Windows Phone is dead. Now what?


Recommended Posts

Quote

Windows Phone started off life as a promising alternative to Android and iOS five years ago. Microsoft positioned its range of Windows Phone 7 handsets as the true third mobile ecosystem, but it's time to admit it has failed. If a lack of devices from phone makers and even Microsoft itself wasn't enough evidence, the final nail in the coffin hit today. Microsoft only sold 4.5 million Lumia devices in the recent quarter, compared to 10.5 million at the same time last year. That's a massive 57 percent drop. Even a 57 percent increase wouldn't be enough to save Windows Phone right now.[...]

With Lumia sales on the decline and Microsoft's plan to not produce a large amount of handsets, it's clear we're witnessing the end of Windows Phone.  [...]

it's the end of the line. Farewell, Windows Phone.

[Source]

 

So with that out of the way. What's next for MS's mobile/handheld efforts? Are they going to build upon Android/iOS to offer their services? Is there still a future for Windows (of some kind) on phones?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1287164-windows-phone-is-dead-now-what/
Share on other sites

I think with the rising popularity/sales of Microsoft's Surface ... they really need to release a phone under that name.  At the same time...they can not expect to sale the devices at equal to or higher than the competitions price ... or people will not jump ship. 

 

I wouldn't call Windows Phone dead yet as Anibal said ... Microsoft is keeping it on life support.  It will be dead when they've decided that enough is enough...which could be much sooner than later. 

2 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

It will be dead when they've decided that enough is enough...which could be much sooner than later. 

So let's speculate, if they did that: what would be their mobile story? Are we sure this could actually happen. I'm assuming they have the resources to drag WP along endlessly regardless of its success.

I was on Windows Phone starting with Windows Mobile 5 -> 6. Then I got a Samsung Focus (WP7), a 920 and then an 830 when the 920 died. My wife followed a similar path but ended at the 920. We both loved the platform but the app thing was getting really old.

 

I was in the Insider Preview since July on my daily driver, and just didn't see improvements. I felt Windows 10 Mobile was a disaster and saw the writing on the wall. After seeing the 950 and being completely disappointed after waiting for a worthy upgrade, I finally gave up.

 

We both moved to iPhone 6s in November. While I think WP is a superior OS, honestly the Microsoft apps are BETTER on iOS than WP. It's really sad. Don't regret the move one bit.

 

Please, as soon as I saw it was more Windows hating FUD from the Verge, I tuned out.  I will say that I got an iPad, and find it to be awesome as a tablet compared to my wife's Windows 10 tablet.

2 minutes ago, Active. said:

So let's speculate, if they did that: what would be their mobile story? Are we sure this could actually happen. I'm assuming they have the resources to drag WP along endlessly regardless of its success.

Good question ... which I don't know.  In reality I do not think they will bail out of the mobile market all together ... because it is (still) a growing sector as these devices are becoming more powerful and productive.  Microsoft is in a predicament...one of which I do not know how they get out of.  Consumers are pretty much split between Android and iOS and it will be hard to pry those devices from their hands.  It isn't just having something better to offer (say a more powerful phone and UI/UX) ... but also and incentive to switch.  Once you've invested in a particular ecosystem (be it Windows, OSX, iOS, Android) it is hard to move ... at least for a lot of people (which MS needs).  What does WP offer that I can not get with Android or iOS?    Continuum?  Ability to have a similar experience on the phone as I do on a W10 machine?  None of that stuff interest me ... and I'm not sure if it interest users of Android or iOS either.  My web browsing history is synced because of Chrome; my items are stored on Drive/OneDrive...I mean I just do not see the need to abandon Android for a WP.  Of course the biggest issue with WP is the app gap...off the top of my head I have two very important apps on Android (both financial) which aren't on the WP.  But this isn't about me ... I just think it highlights a problem Microsoft has.  They release their own apps for competing phones before they do for their platform?  I just don't get it ... nor do I know where they go from here.  Heck...they may just want to start releasing Android phones.

:)

 

  • Like 2
5 minutes ago, scumdogmillionaire said:

I was on Windows Phone starting with Windows Mobile 5 -> 6. Then I got a Samsung Focus (WP7), a 920 and then an 830 when the 920 died. My wife followed a similar path but ended at the 920. We both loved the platform but the app thing was getting really old.

 

I was in the Insider Preview since July on my daily driver, and just didn't see improvements. I felt Windows 10 Mobile was a disaster and saw the writing on the wall. After seeing the 950 and being completely disappointed after waiting for a worthy upgrade, I finally gave up.

 

We both moved to iPhone 6s in November. While I think WP is a superior OS, honestly the Microsoft apps are BETTER on iOS than WP. It's really sad. Don't regret the move one bit.

 

You're not alone. I had a friend finally switch to the dark side as well this Christmas. He had stuck it out with Microsoft since the Mobile 6 days as well, back when I was still using a flip-phone lol.

 

You're absolutely right though. The OS is not bad at all; however, if I'm going to avoid an iPhone, I likely want to be able to do more with my phone. Unfortunately, that means having apps and customization. For those who want that? There's Android running with flagship devices with choices. Outside of that though, not many people are looking over to the Lumias saying, "Hey man, what's THAT?!"

32 minutes ago, vcfan said:

the verge lol

Tom Warren, who use to be with Neowin, wrote the article. While normally I'd say the same thing, he's one of the few writers there I trust.

 

And at any rate, he isn't wrong, just look at the numbers. How long can Microsoft justify to shareholders that a failing product is worth keeping around, at least in the current form?

Just an opinion piece.  Anything could happen.

 

With that said, MS will not get rid of WP anytime soon, if ever.   MS has the money to keep to keep it going for a long time and their egos wont let them admit defeat.    Look how long BB is staying afloat....MS has the means to keep WP around for a much longer time.

1 hour ago, Pork Chopper said:

Any phone without quality apps will fail.

Windows Phone has been around since long before there was such thing as apps, and it didn't fail. Obviously it didn't do well since Windows Phone still isn't popular even though it's been around longer than iPhone.

As a windows fan I agree but this isn't actually news anymore......MS was late and kept changing which hurt development of apps, that and no marketing whatsoever because why market something that is always incomplete? Then there's the Zune music software/xbox music fiasco, laughing at the iPhone, lack of apps and featureless common apps like FB and twitter. I have had a lot of windows phones and where they lost me was Zune software, I originally got a WP because of it and fell in love with music again...now the groove app is ok but no where near what Zune was.....software I mean. Now we have the 950 series failure, which is basically a developers phone that is broken. BT doesn't work, restarts, no apps and iris scanning that isn't consistent. I can't even set a ringtone without settings crashing! MS just released a ringtone maker that doesn't even work on their flagship phone!!! What MS shouldn't do is release a Surface phone with W10M on it that doesn't RUN ANDROID OR IOS APPS natively. And google play If it android. W10M would be a nice android skin and that's how they will succeed and at the same time work on a dedicated OS that will run those apps natively on all platforms. MS will make a big mistake if they tarnish the Surface name by releasing a mobile handset with W10M it will not save it because there are no apps!! period. That's the bottom line, no one wants a phone with no app support.

2 hours ago, Active. said:

Is there still a future for Windows (of some kind) on phones?

There's only a chance for Windows phones if Microsoft can grasp the fact that most people are familiar with the power of traditional Windows on the desktop, and would buy a phone which closely mimics that experience.

 

Unfortunately, Microsoft has taken the opposite approach of creating an inferior, watered-down mobile OS, and then trying to get most of their user base to get accustomed to that same inferior watered-down experience on the desktop.

  • Like 3
10 minutes ago, mrdeezus said:

As a windows fan I agree but this isn't actually news anymore......MS was late and kept changing which hurt development of apps, that and no marketing whatsoever because why market something that is always incomplete? Then there's the Zune music software/xbox music fiasco, laughing at the iPhone, lack of apps and featureless common apps like FB and twitter. I have had a lot of windows phones and where they lost me was Zune software, I originally got a WP because of it and fell in love with music again...now the groove app is ok but no where near what Zune was.....software I mean. Now we have the 950 series failure, which is basically a developers phone that is broken. BT doesn't work, restarts, no apps and iris scanning that isn't consistent. I can't even set a ringtone without settings crashing! MS just released a ringtone maker that doesn't even work on their flagship phone!!! What MS shouldn't do is release a Surface phone with W10M on it that doesn't RUN ANDROID OR IOS APPS natively. And google play If it android. W10M would be a nice android skin and that's how they will succeed and at the same time work on a dedicated OS that will run those apps natively on all platforms. MS will make a big mistake if they tarnish the Surface name by releasing a mobile handset with W10M it will not save it because there are no apps!! period. That's the bottom line, no one wants a phone with no app support.

Microsoft didn't do too well with their own mobile OS... so they should become one of 1,000 other Android makers?

 

I realize they're out of ideas... but this one doesn't seem so hot.

4 hours ago, LUTZIFER said:

Windows Phone has been around since long before there was such thing as apps, and it didn't fail. Obviously it didn't do well since Windows Phone still isn't popular even though it's been around longer than iPhone.

Incorrect. Windows Phone post-dates the mobile app revolution, by a considerable margin. You're thinking of Windows Mobile, which was an entirely different beast.  It's not just a rebrand, you know... It's a completely different OS.

7 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

That's right, when you have zero argument, attack the source instead. Sad.

I don't know enough about The Verge to say much about it, but some news sites definitely have a strong anti MS bias to the point of posting really pathetic pieces.

 

As for W10M, I wouldn't say it's dead until MS does.  People who do like the platform are likely waiting for the 10 rollout to finally occur, and the mid ranged phones.  The 650 should be a good start, but I don't know what else they have planned (does anyone?)

 

Until those releases happen and/or MS actually opens up about its future plans, it's just a very awkward time to buy.

For me, the answer for Microsoft's mobile efforts is easy: abandon the windows phone hardware and bolster their software, service and consultancy expertise around iOS. Look at the IBM + Apple partnership (https://www.apple.com/business/mobile-enterprise-apps/). That should have been Microsoft. IBM basically builds custom apps for business customers and provides data analytic, while Apple provides the hardware and special AppleCare for business.

 

Why hasn't Microsoft worked to pre-install Office on iPads in education? (https://www.apple.com/education/preview/) Why don't we hear much about Windows Intune for iPhones, iPads and other bring-your-own devices? Why isn't swift (now opened source) supported in visual studio?

1 minute ago, sorlag said:

Microsoft arrived late for nearly everything and fought against big market leaders until it dominated each space. If only young Bill Gates was back, with his skills... He would stomp phone competition as a young hungry microsoft leader, that he was back then.

Back then, they were hit with an antitrust lawsuit that basically paralyzed them (to some degree.)  Which is funny, because other companies later basically got away with murder compared.

6 minutes ago, randomevent said:

Back then, they were hit with an antitrust lawsuit that basically paralyzed them (to some degree.)  Which is funny, because other companies later basically got away with murder compared.

Windows Mobile was released in 2000, right after the anti-truth issues. Microsoft basically failed on it's own.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!