowering launch costs, and reintroducing competition for National Security Space missions,” Lt. Gen. Samuel Greaves, commander of the Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center, said in an April 27 press release.

 

United Launch Alliance, which for the past decade has launched nearly every U.S. national security satellite, said in November it did not submit a bid for the 2018 GPS-3 launch in part because at the time it did not expect to have an Atlas 5 rocket available for the mission.  The company also cited problems certifying its accounting system and concerns about how the Air Force would weigh price versus reliability, schedule certainty, technical capability and past performance in choosing a launch provider.

 

The win gives SpaceX a foothold in a national security launch market it’s been eager to crack for years.

 

In 2012, SpaceX gave the Air Force an unsolicited bid to launch the GPS 3 satellites for $79.9 million per launch. The Air Force rejected the offer, but initiated a process for certifying SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket to carry military and intelligence payloads to orbit. The Air Force completed that process in May.

 

But in four years since SpaceX tossed that unsolicited $79.9 million offer over the Air Force’s fence, SpaceX’s price for the GPS 3 mission barely moved. The new contract is a firm-fixed price contract for $82.7 million to cover launch vehicle production, mission integration, and launch operations and spaceflight certification, the Pentagon’s announcement said.

 

The GPS 3 mission is the first of nine medium-class launches the Air Force intends to put out for bid by the end of 2018. Of the nine, six are for GPS 3 satellites, all of which are in SpaceX’s wheelhouse and will pose a competitive challenge for ULA if the Air Force continues to make price a key deciding factor.

 

A request for proposals for the next GPS 3 launch, this time for the third satellite in the constellation, known as GPS 3-3, is expected later this spring.

ULA has said it plans to bid on the next mission.

http://spacenews.com/spacex-wins-82-million-contract-for-2018-falcon-9-launch-of-gps-3-satellite/

 

ULA has some work to do....rough price before this, for low end Atlas 5

 

Quote

ULA says the lower-end model of the Atlas 5 rocket sells for about $164 million, and a heavy-duty model of the Delta 4 rocket goes for nearly $400 million. Bruno’s goal is to offer a barebones Vulcan rocket for as little as half of today’s price for a basic Atlas 5 rocket. ULA could add up to six strap-on boosters to send up heavier satellites at a higher price.

http://spaceflightnow.com/2015/04/22/ula-needs-commercial-business-to-close-vulcan-rocket-business-case/

 

:)

  • Like 1

First batch of Iridium Next satellites good to go for July SpaceX launch

 

IridiumNext-satellite-image-879x485.jpg

The $3 billion Iridium Next constellation is scheduled for launch starting late July aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. It is to be the first of seven 10-satellite Iridium launches on the Falcon 9, all to be completed by late 2017. Each satellite is expected to weigh 860 kilograms at launch. Credit: Iridium

 

Quote

PARIS — Mobile satellite services provider Iridium Communications on April 28 said the contracting team for its second-generation Iridium Next constellation had put past delays behind it and would be ready for a first launch of 10 satellites in late July aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.

 

McLean, Virginia-based Iridium said the launch date could slip by a few weeks, depending on SpaceX’s management of its busy manifest. But satellite prime contractor Thales Alenia Space of France and Italy, and Orbital ATK of Dulles, Virginia, which is handling the satellites’ assembly, integration and test, will have 10 satellites ready for the July rendezvous.

 

Iridium said that by midsummer, the Iridium Next builders should be producing five Iridium Next satellites per month to meet Iridium’s aggressive schedule.

 

Iridium’s second-generation, like its first, consists of 66 satellites in low Earth orbit. The company has confronted multiple delays for satellite software and hardware issues that have pushed the first launch to where it is now.

 

Iridium Chief Executive Matt Desch, in a conference call with investors, said the company has recently performed a fresh review of the status of the current constellation – well past its retirement date – and concluded that it remains in good enough health to operate for several years.

 

Nonetheless, the possibility of a satellite in-orbit failure, plus the enhanced mobile communications features of Iridium Next, have made Iridium anxious to put the second-generation fleet into service.

 

The current plan is a first launch of 10 satellites aboard SpaceX’s Falcon 9, from Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, in July. Six other Falcon 9 rockets, each carrying 10 satellites, are scheduled to launch by late 2017.

 

Desch said Iridium was seventh in line on SpaceX’s current manifest. But all six of the other launches occur from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. Desch said a delay on one of them would not necessarily mean a corresponding delay for Iridium.

 

Rounding out the 72-satellite constellation, including eight spares, a Russian-Ukrainian Dnepr rocket is scheduled to launch two Iridium Next satellites, but the launch date has not been confirmed. Russian-Ukrainian tensions have thrown the Dnepr schedule into question.

more at the link...

http://spacenews.com/iridium-says-2nd-generation-constellation-ready-to-launch-with-spacex-starting-in-july/

 

----------------------

 

 

Thaicom fact sheet...pdf

https://www.orbitalatk.com/space-systems/commercial-satellites/communications-satellites/docs/FS014_13_OA_3862%20Thaicom%208.pdf

 

:)

  • Like 1

New F9/FH performance numbers from their capabilities page. The F9 page hasn't fully caught up.

 

NSF'ers are boggled, still exploring the ramifications. WOW!

 

Falcon 9/FH Fuller Thrust? 

 

So much for these designs being frozen, and SpaceX's traditional performance sandbagging is clearly out the window.

 

http://www.spacex.com/about/capabilities

 

F9 (expendable)

 

Cost: $62m
LEO: 28.8 tonnes
GTO: 8.3 tonnes
Mars: 4.02 tonnes

 

Falcon Heavy (center core expendable)

 

Cost: $90m
LEO: 54.4 tonnes
GTO: 22.2 tonnes
Mars: 13.6 tonnes
Pluto: 2.9 tonnes (New Horizons = 478 kg)

 

Specs

 

F9: $978.54/lb to LEO
FH: $752.0/lb to LEO
M1D+ thrust: 190,000 lb f
M1DVac+ thrust: 210,000 lbf
F9 liftoff thrust: 1.71 mlbf
FH liftoff thrust: 5.13 mlbf
Merlin 1D+ t/w now 199.5:1

 

These mean

 

F9 can toss more mass to LEO than Delta IV Heavy

 

A fully expendable FH should push almost 70 tonnes to LEO, barring structural limits. Not mentioned for SLS politics? 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, DocM said:

New F9/FH performance numbers from their capabilities page. The F9 page hasn't fully caught up.

 

NSF'ers are boggled, still exploring the ramifications. WOW!

 

Falcon 9/FH Fuller Thrust? 

 

So much for these designs being frozen, and SpaceX's traditional performance sandbagging is clearly out the window.

 

http://www.spacex.com/about/capabilities

 

F9 (expendable)

 

Cost: $62m
LEO: 28.8 tonnes
GTO: 8.3 tonnes
Mars: 4.02 tonnes

 

Falcon Heavy (center core expendable)

 

Cost: $90m
LEO: 54.4 tonnes
GTO: 22.2 tonnes
Mars: 13.6 tonnes
Pluto: 2.9 tonnes (New Horizons = 478 kg)

 

Specs

 

F9: $978.54/lb to LEO
FH: $752.0/lb to LEO
M1D+ thrust: 190,000 lb f
M1DVac+ thrust: 210,000 lbf
F9 liftoff thrust: 1.71 mlbf
FH liftoff thrust: 5.13 mlbf
Merlin 1D+ t/w now 199.5:1

 

These mean

 

F9 can toss more mass to LEO than Delta IV Heavy

 

A fully expendable FH should push almost 70 tonnes to LEO, barring structural limits. Not mentioned for SLS politics? 

:blink: ...woah...

  • Like 2

Landing all 3 on first flight will be one heck of a show. I am wondering if there is enough room at LZ-1 for all, or if there are other spots in proximity?

 

2:29 min.

 

:D

  • Like 1

With what they've shown recently i'm sure that - given the right weather conditions - they could do exactly whats shown there :)

 

They can already land one pencil upright, so why not three!

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

True...I was assuming a delay from first landing to second (entry turbulence) then the third stage, but LZ-1, from what I remember, is not overly large. But, they have demonstrated accuracy...maybe use the edges of the pad?

:D

Most likely, the boosters go to LZ-1 and the center core to OCISLY. 

 

They could build a second pad at LZ-1, but it'll have to wait for a wetlands bird nesting season that ends about the last of July. Zero permits issued during that.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

I thought this was interesting...no need for "shoes" upon landing on ASDS.

 

On the last landing, they welded "eyelet" assemblies to the deck...

 

IBZmewR.jpg

 

They then put the jacks under the octaweb, under pin mount. The jacks are raised, pin installed, then the chains are attached to the deck and the pin ends. the chains use turnbuckles to tighten to a predetermined strain (strain gauges) and pull jack onto deck....minimal stress to the core.

 

9vzsgkQ.jpg

 

This is pretty neat.....

:D

  • Like 1

Musk weighs in

 

Good Lord....eye watering numbers and M1D is one tough SOB. And for a lightweight keroLOX?!?

 

@elonmusk
Just posted latest max payload  of Falcon 9 and Heavy https://t.co/Z45Y5V7G91
>
@mattyteare Basically current, but higher throttle setting. Good performance of recent launches allows us to reduce 3 sigma reserve margin.
>
@elonmusk Max performance numbers are for expendable launches. Subtract 30% to 40% for reusable booster payload.

 

Luke ‏@lukealization  
@elonmusk Does FH expendable performance include crossfeed? Crossfeed is generally off the table correct? Rather difficult to implement...
>
@lukealization No physical changes to the engine. This thrust increase is based on delta qual tests. It is just tougher than we thought.
>
Elon Musk ‏@elonmusk  
@lukealization No cross feed. It would help performance, but is not needed for these numbers.

  • Like 1

OK, there was a typo on the F9 LEO number that's been corrected. Still eye-watering. Add a Raptor upper stage and it zooms right up again.

 

F9 (expendable)

 

Cost: $62m
LEO: 22.8 tonnes
GTO: 8.3 tonnes
Mars: 4.02 tonnes


 

  • Like 1

There aren't any payloads that need crossfeed right now. As it is a bog standard FH can send the mass of a fully loaded & fueled Boeing 737-200, plus another 2 tonnes, to LEO.

 

If the need arises SpaceX will build a crossfeed FH, but a Raptor S2 may also make it unnecessary. Then again, FH + Raptor S2 + crossfeed would make for a crazy cool combo.

  • Like 2

Yup, more thrust. Delta qualification runs showed they can run M1D+ at a higher throttle setting, 190 klbf, and that it holds up under that stress. They also showed that the propellant margins were too large, so the excess props can go into the mission bucket.

 

End result: beasts. FH can now throw 2.9T to freaking Pluto fer chrissake. That's a small commsat, 6 New Horizons, or a pretty good lander/rover. F9 is now in Proton and Atlas V 5xx's turf.

  • Like 1

 

And the hits keep on coming

@elonmusk
F9 thrust at liftoff will be raised to 1.71M lbf later this year. It is capable of 1.9M lbf in flight.
>
Falcon Heavy thrust will be 5.1M lbf at liftoff --  twice any rocket currently flying. It's a beast...

  • Like 1

:shifty: I called it months ago, did I not? I said "FH's config should be good for 59.9 MT to LEO (Reuse), and +19.8 MT (Non-Reuse @ 33% margin) depending on whether they're landing the cores or not". My math was factoring in the reuse margin of 33% -- turns out that's a completely reliable number that still gives good, solid performance characteristics and gets our payload on-target without issues.

 

I believe we were discussing how to get the Bigelow B-330 and BA-2100 uphill, if memory serves; and that the 2100 launching on a FH was workable if they were willing to send it up in a "minimal configuration" to save some weight (and to get the FH cores back)" ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BA_2100 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B330 for anyone needing refresher information.

 

Turns out I was right on the money. Elon confirming your math does wonders for your self-esteem ... :yes: 

 

So now it turns out those numbers are actually conservative. Wow. Makes me pretty excited to see how far SpaceX can take those two platforms' performance.

The NSF'ers are still boggled, exploring the ramifications of these numbers and what adding a Raptor upper stage will mean. 

 

What's becoming clear is that M1D+ is so powerful for its mass that it trumps a hydroLOX engines ISP advantage in many cases. 

 

For the M1DVac+ upper stage it's sole weakness is the RP-1 gelling due to cold  and battery life, which limits how long a cruise the stage can do before a last burn. Maybe a tank heater, Dragon 2 style conformal solar arrays and bigger batteries? 

 

The Raptor stage fixes all of that, adds iSP, has even more thrust, and then whatever ACES features they decide to add. People are already talking about it as a tanker/depot or interplanetary cruise & Earth return stage.

 

Jeezzzz....

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!