Windows Phone is dead. Now what?


Recommended Posts

Honestly it's been dead for sometime. The only reason it even exists is because Microsoft refuses to admit defeat and continues to pour billions into it. I suppose you could call it a PR exercise. Another reason of course is that without a mobile effort themselves, they might be viewed as just another patent troll.

microsoft needs to relies they cant compete with apple. 

 

hell I have an android and I cant compete with apple. everyone I work with owns apple phones.

 

they should just stick with windows computers/laptops 

 

just stop

 

stop making windows mobile builds and focus more on computer builds.

 

 

On 29.1.2016 at 10:33 PM, Active. said:

...and now Ars with their own gloomy take: The fight for a third-best smartphone OS has been lost. By everyone.

 

Quote

To be an existing Windows Phone 8.1 user is to sit by and watch while Microsoft ports every selling point of Windows Phone as a platform to iOS and Android. [...]

 

if you’re recommending a smartphone to someone in 2016, Android and iOS can do pretty much anything that anyone needs to be able to do. Windows Phone and BlackBerry 10 cannot, and they’re best left to people who care more about brand loyalty than functionality. [...]

 

With Windows Mobile fading, there’s essentially no hope that any third-party operating system will ever gain the critical mass of users it would need to compete with iOS or Android. [...] the lack of a strong third pillar in the mobile world [...]is bad for everyone

 

  • 3 months later...

 

Windows Phone market share sinks below 1 percent

http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/23/11743594/microsoft-windows-phone-market-share-below-1-percent

 

Say what you will about Windows Phone. And I can't say that I personally was much of a fan. But I'm not at all looking forward to an Android-only ecosystem. Hopefully Apple at least will continue to provide strong (profitable) competition in the mobile space and Microsoft will come up with something at some point.

Microsoft won PC but lost mobile, what now?

http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/25/11767200/microsoft-mobile-past-and-future

 

Another attempt at answering the question posed by this thread. They trace the problem back to Vista and even further back. I've been criticizing this for a long time:

 

Quote

Microsoft was obsessed with having Windows everywhere.

Quote

Windows Phone's constant reboots were all part of a strategy to get to a single version of Windows across PCs, tablets, and phones. It was an admirable strategy, but consumer confidence was hit time and time again as a result.

Quote

Microsoft chased after the iPad with Windows 8, just like it had chased after the iPhone with Windows Phone 7. The result after this hectic scramble is Windows 10. Microsoft has finally reached its goal of Windows everywhere, but it's a little too late for its mobile ambitions.

Quote

Microsoft is now facing the reality that people don't need Windows on their phones. That's a reality that has always scared the software giant, and it's now finally time for the company to embrace it, move on, and make great software for iOS and Android devices. 

 

As the first commenter on one of Ars Technica's recent articles about 'Windows Everywhere' put it:

 

Quote

It's a little ironic that in the summer they have achieved Windows everywhere, that it would coincide with my first summer of Windows nowhere.

 

Each company has ups and downs....   (development, marketing, whatever you call it, no matter what it is) that they have own mistakes or get in bad timing, etc.

 

MS will do better when the time is right with their new devices and OS gets matured enough for desktop and mobile.

 

Remember, when Android was released ... they were struggling and the customers were having problems with the devices such as freezing, rebooting, etc... and Google has improved a lot since. Now where they are at...  Their userbase has grown since.

 

Apple has improved since iPhone 3G.      Of course some iOS devices have problems in 9.x  but hopefully they will do better when iOS 10 (or whatever they call it) comes out.  

 

Keep it in your mind...  each company has mistakes... especially ups and downs.. 

 

 

21 minutes ago, TAZMINATOR said:

 MS will do better when the time is right with their new devices and OS gets matured enough for desktop and mobile. 

When is the time right? I don't really see how the OS can get mature without anyone using it. Someone in the Verge comment thread posted the progression of Windows Smartphone OS market share.  

 

Quote

Microsoft Windows Smartphone OS Market Share over the Past 10 Years
2006: 12%
2007: 12% (iPhone launched)
2008: 11%
2009: 9%
2010: 5%
2011: 3% (Nokia joins Windows ecosystem)
2012: 3%
2013: 3%
2014: 3% (Nokia sells handset business to Microsoft)
2015: 2%
2016: 1% (optimistic estimate, may end up below 0.5%)
Source: TomiAhonen Consulting May 2016
The above may be freely shared

 

1 hour ago, Active. said:

When is the time right? I don't really see how the OS can get mature without anyone using it. Someone in the Verge comment thread posted the progression of Windows Smartphone OS market share.  

 

 

Look at Android with small userbase back in the day... now look where they are at.

 

Just wait and see... MS will do something about that and make it grow somehow if they plan to make some changes to OS/devices.

 

 

If they are not able to grow, then they will consider to shut it down and do something else.

  • 2 weeks later...
On 5/26/2016 at 9:44 PM, TAZMINATOR said:

Look at Android with small userbase back in the day... now look where they are at.

 

Just wait and see... MS will do something about that and make it grow somehow if they plan to make some changes to OS/devices.

 

 

If they are not able to grow, then they will consider to shut it down and do something else.

Microsoft already gave up on  mobile space in this form. If Surface phone ever arrives it won't be mass market device, but rather a niche one with super high price tag since Intel Atom is dead and core M is both too expensive and too power hungry. It is clear that UWP will stay on PC/tablet space and that is one more reason to think twice about Windows phone.

On 5/26/2016 at 10:49 PM, Active. said:

Microsoft won PC but lost mobile, what now?

They won PC at what cost? 

 

Forcing unwilling gullible users to accept upgrade. Building extreme amount of telemetry sending code into windows 10. People hated the so called Modern interface which is slower to respond and clunky as hell. The hate is going on since Windows 8. But did they learn from it? No, instead, they are hellbent on replacing the (once nice) interface of Windows 7 with this rejected piece of turd. 

 

The insane amount of bad-will has been generated. So many unpopular decisions will continue to cause biggest damage in the long run.

6 hours ago, Chitale said:

They won PC at what cost? 

 

Forcing unwilling gullible users to accept upgrade. Building extreme amount of telemetry sending code into windows 10. People hated the so called Modern interface which is slower to respond and clunky as hell. The hate is going on since Windows 8. But did they learn from it? No, instead, they are hellbent on replacing the (once nice) interface of Windows 7 with this rejected piece of turd. 

 

The insane amount of bad-will has been generated. So many unpopular decisions will continue to cause biggest damage in the long run.

You are joking right? They won the PC far before telemetry existed  or any upgrade shenanigans or even Aero. 

 

 

I still have most of my family on Windows 7. Despite the reports, it doesn't seem to be as forced as you and I are led to believe. They aren't using apps to prevent the upgrade because they don't know how. They aren't disconnected from the net so...dunno. 

 

The scenario of doom and gloom

portrayed on tech blogs is largely limited to those tech blogs with forums  that complainers flock to (social media as well). Nobody goes around singing the praises of anything (well maybe @Dot Matrix ) but complainers always air their grievances. They naturally think they are the majority as well. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by adrynalyne
  • Like 2
6 hours ago, Chitale said:

They won PC at what cost? 

 

Forcing unwilling gullible users to accept upgrade. Building extreme amount of telemetry sending code into windows 10. People hated the so called Modern interface which is slower to respond and clunky as hell. The hate is going on since Windows 8. But did they learn from it? No, instead, they are hellbent on replacing the (once nice) interface of Windows 7 with this rejected piece of turd. 

 

The insane amount of bad-will has been generated. So many unpopular decisions will continue to cause biggest damage in the long run.

 

The one common thing about those supposedly "forced" to upgrade has been so called tech savvy people doing stupid things, as if they WANT it to happen in a major way to prove a point 

 

I know of NO ONE who has been forced to upgrade, and I personally know a few ignorant types who are still avoiding it because dumb 

  • 1 year later...
On 1/28/2016 at 6:34 PM, Jim K said:

I think with the rising popularity/sales of Microsoft's Surface ... they really need to release a phone under that name.  At the same time...they can not expect to sale the devices at equal to or higher than the competitions price ... or people will not jump ship. 

 

I wouldn't call Windows Phone dead yet as Anibal said ... Microsoft is keeping it on life support.  It will be dead when they've decided that enough is enough...which could be much sooner than later. 

surface name won't help... at most they might get .5% world market share.

 

Main reason why Windows Phone died were:

1) phone had horrible specs

2) "windows" name, people don't associate "windows" with stability, security etc.. and after windows mobile crap, why would anyone buy another windows cell phone

3) Interface sucked, there is no other way of saying it, the metro square interface was generally disliked by everyone

4) and the above 3 reasons, brings us to 4th reason, no apps.

 

 

11 minutes ago, nekrosoft13 said:

surface name won't help... at most they might get .5% world market share.

 

Main reason why Windows Phone died were:

1) phone had horrible specs

2) "windows" name, people don't associate "windows" with stability, security etc.. and after windows mobile crap, why would anyone buy another windows cell phone

3) Interface sucked, there is no other way of saying it, the metro square interface was generally disliked by everyone

4) and the above 3 reasons, brings us to 4th reason, no apps.

 

 

I made those comments January of 2016.  :)

 

6 hours ago, Jim K said:

I made those comments January of 2016.  :)

 

didn't see that... anyway, the only move left for MS is to do with blackberry did.

 

Fork the android, use android to make your "own" os that would be compatible with all android apps, and they do that, for whatever is holy don't call it windows and get rid of the stupid squares.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/8/2017 at 10:01 PM, nekrosoft13 said:

didn't see that... anyway, the only move left for MS is to do with blackberry did.

 

Fork the android, use android to make your "own" os that would be compatible with all android apps, and they do that, for whatever is holy don't call it windows and get rid of the stupid squares.

 

Including the "stupid squares" is the only way MS could get me to try an Android phone again, even their own flavor of Android. The Windows Phone UI is the one of the biggest things I miss after switching to an iPhone.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!