Lumia 950 review...not so good


Recommended Posts

"That new Windows Phone flagships are so overdue has been nothing but bad news for the platform. Even people who otherwise like the platform, develop for the platform, evangelize for the platform have jumped ship for lack of hardware. And for those that stayed, the delay has also placed tremendous weight of expectation on the new flagships. Unfortunately, the Lumia 950 does not really live up to those expectations."

Source

Edited by Jason S.
thread formatted
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1279380-lumia-950-reviewnot-so-good/
Share on other sites

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

I mean sure for $30 I would buy a Lumia 640 to play with and to experiment on.

I can only think of one thing why would be Windows Phones be interesting...a novelty. I was actually looking to buy 640 to check out the platform thouroughly, but these are still ~130 euros here...that is ~160$ and it is too much for my playtoy. The most troubling thing about the Lumia 950 is it's performance. Compared to same hardware on Android (Nexus 5x) Lumia 950 is ~50% slower in various benchmarks. Maybe Microsoft will resolve Windows Phone 10 issues within a year, but then whole new generation of phones will be available, including Lumias, if the platform lives that long. 

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

Plenty of cheap models, updated for years, UI is usually always responsive and applications can't install useless and irritating background services. When the alternatives at the same price are some Samsung Super Mini Neo Trinity Morpheus Déjà vu edition that will likely never be updated or some chinaphones the Lumias seem a pretty reasonable alternative. But I would never ever buy a phone without ad-blocking, especially with those awesome network operators we have here in Italy that would sell their souls to have users end up subscripted to premium SMS services.

Have any of you ever used a windows phone? I am not taking about a cheap one I am talking about the 930 or a 1020. I will give you just several examples - texting - texting on an android device is just painful and iPhone you should just give up even trying. The windows mobile OS is  by far the most efficient OS available and most secure based on many security experts. There is a reason if the windows OS runs rings around the android OS if you put it on the same hardware. There is also the camera my old 1020 still is better than the S6 I am required to use for work. The S6 is good but it is no 1020 and the 950 has an even better camera. Now if you need certain apps that is the only reason to get an android or Apple. There is also windows 10 mobile which is fantastic. There is also one other killer feature that no one else has called Continuum - that you can turn your windows phone into a pc and it really works even better than shown.

windows-10-continuum-shown-off-in-new-vi

  

Edited by krobin

There is a reason if the windows OS runs rings around the android OS if you put it on the same hardware. 

I urge to read once again Arstehnica review. Windows 10 phone is dog slow compared to Android (not sure were the tests conducted on 5.1 or 6.0). The other thing is You can replace texting app in Android, as You can replace almost anything else on user end. Neither Windows Moblie was what it once was nor Andorid is. Android has made significant strides in optimizations, while still keeping modularity. Windows Mobile seems to have gone backwards as feature parity with iOS and Android are closer.

Have any of you ever used a windows phone? I am not taking about a cheap one I am talking about the 930 or a 1020. I will give you just several examples - texting - texting on an android device is just painful and iPhone you should just give up even trying. The windows mobile OS is  by far the most efficient OS available and most secure based on many security experts. There is a reason if the windows OS runs rings around the android OS if you put it on the same hardware. There is also the camera my old 1020 still is better than the S6 I am required to use for work. The S6 is good but it is no 1020 and the 950 has an even better camera. Now if you need certain apps that is the only reason to get an android or Apple. There is also windows 10 mobile which is fantastic. There is also one other killer feature that no one else has called Continuum - that you can turn your windows phone into a pc and it really works even better than shown.

windows-10-continuum-shown-off-in-new-vi

  

As much as a supporter I could be for Windows Mobile, I have to admit that there are a lot of problems with the OS. Continnum is still in its infancy, Camera and screen are great on the 950 but nothing else that is jaw dropping. 1020 is a powerful camera but other than that its just a normal phone with very mediocre specs (in the current situation). Windows is more efficient and secure than Android and iOS but like it or not, its still at 3% of the market because:
1)Lesser crucial apps (for the general population) and many apps present are useless/fake/malware. There are alternatives, but people always want the 'original'. App gap is still in the minds of the people though its getting reduced day by day.
2)The whole 'Metro' design interface is not accepted by the majority of the masses. (Tiles are much better than icons, I know, but the whole world is 'seasoned' by icons and people hate change)
3)Lumias have been following a hardware design that is boring and cheap (I support polycarbonate backs for its advantages but not many like it). Other manufacturers may have better designs but those phones don't run on Windows.
4)Microsoft is hated/ignored by many (even those who don't know much about it) and Apple is always the 'Hero'  (Because people believe in Apple more than themselves) while Android is famous because every 'techy' neighbour seems to praise it for its customizability and ease of use and the word 'Google'. (Because people are 'seasoned' by Google to believe that it is the king of all companies that exists in the online realm and by the fact that google is 'fun' and 'exciting', not boring like Microsoft). Windows on the desktop stays there because 1. People don't know Windows is created by Microsoft, 2. They've accepted it because it comes pre installed on most computers and they are 'seasoned' by it.

It takes a lot of effort to change the perception people have in their minds about MS. Also since MS has a competitor in every field it exists, the competition will always try to downplay MS and usually they are at no.2 (with a few exceptions).

Love it as much as you want, but you cant make someone else love it too, especially after being 'seasoned' by iOS and Android.

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

I mean sure for $30 I would buy a Lumia 640 to play with and to experiment on.

I used Android for years. What started really getting bothersome with it, is that issues would pile up, performance would degrade, and support was (and still mostly is) non-existent. It became really tiresome to hunt XDA for ROMs that might offer updates that really should have been there to begin with, or to fix issues that shouldn't have. Besides the Nexus line, which had its own issues on the spec/hardware front prior to 6P, I just don't think Android is that good of a platform, if you want something that just works.

I got a Lumia 1020 and it was a gamble, but it paid off for me. I don't care about having every app out there, the phones run really good, and the UI was unique and really tailored for mobile first, which made it a joy to use. It took a bit of a step back now with Windows 10 and the generic app appearance, but it's still ahead of the competition imo.

Having said all this, I don't think anyone will jump ship for the new Lumias, and even I am not really hot on them. Besides having really great specs, I am really disappointed with the physical appearance of these phone. My 1020 is probably the best looking gadget I've ever owned, and I love that design. The only problem I had with it (rounded edges make it a bit hard to hold) was fixed with the *30 line. But these new ones look so generic and lack any personality whatsoever. 830 looks about a 100 times more premium than the new phones.

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones.

Off the top of my head, security (over Android.)  Having more invested into MSes ecosystem than Googles.  Enterprise support (for some people.)  Every Apple user I know bitching about iTunes. 

I don't see what's so compelling about anything else.  But if I had to leave WP I'd go iOS.

Not to mention as little as I use my laptop I could easily sell it off and go with Continuum.  For the most part, I'd only be using two devices after that (not getting rid of my Android tab, but I won't use it for much.)

I actually do plan to get the 950 already, though I haven't decided when the best time to do it is.

I can only think of one thing why would be Windows Phones be interesting...a novelty. I was actually looking to buy 640 to check out the platform thouroughly, but these are still ~130 euros here...that is ~160$ and it is too much for my playtoy. The most troubling thing about the Lumia 950 is it's performance. Compared to same hardware on Android (Nexus 5x) Lumia 950 is ~50% slower in various benchmarks. Maybe Microsoft will resolve Windows Phone 10 issues within a year, but then whole new generation of phones will be available, including Lumias, if the platform lives that long. 

True. Windows phones will be a novelty. Nothing will change after 1 year. Windows 10 Mobile may be in few other phones but those are just created by the companies to claim 'We make Windows Mobiles too!'.I don't believe in Benchmarks but that phone is more expensive for what it offers. Sure its for the fans alone but I am sure not all fans will enjoy is thoroughly. Now since Microsoft has told that they will be reducing the number of models, expect the Windows market share to even fall. I want a new Windows Mobile too and I am also interested in the 640 just for 'checking it out'. Unless something radical happens to Windows Mobile (unlikely), things will stay the same. And I feel this is what Microsoft wants. I don't know why but all their actions (rather the lack of it) seems to point that they want a smaller user base. Maybe shut it down permanently? But that ain't going to happen. They have compromised their biggest strength-Windows for Windows mobile. They have invested deeply to go through this route. They should know what they are doing, because if they don't know the entire company could take a big hit.

this is probably the reason Joe Belfiore was fired sent on a year long holiday. At this point, i'm not sure sure what W10 M brings to the table over W8.1M 

I've moved over to Android in the last 3 months. Its laggy pos but its got every feature i use and can think of. not to mention apps. but I'm going to continue using Android. Kinda like Chrome. There is no alternative.

Only think that'll get me back to W10M is a surface phone with a Xiaomi price. 

  • Like 2

I urge to read once again Arstehnica review. Windows 10 phone is dog slow compared to Android (not sure were the tests conducted on 5.1 or 6.0). The other thing is You can replace texting app in Android, as You can replace almost anything else on user end. Neither Windows Moblie was what it once was nor Andorid is. Android has made significant strides in optimizations, while still keeping modularity. Windows Mobile seems to have gone backwards as feature parity with iOS and Android are closer.

benchmarks are only comparable when comparing the similar 2 things of the same family.

Hardware wise it's pretty good, comparable to other phones on the market. Not sure why the 3D performance is so low. Is W10 Mobile even finished yet? This has to be one of the worst handled launches ever. It's a shame because Windows Phones are pretty intuitive despite some shortcomings. If Microsoft put some real leadership in its mobile division, they could do a lot better, but at this point it's very late in the game.

As for this review, it's funny that the iris scanner didn't work well with his coke bottle glasses. Obviously he wrote it in anger. There are better written reviews out there.

Lumia 920 owner here. This review is EXACTLY what I wanted to say!

I am NOT an English major and writing long, non-scientific papers is hard for me, but THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WANTED TO SAY!

I wanted McLaren, but that was cancelled and now the Lumia 950 is a big letdown, in term of build, quality, everything.

I like Peter Bright and MJF but I don't trust them for good reviews. In this review, he has written off Windows Hello because of problems with his eye glasses. There are reports on reddit that it works fine with eye glasses. Same with MJF, she couldn't get it to work properly with Surface Book whereas every other review mentioned how fast and reliable it is.

I urge to read once again Arstehnica review. Windows 10 phone is dog slow compared to Android (not sure were the tests conducted on 5.1 or 6.0). The other thing is You can replace texting app in Android, as You can replace almost anything else on user end. Neither Windows Moblie was what it once was nor Andorid is. Android has made significant strides in optimizations, while still keeping modularity. Windows Mobile seems to have gone backwards as feature parity with iOS and Android are closer.

I wouldn't read much into browser benchmarks because I know Edge runs circles around Chrome in real world usage (provided it doesn't crash :laugh:), The Gfxbench is probably just drivers as the review mentions.

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

I mean sure for $30 I would buy a Lumia 640 to play with and to experiment on.

I wouldn't.  Had the 640 for two weeks and sent it back.  Not even worth $30

Everyone kept saying "you dont need mega hardware for windows" yet it ran like an absolute dog

 

I wouldn't.  Had the 640 for two weeks and sent it back.  Not even worth $30

Everyone kept saying "you dont need mega hardware for windows" yet it ran like an absolute dog

Having used both Lumia 630 and Lumia 640, I call ###### on this post. The 640 is an amazing phone for the price.

this is probably the reason Joe Belfiore was fired sent on a year long holiday. At this point, i'm not sure sure what W10 M brings to the table over W8.1M 

I've moved over to Android in the last 3 months. Its laggy pos but its got every feature i use and can think of. not to mention apps. but I'm going to continue using Android. Kinda like Chrome. There is no alternative.

Only think that'll get me back to W10M is a surface phone with a Xiaomi price. 

IMHO, Android is still not a good alternative.

If my friend/family ask me for advice on which phone to buy I generally

  1. buy windows phone as long as it has all the apps you need (in most cases this works out well)
  2. if WP is missing the app(s) you need, buy an iPhone
  3. buy Android as the last resort (need apps but don't want to pay Apple tax)

Having used both Lumia 630 and Lumia 640, I call ###### on this post. The 640 is an amazing phone for the price.

The vodafone smart ultra 6 is an amazing phone for the price.  The 640/xl felt like a three year old phone.

Too many app resumes for my liking, and multitasking was very slow.

Not trying to troll, I just don't see what is so compelling about Windows phones. I just don't know what about them would jingle someones jangles.

I mean sure for $30 I would buy a Lumia 640 to play with and to experiment on.

The real question is, what is soo compelling about these other platforms? Sure they have their good points, but so has Windows. I prefer to have a secure platform with lesser apps than a platform that is not secure, doesn't get updated but has more apps.

this is probably the reason Joe Belfiore was fired sent on a year long holiday. At this point, i'm not sure sure what W10 M brings to the table over W8.1M 

Sigh, he wasn't fired or sent away, he took a break, for 7 months. You act like such long vacations never happen. You're wrong.

Anyway, if I read into the review and scroll down to the end. The "bad" points are kinda... odd. He mentions Continuum as a bad thing (after also listing it as a good thing). However, in what way is it bad? He says that it "might not be the future". So what? Does that make it a bad thing to have? No. And "Windows 10 Mobile does not feel ready for prime time.", nothing an update can't solve, and honestly, it runs quiet stable on my different Windows phones. Expencive realy isn't a bad thing, you might find it bad, but it is still a flagship device, and still cheaper then its competitors, so no, not expensive at all. And finally "Limited carrier compatibility in the US", that's an US only issue, and not even close to relevant for the majority of the Windows phone user base. Honestly, most of his points are just personal experience that can be totally different for others (or can be solved for him), location related issues or plain weird.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Russia was able to invade Crimea because of those people. But my point is that I've personally heard how great it was to be "back in Russia" right afterwards - look how great it is now. I've asked you a question in another comment which you haven't answered, so I'll ask it again: is it better now without "Europrats"?
    • ZimaBoard 2 1664 Starter Kit review: it's a cool and affordable DIY NAS by Steven Parker IceWhale Technology reached out to me asking if I was interested in testing the ZimaBoard 2, and after convincing them to send me the Starter Kit, it arrived at my doorstep in May. A bit of background: it is a Shanghai-based Chinese company founded in 2020, which specializes in single-board servers and personal cloud solutions. From searching around online, user feedback on the company and ZimaOS is mostly positive, so we're off to a good start. In addition, I should probably point out that although they do not have a large portfolio of NAS devices, with just four of what they do offer, they seem to have covered everything from a relatively low-priced entry point with the ZimaBoard 2, right up to the high end, with the ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack that even includes an NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000. Anyway, as already mentioned, what we have today is the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit, and here are the full specifications: ZimaBoard 2 Model 832, 1664 CPU Intel Core N150 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.6 GHz) TDP: 6W (Base) 10W (Max) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.00 GHz) Memory 8 GB, 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (soldered) Disk Capacity 60 TB (30 TB x 2) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Storage 2 x SATA 3.0 6Gb/s Ports with Power Bootloader 32 GB, 64 GB eMMC Network 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE PCIe 1 x PCIe 3.0 (via LPC) USB Ports 2 x USB-A 3.1 (5 Gbps) Display Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Virtualization Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Size (H/W/D) 140mm x 83mm x 31mm Weight 0.4 kg (only ZimaBoard 2 device) Power 12v 5A Power Supply Warranty 1 year (Global) 2 Years (EU) OS ZimaOS v1.6.1 MSRP $339, $399 ($548.60) As you can see above, there are two variants of the ZimaBoard 2. The lesser variant has half the eMMC storage and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $60 less than the top variant we are testing today. The above pricing is only for the ZimaBoard 2. I put the MSRP of the Starter Kit next to it in brackets, although as of publishing, it is discounted to $534.50. The ZimaBoard 2 started life on Kickstarter and shipped to backers in August last year. It became available via the official website in late 2025 and Q1 2026. This hobbyist NAS contains the still relatively new N150 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, although in this case, the memory is integrated into the board itself, so it will not be possible to upgrade or expand the amount. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Twin Lake series that sits near the bottom of the N-series, designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops, and as such has a base level TDP of just 6W. As I have noted before, we are seeing another NAS with a great amount of RAM. It's important to mention that the ZimaBoard 2's memory is integrated into the base board (which is why they have two variants of it). As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The Starter Kit came in one outer box with several packages inside it (shown above). I forgot to take pics of it because when it arrived, it wasn't clear what was inside, and I had to confirm with my contact that I received the entire Starter Kit. In the box ZimaBoard 2 ZimaBoard 2 HDD Expansion Bracket + PCIe card frame Zimaboard Mini DisplayPort Male to HDMI Female Cable 4K 60Hz Zimaboard PCIe 3.0 x4 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Adapter Card Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws Design Where to start? You'd be forgiven for mistaking it as an SSD enclosure if not for all the ports on it. It is completely made out of metal, and the top is an entire heatsink. It has a premium feel about it, but it definitely looks like a hobby device. As you will see, the completed build looks like it belongs in a server or meter closet rather than as a showpiece on someone's desk. On what I am calling the rear, there's a Mini DisplayPort (1.4), two 2.5 GbE ports, with Type A 3.1 USB ports, and then the barrel connector port. Around the front, there are two SATA6 ports with a power connector in the middle. Left side Right side One side is completely free of ports. On the other there's a slit that allows for the feed of a CPU fan cable, and a PCIe 3.0 X4 slot. Top Bottom The top is entirely made up of a heatsink except for the extended height for the I/O on the rear. Around the other side, you can find the ZIMA branding and some regulatory information stamped near the bottom. As you may see from the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, it scratches quite easily from just moving it around on my Ikea island. Teardown Before we get started, let's have a look at this thing on the inside. The steps to get to the board are as follows: Remove the four smaller Torx screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2; Remove the four larger Torx screws on the sides of the device; Carefully unstick the CMOS battery from the PCB; Remove two Phillips screws on the PCB; Lift out the PCB. Yes, as you can tell from the instructions, you need three different tools to remove Torx and Phillips screws (10 in total), and unhelpfully, one of the screws is located under the CMOS battery, which is stuck onto the PCB. Building Now comes the fun part. Because the ZimaSpace website does not provide any guidance on how to put the Starter Kit together. They only have guidance for connecting the CPU fan. However, they did upload a video to their YouTube channel that shows the entire process. To install the fan, first remove the four screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, then on the inside, there is a CPU FAN connector where you can attach the fan, reattach the ZimaBoard 2 frame, and feed the fan cable through the provided slit. Then remove the nearest screw on the side and attach the fan frame to the side of the device using the same screw. ZimaBard 2 screws Aligning the screws Bottom view Remember those four screws we removed to access the CPU FAN? Longer screws are provided in the box with the HDD Expansion Bracket, which is what you will now need to attach the ZimaBoard 2 to it. Helpfully, the orientation on how to attach it is made obvious when the frame can only be screwed on at the same overall length as the ZimaBoard 2. If you do it the wrong way around (which is what I did initially) one side hangs off the frame, and it becomes difficult to attach the PCIe Adapter Card cable. PCIe card frame Other side PCIe slot connector Next, it's time to attach the PCIe card frame, which is fastened with the help of 3.5-inch SATA HDD (3 screws). These are toolless screws that you can just use your fingers to fasten them with. Then it is time to connect the provided PCIe cable with the slot connector on one side of the ZimaBoard 2, feed it through the bottom of the HDD frame, and fasten it with two standoffs. Both bracket options 2280 standoffs with 2x 4TB MP44Q The PCIe 3.0 X4 card comes with a short bracket option, handy if you decide to place it inside a different NAS or rack server, but here we need the long bracket. Oddly enough, the M.2 standoffs were preinstalled into the 22110 position, but extra standoffs are included in the box, which I installed at the 2280 position for our use. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $478.99 (the lowest price for 3 months) that TEAMGROUP supplied us with Then we have the almost completed build, you just need to push the card into the PCIe slot. Unfortunately, IceWhale Technologies did not provide a screw for the PCIe card frame (this is also apparent in their own video). Here it is at several different angles, with the last pic showing the SATA Y-Cable connected to the two WD Red Plus 4TB drives. Setup and Usage Next, you connect your cables to the I/O, and the ZimaBoard 2 powers on automatically, as there is no power button on the device. Power is controlled through the Settings in ZimaOS. BIOS The ZimaBoard 2 includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2, 3], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to a SATA/USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the ZimaBoard 2 can be reached by navigating to the IP address (shown if you have a monitor connected), or you can find it using the ZIMA Client desktop application, which is essentially a Zima device finder. Initializing the ZimaBoard 2 The ZimaOS setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full above, it basically consists of setting up an account and some handy tips, and that's that! Post Setup (ZimaOS update) Upon first boot, you are alerted that there is a ZimaOS update from 1.5.0 to 1.6.1, which I applied; the full process is shown above with the changelog. ZimaBoard 2 Storage Setup Next, it is time to set up the storage. ZimaOS actually throws everything onto the eMMC flash drive; it is also the default location of AppData, which is definitely something to be wary about, as the 45GB available storage could fill up quickly. HDDs I first attempted to create a Storage Pool using the two 4TB WD Red Plus NAS drives, and got an error message: After several attempts and then looking online, I discovered it was a bug with ZimaOS where the fix was simply to reboot ZimaOS and then try again, this time I was able to create a RAID mirror using the two drives. SSDs I did the same for the SSDs, as you will see in the above gallery, when I created the second Storage Pool, it only allowed me to select available drives. ZimaBoard 2 AppData ZimaOS comes with an App Store that includes a repository of almost 400 apps, so you will be able to find most of what you'll need for a NAS (although after a quick search, I wasn't able to find a Surveillance Manager), and now comes the important part: moving the default AppData location off the 45GB eMMC and onto a larger volume: Open Settings Then Apps Then, in the Select a new location field, click on the new Storage volume you want to move it to (in my case, the Apps Storage Pool), which is the SSD RAID mirror. Confirm the Migration warning Be praised! You can also do this for Docker (which by default installs onto the 45GB eMMC flash drive) and the User database. Plex Setup Next, I tested the configuration by installing the Plex Server app from the App Store. The library folders must already exist (which I placed into the Storage Pool). Plex Server setup is straightforward and requires very little configuration. In my case, all I had to do was add the media path I just created, which you can also browse to using the folder icon in the path field. In addition, you can now map the new Media library in Windows Explorer using the Zima Client. Oddly enough, it is not possible to access the ZimaBoard 2 over the Network Neighborhood; you must map drives using the client, which is shown in the last image in the above gallery. I watched one of my Blu-Ray rips, which is Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos, and the content played fine with no stuttering or buffering, which is what anyone needs in this scenario. ZimaBoard 2 Zima Client mobile app There's also a client for mobile. It is pretty barebones, as shown in the above gallery, for example, the Apps screen launches the WebUI for that app, and the Backup must be done manually. On opening Backup, you can select internal storage folders on your phone to backup to the ZimaBoard 2's storage, and although this is constantly scanned, the backup action itself must be manually triggered. There is an option to allow foreground backup (last image in the above gallery), but this basically means the queued backup gets triggered when you manually open the app. Benchmarking SATA PCIe 3.0 X4 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 2.5 GbE was well within acceptable ranges. Writes were generally better on the SSD RAID mirror. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 2.5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 2.5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. Thermals Top PCIe card SATA HDDs Next, I measured some hotspots while playing content on Plex. It's fair to say this will perform better than a NAS that is enclosed in a metal or plastic case, as almost everything storage-wise is exposed! Anyway, the ZimaBoard 2 did not break a sweat with Plex streaming or disk benchmarks. ZimaOS Factory Reset ZimaOS does not include a factory reset option. Instead, you have to download the ZimaOS image and flash it to the eMMC manually. The flashing process is shown in the above gallery. The steps to do so are listed below: Download the ZimaOS image here; Open BalenaEtcher (Run as Administrator) and select the image; Select your inserted USB drive (min 8 GB) Flash to it; Connect your USB drive, monitor, keyboard, USB hub (optional), mouse (optional), and network cable (recommended) to the ZimaBoard 2; Connect power and press F11 continuously; Select your USB drive starting with UEFI in the boot device menu; Press Enter on the Install ZimaOS option; Select /dev/mmcblk0 (MMC) flash drive as target; Confirm with (three times) to wipe the target disk; Wait a couple of minutes while ZimaOS installs; Remove the USB drive and confirm with a reboot; Your ZimaBoard 2 has been factory reset. However, you don't have to stick with ZimaOS, in fact the company also offers official CasaOS images, that are based on Debian; or as they say themselves, put anything you want on this "hackable single board server" it's up to you. Conclusion I had a lot of fun putting this together. I've custom-built all my own PCs and servers since the 90s, and this is the first time I have had to put a NAS together. Even if the actual base ZimaBoard 2 was already a completed build, it still feels pretty custom. I just wish that IceWhale Technology included a getting-started guide in the box for the Start Kit, which would have really completed this kit. Instead, I had to search for the official video on the YouTube channel to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong. So who is this for? Definitely the hobbyist who is comfortable building their own PC and servers. It also has a much smaller footprint than its nearest equivalent (in terms of specs), like the Beelink Me Pro, which is another NAS I will be testing soon. Although the Beelink does not come with the PCIe 3.0 X4 expansion, the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit suddenly looks to be a great bargain, even if it only offers the two 3.5-inch bays over the four in the other example. It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N150 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the ZimaBoard 2 is intended for, media streaming and backup. It also looks like the IceWhale Technology staff are quite active in the official forums helping people with issues they come across with ZimaOS and the devices, peer support seems to be good as well, I was quickly able to find why I was not able to create a new Storage Pool in ZimaOS v1.6.1 even though that is quite a serious bug, hopefully it will be fixed in the next update. If you are comfortable with the command line and Docker, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. This was my first time with ZimaOS. It seems a bit barebones in comparison to the likes of Synology DSM, TOS, and UGOS, but it has a ton of apps to get you started with your home or small business NAS. Where to buy As of publishing, IceWhale Technology is running a discount of up to 5% for the Starter Kit. If you opt to get just the ZimaBoard 2 itself, it does come with a SATA Y-Cable, so you will be able to connect up to two 3.5-inch HDDs to it. ZimaBoard 2 1668 Starter Kit for $534.50 on Amazon US (was $548.60) ZimaBoard 2 832 Starter Kit for $372.88 on Amazon US (was $390.60) Zimaboard 2 1668 (16GB+64GB) for $419.90 on Amazon US Zimaboard 2 832 (8GB+32GB) for $359.90 on Amazon Disclosure: IceWhale Technology provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. Good to know The Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It's in the Insider's group so yes it's technically beta, though these days it's hard to see much of a difference unless you opt for the most extreme beta builds, which I don't. When I moved here from the Release Preview channel I did so primarily because I wanted to see how well the restored taskbar functionality (restored from Win10, and earlier) is working and whether it was time to finally abandon SAB--and it is--working fine, so far. Not as polished as SAB, but it'll do for me.
    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      222
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!