Yay or nay? Made an app that adds Aero Glass, Start Menu on Windows 10


Recommended Posts

What the title says. I got sick and tired of the included Windows 10 theme, and the slow Start Screen. Now I think it looks perfect. Why make my own? I know there's Window Blinds which is incredibly slow (it uses GDI instead of HW-accelerated Direct2D), doesn't even have blur behind the glass and there's also Glass8 (I think that's what it's called?) but is exceptionally hacky and, I would say, shady. My implementation is not perfect, but it doesn't add a single line of low-level rendering code, doesn't break any application (so far) and it's all (theme+start menu) contained into a single library. On the other hand, it's largely unoptimized, thus DWM memory consumption increased to about 70mb (still nothing compared to most apps). There's some work ahead before I can even release an installer but it can be done if a good amount of people is even interested.

 

screen1.png

Using the flat built in Windows 10 theme:

screen2.png

You DEFINITELY have my vote! I love it! 

 

Suggestion: Bring back GDI / DirectUI jumplists from the classic taskbar. The ones that supported up to 60 items. Something that hooks Explorer maybe to override the XAML jumplists -- if this is possible? 

I never could stand the glass effect personally, even when it was new in Vista, always edited it out in the visual style... but that said *shrug* I know there's some people who like that sort of thing, so why not.  Start menu though, no thanks.. but again I know there's some who like the old way of doing things, so why not. 

12 minutes ago, MeowPurr said:

What the title says. I got sick and tired of the included Windows 10 theme, and the slow Start Screen. Now I think it looks perfect. Why make my own? I know there's Window Blinds which is incredibly slow (it uses GDI instead of HW-accelerated Direct2D), doesn't even have blur behind the glass and there's also Glass8 (I think that's what it's called?) but is exceptionally hacky and, I would say, shady. My implementation is not perfect, but it doesn't add a single line of low-level rendering code, doesn't break any application (so far) and it's all (theme+start menu) contained into a single library. On the other hand, it's largely unoptimized, thus DWM memory consumption increased to about 70mb (still nothing compared to most apps). There's some work ahead before I can even release an installer but it can be done if a good amount of people is even interested.

 

screen1.png

Using the flat built in Windows 10 theme:

screen2.png

This is what people like myself who are desktop users have asked for since even 8.1 days. I knew its possible but MS doesn't want to give their users what they want.

5 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

This is what people like myself who are desktop users have asked for since even 8.1 days. I knew its possible but MS doesn't want to give their users what they want.

There are plenty of people who dislike glass, me included. People on Neowin aren't representatives of anything but themselves.

Just now, -Razorfold said:

There are plenty of people who dislike glass, me included. People on Neowin aren't representatives of anything but themselves.

my comment was based upon others who made the same or similar replies. Aero Glass was loved but got smashed with Win8/8.1 and 10.

  • Like 2
22 minutes ago, chrisj1968 said:

my comment was based upon others who made the same or similar replies. Aero Glass was loved but got smashed with Win8/8.1 and 10.

Of course it did. After nearly 10 years of it, it was time for something new. Windows 10 is not Windows 7.

Edited by Dot Matrix
3 minutes ago, Dot Matrix said:

Of course it did. After nearly 10 years of it, it was time for something new.

Something "new", you mean the whole flat, dull and ugly look that google and Apple copied and made it look 1000x better than Microsoft?

To OP...I think the popularity of other third party enablers (like Start10, Classic Shell, Glass8, etc) should give you a pretty good answer.  If you can get your method optimized and running better than the other third party solutions ... I'd think you'd have a winner on your hands.  Personally, I would love for Windows 10 UI/UX to be more like that of 7.

  • Like 5

The developer of Glass8 is a jackass, I'd definitely use it if you released it. 70MB isn't all that much memory use for a first generation.

13 minutes ago, Javik said:

The developer of Glass8 is a jackass, I'd definitely use it if you released it. 70MB isn't all that much memory use for a first generation.

Agreed wholeheartedly. He deliberately maintains super-vague licensing terms, and calls his shareware "donationware" but refuses to state how much you much "donate" to get the unlocked version. And he maintains that not everyone that "donates" will get a license key to unlock the full version. Basically it depends on his mood. So it's a gamble if you "donate" to unlock the full version. I've never seen another author act like that before. I think he gets off on it. 

 

And he constantly berates his users who post constructive suggestions, insulting them savagely and disrespecting them -- including "donors." 

 

Now on the other side of the spectrum we have StartisBack. $2.99 with clear licensing terms: Lifetime updates, payment will always get you a key, etc. 

 

He also refuses to support Insider builds. I think he deliberately makes it so Glass8 breaks on Insider builds. And then he'll brag about how his own private version works great on Insider builds and then say something like "Well since So-and-So made me mad I will not release it now!" Basically, he expects his users to never ask questions or post suggestions, and to only post to kiss up and claim he is the greatest person ever etc etc. 

 

He also brags about how nobody else is able to implement Aero Glass into Windows 10. How only he has the l33t skills to do so. And of course how all the users are not worthy of his work. 

Edited by DeusProto
  • Like 3
15 minutes ago, DeusProto said:

Agreed wholeheartedly. He deliberately maintains super-vague licensing terms, and calls his shareware "donationware" but refuses to state how much you much "donate" to get the unlocked version. And he maintains that not everyone that "donates" will get a license key to unlock the full version. Basically it depends on his mood. So it's a gamble if you "donate" to unlock the full version. I've never seen another author act like that before. I think he gets off on it. 

 

Now on the other side of the spectrum we have StartisBack. $2.99 with clear licensing terms: Lifetime updates, payment will always get you a key, etc. 

That's exactly the reason why I purchased Startisback back in 2012 and won't touch Glass8 with a 10ft pole, its "terms" are utterly laughable.

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, DeusProto said:

You DEFINITELY have my vote! I love it! 

 

Suggestion: Bring back GDI / DirectUI jumplists from the classic taskbar. The ones that supported up to 60 items. Something that hooks Explorer maybe to override the XAML jumplists -- if this is possible? 

Hi. Yes - one of the things I'm working on is Explorer customizations. Not just the Start Menu/Screen but also adding a toggle to remove so-called 'immersive' context menus, adding back theming for Live Previews, Network flyout and particularly to the Action Center, as well as making it resizeable (I don't like the way it slides out from edge, it looks massive on a big screen). For the last two it's going to be a bit hard since these Windows 10 features are hosted inside UWP binaries, a different monster but definitely feasible.

Don't get me wrong, there are good features in Windows 10 but the execution is awful. And secondly, I just don't recommend anyone using an outdated OS for security reasons. You have no idea how exposed you are if you don't get updated for zero-day vulnerabilities.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Alphabet Raises $84.75 Billion To Feed Its AI Compute Hunger https://www.techtimes.com/articles/317953/20260607/alphabet-raises-8475-billion-feed-its-ai-compute-hunger-warren-buffetts-berkshire-buying.htm
    • Good point Anti-spoofing protection for cloud mailboxes Anti-spoofing technology in Microsoft 365 specifically examines forgery of the From header field (also known as the 5322.From address, From address, or P2 sender), because email clients show the From header value as the message sender. When Microsoft 365 has high confidence the From header is forged, the message is identified as spoofed. https://learn.microsoft.com/en...g-protection-spoofing-about
    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique materials by using master materials, using instanced meshes, generating a PSO cache, pre-compiling every shader before loading the game and also managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime. It's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!