[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Slarlac249 said:

i just with they stopped messing with the source material so much in star trek, you don't see disney buggering up star wars, changing everything.

^This!  I kinda felt like punching JJ Abrahms in the face after seeing he left Star Wars untouched yet pretty much raped everything there is about Star Trek.  Jerk!

 

  • Like 3

finally someone who agrees, ep7 wasn't as good as rogue one but it still felt like a star wars movie. i don't think people can justify the 100% changing everything in the new star trek movies because it's an alternative timeline, it's still meant to be star trek.

 

and i don't say all that as some die hard trekkie, i have no toys, action figures or anything merchanise related, i only have the movies / tv shows on dvd, bluray. i just don't understand why the studio allowed such a bastardization be created and make it look worse than enterprise but also nothing like what we already expect from watching any trek movie or show. it's like saying, star wars is holy stuff, you can't change anything, only add stuff, but trek is fair game, all source material is garbage, start again.

 

boggles the mind.

  • Steven P. changed the title to Star Trek: Discovery (September 24 2017: CBS All Access)

Updated with premiere date September 24

 

Quote

US schedule

 

Star Trek: Discovery will launch in the U.S. on Sunday, September 24 with a broadcast premiere that night on the CBS Television Network airing at 8:30-9:30 PM, ET/PT (time approximate following NFL Football and 60 Minutes). The series premiere will also be available on-demand on CBS All Access and the second episode of the series will be available on the service that same night immediately following the broadcast premiere.

 

After premiere night, all new episodes will be available on-demand weekly on Sundays exclusively for CBS All Access subscribers in the U.S. The 15-episode season will be released in two chapters. The first eight episodes will run from Sunday, Sept. 24 through Sunday, Nov. 5. The season will then resume with the second chapter debuting in January 2018.
- See more at: http://www.startrek.com/article/star-trek-discovery-sets-premiere-date#sthash.jAbpxhPq.dpuf

For rest of world schedule and info hit the link http://www.startrek.com/article/star-trek-discovery-sets-premiere-date

On 6/10/2017 at 9:32 AM, Slarlac249 said:

finally someone who agrees, ep7 wasn't as good as rogue one but it still felt like a star wars movie. i don't think people can justify the 100% changing everything in the new star trek movies because it's an alternative timeline, it's still meant to be star trek.

 

and i don't say all that as some die hard trekkie, i have no toys, action figures or anything merchanise related, i only have the movies / tv shows on dvd, bluray. i just don't understand why the studio allowed such a bastardization be created and make it look worse than enterprise but also nothing like what we already expect from watching any trek movie or show. it's like saying, star wars is holy stuff, you can't change anything, only add stuff, but trek is fair game, all source material is garbage, start again.

 

boggles the mind.

Well looks like that type of mentality won out, I doubt there will be any additional JJverse movies sadly. It was a fresh take on Trek and it didn't alter the franchise due to the fact that the entire premise is set in an alternate reality. There's no permanent damage to the prime timeline and can be revisited at anytime. Trekkies and the like have complained since TNG was in its infancy. In fact with Discovery, we'll hopefully get a new infusion of prime content without them rewriting the books, and sorry, if you're about to complain about new make up and what not for klingons and the like, it's called staying current with modern filmography tech, it'd be outright ridiclous to watch a new trek with 60s sets and makeup. They didn't do it in the 80s, or 90s or 2000s and they certainly wont' do it today.

36 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Star Trek: Discovery will launch in the U.S. on Sunday, September 24 with a broadcast premiere that night on the CBS Television Network airing at 8:30-9:30 PM, ET/PT (time approximate following NFL Football and 60 Minutes).

Personal gripe....  Yes lets schedule right after a football game :angry:  Anyone that DVR's it is going have to pad a hour or so to handle overtime and such.

1 minute ago, shockz said:

Well looks like that type of mentality won out, I doubt there will be any additional JJverse movies sadly. It was a fresh take on Trek and it didn't alter the franchise due to the fact that the entire premise is set in an alternate reality. There's no permanent damage to the prime timeline and can be revisited at anytime. Trekkies and the like have complained since TNG was in its infancy. In fact with Discovery, we'll hopefully get a new infusion of prime content without them rewriting the books, and sorry, if you're about to complain about new make up and what not for klingons and the like, it's called staying current with modern filmography tech, it'd be outright ridiclous to watch a new trek with 60s sets and makeup. They didn't do it in the 80s, or 90s and they certainly wont' do it today.

Though in ST:Enterprise they did a good job of explaining the Klingon ridges :D

12 hours ago, primortal said:

Personal gripe....  Yes lets schedule right after a football game :angry:  Anyone that DVR's it is going have to pad a hour or so to handle overtime and such.

Though in ST:Enterprise they did a good job of explaining the Klingon ridges :D

DS9 even touched on that subject with the tribble episode where they go back in time to the TOS era and see klingons, one of the best DS9 episodes.

31 minutes ago, Slarlac249 said:

DS9 even touched on that subject with the tribble episode where they go back in time to the TOS era and see klingons, one of the best DS9 episodes.

Ah, I loved that episode, it was a nice bit of fun!

 

As for touching on it though...  Is the line "We don't discuss it with outsiders!" really touching on it? :p

 

Personally, I don't mind the incongruity with the ridges as I always accepting it was a makeup technology thing.  Roddenbury clearly always wanted the ridges but makeup technology and show budget just couldn't achieve it at the time.  When technology and budget was finally able to achieve it, we finally saw Klingons as they were always meant to be.

well it was more or less a nod to it, but yeah it was a budget thing back then, it's why they couldn't do many things fx and makeup wise. phase 2 would've been much better but the dumb networks cancelled tos and we got the movies instead.

14 hours ago, shockz said:

Well looks like that type of mentality won out, I doubt there will be any additional JJverse movies sadly. It was a fresh take on Trek and it didn't alter the franchise due to the fact that the entire premise is set in an alternate reality. There's no permanent damage to the prime timeline and can be revisited at anytime. Trekkies and the like have complained since TNG was in its infancy. In fact with Discovery, we'll hopefully get a new infusion of prime content without them rewriting the books, and sorry, if you're about to complain about new make up and what not for klingons and the like, it's called staying current with modern filmography tech, it'd be outright ridiclous to watch a new trek with 60s sets and makeup. They didn't do it in the 80s, or 90s or 2000s and they certainly wont' do it today.

Still, they could have let them look more like the Worf era klingon. They look more like the mutant crew from the last movie.. They look fake.

 

Hate to say it but it is also looking quite sjw and the "white man" is all but forgotten. Roddenberry was the first to be all inclusive and this just smacks in the face of what he did. It's going to make it hard for me to watch. I'll watch it though, for as long as I can stomach it that is.. I sure hope I'm of base but it's not looking good.

 

I would prefer to have seen Axinar in all it's glory, to bad that is a dead endeavor. Maybe a spin-off of it for a show. It almost seems that is were they got the timeline from though, I guess they figured with all the hype it got that would be a good place to go with this series. Makes you wonder what that lawsuit was really all about..

3 hours ago, Slarlac249 said:

can't say axinar grabbed my attention, it seemed to fit in with all the other fan trek videos, somewhere between cringe and watchable.

Yeah but they had at least gotten enough money to make it look, professional-ish and had plenty of Trek veterans already signed on, and to do a story that hasn't been done yet (though I know Discovery is sorta doing that as well kinda?). Still, we will never know (unless Paramount changes course so to speak, pun intended heh) how the final Axanar project would have looked.

7 hours ago, LOC said:

Yeah but they had at least gotten enough money to make it look, professional-ish and had plenty of Trek veterans already signed on, and to do a story that hasn't been done yet (though I know Discovery is sorta doing that as well kinda?). Still, we will never know (unless Paramount changes course so to speak, pun intended heh) how the final Axanar project would have looked.

I just don't understand why Trekkies are angry over it? They literally were making profit/throwing large amounts of fan funding around on the Star Trek name. It'd have been shut down under any other franchise as well.

9 hours ago, shockz said:

I just don't understand why Trekkies are angry over it? They literally were making profit/throwing large amounts of fan funding around on the Star Trek name. It'd have been shut down under any other franchise as well.

Because they're desperate for some new Trek, and as Paramount weren't bringing any until now, fan productions are the only other option. Also, Axenar DID look pretty good!

you know what, here's an idea, what what you guys make into a series if you had the power?

 

first i'd do a series set after star trek 6 which fills the gap between 6 & the launch of the enterprise b, then i'd do a series of the what happened to the enterprise b starring the captain from generations, then i'd do a series featuring the enterprise c which ends with a two parter where it goes through the rift, returns and is destroyed but would all be from the pov of the enterprise c crew and would guest star the tng actors in some brief re-created scenes.

 

finally id do a series that picks up where nemesis left off and continue the adventures of the enterprise e, tng actors would reprise their rolels plus introduce new crew / actors.

 

i'd call it Star Trek Legacy.

 

They would each be a mini series, to fill in what happened to the enterprise from star trek 6 to after nemeis.

 

one can dream........

21 minutes ago, Slarlac249 said:

 

you know what, here's an idea, what what you guys make into a series if you had the power?

 

I was pondering this earlier.  How about this:

 

A series where technology is discovered where you can jump to another dimension.  Remember the episode with 100s of Enterprise D's from different dimensions, season 7 I think?  Take that and expand upon it.  Give it something like it can't be mobile as the computational maths isn't there yet, so it's used in a stationary location such as a Starfleet HQ and you have to go to it like a Holodeck.  So you're exploring Earth, just in different dimensions where sometimes there are subtle changes, sometimes huge ones.

 

OK, it's Sliders.  OK it's quantum leap.  But it allows awesome stories, it allows plot points to be picked up and expanded on from existing Trek and it allows a different form of exploration.

Back in the day (you know, in the 80s lol) I used to write Trek scripts back when TNG first started up etc. There was this one episode named Conspiracy that was really good about this slug like alien species that invaded Starfleet and the Federation and took over humans (and other aliens I assume, don't remember actually, but I think a Vulcan captain was taken over heh) and was trying to seize control etc. It ended with Picard and Riker basically blowing up this adjunct to this Starfleet admiral I believe (literally blew his torso up, like wtf back then!) and then Data said at the end the aliens managed to send off a message something like "try again" or "come here" or something like that. I had this big whole thing where the species was tied to the Trill (but not the Trill) and this whole thing with the Romulans getting involved trying to help. So yeah, there is plenty of stuff they could go back to and re-visit or what have you again.

10 minutes ago, LOC said:

Back in the day (you know, in the 80s lol) I used to write Trek scripts back when TNG first started up etc. There was this one episode named Conspiracy that was really good about this slug like alien species that invaded Starfleet and the Federation and took over humans (and other aliens I assume, don't remember actually, but I think a Vulcan captain was taken over heh) and was trying to seize control etc. It ended with Picard and Riker basically blowing up this adjunct to this Starfleet admiral I believe (literally blew his torso up, like wtf back then!) and then Data said at the end the aliens managed to send off a message something like "try again" or "come here" or something like that. I had this big whole thing where the species was tied to the Trill (but not the Trill) and this whole thing with the Romulans getting involved trying to help. So yeah, there is plenty of stuff they could go back to and re-visit or what have you again.

Wait, you're not suggesting you wrote it are you?

 

Anyway, the episode was WAY ahead of it's time, certainly for Trek.  Now we have the Tal Shiar, Section 31 and so on, it would fit in perfectly.

Yes, wrote an entire script and sent it in (and a sorta semi-sequel script I wrote as well bringing in the mirror universe version of the aliens who were hopping from one universe to another trying to stop them). I guess Paramount never liked it :D

  • Like 2
17 minutes ago, LOC said:

Back in the day (you know, in the 80s lol) I used to write Trek scripts back when TNG first started up etc. There was this one episode named Conspiracy that was really good about this slug like alien species that invaded Starfleet and the Federation and took over humans (and other aliens I assume, don't remember actually, but I think a Vulcan captain was taken over heh) and was trying to seize control etc. It ended with Picard and Riker basically blowing up this adjunct to this Starfleet admiral I believe (literally blew his torso up, like wtf back then!) and then Data said at the end the aliens managed to send off a message something like "try again" or "come here" or something like that. I had this big whole thing where the species was tied to the Trill (but not the Trill) and this whole thing with the Romulans getting involved trying to help. So yeah, there is plenty of stuff they could go back to and re-visit or what have you again.

probably the only tng episode that had a gory-ish death scene, something never repeated on star trek, was kinda raiders of the lost ark exploding head gory but not quite as cool looking.

16 minutes ago, LOC said:

Yes, wrote an entire script and sent it in (and a sorta semi-sequel script I wrote as well bringing in the mirror universe version of the aliens who were hopping from one universe to another trying to stop them). I guess Paramount never liked it :D

You are suggesting that your script was used for the Conspiracy episode?  Blimey!

1 minute ago, LOC said:

Oh no no, I wrote a continuation of the story where they returned lol It was a couple years after the 1st season episode at least.

According to StarTrek lore, it was meant to be an ongoing storyline that simply wasn't well received so was ditched.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!