Neowin ThinkTank #2 -- Design, Plan, and Launch a "Two Decades" Science Set / Mission Programme to the four Gas Giants by 2020 or earlier


Recommended Posts

Unobscured Vision

Hello, science buffs, independent researchers and armchair nerds! (And yes, that's a good thing!)

I welcome all of you to the second Neowin ThinkTank.

In this ThinkTank, we'll explore how a motivated Company, Partnership of Companies, or even a Governmental Space Entity like ESA, NASA, Roscosmos and others could (and probably should) pursue an extended, committed, "Two Decades" Probe + Multiple Landers* mission set to the Solar Systems' "Gas Giants" -- Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.

(*Number of Landers per Probe depends on the destination, obviously)

In this ThinkTank, we should strive to explore every aspect of what a committed, motivated effort like this will require to succeed. We should also be mindful of a budget, since financial concerns are of (usually) vital importance before a project of any scale is given the green-light. We also should consider whether to use "flight-proven" designs such as Cassini and simply update them with the latest hardware & software (then modify that design to accommodate the additional Landers), or if we should "start from the ground up" with an all-new design.

We will also actually plan the Mission(s) themselves. That's a key part of any Probe mission -- where are we going? The science packages, even the very hardware and software itself, depends on that answer. Since each Probe will be going to one destination only, we can dedicate each Probe to its' destination as well as which Landers or Atmospheric Entry Probes we equip it with. Come on, you know you want to send AEP's down into Saturn, Uranus and Neptune! Now's the chance to actually plan those kinds of Missions!

Then we will actually decide which launch hardware should be used for which platform, and when it can be launched. We have the means to simulate the entire flight(s). And yes, it'll be Kerbal Space Program. (Just kidding....? :D)

For anyone not familiar with the Neowin ThinkTank, it's a very special study that the entire Community is invited to contribute to. Think of it as an exercise, an "Intellectual Interest Topic", where those members with the know-how, the fortitude, the moxy and the savvy can pool their collective talents into one "Grand Objective". Our last ThinkTank, "Establish Mars Colony One (and Two, and Three, and ...)" can be found here: http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1259650-neowin-think-tank-mars-colony-one-and-two-and-three-and/ 

Edited by BetaguyGZT
Added reference to ThinkTank One
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

So ... let's start off the festivities with important information about each of the four Mission Destinations. We'll need to be familiar with each location, intimately, in order to:

1) Identify the best flight plan for each Mothership, including Point of Orbital Insertion, and the fuel requirements to achieve the optimal POI, identify the desired Mission Length (ML) and account for additional RCS propellant requirements for the desired ML versus how much we can actually get to the destination;

2) identify desired Science Objectives as well as a healthy list of secondary Science Objectives; additional Objectives can be assigned on an as-needed/desired basis, as the opportunities present themselves or if new Scientific findings demand further study;

3) finally, design each Primary Probe (Mothership), it's Landers and Atmospheric Entry Probes (AEP's) that each Mothership will carry (including number), and the science suites that each item will carry to each destination within the requirements of (1) and (2).

With that in mind, let's get familiar with our destinations.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

Jupiter - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter (all images courtesy of Wikipedia/Wikimedia)

501px-Jupiter_in_true_color.thumb.jpg.63

Size: 71,492km x 66,854km (flattening at Polar Regions due to high rotation speed)

Rotation: 9h 55m | Axial Tilt: 3.13°

Gravity: 24.79 m/s^2 | 2.528 g at surface (relative to Earth) | Mass: 1.8986 × 10^27 kg | Density: 1.326 g/cm^3 | Escape Velocity: 59.5 km/s

Distance from Sol: Aphelion: 5.458104 AU (816,520,800 km) | Perihelion: 4.950429 AU (740,573,600 km) | Orbital Speed: 13.07 km/s | Inclination: 1.305° (Earth) 6.09° (Sun)

Primary Moons: Io, Europa, Callisto, Ganymede

Jupiter_diagram.svg.thumb.png.714e34d80e 480px-Jupiter_MAD.thumb.jpg.b1a1886fce38

(Left: Cutaway view of Jupiter's interior expanding outward to the Ring System. Right: Infra-Red image of Jupiter taken by the VLT at the European Space Observatory ... WOW!)

(End Part 1 of Jupiter Presentation ... Editor glitching again.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Draggendrop

Do we have until tomorrow at lunch for final submissions.....:woot:    just kidding...

....now where did I leave the cat...need to dust off a few books.......:woot:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

Absolutely. :) In fact, I'm going to try something on my end that'll let me draft posts -- that way I can post here in the thread with awesome data, not fight with the troublesome editor aside from simple edits, and let me research information at my pace (since I have a household to run, I'm called away from my computer frequently). :yes: Win-win.

So do your thing, DD (and everyone else). Remember to "show your work", as they say in Science. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Unobscured Vision

Moving along -- Jupiter Presentation Part 2 -- Io (Images and Data courtesy of Wikipedia. Wikimedia, NASA and others) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_(moon)

 Io_highest_resolution_true_color.thumb.j Io_diagram.svg.thumb.png.8e2754a05f12805  564faa73cd104_Io_Earth__Moon_size_compar

Radius: 1,821.6 ± 0.5 km (28.6% of Earth) | Mass: (8.932 ± 0.000018) × 10^22 kg (0.015 Earth) | Density: 3.528 ± 0.006 g/cm^3 | Surface Gravity: 1.796 m/s^2 (0.183 g) | Escape Velocity: 2.558 km/s

Orbital Distance: 350,000 km from cloud tops / 421,700 km avg. | Orbital Speed: 17.334 km/s | Orbital Period: 42.46 hours / 1.77 days | Inclination (to Jupiter): 0.05° | Rotation: Tidally-locked

Nomenclature / naming convention criteria: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_(moon)#Nomenclature | Observational History: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_(moon)#Observational_history 

Summary: Io is the most distinct, recognizable Moon in the Solar System (aside from our own Moon). The intense geological activity on Io is literally the stuff of science fiction -- if there's an amalgam of a "Hellscape", this would be half of the picture simply from the geology alone. This is due to the extreme proximity to Jupiter's magnetic field as well as the gravitational "tug of war" between Jupiter and the three larger, outer Jovian Moons that constantly knead and flex Io during the orbital resonance forces at play throughout the Jovian system. In fact, Io plays a significant role in shaping the Jovian magnetic field, acting as an electric generator that can develop 400,000 volts across itself and create an electric current of 3 million amperes, releasing ions that give Jupiter a magnetic field more than twice the size it would otherwise have.

Io orbits within a belt of intense radiation known as the Io Plasma Torus. The plasma in this doughnut-shaped ring of ionized sulfur, oxygen, sodium, and chlorine originates when neutral atoms in the "cloud" surrounding Io are ionized and carried along by the Jovian magnetosphere. Unlike the particles in the neutral cloud, these particles co-rotate with Jupiter's magnetosphere, revolving around Jupiter at 74 km/s. Like the rest of Jupiter's magnetic field, the plasma torus is tilted with respect to Jupiter's equator (and Io's orbital plane), so that Io is at times below and at other times above the core of the plasma torus. As noted above, these ions' higher velocity and energy levels are partly responsible for the removal of neutral atoms and molecules from Io's atmosphere and more extended neutral cloud. The torus is composed of three sections: an outer, "warm" torus that resides just outside Io's orbit; a vertically extended region known as the "ribbon", composed of the neutral source region and cooling plasma, located at around Io's distance from Jupiter; and an inner, "cold" torus, composed of particles that are slowly spiraling in toward Jupiter. After residing an average of 40 days in the torus, particles in the "warm" torus escape and are partially responsible for Jupiter's unusually large magnetosphere, their outward pressure inflating it from within.

Jupiter's magnetic field lines, which Io crosses, couple Io's atmosphere and neutral cloud to Jupiter's polar upper atmosphere by generating an electric current known as the Io flux tube. This current produces an auroral glow in Jupiter's polar regions known as the Io footprint, as well as aurorae in Io's atmosphere. Particles from this auroral interaction darken the Jovian polar regions at visible wavelengths. The location of Io and its auroral footprint with respect to Earth and Jupiter has a strong influence on Jovian radio emissions from our vantage point: when Io is visible, radio signals from Jupiter increase considerably. The Juno mission, currently en route to Jupiter with a planned orbital insertion in June 2016, should help to shed light on these processes. The Jovian magnetic field lines that do get past Io's ionosphere also induce an electric current, which in turn creates an induced magnetic field within Io's interior. Io's induced magnetic field is thought to be generated within a partially molten, silicate magma ocean 50 kilometers beneath Io's surface. Similar induced fields were found at the other Galilean satellites by Galileo, generated within liquid water oceans in the interiors of those moons.

Io is slightly larger than the Moon. It has a mean radius of 1,821.3 km (1,131.7 mi) (about 5% greater than the Moon's) and a mass of 8.9319 × 10^22 kg (about 21% greater than the Moon's). It is a slight ellipsoid in shape, with its longest axis directed toward Jupiter. Among the Galilean satellites, in both mass and volume, Io ranks behind Ganymede and Callisto but ahead of Europa.

Composed primarily of silicate rock and iron, Io is closer in bulk composition to the terrestrial planets than to other satellites in the outer Solar System, which are mostly composed of a mix of water ice and silicates. Io has a density of 3.5275 g/cm3, the highest of any moon in the Solar System; significantly higher than the other Galilean satellites and higher than the Moon. Models based on the Voyager and Galileo measurements of Io's mass, radius, and quadrupole gravitational coefficients (numerical values related to how mass is distributed within an object) suggest that its interior is differentiated between a silicate-rich crust and mantle and an iron- or iron-sulfide-rich core. Io's metallic core makes up approximately 20% of its mass. Depending on the amount of sulfur in the core, the core has a radius between 350 and 650 km (220–400 mi) if it is composed almost entirely of iron, or between 550 and 900 km (340–560 mi) for a core consisting of a mix of iron and sulfur. Galileo's magnetometer failed to detect an internal, intrinsic magnetic field at Io, suggesting that the core is not convecting.

Modeling of Io's interior composition suggests that the mantle is composed of at least 75% of the magnesium-rich mineral forsterite, and has a bulk composition similar to that of L-chondrite and LL-chondrite meteorites, with higher iron content (compared to silicon) than the Moon or Earth, but lower than Mars. To support the heat flow observed on Io, 10–20% of Io's mantle may be molten, though regions where high-temperature volcanism has been observed may have higher melt fractions. However, re-analysis of Galileo magnetometer data in 2009 revealed the presence of an induced magnetic field at Io, requiring a magma ocean 50 km (31 mi) below the surface. Further analysis published in 2011 provided direct evidence of such an ocean.[68] This layer is estimated to be 50 km thick and to make up about 10% of Io's mantle. It is estimated that the temperature in the magma ocean reaches 1,200 °C. It is not known if the 10–20% partial melting percentage for Io's mantle is consistent with the requirement for a significant amount of molten silicates in this possible magma ocean. The lithosphere of Io, composed of basalt and sulfur deposited by Io's extensive volcanism, is at least 12 km (7 mi) thick, but is likely to be less than 40 km (25 mi) thick.

Based on their experience with the ancient surfaces of the Moon, Mars, and Mercury, scientists expected to see numerous impact craters in Voyager 1's first images of Io. The density of impact craters across Io's surface would have given clues to Io's age. However, they were surprised to discover that the surface was almost completely lacking in impact craters, but was instead covered in smooth plains dotted with tall mountains, pits of various shapes and sizes, and volcanic lava flows. Compared to most worlds observed to that point, Io's surface was covered in a variety of colorful materials (leading Io to be compared to a rotten orange or to pizza) from various sulfurous compounds. The lack of impact craters indicated that Io's surface is geologically young, like the terrestrial surface; volcanic materials continuously bury craters as they are produced. This result was spectacularly confirmed as at least nine active volcanoes were observed by Voyager 1.

564fb699cb0ce_220px-First_Geologic_Map_o

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/First_Geologic_Map_of_Jupiter’s_Moon_Io.jpg 

Io's colorful appearance is the result of materials deposited by its extensive volcanism, including silicates (such as orthopyroxene), sulfur, and sulfur dioxide. Sulfur dioxide frost is ubiquitous across the surface of Io, forming large regions covered in white or grey materials. Sulfur is also seen in many places across Io, forming yellow to yellow-green regions. Sulfur deposited in the mid-latitude and polar regions is often radiation damaged, breaking up normally stable cyclic 8-chain sulfur. This radiation damage produces Io's red-brown polar regions.

Explosive volcanism, often taking the form of umbrella-shaped plumes, paints the surface with sulfurous and silicate materials. Plume deposits on Io are often colored red or white depending on the amount of sulfur and sulfur dioxide in the plume. Generally, plumes formed at volcanic vents from degassing lava contain a greater amount of S2, producing a red "fan" deposit, or in extreme cases, large (often reaching beyond 450 km or 280 mi from the central vent) red rings. A prominent example of a red-ring plume deposit is located at Pele. These red deposits consist primarily of sulfur (generally 3- and 4-chain molecular sulfur), sulfur dioxide, and perhaps Cl2SO2. Plumes formed at the margins of silicate lava flows (through the interaction of lava and pre-existing deposits of sulfur and sulfur dioxide) produce white or gray deposits.

Compositional mapping and Io's high density suggest that Io contains little to no water, though small pockets of water ice or hydrated minerals have been tentatively identified, most notably on the northwest flank of the mountain Gish Bar Mons. Io has the least amount of water of any known body in the Solar System. This lack of water is likely due to Jupiter being hot enough early in the evolution of the Solar System to drive off volatile materials like water in the vicinity of Io, but not hot enough to do so farther out.

---------------------------

End Io Presentation

---------------------------

471px-PIA01667-Io's_Pele_Hemisphere_After_Pillan_Changes.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Ather Fawaz
      China launches Chang'e-5 mission to extract and bring lunar rock samples to Earth
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via National Geographic China successfully launched its Chang'e-5 mission on Monday whereby it is sending a spacecraft to the Moon to collect rock samples. If everything goes according to plan, the lander portion of the spacecraft will touch down on the lunar surface by the end of this week and will have approximately 14 days—or the length of a single day on the satellite—to collect the samples and bring them back to Earth.

      The spacecraft took off from the Wenchang space site at Hainan Island in China on Monday. Unlike previous missions, China was open about live-streaming and consistently sharing information about the launch procedures. The entire event was live-streamed by Chinese state media without any delay, showing the growing confidence that the nation has in its space program.

      The mission is being hailed as the most ambitious program in China's space history. Not only will it be the first attempt at collecting lunar rock samples in over forty years, but it also sets the nation on course to become only the third country to bring pieces of the moon back to Earth, joining the ranks of the U.S. and Soviet Russia who each completed this feat with the Apollo Missions and the Luna robotic landings, respectively.

      China plans to land Chang'e-5 on the Mons Rümker, which is an isolated volcanic formation that is located in the northwest part of the Moon's near side. It's also much younger than the craters that the Apollo astronauts visited. Once there, the spacecraft is slated to retrieve more than four pounds of lunar samples. For contrast, the three successful Soviet Luna missions brought close to 0.625 pounds while NASA’s Apollo astronauts ferried 842 pounds of moon rock and soil back to the Earth.

      From liftoff to touchdown back to Earth, the entire mission is scheduled to take less than a month. China hopes that the successful completion of Chang’e-5 will be a stepping stone towards establishing an international lunar research station before colonizing the moon by the next decade.

      Source: The New York Times via Engadget

    • By zikalify
      UK set to help build space debris removal satellite
      by Paul Hill



      The UK government has announced a firm based in the UK will help build the Clearspace-1 satellite which aims to clear space debris. The satellite is jokingly called ‘The Claw’ and will begin its mission in 2025.

      Once in space, The Claw will use a pincer motion to collect debris and then control it to re-enter Earth’s atmosphere where it will burn up. The debris that is sent into the atmosphere will be too small to make it through the atmosphere and pose a risk to life but if any does eke its way through there’s a very high likelihood it’ll end up in the sea.

      According to the government, Elecnor Deimos in the UK will design Clearspace-1’s Attitude and Orbit Control System (AOCS), a vital part of the entity which helps to orientate and position the satellite to help grab space debris using power generators, thrusters, and antennas.

      Commenting on the news, Science Minister Amanda Solloway said:

      The AOCS developed by Elecnor Deimos UK will be integrated into the satellite’s autopilot. Elecnor Deimos in Portugal and Germany are also developing parts of the satellite ready for the mission in 2025. As more and more satellites go into space, missions like Clearspace-1 become more and more necessary to avoid collisions.

    • By Ather Fawaz
      Arianespace Vega rocket fails shortly after launch, Spanish and French satellites lost
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via ESA/CNES/Arianespace/Optique Arianespace, a European satellite launch company, lost its Vega rocket shortly after launch. The four-stage Vega rocket, jointly developed by France and Italy, lifted off from the Guiana Space Center in Kourou, French Guiana at 8:52 PM EST (01:52 GMT, November 17), with two satellites onboard—one French and the other Spanish. Things appeared to go well in the initial stages of the flight but as the rocket neared the eight-minute mark, things started to go downhill as the rocket showed signs of going off-course. Stéphane Israël, CEO of Arianespace, later delivered the official statement, confirming that the mission is lost.

      The problem, which is yet to identified, occurred shortly after the Vega rocket ignited its upper stage, and veered off course, indicating that the speed was not nominal anymore, apprised Israël. The rocket did not make its next expected contact with ground stations either.

      The Vega 9 launch system had two satellites on board that it was expected to deploy. The first one was the Spanish Earth-watching satellite called SEOSAT-Ingenio, which came under the envelope of the European Space Agency's (ESA) plan to study our planet in greater detail. The second one was the French TARANIS satellite for the country's space Agency CNES. It was tasked to study visible-light flashes, including gamma-ray flashes, sprites, blue jets, and elves over the next four years.

      "I want to present my deepest apologies to my customers for this mission," Israël continued. "Arianespace is presenting its apologies and we have now to analyze and to understand." This failed launch is Arianespace's second in the span of two years. The last one came last year in July in which another Vega rocket failed during the launch due to a faulty motor on the booster.

      Whether this will be the case this time around as well, remains to be seen. Extrapolating from the loss of nominal speed, it seems that the upper stage did not produce the thrust required to keep the Vega on-course. But of course, we cannot say anything until the formal investigation committee passes a verdict on the incident and reveals its findings.

      For the complete coverage of the event, you may check out this webcast from Arianespace.

      Source: Arianespace (Livestream) via Space.com

    • By zikalify
      The UK begins research into space-based solar power
      by Paul Hill



      The UK government has announced that it’s commissioning new research into space-based solar power (SBSP) systems that collect solar energy in space and beam it back to receivers on earth using high-frequency radio waves. The ground-based stations then feed the energy into the electrical power grid.

      According to the government, the idea was first floated by the SciFi author, Isaac Asimov, in 1941. The UK’s research will seek to find whether the engineering hurdles and economic hurdles can be overcome. It believes that launching systems into space will be cost-effective with commercial space launch systems but it remains to be seen whether these massive satellites could be assembled in orbit.

      Commenting on the news, Dr Graham Turnock, Chief Executive of the UK Space Agency, said:

      The government has asked Frazer-Nash Consultancy to research space-based solar power. While the government expects this plan to be feasible with affordable launch systems other problems could still arise. If the research says the idea is sound, then it could drastically shift the UK’s energy mix away from carbon-emitting sources.

    • By Ather Fawaz
      NASA approves SpaceX and the Crew Dragon for regular crewed missions to the ISS
      by Ather Fawaz

      Image via NASA/SpaceX It has been a big year so far for SpaceX. Back in May, its Crew Dragon spacecraft completed its first manned voyage to the International Space Station (ISS). With Elon Musk accrediting Starship as the top priority for the company, the famed project has also picked up pace. So has the Starlink initiative, with its recent expansion to include more beta customers. The firm is also gearing up for Dragon's second manned mission, Crew-1, to the ISS in a few days as well. Amidst all this, it has now finally gained NASA's approval that it has been striving towards with the Commercial Crew program.

      The approval came after NASA signed the Human Rating Certification Plan for SpaceX’s crew transportation system yesterday. The signing was completed after conducting a thorough flight readiness review ahead of the agency’s Crew-1 mission, with astronauts onboard, to the space station. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine commended the success of the Commercial Crew Program and the achievements of both companies, stating:

      The founder and CEO of SpaceX, Elon Musk marked it as an honor and a motivating force in the company's vision to make flights to the Moon and Mars a reality:

      This is a milestone for both companies. For SpaceX, this system of the Crew Dragon plus the Falcon 9 rocket along with the associated ground systems is the first to be NASA-certified for regular manned flights since the space shuttle nearly 40 years ago. This obviously means that SpaceX's hefty investment in the Commercial Crew program has paid off. For NASA, this is the first time that the agency has certified a commercial spacecraft system in history that is capable of transporting humans to and from the ISS. This directly means that astronauts can regularly make trips to the ISS to and from American soil, which could be a vital step towards commercializing space flights.