Recommended Posts

Lenovo Yoga 900

 

6560U CPU, QHD Touch Screen, Intel Iris 540 GPU, 16 gig RAM, 512 gig SSD

 

Comes in Gold, Orange and Silver versions but really, a "Real GPU" would have been a nicer color

 

Folds into a tablet mode.

 

About 3 lbs

 

About $2,000

 

Slightly weak CPU, very weak GPU, price seems like a good value.

 

Dell Inspiron 15 7000

 

6700HQ CPU, QHD Touch Screen, 16 gig RAM, 960 GPU 4 gig, 128 gig SSD + 1 Tb HD

 

About 6 lbs

 

About $1800

 

A low price point for a very reasonable conformance to modern development requirements.

 

10 hours ago, T3X4S said:

Sorry - I didnt fully read your OP where this was more of a pondering of what it would take.  My answer was based on what is out there that is closest to what you are asking for.

A fully loaded MBP will do the stuff faster than a similarly outfitted PC - thats all I was basing my post on

Yeah, based on our previous interactions, I thought your post was humor and attempted to construct a humorous reply.

 

There is a scenario for using a Macbook Pro for development and it is almost impossible to engage a sensible discussion on the subject due to the hordes of Apple Zombies patrolling the internet. Neowin might be one of a handful of places it could happen.

 

Over time, Tim Cook is gradually breaking the various "rules" set out by Steve Jobs but a Touch Screen on a Mac might be the last of them to fall. Clearly, touch interfaces have been fundmental to Apple's sucess and they seriously disadvantaged their developers by not including touch on a Mac. It has only been tolerable to this point due to the low degree of fragmentation in Apple's mobile market but at this point the number of test devices an IOS developer would need to throw into his backpack is getting larger. And if he wants to do Android, emulation is the only practical solution due to high fragmentation.

 

The negatives of not having a Touch Screen are obvious, and the single positive of owning a Mac is an annoying arbitrary marketing restriction from Apple. Legally, you must own a Mac to submit an App to their store. Buying a used Mac Mini and shoving in a desk drawer would meet the requirements, but that becomes a dollar value that enters any price comparison between laptops. Any Windows laptop plus the cost of a Mac Mini equals more expensive than a Macbook. Hence the unusual percentage of developers who own Macs compared to the general population.

 

Once developers are extorted into buying a Mac to access the attractive IOS App market, they seem to fall into two categories. Most just accept it as the cost of doing business and then there is a vocal bunch that pollute the blogosphere with the hardware tail wagging the software dog. This crazy retrograde influence has led to the ASP.NET team adopting Mac-like command line driven interfaces which the Mac crowd refers to as "Modern Web development" (finally development has become mainstream enough that propoganda and cults can sweep through the community like a virus)

 

In this context it becomes a difficult task to look at the plain metal and silicon parts inside Mac device and ignore the glowing white Apple logo. (btw as a blackish humor sidenote, that glowing logo actually leaves a kind of "Burn-in" type mark on the LCD screen caused by pressure over time passed through the softer plastic when the device is in a carry bag but the marketing value to Apple beats out the consumer every time)

 

So a current Macbook Pro with Retina display is a very decent assembly of hardware that carries so much insanely annoying marketing baggage and arbitrary impairments that I couldn't see a rational developer being comfortable with allocating real money to be annoyed on a daily basis. It is hard to know if the device will get a Skylake refresh or if the insane quest to achieve the mathematical impossibility of "less is more" will kill off the "Pro" line. Apple is finally price competative with the industry and so the Macbook Pro is a reasonably priced option for developers considering IOS development. You can run Windows in a VM or even replace OSX with a native Windows to get a better O/S (subjective depending on "better") and still meet IOS requirments.

 

Still, it is such a giant ball of awkward compromises that one should examine all of Heaven and Earth before settling on this pact with the Devil.

 

 

  • Like 2
26 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Read the service manual of what ever device you are thinking about getting and see how easy it is to replace the hard drive.

Ah, the modern era of disposable laptops...

 

Replaceable Parts in order of difficulty:

 

CPU: Some Clevo units.

 

Video Card: There is a standard plug in card format used by some Clevos, Alienware and others in full thickness models. Upgrading is sometimes limited by the laptops BIOS.

 

Hard Drives: Access panels to a 2.5" drive used to be common. Often the entire bottom panel or top panel now needs to be removed. Some laptops only have a M.2 type connector now. Ultra thin units can be filled with a glue-like compound making upgrades almost impossible.

 

Battery: It used be simple to carry a spare battery and swap it in to double battery life. Increasingly batteries are glued in place as a structural component. When the batteries die, the laptop is thrown out. And batteries are the least rapidly improving technology.

 

RAM: DIMM sockets are still common but there is an increasing trend to permanently solder RAM to the motherboard. With Skylake, even work station laptops might only have two sockets since each module can be 16 gig. Skylake laptops with 4 sockets of DDR4 can be 64 gigs of RAM for VM heaven or sequencing your own DNA perhaps...

 

When purchasing Ultra-Thin laptops, start with the assumption that those little boxes you click to select RAM and SSD space are permanent and NOT upgradable...

Based on this thread:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1295038-ramdisk-how-large-to-use-it-as-boot/

 

There is a suggestion that two M.2 Samsung 950 Pros in RAID-0 are very effective.

 

This would essentially mean that a laptop could have the disk performance of the very best desktops.

 

So I will review the laptops in this thread to see if any of them have two M.2 slots to make the Ultimate Development Laptop...

 

RAID-0 M.2

 

Dell Precision 15 7510

 

(unclear if QHD is touch or not)

 

512GB M.2 PCIe NVMe High Performance Solid State Drive [Included in Price]

512GB M.2 PCIe NVMe High Performance Solid State Drive with Interposer [Included in Price]

RAID 0 [Included in Price]

 

Adds about $1500 to the price, not sure which drive they use

 

 

http://laptopmedia.com/review/alienware-15-r2-late-2015-review-pushing-the-boundaries-of-the-15-inch-form-factor/

DSC05901.jpg

 

 

The Dell Alienware 15 R2 with QHD Touch Screen and two Samsung 950 Pro NVMe drives might be the ultimate development work station at the lowest possible price of about $2,500 plus about $1,000 to add the speed demon Samsungs

 

If 7 lbs seems a bit much, just cancel your gym subscription and lift this over your head 15 times a day until your muscles can lift 7 lbs.

 

 

 

Hello,

 

Have you looked into any of the mobile workstations from Boxx?  They are geared towards content creation, but might be good for development.  Not sure about touchscreen UHD options, though.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

1 minute ago, Draconian Guppy said:

suprised no one here mentiond asus ROG, they get good rep and awesome double warranty  + good bang per buck

 

Probably because I have placed a strong emphasis on QHD Touch Screens which ASUS is strangely ignoring. You might think at least one premium model would include that.

 

SInce we are considering someone making a purchase of a new development laptop in 2016, it is reasonable to assume that somewhere during the projected lifetime of the device, the owner will consider some sort of touch device mobile development and having a QHD Touch Screen, so many device resolutions can be nicely emulated.

 

So, to not specify a touch screen, some sort of compensating advantage should be present and given the decent models I have found here with QHD Touch, only a Macbook Pro has a specific compelling argument to bypass touch in order to enable Apple iTunes Store submission. The Macbook Pro is so annoying to me in so many ways that for me, I'd rather buy a Mac Mini if I had to for that purpose.

 

If you are convinced you will never need Mobile Emulation, then ASUS ROG, MSI GS60, MSI WS60 and Gigabyte P35W are interesting budget alternatives to work station laptops.

 

 

 

 

14 minutes ago, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

Have you looked into any of the mobile workstations from Boxx?  They are geared towards content creation, but might be good for development.  Not sure about touchscreen UHD options, though.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

OK, Only this model has a QHD screen:

 

http://www.boxxtech.com/guru/goboxx-15-slm-performance-edition-skylake?GuruSessionId=8dc962b9-68fc-4b7e-8f1e-9c2e77e5a495&ModelNumber=G2080_HUHD&ConfigName=GoBOXX-15-SLM-Performance-Edition-Skylake-1&referrer=/products/mobile-workstations

 

But it does not seem touch enabled.

 

Also most of these third party laptops are built on Clevo hardware and I have yet to find one with proper attention to battery life, so that would require close examination.

 

Aside from those 2 rather serious concerns, the config is decent:

 

6920HQ CPU, QHD 15", 32 gig RAM, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, 512 NVMe

 

About $3500

 

On 4/15/2016 at 9:48 AM, DevTech said:

Just pondering a bit on the intersection of technology and the unique requirements of modern development in a portable device.

 

Must have items for Development:

 

  • Minimum 16 gig RAM, preferrably 32 or 64  for Various VMs
  • Touch screen for testing mobile apps in various emulators
  • Ideally, 2 hours of battery at full CPU and GPU load but I suspect that is not yet possible in 2016 unless the CPU and GPU are under powered
  • 4K type screen - 3xxx by 2xxx for readability
  • CPU 6700HQ or better, 6600U possibly in special cases
  • GPU NVIDIA 960M or equivilent Quadro
  • 512 gig SSD plus ideally 1 Tb 2nd drive
  • I/O connector such as Thunderbolt to drive 2 external 4K Monitors
  • Weight should not be important for a healthy human but lighter is better provided there is enough weight to leave a stable working surface.
  • Large enough power supply to handle full load without draining battery

 

A Surface Book with larger (but still detachable) screen, and a base with 970 instead of 940 along with a second CPU and more RAM slots would be very nice and there is a lot of empty space in the keyboard unit to do that. That would feel very 2016ish advanced!

 

Until then, the sad technology situation is what it is and compromises need to be made.

 

 

Look into the Lenovo P-series.

http://shop.lenovo.com/us/en/laptops/thinkpad/p-series/

 

You can customize them into absolute monsters. 

 

They make a yoga-style model, but you're probably looking at the P50 or P70. 

 

Avoid the P50s, since that one is compromised for power to make it lighter.

Edited by bluesman86
3 minutes ago, bluesman86 said:

I investigated that here:

 

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1295020-some-ideas-for-best-laptop-for-development-and-graphics/?do=findComment&comment=597369022

 

Only the P-40 Yoga had QHD Touch Screen, but given the bizarre video card in that model, the Microsoft Surface Book seems like a better value and that's saying a lot with Microsoft's nose bleeding prices at the top end of their line...

 

Summary of Suitable Development Laptops That Meet Requirements

 

The list so far. Please add to it if you can but try to verify QHD Touch screen beforehand. I have looked up too many laptops!

 

There is something to like about every device on this list and I would like to have every one of them humming away on my desk! A Surface Book with an extra 6700HQ CPU, NVIDIA 970 and two M.2 slots in the base unit even if it added 2 lbs would be my choice but such a marvel does not exist. I have to pick one of these compromises or decide to hold off another year to see what 2017 brings...

 

All Laptops Listed Here Have:

 

1. i7 6500U, 6600U or 6560U Dual Core Skylake OR i7 6700HQ Quad Core Skylake

 

2. QHD+ Touch Screen

 

3. 512 gig SSD

 

4. 16 gig DDR4 RAM

 

5. Thunderbolt or DisplayPort to drive 2 4K external monitors

 

6. NVIDIA 940, 960 or 970 GPU OR Intel Iris 540 (6560) Iris 520 (6600)

 

 

Full List of All Laptops That Come Close to Meeting Full 2016 Development Requirements

 

("come close" is in the title because I think all laptops on Planet Earth currently fail the 2 hour battery runtime requirement)

 

 

1. Dell Alienware 15 R2 - Currently leads the pack. - 7 lbs

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Alienware-15-R2-Notebook-Review.153808.0.html

http://laptopmedia.com/review/alienware-15-r2-late-2015-review-pushing-the-boundaries-of-the-15-inch-form-factor/

 

2. Dell XPS 15 - trades away very little for a weight in the ultra-light ballpark - 4.5 lbs

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-XPS-15-9550-i7-512GB-UHD-InfinityEdge-Notebook-Review.156462.0.html

 

3. Dell Inspiron 15 7000 - 6 lbs

 

4. Lenovo Ideapad Y700 Touch - 5.7 lbs

 

http://shop.lenovo.com/ca/en/laptops/thinkpad/yoga-series/yoga-460/

 

 

 

Note - not a single traditional work station laptop (which are common for development usage) makes the list due to the lack of a QHD Touch Screen. I suspect Dell Precision, Lenovo P series and HP Z will catch up to their consumer counterparts somewhere in the next 6 months.

 

 

 

Special Case Laptops That Trade Computing Power for Weight

 

1. Dell XPS 13 - 3 lbs - a smaller version of the XPS 15  without a quad core CPU or NVIDIA GPU.

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-XPS-13-9350-i7-6560U-QHD-Ultrabook-Review.159487.0.html

 

2. Dell Alienware 13 - 4.5 lbs - CPU similar to XPS 13, but has a real and powerful GPU, NVIDIA 965

 

 

 

Special Case Laptops with  Tablet Mode

 

The ULV CPUs in these laptops (Intel U series) are dual core Skylakes that are about 1/2 the performance of the i7-6700HQ quad core but still fast enough for most development and graphics tasks. Video editing and 3D rendering will be largest sacrifice.

 

The GPUs are weak as well but unlike previous generations cannot be classified as horrible. The new Iris 540 in the 6560U is on par with a NVIDIA 940 (the 6560U is a new SKU, the 6600U has a weaker GPU)

 

The rest of the specs are QHD Touch, 16 gig RAM, and 512 gig SSD.

 

 

 

1. Microsoft Surface Book - 3.5 lbs

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Microsoft-Surface-Book-Core-i7-940M-Convertible-Review.160679.0.html

 

2. Microsoft Surface Pro 4 - 2 lbs

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Face-Off-Microsoft-Surface-Pro-4-Core-i7-vs-Surface-Pro-4-Core-i5-vs-Surface-Pro-4-Core-m3.156031.0.html

 

3. Lenovo Yoga 900 - 3 lbs

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-Yoga-900-13ISK-Convertible-Review.154217.0.html

 

4. HP Spectre x360 15

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-Spectre-x360-15-ap012dx-Convertible-Review.160615.0.html

http://store.hp.com/us/en/PDPStdView?storeId=10151&urlLangId=-1&productId=1179654&urlRequestType=Base&categoryId=&langId=-1&catalogId=10051

 

5. Lenovo ThinkPad P40 Yoga - 4 lbs

 

http://shop.lenovo.com/ca/en/laptops/thinkpad/p-series/p40-yoga/

 

6. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga - 2.8 lbs

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-ThinkPad-X1-Yoga-20FQ-000QUS-Convertible-Review.163271.0.html

http://shop.lenovo.com/ca/en/laptops/thinkpad/x-series/x1-yoga/

 

 

 

Remaining QHD Touch Screen Laptops that might not be suitable

 

For odd reasons perhaps most of the  new laptops with QHD Touch are showing up in the ultralight 12" and 13" range. There are a few laptops that I am not (yet) confident in listing as suitable for development:

 

1. HP Spectre x360 13

 

Seems to only be available as max 8 gig, otherwise has QHD Touch and 512 gig SSD, Intel 520 GPU

Copper color looks interesting

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-Spectre-x360-13-i5-6200U-Convertible-Review.153933.0.html

http://store.hp.com/us/en/PDPStdView?storeId=10151&urlLangId=-1&productId=1126670&urlRequestType=Base&categoryId=&langId=-1&catalogId=10051

 

2. Asus Zenbook UX303

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX303UB-DH74T-Notebook-Review.156912.0.html

 

3. Vaio Z Flip VJZ13BA11L

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Vaio-Z-Flip-VJZ13BA11L-Convertible-Review.161637.0.html


 

 

4. Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460

 

Max SSD is 256 gig

 

http://shop.lenovo.com/ca/en/laptops/thinkpad/yoga-series/yoga-460/

 

 

 

 

Remaining QHD Touch Screen Laptops that might not be suitable

 

For odd reasons perhaps most of the  new laptops with QHD Touch are showing up in the ultralight 12" and 13" range. There are a few laptops that I am not (yet) confident in listing as suitable for development:

 

1. HP Spectre x360 13

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-Spectre-x360-13-i5-6200U-Convertible-Review.153933.0.html

 

2. Asus Zenbook UX303

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX303UB-DH74T-Notebook-Review.156912.0.html

 

3. Vaio Z Flip VJZ13BA11L

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Vaio-Z-Flip-VJZ13BA11L-Convertible-Review.161637.0.html

 

4. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-ThinkPad-X1-Yoga-20FQ-000QUS-Convertible-Review.163271.0.html

 

Pascal:

 

Looking at the design of the NVIDIA Pascal architecture which is an update to Maxwell, it seems reasonable to expect a large improvement in GPU processing ability with latency reductions between CPU and GPU so that there might be an unusually large improvement in Video Editing Acceleration and 3D Rendering.

 

Laptops that can upgrade their video are becoming increasingly scarce and none of the laptops on the list above have this ability in order to leverage Pascal when it arrives later in 2016 and 2017.

 

Dell Alienwares and Dell Precisions amoung others have long used the MXM laptop video card standard to permit upgrades. Starting in 2015, the CPU and GPU are now soldered on the motherboard like most laptops.

 

Special Case Exception

 

The Alienware 15 R2 has a special PCIe 3.0 external connector to a box that can hold a large variety of dsektop graphics cards branded as a "Graphics Amplifier"

 

So a Pascal upgrage is possible while the laptop is docked at a fixed location. Or with the purchase of two Graphics Amplifiers and two graphics cards a work/home scenario is possible.

 

As a possible compensation for this expense and inconvenience, an NVIDIA Titan works with this system and the Pascal upgrade for that card will as well.

 

I don't know if NVIDIA Quadro is compatable...

 

http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/alienware-graphics-amplifier?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs&sku=452-BBRG

 

alienware-graphics-amplifier-overview2.j

 

Found another suitable laptop - law of diminishing returns is making laptops hard to find at this point...

 

Alienware 13

 

6500U CPU, QHD Touch screen, 16 gig RAM, 512 gig SSD, NVIDIA GTX965M

 

About $2600

 

About 4.5 lbs

 

Somewhat weak CPU (1/2 of a 6700HQ) - RAM maxes at 16 gig, but GPU is good and has M.2 slot and Thunderbolt expansion along with the Graphics Amplifier port which is faster than Thunderbolt.

 

 

 

 

I would love to own every laptop on this list:

 

 

But everyone of them also has something not quite right.

 

Can anyone add a laptop not listed? It has to have QHD Touch Screen, 16 gig RAM, a Skylake CPU and ideally NVIDIA 960 or greater GPU

 

On 4/17/2016 at 0:33 PM, DevTech said:

I investigated that here:

 

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1295020-some-ideas-for-best-laptop-for-development-and-graphics/?do=findComment&comment=597369022

 

Only the P-40 Yoga had QHD Touch Screen, but given the bizarre video card in that model, the Microsoft Surface Book seems like a better value and that's saying a lot with Microsoft's nose bleeding prices at the top end of their line...

 

What's wrong with the video card? Nvidia Quadro cards are nothing to scoff at.

 

15 hours ago, bluesman86 said:

What's wrong with the video card? Nvidia Quadro cards are nothing to scoff at.

Quadro is just a brand that spans a large range of capability. Most of the time laptop manufacturers will match up a Quadro chip that is in the range of a consumer version of the laptop. With the P-40, Lenovo selected an extremely weak Quadro which of course might pull ahead in some specific tasks but is across the board weaker than a 940. And the 940 is almost a useless improvement itself over the new Intel Iris 540 in the new i7 6560U Skylake SKU. So the days of enhancing the U series Skylakes with low end NVIDIAs appear to be numbered. In terms of the P-40 considering the excellent product line it is slotted into, it should have had a stronger Quadro. I'm sure the engineering problem was battery life, and they have the marketing branding power of Quadro in their spec sheet. But the trade-off results in an almost useless apendage for marketing reasons (I am guessing here of course) - The Lenovo Yoga 900 seems to have the balance just right for a laptop being used sometimes in tablet mode. It uses the new 6560U to get slightly less CPU power and 940-ish GPU power in a single chip. I am totally cool with the idea of trading battery life for a significant processing boost and the P-40 needs a stronger Quadro to acheive that in my opinion.

 

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html

 

Edited by DevTech
added link to GPU list
15 hours ago, bluesman86 said:

What's wrong with the video card? Nvidia Quadro cards are nothing to scoff at.

Addendum:

 

 Thanks for posting this. I hate to be inaccurate and in the process of rechecking the P-40, I realized it belongs on my list of qualifying development/creativity laptops!

 

I will fix that right away.

 

Lenovo ThinkPad P-40 Yoga

 

6600U CPU

 

QHD Touch Screen 14"

 

16 gig RAM

 

512 gig SSD

 

NVIDIA Quadro M500M 2GB

 

About $3,200

 

About 4 lbs

 

http://shop.lenovo.com/ca/en/laptops/thinkpad/p-series/p40-yoga/

 

Edited by DevTech
Thanks to goretsky for spec update!
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!