[Official] Star Trek: Discovery Thread


Recommended Posts

Well, I found season 3 to be really bad.  I didn't like the way it ended up either.  Saru was the last interesting character, admittedly not nearly captain material though, but they've gotten rid of him, at least as a character on the ship it seems.  I'm not liking that Michael is captain now and I'm wondering if she'll keep Tilly as her first officer which was a really bad move by Saru, but they barely let us know any of the other bridge officers (I couldn't even probably give you names on most of them), so of course they'd pick her.  They really need to give more character development rather than making it the Michael Burnham show.  They attempted to do that with Saru's dinner episode, but they really messed that one up and made it more about everyone not getting along.  Unless they vastly improve in season 4, I don't think I'll be watching this anymore.

5 minutes ago, kjordan2001 said:

Well, I found season 3 to be really bad.  I didn't like the way it ended up either.  Saru was the last interesting character, admittedly not nearly captain material though, but they've gotten rid of him, at least as a character on the ship it seems.  I'm not liking that Michael is captain now and I'm wondering if she'll keep Tilly as her first officer which was a really bad move by Saru, but they barely let us know any of the other bridge officers (I couldn't even probably give you names on most of them), so of course they'd pick her.  They really need to give more character development rather than making it the Michael Burnham show.  They attempted to do that with Saru's dinner episode, but they really messed that one up and made it more about everyone not getting along.  Unless they vastly improve in season 4, I don't think I'll be watching this anymore.

I quite enjoyed this season.  They only really thing that bugged me was Booker's "morphing" ship.  I have no problem with Michael as acting captain or Tilly being the first officer.

 

Agreed, there needs to be a little more character development but being they like to do each season as a story arch it makes it a little harder to spend time on the crew.

12 minutes ago, primortal said:

I quite enjoyed this season.  They only really thing that bugged me was Booker's "morphing" ship.  I have no problem with Michael as acting captain or Tilly being the first officer.

 

Agreed, there needs to be a little more character development but being they like to do each season as a story arch it makes it a little harder to spend time on the crew.

I'd say a lot more character development.  We know pretty much nothing about the bridge crew.  They just seem to be there for reaction shots.  The season really just needs to be longer and not every episode needs to be full of CGI or Michael being Rambo.  I think they tried to model her after Sisko, but made her much less likable with too much whispering and crying.  And yes, Booker's morphing ship made absolutely no sense, especially with how it morphed while "avoiding" asteroids.  The detached nacelles make no sense either on Discovery, maybe if they actually showed them being useful instead of a one-off line about "increased maneuverability" .  I wouldn't mind Tilly being first officer if she wasn't a really inexperienced ensign.

15 minutes ago, kjordan2001 said:

I'd say a lot more character development.  We know pretty much nothing about the bridge crew.  They just seem to be there for reaction shots.  The season really just needs to be longer and not every episode needs to be full of CGI or Michael being Rambo.  I think they tried to model her after Sisko, but made her much less likable with too much whispering and crying.  And yes, Booker's morphing ship made absolutely no sense, especially with how it morphed while "avoiding" asteroids.  The detached nacelles make no sense either on Discovery, maybe if they actually showed them being useful instead of a one-off line about "increased maneuverability" .  I wouldn't mind Tilly being first officer if she wasn't a really inexperienced ensign.

We did get some minor character development with Detmer and Owosekun this season. The series was/is based around Michael when it first announced, and I don't think that will change as her being the focus of the series. Discovery was retrofitted once it rejoined the Federation, so the detachable nacelles were part of the upgrade and hopefully, we'll see how they work next season. Tilly was/is taking the Command Training Program, so she'll get to a somewhat "Killy" mentality over time.

 

No Star Trek series has never come close to rich character development other than DS9, but again DS9 was a station-based series instead of a starship so it lends itself to focus on character development.

Discovery's main problem for me is the inconsistent story lines, particularly Detmer this season... she could have gone full crazy, and they were setting that all up too. They started off with two things: What caused the burn... and the crew adjusting to life in the 32nd century, leaving their entire lives behind and shambles... and sure, finding Starfleet again may have helped somewhat, but the whole abandonment of that story arc was pretty bad.

 

And the cause of the burn really irked me at first, lazy writing, and while it's still sci-fi, the cause of why this particular entity was able to even initiate a burn was pretty far fetched. There was so many other options. It was tidied up okay, but so many unanswered questions... how far did the burn go? The whole galaxy? Did other super powers collapse? The Dominion, The Borg? The Devore? Hirogen? (which I think we saw in one of the episodes) etc...

 

Having said that, it's still good Trek, but it could be great Trek if they actually hired on some decent sci-fi buffs for their writers team. I seriously feel there were separate rooms of writers for each episode, and none of them really talked to each other outside of getting a overall A > B plot line.

 

Also, Burnhams Mom plot was poorly thought out too. Another wasted story.

 

Also, s31 nanoprobes/Leland was also too quickly ended. I thought for sure we saw the nanoprobes bouncing around the floor when Saru was on the floor flying through the worm hole.

 

Edited by shockz
  • Brandon H unpinned this topic
  • 7 months later...

https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/star-trek-fans-rage-netflix-25477453

 

Two days before season 4 starts it has been pulled worldwide from Netflix and will only stream in the US (and Canada) on Paramount+

 

And people wonder why piracy is still so rampant, it's because of dick moves like this, that's why. 

 

Quote

“In broad strokes, the bargain that then-CBS head honcho Les Moonves made with Netflix saw the latter paying the vast majority of Discovery‘s hefty budget for the overseas rights.

it makes no sense to me why they wouldn't have the right to keep seasons 1-3 on Netflix if they already paid toward the show's budgets?

On 17/11/2021 at 08:10, Steven P. said:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/star-trek-fans-rage-netflix-25477453

 

Two days before season 4 starts it has been pulled worldwide from Netflix and will only stream in the US (and Canada) on Paramount+

 

And people wonder why piracy is still so rampant, it's because of dick moves like this, that's why. 

 

it makes no sense to me why they wouldn't have the right to keep seasons 1-3 on Netflix if they already paid toward the show's budgets?

From article: Star Trek fans have been left livid after the global release of the new season of spin-off show Discovery was pulled days before its planned launch.

 

When aren't Star Trek fans livid at this point. lol

  • Haha 1
On 17/11/2021 at 13:10, Steven P. said:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/star-trek-fans-rage-netflix-25477453

 

Two days before season 4 starts it has been pulled worldwide from Netflix and will only stream in the US (and Canada) on Paramount+

 

And people wonder why piracy is still so rampant, it's because of dick moves like this, that's why. 

 

it makes no sense to me why they wouldn't have the right to keep seasons 1-3 on Netflix if they already paid toward the show's budgets?

It's already hit certain... sources. ;)  Not that I have ANY interest in the show mind... Just reportin'. :p 

I just watched the new episode. It was kinda meh at the start but ended strong.

 

Spoiler

I dont know why but I got the feeling that it is gonna be a doomsday like machine like in the original series. 

 

First episode was off to a good start, no crying or whispering, but Tilly still ticks me off, every episode she shows why she shouldn't be in command and when she gets her moments they don't come across in a believable manner.

Spoiler

Her moment was of course talking down the captain of the station, but it ended up being the admiral who defused it anyway, and are we to believe that none of the captain of that station's own crew could have been onside to help in a stressful situation, erm okay. Nooo leave it to Tilly!!!111 to show us why she's in a command position /s

It is still better than the cryfest soap like performances of last season :) 

On 19/11/2021 at 05:21, Steven P. said:

First episode was off to a good start, no crying or whispering, but Tilly still ticks me off, every episode she shows why she shouldn't be in command and when she gets her moments they don't come across in a believable manner.

  Reveal hidden contents

Her moment was of course talking down the captain of the station, but it ended up being the admiral who defused it anyway, and are we to believe that none of the captain of that station's own crew could have been onside to help in a stressful situation, erm okay. Nooo leave it to Tilly!!!111 to show us why she's in a command position /s

It is still better than the cryfest soap like performances of last season :) 

 

It was a good first episode and I don't have a problem with Tilly.  She is who she is and I don't think she'll get to her mirror universe demeanor.

 

What drive me nuts that there's always gotta be fire all over the place when a ship takes damage.  Really, there's still flammable material used in ships?

 

Spoiler

Curious if we see what the next generation Spore drive is going to look like.


 

Spoiler

Upgraded Discovery [A]?

FElJ6_SXEAM94HI.thumb.jpg.2e4e5625f104fd5477c7f6af251fadc3.jpg


 

On 19/11/2021 at 10:21, Steven P. said:

First episode was off to a good start, no crying or whispering, but Tilly still ticks me off, every episode she shows why she shouldn't be in command and when she gets her moments they don't come across in a believable manner.

  Reveal hidden contents

Her moment was of course talking down the captain of the station, but it ended up being the admiral who defused it anyway, and are we to believe that none of the captain of that station's own crew could have been onside to help in a stressful situation, erm okay. Nooo leave it to Tilly!!!111 to show us why she's in a command position /s

It is still better than the cryfest soap like performances of last season :) 

Mikeyspock is still an arrogant bit** I see.  I'm glad she got a dressing down from the president. New favourite character there! :p

 

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...

4th season sets the lowest bar of any other ST seasons in history of the franchise. Between the pearls of wisdom and psychoanalysis there is no room left for Star Trek. Episodes feel like trailers for next week's Oprah Winfrey Show. 

I haven't watched S4 yet, but I liked 1-3. I like all the humor and emotional parts, which has not been Star Trek's strong suit. Tilly makes me laugh because you haven't seen a character in Star Trek like her before and frankly, we all have at least one Tilly in our professional lives. I know people have strong feelings about the main character being a woman and other things but that doesn't bother me. Honestly it makes it more dramatic that the character is a woman, than a man. I loved the character of Phillipa. 

On 10/12/2021 at 22:00, hagjohn said:

I haven't watched S4 yet, but I liked 1-3. I like all the humor and emotional parts, which has not been Star Trek's strong suit. Tilly makes me laugh because you haven't seen a character in Star Trek like her before and frankly, we all have at least one Tilly in our professional lives. I know people have strong feelings about the main character being a woman and other things but that doesn't bother me. Honestly it makes it more dramatic that the character is a woman, than a man. I loved the character of Phillipa. 

No one cares that the lead is a woman.  Janeway was a woman and clearly no one gave a damn because Voyager still performed very well and didn't cause any outcries among the fanbase.  What they DO care about is the terrible writing, the awful acting and the complete and utter disregard for established canon.

On 10/12/2021 at 23:00, hagjohn said:

I haven't watched S4 yet, but I liked 1-3. I like all the humor and emotional parts, which has not been Star Trek's strong suit. Tilly makes me laugh because you haven't seen a character in Star Trek like her before and frankly, we all have at least one Tilly in our professional lives. I know people have strong feelings about the main character being a woman and other things but that doesn't bother me. Honestly it makes it more dramatic that the character is a woman, than a man. I loved the character of Phillipa. 

Exactly what FloatingFatMan said. Voyager is my favorite Trek actually. I have seen it all the way through at least 3 times, which I can't say for other Trek shows.

 

The lead: Sonequa Martin-Green looks like she belongs in a daytime soap opera, and I can't stand Tilly, plus the writing is terrible, lets all dwell on a personal moment while the ship is exploding all around you (seems to be the norm in this show). This is the first show I skip forward frequently too because I just can't stand all the political correctness and bad daytime soap acting.

 

South Park was eons ahead of its time with the whole "Token" character, and that's all I have to say about that and "Hollyweird" You can have your token actors portraying traits we now all feel forced to be confronted with like repeated slaps to the face every day, but I don't really need it thanks :) 

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
  • 11 months later...

May be an image of 6 people and text that says 'STAR TREK DISCOVERY THE FINAL AOVENTURE STREAMING APRIL 4'

https://www.startrek.com/news/discovery-season-5-arriving-april

Looks like everyone's favorite character is back, Tilly 😛

Did they really need to spend millions to end a show a lot of the actively fanbase hates?  Makes me feel bad for so many other far superior shows that just got terminated unfinished... :/  Not even Enterprise was hated as much as Disco is...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!