Windows Phone is dead. Now what?


Recommended Posts

Honestly it's been dead for sometime. The only reason it even exists is because Microsoft refuses to admit defeat and continues to pour billions into it. I suppose you could call it a PR exercise. Another reason of course is that without a mobile effort themselves, they might be viewed as just another patent troll.

microsoft needs to relies they cant compete with apple. 

 

hell I have an android and I cant compete with apple. everyone I work with owns apple phones.

 

they should just stick with windows computers/laptops 

 

just stop

 

stop making windows mobile builds and focus more on computer builds.

 

 

On 29.1.2016 at 10:33 PM, Active. said:

...and now Ars with their own gloomy take: The fight for a third-best smartphone OS has been lost. By everyone.

 

Quote

To be an existing Windows Phone 8.1 user is to sit by and watch while Microsoft ports every selling point of Windows Phone as a platform to iOS and Android. [...]

 

if you’re recommending a smartphone to someone in 2016, Android and iOS can do pretty much anything that anyone needs to be able to do. Windows Phone and BlackBerry 10 cannot, and they’re best left to people who care more about brand loyalty than functionality. [...]

 

With Windows Mobile fading, there’s essentially no hope that any third-party operating system will ever gain the critical mass of users it would need to compete with iOS or Android. [...] the lack of a strong third pillar in the mobile world [...]is bad for everyone

 

  • 3 months later...

 

Windows Phone market share sinks below 1 percent

http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/23/11743594/microsoft-windows-phone-market-share-below-1-percent

 

Say what you will about Windows Phone. And I can't say that I personally was much of a fan. But I'm not at all looking forward to an Android-only ecosystem. Hopefully Apple at least will continue to provide strong (profitable) competition in the mobile space and Microsoft will come up with something at some point.

Microsoft won PC but lost mobile, what now?

http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/25/11767200/microsoft-mobile-past-and-future

 

Another attempt at answering the question posed by this thread. They trace the problem back to Vista and even further back. I've been criticizing this for a long time:

 

Quote

Microsoft was obsessed with having Windows everywhere.

Quote

Windows Phone's constant reboots were all part of a strategy to get to a single version of Windows across PCs, tablets, and phones. It was an admirable strategy, but consumer confidence was hit time and time again as a result.

Quote

Microsoft chased after the iPad with Windows 8, just like it had chased after the iPhone with Windows Phone 7. The result after this hectic scramble is Windows 10. Microsoft has finally reached its goal of Windows everywhere, but it's a little too late for its mobile ambitions.

Quote

Microsoft is now facing the reality that people don't need Windows on their phones. That's a reality that has always scared the software giant, and it's now finally time for the company to embrace it, move on, and make great software for iOS and Android devices. 

 

As the first commenter on one of Ars Technica's recent articles about 'Windows Everywhere' put it:

 

Quote

It's a little ironic that in the summer they have achieved Windows everywhere, that it would coincide with my first summer of Windows nowhere.

 

Each company has ups and downs....   (development, marketing, whatever you call it, no matter what it is) that they have own mistakes or get in bad timing, etc.

 

MS will do better when the time is right with their new devices and OS gets matured enough for desktop and mobile.

 

Remember, when Android was released ... they were struggling and the customers were having problems with the devices such as freezing, rebooting, etc... and Google has improved a lot since. Now where they are at...  Their userbase has grown since.

 

Apple has improved since iPhone 3G.      Of course some iOS devices have problems in 9.x  but hopefully they will do better when iOS 10 (or whatever they call it) comes out.  

 

Keep it in your mind...  each company has mistakes... especially ups and downs.. 

 

 

21 minutes ago, TAZMINATOR said:

 MS will do better when the time is right with their new devices and OS gets matured enough for desktop and mobile. 

When is the time right? I don't really see how the OS can get mature without anyone using it. Someone in the Verge comment thread posted the progression of Windows Smartphone OS market share.  

 

Quote

Microsoft Windows Smartphone OS Market Share over the Past 10 Years
2006: 12%
2007: 12% (iPhone launched)
2008: 11%
2009: 9%
2010: 5%
2011: 3% (Nokia joins Windows ecosystem)
2012: 3%
2013: 3%
2014: 3% (Nokia sells handset business to Microsoft)
2015: 2%
2016: 1% (optimistic estimate, may end up below 0.5%)
Source: TomiAhonen Consulting May 2016
The above may be freely shared

 

1 hour ago, Active. said:

When is the time right? I don't really see how the OS can get mature without anyone using it. Someone in the Verge comment thread posted the progression of Windows Smartphone OS market share.  

 

 

Look at Android with small userbase back in the day... now look where they are at.

 

Just wait and see... MS will do something about that and make it grow somehow if they plan to make some changes to OS/devices.

 

 

If they are not able to grow, then they will consider to shut it down and do something else.

  • 2 weeks later...
On 5/26/2016 at 9:44 PM, TAZMINATOR said:

Look at Android with small userbase back in the day... now look where they are at.

 

Just wait and see... MS will do something about that and make it grow somehow if they plan to make some changes to OS/devices.

 

 

If they are not able to grow, then they will consider to shut it down and do something else.

Microsoft already gave up on  mobile space in this form. If Surface phone ever arrives it won't be mass market device, but rather a niche one with super high price tag since Intel Atom is dead and core M is both too expensive and too power hungry. It is clear that UWP will stay on PC/tablet space and that is one more reason to think twice about Windows phone.

On 5/26/2016 at 10:49 PM, Active. said:

Microsoft won PC but lost mobile, what now?

They won PC at what cost? 

 

Forcing unwilling gullible users to accept upgrade. Building extreme amount of telemetry sending code into windows 10. People hated the so called Modern interface which is slower to respond and clunky as hell. The hate is going on since Windows 8. But did they learn from it? No, instead, they are hellbent on replacing the (once nice) interface of Windows 7 with this rejected piece of turd. 

 

The insane amount of bad-will has been generated. So many unpopular decisions will continue to cause biggest damage in the long run.

6 hours ago, Chitale said:

They won PC at what cost? 

 

Forcing unwilling gullible users to accept upgrade. Building extreme amount of telemetry sending code into windows 10. People hated the so called Modern interface which is slower to respond and clunky as hell. The hate is going on since Windows 8. But did they learn from it? No, instead, they are hellbent on replacing the (once nice) interface of Windows 7 with this rejected piece of turd. 

 

The insane amount of bad-will has been generated. So many unpopular decisions will continue to cause biggest damage in the long run.

You are joking right? They won the PC far before telemetry existed  or any upgrade shenanigans or even Aero. 

 

 

I still have most of my family on Windows 7. Despite the reports, it doesn't seem to be as forced as you and I are led to believe. They aren't using apps to prevent the upgrade because they don't know how. They aren't disconnected from the net so...dunno. 

 

The scenario of doom and gloom

portrayed on tech blogs is largely limited to those tech blogs with forums  that complainers flock to (social media as well). Nobody goes around singing the praises of anything (well maybe @Dot Matrix ) but complainers always air their grievances. They naturally think they are the majority as well. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by adrynalyne
  • Like 2
6 hours ago, Chitale said:

They won PC at what cost? 

 

Forcing unwilling gullible users to accept upgrade. Building extreme amount of telemetry sending code into windows 10. People hated the so called Modern interface which is slower to respond and clunky as hell. The hate is going on since Windows 8. But did they learn from it? No, instead, they are hellbent on replacing the (once nice) interface of Windows 7 with this rejected piece of turd. 

 

The insane amount of bad-will has been generated. So many unpopular decisions will continue to cause biggest damage in the long run.

 

The one common thing about those supposedly "forced" to upgrade has been so called tech savvy people doing stupid things, as if they WANT it to happen in a major way to prove a point 

 

I know of NO ONE who has been forced to upgrade, and I personally know a few ignorant types who are still avoiding it because dumb 

  • 1 year later...
On 1/28/2016 at 6:34 PM, Jim K said:

I think with the rising popularity/sales of Microsoft's Surface ... they really need to release a phone under that name.  At the same time...they can not expect to sale the devices at equal to or higher than the competitions price ... or people will not jump ship. 

 

I wouldn't call Windows Phone dead yet as Anibal said ... Microsoft is keeping it on life support.  It will be dead when they've decided that enough is enough...which could be much sooner than later. 

surface name won't help... at most they might get .5% world market share.

 

Main reason why Windows Phone died were:

1) phone had horrible specs

2) "windows" name, people don't associate "windows" with stability, security etc.. and after windows mobile crap, why would anyone buy another windows cell phone

3) Interface sucked, there is no other way of saying it, the metro square interface was generally disliked by everyone

4) and the above 3 reasons, brings us to 4th reason, no apps.

 

 

11 minutes ago, nekrosoft13 said:

surface name won't help... at most they might get .5% world market share.

 

Main reason why Windows Phone died were:

1) phone had horrible specs

2) "windows" name, people don't associate "windows" with stability, security etc.. and after windows mobile crap, why would anyone buy another windows cell phone

3) Interface sucked, there is no other way of saying it, the metro square interface was generally disliked by everyone

4) and the above 3 reasons, brings us to 4th reason, no apps.

 

 

I made those comments January of 2016.  :)

 

6 hours ago, Jim K said:

I made those comments January of 2016.  :)

 

didn't see that... anyway, the only move left for MS is to do with blackberry did.

 

Fork the android, use android to make your "own" os that would be compatible with all android apps, and they do that, for whatever is holy don't call it windows and get rid of the stupid squares.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/8/2017 at 10:01 PM, nekrosoft13 said:

didn't see that... anyway, the only move left for MS is to do with blackberry did.

 

Fork the android, use android to make your "own" os that would be compatible with all android apps, and they do that, for whatever is holy don't call it windows and get rid of the stupid squares.

 

Including the "stupid squares" is the only way MS could get me to try an Android phone again, even their own flavor of Android. The Windows Phone UI is the one of the biggest things I miss after switching to an iPhone.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!